Skip to content

Evolution, But For What?

by on February 22, 2010

1/11/97
Columbia University
New York, New York, 10027
Re: Evolution, but of what?
ŠDear Sir: (Psy. Today; Jan/Feb issue)

Your PT quoted remarks evokes this note as contingent to the
relative value of DNA verses mtDNA where the prior merely offers
some appropriate `housing’ for the mentally evoluting mitochond
rial like historical record, to suggest that what might be best
about “civilization”(?) to thwart evolution defines the mounting
impasse to Nature’s goals– thus some promised chaos which now is
looming most clearly for late mankind. If we continue to refuse
the empirical obvious Nature has ways to teaching such neurotics,
albeit maybe not in some benign way to get the message across!
Since Dawkins dwells on the `mechanics’ as nearly what Darwin
did but expected for his time, that which guards with jealousy
our fat cells as likely defines McDougal’s found weight loss at
death (Harvard, circa 1910), to define also the Anasazi’s fear of
rectilinear `travelers’ to abandon their fixed 2D spatial homes,
the Roberts letter (over) may help to explain.
When government is guilty of stamping secret anything for its
profit– never said to win the planet, the enigma best defines
what evolutes in our left cerebral hemisphere and wants nothing
to do with its all-knowing (non-temporal) complemental, so steals
whatever, as whenever, with some appropriate engineered opportu
nity that might then be so managed politically. The scenario is
tragic, but not oddly a twofold good insofar as a vast thinning
of the corrupt to then allow the few who remain the opportunity
to learn about reality without the subterfuge of intellect buying
tenured time with half truths. The current `scientific’ following
the church for both of their net demise may be fortunate indeed!
To comprehend neat 600Bly intervals of evoked cosmic bubbles
(Huchra) across this universe– likely done by one hand clapping,
to precipitate an a priori magnetic flux into quantized standing
waves to promote temporal conditions– once called `foot-stools’,
the evolutional game can be understood as fundamentally between
our two (spatial vs. temporal) brain halves.
Finding to some dismay many past files as got dumped onto the
internet defining a very long study (as brought the self thinking
computer using the freed electron to escape the time reversal
paradigm; note EPR experiments)– even the key yet needed for
fully controlled fusion– the above danger becomes clear, where a
net late awakening of the carefully enslaved is that expected
adjunct needed to return whatever humanity may be left– back to
Nature’s goal– with utilized conscience instead of manipulation!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Path/IQ; S-T; Phys/Psy CC: Brockman

11/15/96
Simon and Schuster
1230 Ave. of the Americas
New york, New York 10020
Re:`In Search of– Ancient Ones’
ŠSirs:

The speculative use of some mirror to signal for a straight line
(recent Curtis TV `Explorer’) may come close but better is it to
define the truly `old ones’ in spatial 2D as that grand late fac
tor to make far more sooner all of us to become nomads. Many of
the past `ancient ones’, as recent aware gypsy understands about
psychic matters– that Anasazi had to learn, no doubt was their
dismay as well– as very soon ours.

Since the human split-brain data hit the fan with the right hand
getting lost* in space– as primary UFO travel**, weight loss at
death (Harvard’s McDougal, circa 1910?), it made clear that some
finite mass left the body– as now known evoluted intellect as
uses our left cerebral hemisphere– to likely make for our dogma
belief of some apocalypse, as did for others throughout human
history. The “awakening” has always been traumatic even if less
substantiated– as now with the mounting empirical obvious– that
can no longer be twisted into half truth to hold off evolution.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `The Human Split-Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
** MUFON ’83 Symposium Proceedings; p.60>

12/19/96
University of Chicago,
Chicago, IL 60637
Re: punctuated evolution
Sirs: (6, Dec. SCIENCE “Mechanisms–“)

As Dawkins and others get close to looking at our mtDNA growth–
not denying Darwin nor DNA changes, two kinds of punctuated evo
lution occur, the DNA change for the different body design and
the mtDNA, evoked by some father’s goading his child to use its
insight offering right cerebral (non-temporal) brain. Rash might
be this conclusion but since Sperry’s predicted findings* many
years ago of the spatial versus temporal oriented (derived) bi
lateral mental attributes in the human animal so little question
remains to Nature’s net design, especially in physics– even ast
ronomy now with Huchra’s cosmic bubble findings.

The freed electron for fresh `opportunity’ (note EPR experiments)
denotes the mechanism for evolutional change, however slow in any
Darwinian term. If no optimum `phenotype’ can be easily found for
some next evolutional step the said freed electron appears to do
its thing to modify, now called punctuated evolution. Not oddly,
mutations go both ways, depending on how well either CNS can bias
its want, intellectual evolution now offers the most Thanatosic
response (Freud) better noted by Renoux**, to play its game of
Thanatos, or the other’s need of body change to evoke some fresh
series of experiencial existence in yet slow relative mass-time!
Š
You may find interesting what physics is now uncovering which we
suspect defines much that biological evolution might use. Recent
correlations in 5HT bias for covert psychopathic behaviors also
is indicating the stagnation of current mental evolution via aca
demic programming, especially keeping all academic disciplines
separated as far as feasible. Nature’s `batch’ system to enhance
any one specie’s mental evolution may be that optimum that even
defines humanity– despite its jealous ethnic problems likely
controlled again by its mtDNA. The current culmination of empiri
cal data defining unconscious structure as relative unsaid objec
tive may conclude an epoch for another needed `punctuation’!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `The Human Split-Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
and `The Others Side of the Brain’, J.E. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.
** Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER,
Feb.’87; pgs. 57-58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)

12/17/96
Lehigh University
Bethlehem PA 18015
Re: DNA + mtDNA
Sir:

Noting your proximity to defining likely what Dawkins yet does
not perceive– as Darwin’s more crude perspective, there appears
the key to psychological evolution somehow tied into our mtDNA to
define mankind’s late great problem of his intellectual neurosis.

The need for two (at least) recording systems within our slow
mass-time environs, the molecular sustenance, possibly what Mc
Dougal (Harvard; circa 1910) found as weight loss at death, an
ominous factor looms when contingent with theological basics. Of
more potential threatening nature now is the correlation between
what Sperry’s split-brain data uncovered* and human rectilinear
awareness (even travel; note ample UFO phenomena**) of our left
cerebral hemisphere. There may be no anomaly to why the Anasazi
packed up and moved to return to the nomadic life!

Beyond being goaded by official programs and now overt greed, the
many syndromes define a defunct human animal specie well prepared
for its ritualized demise. The paradigm facing us is the lateral
cerebral hemisphere switch to likely complete this phase of de
signed evolution for Nature’s goal. Hopefully the letter copy
(over) does not offend.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

Š* `The Human Split-Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
** Rectilinear travel; MUFON ’83 Symposium Proceedings; p.60>

cc: Phys-Psy; Path/IQ; Pat-Med/Disc/let copy(over)

11/18/96
Yale University
School of Medical
New Haven, CT 06520
Re: curiosity gene D4DR
Sir: (`New Data–‘ SC.NEWS, Nov. 2, p.279)

Your data is of prime importance albeit not the opinions. I’m not
flaming nor kidding, but the key to how excitory DA goads the
parasympathetic to offer right cerebral insights for ensuing men
tal evolution. A profound import that has been wanted for some
time– since Sperry’s split brain data defined the spatial versus
temporal complemental lateral brain halves, defining the underly
ing mental matrix processing for the self thinking device.(over)

In short, the `spice’ of life is the D4DR gene, which ever way it
goads the human animal on its long evolutional trek. Between the
truly ancient philosophical oriental beginnings in China with its
longer but sure route in peaceful evolution, many other ethnic
groups, as goaded by their greater net D4DR genetic repeats grad
uate faster, but with strife because of greed. The human animal’s
evolution now culminates with the greatest strife to conclude now
this last epoch for Nature’s grand design in slow mass-time of at
least one major specie that Darwin paid little attention.

