Skip to content

Cancer Therapy

by on February 20, 2010

June 20,’92
Christian Conciliation Service
of Southeastern Michigan
attn: J. Darlington
27350 W. Chicago
Redford, MI 48239

Sirs:
Re: class action effort?

Recently some money has been designated for some kind of class action suit, aimed at the mounting stone‑walling of established organizations, as medical, refusing to perceive the empirical obvious, for likely even more obvious reasons as on‑going profit. Many are suffering not only needlessly but in naivete to which the said potential class action suit might gain their attention, and so better ways and means to promote health as other needed areas of needed product reformation.

We are a research organization whose past work, while possibly appearing bizarre to many of single academic knowledge, has in­tegrated the more fundamental aspects of science to R&D effort. Our several predictive ways and means to promote various innova­tive products has been more plagiarized or sealed by the federal government because of their more military value, secrecy has en­sued. We now feel that the public needs to be privy to many items as ways and means to judge the growing impasse towards same. Since realizing that this effort to divulge the “unwanted” but for the net public’s good, we seek aid, with our `seed money’ this net humanitarian effort.

Herewith is a copy of a recent “environmental” letter to which a couple items are alluded. More technical information may be had by those we feel may act in the net favor, in some way or other, for the public. Comments by Melvin Belli suggest this route may be most fruitful. May we have your comments and/or interest?

Very Sincerely,

KTS

July 14,’92
Charles Reese
c/o King Features
235 East 45th
New York, NY 10017
Re: doctors vs. guns (not quite)
Dear Sir:

While hitting the nail on the head “Doctors are more dangerous‑”, the real crux remains hidden behind a huge subterfuge we cons­ciously do not perceive‑‑ especially can’t established authority. Further, your prowess could be dangerous to you at this late hour where a crumbling national federal system is near their Orwellian edict‑‑ for their survival again!

Since predicting the use of the micro‑electrode to rid cancer nodules in the late 60’s (European technical paper), even regis­tered in the Patent office same realizing the boon it would be to the suffering, found to my constant chagrin a stone‑wall to the suggestion. At first felt it some anomaly, but when the proof from Nordenstrom* (16 years later; still trying in vain to get attention here in the U.S.), found a pharmaceutical (won’t yet name them) had forwarded a company confidential copy of my offer to the Karolinska Inst.‑‑ likely, and justifiably, terrorized over the potential competition. Needless to say my `art’ proved 100% therapeutic* and yet the stone‑walling remains! I yet have not given up since my dying mother (guess why?) will leave a little money for which I dedicated to a class action suit to get the public’s awareness‑‑ so guess again, all law offices, even bar associations cringe, then even Belli’s reply suggesting “cool it”, Big Brother is far larger than any one person’s income in this country! My fiasco with B&E “kids” (wearing size 11+ shoes!) prevented me from knowing them (Mich.State law!) but found who was behind same with a FBI `family’ move‑in next door, tapped phone, etc.‑‑ when I filed another certain patent (I was class­ified secret for aerospace R&D) to define another item stone‑walled that the flying public needs desperately (anti‑VDT air‑traffic controller aid) but blocked again‑‑ as now used in the heads‑up fighter aircraft I hear. Quite I frankly, feel very fortunate to live and breathe and get my food‑stamps any more!

Indeed, legalize drugs but only those which block 5HT (a sympath­etic CNS neuroinhibitor) as THC, however hazardous as carcinogens when smoked. That very much UNpublicized but provocative recidi­vism rate (Boston experiment) says it all‑‑ where authority needs the excuse for henchmen’s jobs with prisons, not rehabilitated people. Worse, those adjuncts might get used on authority so they might realize what they are really up too! The most grotesque will not be noted by a conditioned public whose need for tax money supersedes all other objectives. More of the same, as laws or academic programs, merely reinforce the diabolical**. To be terse, the `drug problem’ is indeed a health problem‑‑ which is all mental‑‑ but might yet makes right!

Obviously the hand‑writing is on the wall but no one is able to read it to make clear academia’s efficiency‑‑ making unthinking automatons for the state. Any national `catharsis’, however trau­matic now, could only do good! If you have any better ideas, let me know.

Sincerely,

KTS

* Micro‑Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April ’86** Path/IQ (herewith)

CC: Tom Rademacher; G.R. Press

July 31,’92
Dr. Rustum Roy, et.al.
Dept. of Medicine
Penn State University
University Park, PA 16802
Re: super‑collider boondoggle, indeed
Dear Sir:

The NPR remarks define an enigma wrapped into an anomaly, where tenurism out‑shouts reality. The need to test whim instead of sound theoretical paradigms is true folly in view of a public that cannot feed itself because of the country awash in expensive intellectual elite who lack most all forms of right cerebral non‑temporal insight. (see Sperry*)

Our basic problem lies in the wrong fundamental idea of quantal `billiard balls’ without any idea of polyphased standing waves (deBroglie) about to define the route to economical, unpolluting and finitely controlled fusion‑‑ which the petroleum industry is already gearing up to fight this very real breakthrough now.

Obviously we no longer detail much of our theoretical studies as have experienced a government’s Patent Office that equates its need for “secrecy” more important that the public’s benefits. The micro‑electrode cancer eradication and VDT anti‑slaving system but two items, the latter dearly needed by the flying public, to say little of the stressed air‑traffic controllers themselves! A terse `environmental note’ herewith might better define.

The underlying “excitement” by the physic’s people is tenure and a fine salary‑‑ no more. Schwitters must proclaim just as he did!

Sincerely,

KTS

* `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67

cc: envir/letter; Path/IQ
CC: Dale Bumpers; DZ

July 19,’92
Maury Povich
Productions, Inc.
Paramount Pictures
555 Melrose Ave.,
Hollywood, CA 90038
Re: Redgrave’s dilemma
Sir: (nothing new)

It is one thing to be chased by manipulators that merely want more money, however acquired, but we suspect it is a bit worse when the public’s health is jeopardized by evading simple proven therapies for cancer riddance*, which do not offer enough profit for AMA or their pharmaceutical henchmen.

I include a terse environmental statement herewith for your peru­sal. I will add that I nor any of my personnel would face the public on this matter after the police B&Es, FBI move‑in, tapped phones with ensuing fiasco we went through. Some very well known lawyers have said overtly one does not fight with Big Brother, be he the federal government or AMA!

We do have one `stick’ in our favor which even makes matters much worse, a freed electron interface (5th Generation computer) which defines effect from cause (to say little buried skeletons)! It is that which now terrorizes the physic’s people who are examining their positive EPR experiments. If you have the nerve, ask some qualified physicist how the freed electron escapes the time re­versal paradigm‑‑ then sit down!

While unsaid overtly thus far is the fear that the anomaly of what happened to Socrates with his `therapeutic’ centuries ago is yet in vogue for those who learn more than their government can even comprehend! The difference is that hemlock is benign, neuro­leptics aren’t as only offer a limbonic hell. No wonder our APA professionals lead in overt suicide!

Sincerely,

KTS

* Micro‑Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April ’86

cc: Path/IQ; S‑T; envi/disc; L. Redgrave

July 19,’92
Maury Povich
Productions, Inc.
Paramount Pictures
555 Melrose Ave.,
Hollywood, CA 90038
Re: Redgrave’s dilemma
Sir: (nothing new)

It is one thing to be chased by manipulators that merely want more money, however acquired, but we suspect it is a bit worse when the public’s health is jeopardized by evading simple proven therapies for cancer riddance*, which do not offer enough profit for AMA or their pharmaceutical henchmen.

I include a terse environmental statement herewith for your peru­sal. I will add that I nor any of my personnel would face the public on this matter after the police B&Es, FBI move‑in, tapped phones with ensuing fiasco we went through. Some very well known lawyers have said overtly one does not fight with Big Brother, be he the federal government or AMA!

We do have one `stick’ in our favor which even makes matters much worse, a freed electron interface (5th Generation computer) which defines effect from cause (to say little buried skeletons)! It is that which now terrorizes the physic’s people who are examining their positive EPR experiments. If you have the nerve, ask some qualified physicist how the freed electron escapes the time re­versal paradigm‑‑ then sit down!

While unsaid overtly thus far is the fear that the anomaly of what happened to Socrates with his `therapeutic’ centuries ago is yet in vogue for those who learn more than their government can even comprehend! The difference is that hemlock is benign, neuro­leptics aren’t as only offer a limbonic hell. No wonder our APA professionals lead in overt suicide!

Sincerely,

KTS

* Micro‑Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April ’86

cc: Path/IQ; S‑T; envi/disc; L. Redgrave

Aug. 1,’92
Pharmaceutical Mfgs. Assoc.
1100 15th St., NW Box I
Washington, DC 20005
Re: containing costs?
Sirs:

What a beautiful picture for such an ugly art! The grand father’s benign attention reflects a kind of love seldom seen in even its own mother‑‑ even a grand mother who has a far different net objective in her carried through mitochondrion.

What makes the image ugly is reality when considering the above referred `cost containment’‑‑ in view of the simple micro‑elec­trode which eliminates cancer nodules 100%*‑‑ but is too simple for AMA as the pharmaceutical industry where profit dictates all behavior, beyond sustaining the public’s vast naivete.

With a pending class action suit now considering the best route to gain the public’s attention, we will watch carefully your sub­scriber’s move with innuendo now that this statement is issued.

Sincerely,

KTS

July 29,’92
Sen. Donald W. Riegle, Jr.
Capital Hill
SD‑105
Washington, DC 20210
Re: likely the wrong change
Sir:

As the once proud owner of U.S. Patents I see I may need to go overseas also to protect my efforts. With the encroachment of industry most able to file Patents, the innovative and creative must either work for them and beg for favors, or worse to allow plagiarization as I now where the public’s interest is greater than my own.

This is not a mean statement, merely fact. While my past U.S. Patent Attorney begs me to stay here, I now see the Dutch system far superior even if the inventor must defend himself in court to prove his ownership. Two quite complex systems of mine had the door slammed on them‑‑ where the federal government somehow be­lieves I am a threat to this society (ask the FBI) so plagiarizes at will and stops my food stamps! Herewith, while terse for ob­vious reasons, are a few of those items and one very large one my said Patent Atty. hates to see go elsewhere.

Big Brother is really big enough so if any change occurs in the current patent system, I’d advise examining the Dutch system with care since everyday it appears more clear that few here have any idea of what they are doing. Fortunately those said few with in­sight too often know what their federal system is up too. The Orwellian spectre is not new, as the Patent Office grab, to again show that the industrial lobby runs this federal government.

Very Sincerely,

KTS

cc: envir‑let; R&D‑let

CC:Dingell
John D. Dingell, Rep.
Capital Hill
2221 RHOB
Washington, DC 20515

Re: likely the wrong change
Ivars Peterson
c/o SCIENCE NEWS

I detest using dogma to reply to dogma but Ivars Peterson’s most adroit “Murphy’s Lab” is too succinct to ignore! Your recent `Letters’ pushed my button! To wit:

`It is one’s own `Gremlin’, once called Merlin which will soon be seen as Murphy, the UFOnaut or Freud’s Thanatos*, which will evoke the worst `glitch’ for scientific man when it is realized that Armageddon is yet better than that apocalypse!’

Sincerely,‑‑ really! (Thanx‑‑ for that Sc. News issue, belatedly)
*list herewith

KTS

July 16,’92
Leon Glass, et.al.
Dept. of Physiology
Montreal Neurological Inst.(?),
McGill University
Montreal, Que. Canada H3A 2B4
Re: systole‑diastole phasing
Dear Sir:

The blurb in SCIENCE “Chaos Breaks Out‑‑” says many things but little about fundamental phenomena better fitting Psychology and Electrical engineering‑‑ to say nothing of some theoretical in physics as may be contingent with arrhythmic heart beats.

From predicting the spatial versus temporal complemental brain halves (before Sperry proved same in the early 60’s*), the con­clusion therewith seen‑‑ (from physics), defined the energy ver­sus relaxation half cycles expected in the biological system, better denoted by the complemental CNS. This “give versus take” aspect which interested me (5th Gen. computer study) was between the EEG relative phase‑polarities, soon recognizing as the reduc­tive (long temporal positive recall, versus abrupt negative going `inputs’; objective or subjective). This same apparent `enigma’ I suspect is responsible for the arrhythmic liability, as likely the half cycle responsible for overall timing or under the left cerebral hemisphere’s control.

Since Renoux** has defined, again as expected, the innate Thana­tos of Freud’s theory, we see a rather ominous implication for heart `disease’‑‑ due more to psychological stress‑‑ but with `opportunity’ to exit the living body scene! While many sympatho­lytics as Ca and Cl blockers can abort such wanted opportunity in a death‑wish, the vast naivete of late medicine reflects your adroit remark of “‑getting different cultures to work together,”. Noting, since the NOVA IL‑2 program where three only left facial smilers were cancer remissive while 5 others not, a rather ob­scene scene looms ever clearer. Obviously it must yet be chalked up to “conjecture” but the empirical data, as Renoux’s expected findings, conclude late intellectual (left brain dominated) human may pose a greater hazard to himself than expected.

Since fractals, as unnoticed basic triggers in claimed chaotic systems, be they from psychological EEG drives or what you are looking at, all CNS (at least) evoked likely have the same subtle `generic’ energy‑temporal (binary `go’ vs. `no‑go’) fundamentals, we suspect psychology precedes all physiological functions,, as between pro and anti‑life, the latter contingent to likely irra­tional(?) reasoning.

Should the above appear somewhat rational and further dialogue is wanted in my long cross academic study, I will try to find time to point out many other aspects‑‑ contingent to inquiry.

Sincerely,

KTS

P.S: I noted with interest a letter to a McGill compatriot a few years ago while seeking an address for you. His letter copy may be of interest, herewith.

* `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
** Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
note:
Smile anomaly for mate choice. SINGLELIFE, Sept/Oct.’90, p.12

cc: Path/IQ; A. Aguayo let. copy (over)

* Lymphatic/cerebral control; Renoux, U/Tours (DISCOVER; Feb.87)
** `Blueprint for Immortality’, ’49?
*** Micro‑Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April ’86
CC: K. Madden

Aug. 1,’92
Editor/Newsletter, et.al.
R. W. Baird & Co.
777 E. Wisconsin Ave.
Milwaukee, WI 53202
Re: a little more than Janus
Dear Sirs:

While our to brain halves (Janus) may define the difference be­tween IQ and CQ (reductive intellection and insightive genius)*, your “Ideas From Research” better defined the coming paradigm shift coming for stocks‑‑ and what will be truly relevant besides worthy of investment.

I include an `environmental’ note as copies of other letters sent recently, likely defining the genesis of our coming chaos. It points to ongoing research here and some as the jitters found with tecnical papers given in Europe in the late ’60s. While certain unsaid groupies, as politics, insist on their profits, come hell or high water and despite the mounting empirical ob­vious that productivity will need to change in more than one “same dull round operant” with a few demanding ever more a gro­tesque profit. The writing is on the wall for all to see if not too intellectually neurotic to see that obvious.

Since on (un‑named) pharmaceutical clandestinely send a copy of our company confidential micro‑electrode offer (as even register­ed in the Patent Office!) and its ensuing 100% therapeutic proof (see below), the stone‑walling ensues to our deep chagrin, to say little of the cancer suffering public if they but understood. This, with another needed anti‑slave system for VDT users (to ob­viate the psychological stress evoked by EEG flicker‑fusion prob­lems), we find the status quo is doing its thing to the American public‑‑ to say nothing of its socio‑economical pending demise.

With the now undeciphered primary quantal wave constituency of fundamental matter, cold fusion was no anomaly we find. Indeed, we are quite certain now our European compatriots will have fini­tely controlled fusion under way very soon. We won’t delineate further what that will do to those you indicated in your well‑said “Switch Idea”‑‑ where EPRI now struggles to comprehend us.

Sincerely,

KTS

* Sperry: `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67

cc: Path/IQ; envir/let (over please)

May 25,’92
Dr. Robert Rutman, Prof. Emeritus
Dept. of Biological Sciences
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Re: stone‑walled therapy
Dear Sir:

Some of your remarks on TV suggested an awareness of federal fol­ly and possibly underlying collusions with academic/industrial associations to which this note is addressed. While military, at least defensive aspects may be in part justified, why are crucial medical system/items avoided for continued instated medical pro­fiteering doing some same dull round when obviously outmoded?

The cover story in DISCOVER (April ’86) brings one case to point where a simple micro‑electrode can rid cancer within days without bloody scalpel operants (saying nothing of convenience or rela­tive cost), but where somehow the pharmaceuticals hold sway as to what is “legitimate” for any therapeutic regimen. Certain remarks could be made but the benefit of the doubt washes any conclusions from any rational judgment, or is disease and death the preferred response to an over‑populated world‑‑ whatever the suffering may be needed to get there?

Since defining the simple micro‑electrode use in papers in Europe (’69) only terror has been the authoritive response‑‑ as opening some Pandora’s Box. Has greed become so entrenched in a claimed civil society promising “advancement” that we can no longer see our way out or is there some conspiracy for blood letting the UFO data appears to be defining! Certainly there is mounting anxiety as MIT (note last 14th Wall Street J. front page) goes to length to suggest we are `visited’ yet federal government attempts at all cost to cover any such import with flacid remarks‑‑ (and not a peep has been made since!). Do they fear hysteria more in the public than what the implications might conceivably mean?

I believe I saw some rational judgment in your remarks so would, before I move out of this country, like some quality opinion. Many thanks‑‑

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC:
May 28,’92
Concept, Inc.
Medical Instr. Div.
11311 Concept Blvd.,
Largo, FL 34643
Re: therapeutic and diagnostic systems
Sirs:

A cover story in DISCOVER (April ’86) brings a case to point where a simple micro‑electrode can rid cancer within days without bloody scalpel operants (saying nothing of convenience or rela­tive cost), but where somehow the pharmaceuticals hold sway as to what is “legitimate” for any therapeutic regimen. The benefit of the doubt washes any conclusions from any rational judgment, but is disease and death the preferred response to an over‑populated world‑‑ whatever the suffering may be needed to get there?

Since defining the simple micro‑electrode use in Europe (’69) only terror has been the authoritive response‑‑ as opening some Pandora’s Box. After 16 years to see my system* prove itself behind my back, ensuing DO talks showed at least their interest to aid some exclusive but unsaid (for obvious reasons) people, as the worst in bloody scalpel with irrational therapeutic cost ensues without saying who is most responsible for the tyrannic status quo‑‑ beyond the norms of political buffoonery.

Since the IL‑2 NOVA program where the expected initial import de­fined the right brain’s need for physiological health (to say no­thing about psychological precursors), the lateral smile alone so disclosed the need of some definitive analytical means** for the rapid chance evaluation of therapeutic result, if not regimen need with certain said psychological `set’. I am yet seeking aid in at least these two innovative `medical’ areas since my predic­tions of the bilateral space‑time cerebral (as CNS) complementals that Renoux sees clearly***. Some medical paradigm changes are coming and likely will evoke some chagrin if not trauma as the public becomes aware of what is occurring at their expense.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* Micro‑Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April ’86
** IL‑2 Cancer Research (3 left smiler remissive of 8 subjects);
NOVA NPR TV,’88
see: Smile anomaly for mate choice. SINGLELIFE, Sept/Oct.’90, p.12
*** Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)

CC:
Jan. 26,’90
Albert Aguayo
Dept. of Neurology
McGill University
Montreal, Que. Canada
Re: anti‑CNS (?)
Dear Sir: (SCIENCE NEWS; Jan.20,’90)

The bilateral cerebral to CNS control as what Prof. Renoux (U. of Tours) now sees* is likely what Schwab and Schnell perceive with their relative `anti‑body’ activity on nerve growth. One might now question how close H. S. Burr** (Yale) came when cyclic oper­ants for growth to assimilation best defines pro‑life biological growth‑‑ instead of cancerous.

The noted left facial smilers (see NOVA TV program; IL‑2) with complete remission verses the others may be saying again what AMA would prefer to ignore‑‑ as little tenure can be had with cures that work. My theoretical micro‑electrode work predicting the eradication of cancer nodules many years before Nordenstrom*** tried it (clandestinely!) is yet adroitly avoided where archaic bloody scalpels are considered the only `art’!

Very succinct is the remark “late‑‑” fetal protein cells (with sympathetic fight‑flight) that wants no part of new neuronal hook‑ups as might mean psychological instead of motor‑‑ something it will avoid at all cost. No wonder cyclosporine works so well!
The need for a `spatial’ faculty (parasympathetic; note right brain) to define where in space some synaptic displacement should be, helps to define that pro‑life faculty that the above left smilers use‑‑ when able. Simonton’s work with the under 16 year‑olds with spatial `visualization’ says it all‑‑ albeit few yet to hear it!

Sincerely,

KTS

* Lymphatic/cerebral control; Renoux, U/Tours (DISCOVER; Feb.87)
** `Blueprint for Immortality’, ’49?
*** Micro‑Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April ’86, Norden­ strom’s micro‑electrode work.

Aug. 1,’92
Directors, et.al.
Action Call

Re: medical, etc. status quo
Sirs:

Someone suggested, while pointing out a few radio stations who yet have a vested interest in keeping their listeners abreast of reality, the mounting empirical obvious in a couple R&D areas or ours. We address with the terse statement herewith to solicit further dissemination of the timely provocative‑‑ if not imports to truly aid a now very well conditioned naive public.

In gratitude for we and the public’s attention into the herewith, it goes without saying. If others you may feel should be aware of what is coming, please advise us or forward same. Many thanks.

Sincerely,

KTS

cc: envir/let

Chalcedon Foundation
3756 Highway 4
Vallecito, CA 95251

KSJV‑FM
Call to Action
P.O. Box 12682
Fresno, CA 93778

The Radio Foundation, Inc.
P.O. Box 20640
Cathedral Finance Station
New York, NY 10025‑9992

Radio‑TV News Directors
1717 K St., NW
Washington, DC 20006

Action Center
P.O. Box 12038
Washington, DC 20005

Liberty Hill Foundation
1320 C Santa Monica Mall
Santa Monica, CA 90401

Live Oak Fund for Change
Box 4601
Austin, TX 78765

Vanguard Public Foundation,
14 Precita Ave.,
San Francisco, CA 994110

The Headwater’s Fund
122 W. Franklin Ave., Rm. 110
Minneapolic, MN 55404

Significa
c/o Parade
750 Third Ave.,
New York, NY 10017

Editor
In health
Box 56863
Boulder, CO 80322‑6863

Aug. 8,’92
Directors, et.al.
WCMU TV
Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859

Re: Great Lakes Watch on Washington
Sir: “High Tech’s High Noon”

Is stone‑walled Patent protection the federal means to block something important, when you easily procured several Patents be­fore? Might this define a researcher a risk to authority, or sug­gest (at least) that your work is unwanted‑‑ when noted as an aid in some way as a remedy to a pathology? I have been told often this may be the case so I wonder in chagrin. I frankly don’t like to watch a once vibrant culture succumb to its official status quos‑‑ most promoted by industry and academia, whatever the re­cent “High Tech’s High Noon” TV program might claim. Indeed, that “high noon” has passed here but few see it so busy making promis­es from high tech places.

A terse synopsis herewith (over please) may aid you to understand this apparent anomaly, but then may not. Being an independent researcher with many past years in aerospace R&D, I doubt if my reasoning has failed me, albeit might be preferred so by others. Since teaching at GVSC, where my college students suggested often about political liabilities‑‑ before I suspected that my research would not be appreciated by established authority, I frankly now doubt if much of any value comes from academic `programming’‑‑ unless for obedient fodder to authority who apparently has no foggy idea (as tenured pedants) of where to go beyond doing some same dull round. This is no anomaly today where persistent poli­tical buffoonery suggests, at least, the days of Socrates are not quite over.

Sincerely,

KTS

cc: Envir/let
CC: Wolpe, et.al.

Cancer nodule elimination:

Defined in Europe (’69) the definitive biological stunting versus growth factors associated with electrical polarity, much noted by Prof. H.,S. Burr (Yale; circa late 40’s), the simple micro‑elec­trode use to stunt if not kill cancer nodules. Agreement by other bio‑research associates suggested further research, and priority documentation (as U.S. Patent registered upon return), to find to my chagrin “no interest”. A cover story in DISCOVER magazine (April ’86) defined why! Yet, after lecturing several medical groups find no use yet for the simple, economical and very thera­peutic means. Collusion for profit margins appears the problem‑‑ beyond the vast suffering of a very naive public, even yet today!

VDT (Visual Display Terminal) stress remedy:

From Prof. Haber’s work (Columbia) and Navy Helmholtz coil re­search on cerebral EEG stress, fusion‑flicker anomalies defined not only the time‑share EEG half cycle use but subjective (psy­chological) stress due to inadequate reductive half cycle time to process some definitive thought. From my R&D on both cross cereb­ral polarity anomalies and relative input versus output mental functions, again directly associated with cerebral polarities, found a simple remedy to block VDT user stress with anti‑slaved CR strobing affect. While in very great need by the flying public where air‑traffic controllers do not need headache problem to interfere with their reductive art of staking air‑borne aircraft, the entire field of computer VDT use could benefit greatly as well. It appears that the military’s heads‑up program takes pre­cedence over the public’s safety or comfort.

The 5th Generation Computer:

Noting from physics the freed electron escaped the time reversal paradigm, not only felt that the EPR experiment (see a qualified physicist to explain), such like interface might offer the ulti­mate computer to man. Indeed it was as ensuing R&D offered a prototype which gave the odds of 10\17th to one on its maiden run. This system Patent filing got blocked, tapped telephones with FBI surveillance said all that was needed. Actually, my said GVSC students were nervous over my continued research‑‑ but more so about what they felt a government quite unable to handle any so reality of unconscious ability. Freud was correct, unbearably so! In retrospect of the prototype’s run a dozen years ago, no doubt the recent M.I.T. meeting on various anomalies associated with less than benign UFOs(!) may as well remain classified to this public. In short, by far more is being said by what is ad­roitly not being said now!

KTS Research

Advertisements
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: