Dr. Robert Rutman, Prof. Emeritus
Dept. of Biological Sciences
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Re: stone‑walled therapy
Some of your remarks on TV suggested an awareness of federal folly and possibly underlying collusions with academic/industrial associations to which this note is addressed. While military, at least defensive aspects may be in part justified, why are crucial medical system/items avoided for continued instated medical profiteering doing some same dull round when obviously outmoded?
The cover story in DISCOVER (April ’86) brings one case to point where a simple micro‑electrode can rid cancer within days without bloody scalpel operants (saying nothing of convenience or relative cost), but where somehow the pharmaceuticals hold sway as to what is “legitimate” for any therapeutic regimen. Certain remarks could be made but the benefit of the doubt washes any conclusions from any rational judgment, or is disease and death the preferred response to an over‑populated world‑‑ whatever the suffering may be needed to get there?
Since defining the simple micro‑electrode use in papers in Europe (’69) only terror has been the authoritive response‑‑ as opening some Pandora’s Box. Has greed become so entrenched in a claimed civil society promising “advancement” that we can no longer see our way out or is there some conspiracy for blood letting the UFO data appears to be defining! Certainly there is mounting anxiety as MIT (note last 14th Wall Street J. front page) goes to length to suggest we are `visited’ yet federal government attempts at all cost to cover any such import with flacid remarks. Do they fear hysteria more in the public than what the implications might conceivably mean?
I believe I saw some rational judgment in your remarks so would, before I move out of this country, like some quality opinion. Many thanks‑‑
The Hastings Center
Dept. of Medical Ethics
255 Elm Rd.,
Briercliff Manor, NY 10510
Re: The Ethical Problem
A lengthy AI (Artificial Intelligence) study, initiated over 30 years ago, delved deeply into the anomaly of IQ versus CQ, especially the correlative synonymity of conscience with genius. Inferring a degree of intuitive knowledge as knowing “effect from cause”, a can of worms began to be perceived with rutty academic efforts separating its fields of discipline and so a programmed behavior for unthinking automatons, however valuable the credential became for verbal memory prowess. Worse, on using Einstein’s Special Relativity theory, as evoked by the edict of the Physic’s CPT complemental theorem, found reason to suspect man’s two minds of spatial versus temporal orientation, even as lateral cerebral hemispheres‑‑ soon thereafter confirmed by Sperry*.
While seeking ways and means in R&D for the 5th Generation self thinking computer, half of the needed confirmational data was had with the said split‑brain imports, only the positive EPR Physic’s experiment would conclude the feasibility of such profound device to exceed the net value of all computers which use only reductive process, as man’s left brain with historical aptitude alone. As IQ was indeed the major adjunct for deductive reasoning, its net value was unequivocal, yet where a non‑temporal inductive mental faculty could offer imports for something new. This other faculty did indeed exist for creative genius, however fleeting its inputs might be as offered in visual, non verbal terms.
With the confirmation of both needed crucial import‑‑ even then a prototype’s maiden run of a 10\17th odds in alpha‑numerical read‑out, the profound also was staring late science in the face. Not oddly, and far more importantly, the anomaly between conscience and intellectual manipulative predatory behavior become the import of these times. In short, to know potentials, much as Plato ascribed to those who might lead others with an innate accessible “Potentia”, a stark realization was recognized. From the evasion of the simple micro‑electrode to rid cancer** as one enigma, to a purposeful avoidance of what the freed electron means in the said EPR experiment***, it might define that late claimed civil man is volitionally standing on the threshold of chaos, to likely conclude some ancient scriptural dogma predictions as true.
When only profit makes right any endeavor, but little of value is the product sold, a re‑evaluation of what indeed is of any net value and who most profits from same needs consideration. It makes important the full comprehension of psychological motivation‑‑ to say little of its derivation, net goals and so man’s late growing genesis of overt greed.
This terse note hopefully provokes some consideration of what is likely coming, so while innuendoes fly with promises to always “do better”‑‑ yet with redundant folly to enrichen mostly the covertly pathological. At least psychopathy can be well understood now and is not far from what Jung and Freud saw clearly, yet is adroitly avoided by APA professionals who not oddly lead in suicide of all professionals but claim their “therapy” is best! With the recent lateral cerebral lymphatic control**** anomalies, AiR (Autoimmune Response) as said overt death‑wish, it is no longer difficult to comprehend‑‑ even by the most neurotic intellectual twisting fact into fancy, that some late great liability now exists for claimed civilization.
Should this evoke more interest than anxiety, please advise.
* `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
also: `The Others Side of the Brain’, J. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.
** Micro‑Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April ’86.
*** Aspect Alain, `Holism and Particalism in Physics’, p.70,
Vol.129, Feb. 1,’86, SCIENCE NEWS
**** Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DIS‑
COVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
see: IL‑2 Cancer Research (3 left smiler remissive of 8 subjects);
NOVA NPR TV,’88
Smile anomaly for mate choice. SINGLELIFE, Sept/Oct.’90, p.12
cc: Path/IQ; Phys‑Psy; S‑T
Medical Instr. Div.
11311 Concept Blvd.,
Largo, FL 34643
Re: therapeutic and diagnostic systems
A cover story in DISCOVER (April ’86) brings a case to point where a simple micro‑electrode can rid cancer within days without bloody scalpel operants (saying nothing of convenience or relative cost), but where somehow the pharmaceuticals hold sway as to what is “legitimate” for any therapeutic regimen. The benefit of the doubt washes any conclusions from any rational judgment, but is disease and death the preferred response to an over‑populated world‑‑ whatever the suffering may be needed to get there?
Since defining the simple micro‑electrode use in Europe (’69) only terror has been the authoritive response‑‑ as opening some Pandora’s Box. After 16 years to see my system* prove itself behind my back, ensuing DO talks showed at least their interest to aid some exclusive but unsaid (for obvious reasons) people, as the worst in bloody scalpel with irrational therapeutic cost ensues without saying who is most responsible for the tyrannic status quo‑‑ beyond the norms of political buffoonery.
Since the IL‑2 NOVA program where the expected initial import defined the right brain’s need for physiological health (to say nothing about psychological precursors), the lateral smile alone so disclosed the need of some definitive analytical means** for the rapid chance evaluation of therapeutic result, if not regimen need with certain said psychological `set’. I am yet seeking aid in at least these two innovative `medical’ areas since my predictions of the bilateral space‑time cerebral (as CNS) complementals that Renoux sees clearly***. Some medical paradigm changes are coming and likely will evoke some chagrin if not trauma as the public becomes aware of what is occurring at their expense.
* Micro‑Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April ’86** “Smile anomaly‑‑” SINGLELIFE, Sept/Oct.’90, p.12 SingleLife
note: IL‑2 Cancer Research (3 left smiler remissive of 8 subjects)
NOVA NPR TV,’88
*** Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
Melvin, Belli, et.al.
The Belli Bldg.
722 Mongomery St.
San Francisco, CA 94111
Re: class action suit?
Everyone now points at you as my need. Are you the only quality lawyer in this country not fearful of Big Brothers? Since finally reading a couple texts on and by you, your more obvious insights may define the perception of others, as yourself, more interested in justice than precedented folly based on prior folly‑‑ to say nothing of the syndrome of might making right at this late hour. Hannibals yet prevail and maybe I should succeed from the `union’ of what I perceive as corrupt to the core leading to its demise.
Briefly, invented (found!) the simple microelectrode would rid cancer nodules efficiently. A technical paper I gave (Europe,’69) only defined in part my data but a few quickly recognized my goal to exclaim the need for Patent Letters. Did register same on returning (have several, most self filed Patents) but continued to try for 16 years to find someone in `medicine’ to test the idea, to no avail‑‑ until the 4/86 Discover Magazine cover story, even using my sketch used in the Patent registration! The DOs, who use micro‑electrodes for acupuncture, kept after me to give papers, realizing I had lost my effort, but needed definitive directions, as were as simple as the said article defined.
Now with a dying mother with so simple that remedy collecting dust, find to my chagrin it was a pharmaceutical who sent my company confidential data to Karolinska for the proof‑‑ obviously fearful of its consequences! Noting a recent patient’s fee of $1500+ for a $10 (if that) microelectrode to rid her cancer nodule at Humana hospital, I’m frankly pissed off. Since my mother, in hospice, gave me what she had left, I seek someone not fearful of AMA or pharmaceutical Big Brothers to draw a little different kind of blood. I think you understand.
I find apparent paranoia (at least no responses) in the “Ethical” organizations, be it in biotechnology, philosophy or you name it. Is there a conspiracy in AMA with the pharmaceuticals? To be terse, I need some guidance, if there is time left in the U.S. with people (if any) yet interested in the welfare of suffering people? Many thanks for your advice or forwarding this for an another’s opinion.
cc: Path/IQ CC:D/Z;J/V;alt‑r
American Foundation for
Alternate Health Care in
Research and Development
25 Landfield Ave.,
Montecello, NY 12707
Re: care versus profit
Dear Sirs: (AMA, et.al. monopoly)
Since defining the application, via physics, of the simple means to halt unwanted growth (to to say nothing of wanted) via the micro‑electrode in Europe (’69), the overt stone‑walling has been deafening since‑‑ including even the verification of this therapeutic means to rid cancer some years later*.
Since it has become obvious that power politics makes right for those who profit with the status quo, in politics or elsewhere, I write to merely define clearly a fallacy that few will, much less wish, to comprehend at this very late hour. While cross academic in nature, my long AI studies has evoked vast chagrin, my late comprehension of what is actually occurring in the name of greed at the expense of the truly suffering. To be enraged by the ever mounting covert, turning overt, behavior in behalf of authority who have the least idea of where they are going beyond seeking more power or tenure, it makes clear we own another democracy very near its conclusion where the few aware self reliant leave.
This letter, while not expecting any further changes for a social change, seeks to say something for posterity‑‑ for after some chaos in whatever form it gets concluded. To such end the terse references‑‑ to avoid the obvious seeds of self destruction sewn for late democracies, and need of the now imminent self thinking computer** to tap what Plato called the Potentia. The data below I hope will be stored for better times‑‑ when that time comes.
* Micro‑Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April ’86, Nordenstrom’s micro‑electrode cancer therapy confirmation of my theory.
** if incredulous, query a qualified Physicist about the EPR experiment and how a freed electron knows effect from cause. See: Aspect Alain, `Holism and Particalism in Physics’, p.70, Vol.129, Feb. 1,’86, SCIENCE NEWS
American Foundation of
Traditional Chinese Medicine
San Francisco, CA 94153
Committee for Freedom
of Choice in Medicine
1180 Walnut Ave.,
Chula Vista, CA 92011
National Council on
P.O. Box 1183
San Jose, CA 95108
Natl. Health Council
350 5th Ave.,
New York, NY 10118
Natl. Health Federation
P.O. Box 688
Monrovia, CA 91017
Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers
1024 Dublin Rd.
Columbus, OH 43215
Re: care versus profit
Dear Sirs: (AMA, et.al. monopoly)
Since defining the application, via physics, of the simple means to halt unwanted growth (to to say nothing of wanted) via the micro‑electrode in Europe (’69), the overt stone‑walling of this definitive quality therapeutic means* has ensued almost with a vengeance. Since the verification of this very simple therapy to rid cancer likely does not offer the medical profits derived from bloody scalpels, a likely coming class action suit may be in the offing once a non‑fearful lawyer group can be found.
Since it has become obvious that power politics “makes right” for those who profit with the status quo, in politics or elsewhere, I write to find aid, indirectly or otherwise, especially names of potential law associated help un‑afraid of Big Brother syndromes. While cross academic in nature, my long AI studies has evoked much chagrin, of what is actually occurring in the name of greed at the expense of the truly suffering. To be enraged by the ever mounting covert, turning overt, behavior in behalf of authority who have not the least idea of where they are going (beyond seeking more power, profit or tenure) it makes clear we own another democracy very near its conclusion, as the few aware self reliant begin to leave. It’s too late for an Iron Curtain for this nation now but the empirical data stands by for the needed mental paradigm shift and the extrication of some extensive psychopathy.
May I have your advice or directives?
* Micro‑Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April ’86, Nordenstrom’s micro‑electrode cancer therapy confirmation of my ’69 theory.
Michigan Assoc. of Environmental Professors
15694 N. East St.,
Lansing, MI 48906
P. Firestone, et.al.
Center for Law in the
11835 W. Olympia Blvd., Ste. 1155
Los Angeles, CA 90064
Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers
1024 Dublin Rd.
Columbus, OH 43215
132 West 43rd
New York, NY 10036
Re: fearful lawyers
Do you have a listing to guide people as myself to lawyers not fearful of a Big Brother? A couple items stone‑walled in the U.S. Patent Office, more because of because of an efficacy than not define a larger anomaly, especially in the medical field that I cannot comprehend if there truly is no `conspiratorial’ reason.
Some money has come into my hands from certain sources which for humanitarian reasons wish to utilize, class action suit or otherwise. I find to my chagrin fearful lawyers (say of AMA) who may prefer the status quo of bloody scalpel use than my simple 100% cancer therapeutic micro electrode* where maybe not enough `care’ is expended to warrant high fees with greater profits. We do have enough suffering in naivete to say nothing of the ensuing greed.
To such end, noting the fiasco of public health care now, maybe you could guide me to the Melvin Belli’s yet practicing? Thank you for your directives.
* Micro‑Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April ’86
CC:ACLU of New York
1249 Washington Blvd.
Detroit, MI 48226‑1822