With the more obvious claimed `civilized’ net conclusion now be
ing seen around this globe, your data makes the greatest sense in
the terms of Nature’s underlying objective– whatever biological
characteristic needed, from the amoeba up. While the `Big Apple’
town is the place for the more intellectual to parade so grab the
biggest bite in life, the likely greater number of D4DR carrying
genes there would indicate greater CQ (creative genius), yet that
excitory neurotransmitter drive is spent more on greed to win es
teem for what is now being noted the truly diabolical yet unseen.

The physics herewith may mean little however is the crux for the
above. The design of the 5th Generation computer took some time
yet its empirical reality may help most in bringing Kuhn’s para
digm shift– as the eradication of much social dead-wood. Sorry.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Path/IQ; Phys-Psy; S-T; 3-dev(over)
CC: D.H. Hamer; A.K. Malhotra; D/Z

1/18/97
ŠWashington, DC 20036
Re: women’s lib
Dear Sir:

Hilarious indeed! Hope you needed no under-carriage stitches
after that unhappy yeowling! (and a few of us yet marry them!)

What was not said however is what all quality Psychoanalyst see
(and beyond those 86% that visit them!) is their bilateral di
chotomies as over-bite mandibles– not to say men don’t own the
same relative enigmas. What is being seen however– even beyond
the tirade of Gorman (TIME article; over) by a woman about our
lateral cerebral differences between the gender, is the lack of
much insight yet demand to be equal somehow– which may be poss
ible now– noting the fancy-Dans and sycophants they raise for
politics or the White House. Our pending `paradigm shift’ may be
interesting– if not bloody, should right brain dominants not
soon stand up to point at the mounting empirical obvious.

There are some stark revelations also defining the mtDNA pass-
through from mother to children (from Lucy back on the planes of
Africa on) which offers a vastly different role for those who do
express those genes over the self reliance found with a father’s
genetic offer. (as father-figure role– now being examined!) The
known enigma of insight for creative genius lack in women becomes
no anomaly now in light of the Physics to said Neurophysiology
dichotomy, where verbal historical versus spatial mental process
ing is distinctly a lateral cerebral penchant, maybe what some of
my GVSC students (25 years ago) suggested as our “apocalypse”. A
case in point is Temple Grandin (note O. Sacks recent text) where
autism (abdicated left brain user) evokes the idiot savant!

Many thanks for that grand `show’– the funniest I’ve seen (at
least on TV) for many moons now!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Time letter/Gorman (over)

1/29/97
Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA 15282
Re: `sugarscape’ revisted
Dear Sirs:

With the need for competition to instill the evolutional trek to
secure intellect, it becomes clear now that the temporal (histor
ical) left brain using `id’ must vie up to death* to win the pla
net– a factor never mentioned verbally (temporal communication!)
to define a few of Freud’s provocative insights. While those few
with right brain empathy suffer, Nature’s plan appears to get
carried out to the fullest to teach well the predatory who refuse
Što tap insight for conscience– to learn of `affect from cause’.

Now that Sperry’s cat** is fully out of the bag it becomes sadly
interesting these final days to watch the official gyrations– as
“protect all from all” as disarming a hapless programmed public,
when most illegal weapons are in the hands of the street kids who
have little compunction about killing to get what they want– and
no police officer can move fast enough much less out-shoot them.

The net goodness of a dying culture at least allows another to so
spring from the prior’s ashes– suspected in Hart’s final chapter
of his `Patriots’– who, as any politician, has alternate plans!
The cutting edge (your remark) lies in the empirical sciences but
they are likely the least to aid mankind at this late hour when
volitional ignorance has the edge on our psychological dominance,
whatever Freud as others said, but for his mass Thanatosic fling.
The enigma of avoiding the empirical obvious now for tenurized
comfort defines academia’s final trek to win whatever– whatever
the cost with promises and fresh neck-tie, which in turn defines
its net business of making fodder for the state. (sorry)

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER,
Feb.’87; pgs. 57-58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
** `The Others Side of the Brain’, J.E. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.
`The Human Split-Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
as Goleman, D.; `Vital Lies, Simple Truths’,’86

cc: Path/IQ; Phys-Psy
CC: Epstein/Axtell; D/Z

1/29/97
Lansdale, PA 19446 Re: But `Logic Failure’ is volitional

Dear Sir:

The logic of failure will not be perceived nor understood until a
profit margin is made for tenure or less said unconscious reason,
a factor least comprehended with history oriented left cerebral
dominance*. Freud saw the `enigma’, even correlated same with the
Thanatosic behavior, that mounting liability that late claimed
civilized as “advanced” society starkly faces**.

Many past as very ancient `beliefs’, some yet as theological dog
ma well misunderstood can be noted in the adroit Mithra belief–
as stabbing one’s Minotaur’s right side, more adroitly seen via
split-brain data as gender corpus callosum dichotomies. Since the
`patterns of thought’ are verbal, never visual, erred reasoning
must be considered relative to intellectual historical reasoning,
not spatial non-temporal as responsible for `cause from affect’
(note EPR results using the freed electron as escapes the time
Šreversal paradigm), but to be avoided at all cost in physics at
this late hour– where only might makes right as manipulation.

Of interest now is the awareness of the ancient Anasazi (with
obvious 2D oriented `something’ bothering them as many primitive
African tribes whose shamans apparently knew more about our sub
jective dilemma today than claimed wise APA (who lead in suicide
of all professionals!) as likely defines the need for error over
any adroit scientific fact. While obviously addressed by you, one
wonders if there is time left to integrate all of the cross aca
demic imports to perceive the reality coming?

Our real blessings to come will be controlled fusion as the quan
tized EM standing wave `matter’ becomes understood– where pollu
tion will cease– after certain petroleum cartel people get their
last cent from the planet’s last drop of oil while we choke on
pollution! For now the enigma of lateral cerebral drive needs
dissemination, if indeed we manage to live that long, as the self
thinking computer (knowing effect from cause) via Heisenberg’s
freed electron! (over)

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; S-T
* `The Others Side of the Brain’, J.E. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.
note: `The Human Split-Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
**Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER,
Feb.’87; pgs. 57-58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)

2/8/97
Columbia University
New York, NY 10027
Re: relative time?
Dear Sir: (“Enzymes illuminate–“; SC.NEWS)

Noting the split-brain data confirming the space-time relative
operants now, your work as conjecture would imply a correlation
between the temporal (historical) oriented right primitive brain
(using the left cerebral hemisphere) or sympathetic CNS, may have
alternate `objectives’, possibly less than a host organism’s pro-
life– in keeping with what Renoux* is looking at. Suspecting DNA
was a priori in the `mechanical’ sense, ensuing questions as pur
pose– beyond Darwinian conjecture, suspicion revolves now around
the mtDNA with its rapid modification with noted psychological
evolution– so begs the question of the amoeba’s epoch?
The above defines the current quandary of virus `need’ beyond
an element of energy conveyance, albeit apparently living with a
goal and/or objective in the deeper sense. Our research, after
predicting the space versus time complemental brain halves before
Sperry confirmed same, indicated a like correlate between DNA (in
keeping with Dawkins) but why an adjunctive aid as RNA to convey
genetic fragments in less than `sincere’ ways if indeed mutates
Što become an independent active agent on its own?
Further imports well define our left brain half** owns far
less that benign behavioral objectives, albeit with evoluted re
ductive intellect to make Renoux’s data a less then happy spectre
noting AiR (Autoimmune Response)– as viewed from the perspective
of psychology– especially Freudian thought. We suspect that more
in scope of what goes on in mass-time may now be seen.
Whether flawed `enzyme’ or chink in a genetic coded armor, we
may appear bizarre in suggesting there may be far more than meets
the eye under a microscope when some, albeit few weird `healings’
do occur under psychological influence– however done. The child
before puberty appears one of these anomalies– but parasympathe
tic CNS dominance may bias their system, again suggesting a fluke
in its `complemental’ when mental stress begins.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER,
Feb.’87; pgs. 57-58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
** `The Others Side of the Brain’, J.E. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ
CC: Robb; Weiss; D/Z;w:

Advertisements
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: