Skip to content

Emerging Virus

by on February 22, 2010

L. Horowitz,
P.O. Box 402
Rockport, MA 01966
Re: “Emerging Virus‑‑” book order $35 herewith
and the Thanatosic syndrome
Dear Sir:

Not only NIH (Gallo) but most federally ensconced authority need­ing parasympathetic CNS silencing to make good warriors or dumb point runners‑‑ (note pyridostigmine anti‑cholinergic) so the atrophied parasympathetic using right brain* behind the Gulf‑war syndrome, any in‑depth thought now could evoke paranoia‑‑ as out lead in suicide of APA professionals!

Most ominous now with AiR** (autoimmune Response) is the direct correlation of Freud’s suspicion of our innate Thanatos‑‑ beyond telemores or the phagocytic killer T cells ignoring the guidance T cells, but our left time oriented lateral brain faculty with evolutional history, brings mankind’s likely greatest threat of all‑‑ just to remain anonymous! (“The unconscious wills to remain unconscious‑‑”; Freud, so we now find at ALL cost!)

Any yet naive human conscious mind could get somewhat religious with the mounting empirical obvious‑‑ thus the even greater net danger of exposed empirical data. My few overt suicides while do­ing psychoanalytical work (while studying under a UCLA BIS grant) defined best their IQ was too great for their introspection! The win‑lose syndrome began before Genghis Khan, but was the goading factor behind Nature’s drive for mental evolution where the mtDNA now has reached its final stage. The UFO phenomena may fit into this epoch’s greatest anomaly!(over)


KTS Research

* `Scanning‑‑’ 1/19/97 SC.NEWS (CT of pyridostigmine RCH atrophy)
** Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
note: `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67 and
Bogan, J.E: `The Other Side of the Brain’, Bul. L.A. Neurol.

cc: Path/IQ; Phys‑Psy; check/$35; 3‑dev(over)
CC: d/z w:

B. Raymond Fink,
Dept. of Anesthesiology
University of Washington
Seattle, WA 98195
Re: ATP/mitochondrion `life’
Sir: (Letters; Jan. 10th SC. NEWS)

Your remarks are well taken, especially as contingent to our fat‑cell watcher/user mitochondrion with its innate cargo of DNA!

Suspicions of `what’ Anthropologists had been examining about the Clovis as Anasazi awareness(?) of unconscious drive as goals may underlie the enigma of the anomalous weight loss seen by McDougal at Harvard (circa 1910?) at the body’s physiological death. If it is the evolutional goal of nature to goad any living specie into its mass‑slow‑time act down here near 300 Kelvin, then what does such feat in psychological terms neglecting Darwin’s physical DNA aspects for such modus de operandi?

There are distinct imports showing the more mentally `evoluted’ have the greatest neurosis (as above said IQ/weight loss factor), especially towards unconscious structure (Freud’s “The uncons­cious wills to remain unconscious”), we find to our chagrin his use of the Greek Thanatos as AiR (Autoimmune Response*) succinct when stress promotes an evasive death.


KTS Research

* Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
note: `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ
CC: ED/Sc‑News; D/Z w:

Virginia Valian,
Dept. of Psychology
Hunter College
New York City, NY 10021
Re:`Running in Place’
Madam: (Jan/Feb THE SCIENCES)

I include a copy of a past letter to TIME, doubting if Gorman as yourself, will understand same‑‑ now noting the real human female’s plight, seen in the above article. There is no anomaly as to why we in psychoanalytical work have so many frustrated women unable to integrate insight, especially from what Freud called one’s Royal Road. While slashed wrists may be a cry for attention, the care to not go too far is seen by male suicides‑‑ well noted in APA (Psychiatric) who lead in suicide of all pro­fessionals, likely learning too much from their too informative schizophrenics! While I am not Freudian, his few remarks as “the unconscious wills to remain unconscious‑‑” (at all cost!), his insights define well the late human psychopathy with left cereb­ral dominance‑‑ to our conscious mind RAS (midbrain) chagrin as dismay. The change is indeed coming‑‑ and how!

Your work appears adroit‑‑ now to it’s few needed keys as mtDNA.


KTS Research

CC: Gorman let (over)
cc: Sciences; D/Z w:

3/6/98 S. M. Courtney,
Labs/Brain and Cognition
Natl. Inst. of Mental Health
Bldg. 10, Rm. 4C104
10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD 20892‑1366
Re: `An Area‑‑’ 27 Feb. SCIENCE, p.1347

Your fine expose’ leaves one `enigma’ to fathom, that which Shay­witz (Yale) discovered between gender anterio‑corpus callosum differences. Gorman’s TIME (7/17/95) article (over) was expected, its vociferous tone (as apologetic AAAS `letter’)‑‑ while using twisted data, defines the relative aptitudes (noting Ankney; West Ont.U.), but a much deeper anomaly fully suspected as contingent with mtDNA pass‑through.

I wonder if direct correlations exist between saccadic drive to REM, yet bilateral definitive correlates to visual gestalt right brain input offered to fovea/FEF narrow field scan‑‑ as the face recall or mnemonic function? Might most `transient’ data signals appear as artifacts, yet define a non‑temporal right brain input?

The FEFs would appear a function of the `self’ within space (not of; as the Physic’s defines) thus your fine data noted with gross eye displacement as spatial knowledge during `hold’.

Your remarks “not recognized previously” may fit Gorman’s plight, to not mention Freud’s `overt censoring’ as seen proportionate to IQ and Thanatos which “wills to remain unconscious‑‑”. The `anom­aly’ of APA (Psychiatric) professional lead in suicide may help define the greatest as least understood `psychopathy’ of all human behavior‑‑ possibly where their right only cerebral expres­sing schizoid clientele have said too much! I hope I haven’t‑‑ as had to learn with a few suicides to never fully disclose reality.

Your comments would be appreciated.


KTS Research

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; S‑T
CC: D/Z w:

C. Woese,
Dept. of Evolutional Biology
University of Illinois
Urbana‑Champaign, IL

Re: `Direct Descendants‑‑'(SCIENCE, 1 May,’98)
Dear Sir:

Maybe the prokaryotes lived in peace when the planet was mostly devoid of their own predatory kind. Thus the membrane of any nu­cleated eukaryote cell is its bubble defense from the cells of a like predatory kind as the primitive RNA forager. This predatory behavior abounds now where any fragment of DNA can infect a hap­less host, especially the human with AiR (Autoimume Response) as with an inactive killer T cell (or blocked guidance cell) immune system. This network may well be what Renoux* examined to define more accurately as the sympathetic CNS with an evoluted mental ability to defend itself, when felt worth while, a phenomena well noted by psychoanalysts today‑‑ especially in this greedy tenure oriented culture.

Maybe useful gene swapping, as aboard the mtDNA, was helpful in the sense of psychological evolution, something Darwin would miss without the finesse of close genetic scrutiny of today, to say little of Lucy’s offer.


KTS Research

* Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance [spatial] T cells)
note: `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67

cc: Path/IQ
CC: Doolittle; Penny; D/Z w:

Craig Warden, et. el.
Dept. of Genetics
University of California
Davis, California 95616
Re: “Uncoupling‑‑” (May 29th, SCIENCE)
Sir: (the weird from the empirical)

While tempting but too bizarre yet, the correlation of Carl Sagan’s TV remark “Are our ancestors coming to get us” (after the classified MIT meeting on UFOs‑‑ with likely McDougals’ mass lost at death Harvard (circa 1910) as Lucy’s legacy from the plains of Africa, might define the mental evolutional thing getting beyond the more obvious that started the Darwin ruckus! In short, your data may be defining the key to what data is most unwanted in all of the sciences today as could be uniting the empirical for what the religious dogmas call some apocalypse! Weird? Obviously, but as a schizophrenic might say, life is like that‑‑ at least until better understood by the less neurotic, as Psychiatric APA pro­fessionals who lead in suicide for some anomalous reason!

The import of `family’ DNA `flanking’ an incarnate host for their UCP2 bias in order to feed may have been better seen by M. Mead on Bali‑‑ whose people yet better comprehend the uncons­cious than even Freud, speaking of `death‑wish’ or some weird re­mark of “The unconscious wills to remain UNconscious”! We suspect that Renoux* saw the tip of the ugly via left brain dominance* to not mention Freud, where authority yet suffer Genghis Khan’s syn­drome of `winning the planet’, whatever the cost!


KTS Research

* Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
note: `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67

cc: Path/IQ; Phys‑psy
CC: Collins; Brand; Harper; D/Z+ w:

M. van Turennout,
Brain and Cognition Labs
Natl. Inst. of Mental Health
Bldg. 10, Rm. 4C104
10 Center Drive MSC 1366
Bethesda, MD 20892‑1366
Re: `Brain Activity‑‑’ 24 April SCIENCE

The referred text data may define one of two major memory faculty as the S.T. `cerebral’ with rapid response. The question of hip­pocampal use for L.T. memory. Since the EEG (with polarity dis­crimination) its half cycle appears as some sub‑ordinate function in this case where 40msec is but a short percentage of operant.

Aside from noun (to verb; static vs. dynamic, as lateral cerebral orientation), little evidence that sub‑cerebral (pons area) op­erations are utilized for simple thoughts or motor functions, so the question as to possibly others in the more theoretical areas of mental processing? Empirical data is fine if some net rational mental matrix can be considered.

Directives would be appreciated.


KTS Research

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ
CC: Hagoort; D/Z w:

Robert H. Singer,
Dept. of Anatomy and Structural
Biology and Cell Biology
Inst. for Molecular Medicine
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Bronx, NY 10461 Re: oncogene polymerase equivalent?
Dear Sir:

From physics the temporal oriented left cerebral hemisphere has much to do with the Freudian Thanatos, noted by Renoux*, yet few appear to examine that sympathetic CNS with biasing genetic folly in AiR (Autoimmune Response) when sufficient psychological stress promotes the death‑wish. Somehow bases as positive polarity has either a `status quo’ adjunctive effect, or destructive if enough of that repeated stimulus becomes active.

Aside from direct genetic flukes or carry‑through (possibly as may ride the mtDNA now noted contingent with the psychological), an ominous sign may be seen about `what’, as said time oriented‑‑ is seated in our left brain half! Maybe herewith, as derived from a long physics‑neurophysiology study, may mean something‑‑ as no doubt bizarre to most single academic research field people.


KTS Research

* Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)

cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy
CC: D/Z w:

S. LeBlanc,
Dept. of Archaeology
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, CA 90007
Re: only massacres?
Dear Sir: (`N. America’s Wars’; 27 March, SCIENCE)

As Lewis‑Williams (U/Witwatersan) well recognizes from the Clovis as likely the Kiva warrior shield symbolism, when now compared to Sperry’s human split brain data* a true horror story begins to be spelled out, albeit few in science will take the interest in UFOs much less examine to compare the diabolical looming clearly‑‑ as it could be their own nemesis‑‑ of the fearful Feds. also act!

Foragers as warriors have always been, but farmers more recently when foraging turned lean, even to depend on unseen ancestors for evoked (cold down draft) rain. This latter feat yet well in vogue with greed enters the paradigm, the Anasazi the more recent to leave a 2D fixed abode, however well fortified, to return to for­aging, moving about at right angles (note* and UFO travel**) to what they may have well understood threatened them.

In short, river followers for agriculture knew the need of mois­ture in some constant form‑‑ once they learned the blackmail of mtDNA following ancestors. The Anasazi managed to escape their own human other mtDNA carrier kind (ethnic cleansing) so under­stood‑‑as the Tewas today, of the more direct cause of rain‑loss with their own unseen ancestors, to move on to evade them at right angles. This bizarre import stems from the Zen knowledge of right angle as rectilinear perception‑‑ thus likely their often staggered bridges across streams to evade some unseen follower!


KTS Research

* `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
** MUFON ’83 Symposium Proceedings; Rectilinear travel;p.60>

cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; L‑W let.copy
CC: D/Z w:


From → Biology

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: