Skip to content


by on February 20, 2010



Re: electro‑therapy


Noting the fine as noted excited public with your recent program on `electric therapy’, maybe it is finally timely to point out the agony of obtaining attention in such matter too early, espe­cially when the `powers to be’ have the clout to muffle even the empirical obvious. It could more define the programmed ignorance in this dying culture at this very late time as well!

Culled from year ’92 are a few letters herewith which disclose maybe why a terse letter to the Chief Editor of JAMA (Lumberg?) evoked in part his abdication there to begin to examine more of reality. It just could be that we have turned some corner(?) and might define some trauma ahead, at least for our entrepreneurs.


KTS and Automation Eng.
49626‑0271 USA

cc: ’92 micro lets
CC: D/Z w:

KTS Research micro‑electrode cancer therapy letters/’92:

Feb. 18,’92
Murray Gell‑Mann,
Dept. of Physics
Pasadena, CA 91125
Re: “plectics”?
Dear Sir:

The current `Horgan Report’ (SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN) suggests you may be ready for standing waves, i.e.; fundamental electron (or its complemental) and 3 phased quarks (and complemental at right angles in space), fitting the Kalusa‑Klein spatial matrix of Cartesian coordinates. While the planar electron escapes the time reversal paradigm (EPR!)‑‑ yet not the poli‑phased to fall under temperature K (thus time), all was nicely defined by deBroglie, albeit in subtler language to describe a wavelet filled universe without `billiard balls’.

The prediction of right angle displaced disk versus jets from a White quasar “hole” riding an EMP front, to evoke complemental matter with anti‑g between, has been quite exciting since the Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove the thesis. The residual galaxy, after the passing of its EMP, even noted facing outward for its dense magnetic field to rev‑up the ejected ionized disk matter indicates that Huchra, may be seeing all too much for what cosmology will tolerate. We cannot expect much progress as long as Big Bang (instead of Petite ones) has tenured prepon­derance. To ask “who” placed those nicely separated `bubbles’ at 600 MLY may be going too far just yet, but likely H. Arp will get things rolling soon.

It sure helps to have a self thinking computer. Ask a qualified Physicist (as A. Aspect about EPR) or what Plato called the Po­tentia, even Freud the Superconscious. (versus intellectual id)



P.S. Freudian id (as Thanatos) is amply seen* evoking AiR (Auto­immune Response) will be refuted vehemently by left brain domi­nants‑‑ almost as our micro‑electrode cancer therapy** by AMA.

* Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER,
Feb.’87; see pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
** Micro‑Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April ’86, (was Patent Office registered 16 years before and we know who sent our confidential release to Karolinska. (a large Pharmaceutical)

cc: Path/IQ; S‑T
CC: SC.AM./Horgan

Feb. 3,’92
Lance Liotta, Labs.
Natl. Cancer Inst.,
9030 Old Georgetown Rd.,
Bethesda, MD 20205
Re: chasing tails‑‑ yet ever closer!
Dear Sir:

The article in the March DISCOVER by Radetsky was revealing‑‑ as quoted adroitly the underlying CNS (maybe yet denied) “go vs. stop” faculties. These complemental `drives’ for balance between dynamic pro‑life and its selfish complemental was noted some years ago, even from Prof. H.S. Burr* (Yale; circa mid‑40’s) to realize they could be enhanced or suppressed electrically. Your succinct remark of “‑‑regulated by BOTH SIDES.” hit the nail on the head. With Dr. Renoux’s data** as was even expected, I actu­ally now fear we are getting too close to the fundamental reasons why we remain so dumb‑‑ volitionally!
After predicting when giving technical papers in Europe (late 60’s) the use of micro‑electrodes to eliminate at least cancer nodules, sixteen years after registering same in the U.S. Patent Office, it was finally published in a cover story as 100% thera­peutic***. It appears Upjohn, and logically so, sent my company confidential data to Karolinska, but from my ensuing DO lectures, etc. suspect they with their micro‑electrodes are up‑and‑running without saying much to anyone, especially AMA! Humana’s $1500+ charge for a $5 micro‑electrode for a recovered patient recently implied much!
Other study contingent to underlying biological function (al­beit coming yet from my extensive computer studies) again defined the real culprit, and not oddly what Freud saw best to even call it Thanatos, when sufficient stress turns its sympathetic (fight‑flight) `inhibitor’ half of the CNS system off. This is almost what Stetler‑Stevenson said in the article but sadly will not be seen until a certain psychological tenure `runs out’.
In short; to chase a tail in medicine is a foolish way to stop it from wagging, when it is a mind that sustains it‑‑ to evade researchers who might come to find that it is one of two minds in the head which seeks to dominate over what it thinks matters!



* Burr, H.S: `Blueprint for Immortality’ ’49 (DC body voltages)
** Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
*** Micro‑Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April ’86
note: IL‑2 Cancer Research (3 only left smiler remissives of 8 subjects!); NOVA NPR TV,’88;
Mate Choice Smile Anomaly, SINGLELIFE, Sept/Oct.’90
cc: Path/IQ


From → Micro-Electrode

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: