Skip to content

Father-Figure Additive

by on February 22, 2010

2/8/97
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Re: father-figure `additive’?
Dear Sir: (`Debunking–‘; Science News, 1/25/97)

What you say is provocative, so how does a mother’s mtDNA devour
Dad’s, just as now noted in our social milieu? But they also now
deny the contra-obvious lateral cerebral connection where right
brain spatial insights are blocked from their left hemisphere, to
likely define their 86% need of shrinks to calm them down! (over;
as a couple other letter copies contingent with what terrorizes)

Assumptions are needed for research as tenure– etc. etc., thus
careful conjecture allows the evasion on one import, however
obvious, to overrule the profound, unconsciously knowing it might
terminate all parading on which the mtDNA must survive. Darwin’s
as Dawkins examine the DNA for the `mechanics’ but all fail to so
wonder what evolves in the psychological sense as the net evolu
tional sojourn for the human animal appears to be wrapping up for
some overt trauma ahead. The recent data defining ATP genesis
with fatty lipid use may suggest the objective of the obese, pre
paring for the worse– as that Freud as Renoux* is staring at!

Sycophants lacking real father figures disclose who now lead us,
to say nothing of who in mother led them! The orthodox Jew is a
sad example where IQ (left brain reductive time oriented) often
abounds, yet very little complemental spatial insightive nuance.
We have lost our moorings as Rollo May would say (or R.D. Laing),
so we may face our own music much as the Anasazi did a millennium
ago– where the rectilinear 2D oriented, UFO or that right hand
of Sperry’s split-brain subject** uncovers the provocative.

If indeed McDougal (Harvard; circa 1910) did find finite weight-
loss at physiological death then what got up and left? Is it some
wad of mtDNA to house a L.T. memory (not found in the cortex!) as
prowls about as the Amerindians (as Anasazi) all claim? The “egg
or chick” (or what came first the egg or the chicken) enigma may be
that pending apocalyptic dogma’s answer.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER,
Feb.’87; pgs. 57-58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
** `The Human Split-Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
as:`The Others Side of the Brain’, J.E. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.

Šcc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; Gorman’s let + CC: Ankel-Simons; D/Z;w:

2/10/97
University of California
Irvine, CA 92697
Re: 24th Jan. SCIENCE Book Review
Dear Sir:

Well said– whatever the harangue as `ruse’ some use to define
reality sans all of the facts. The murky business of using only
conjecture as the DNA (“mechanical” structure) to equate what now
appears the whole mass-time objective of evoluting some mtDNA may
be a volitional fluke– as evading other imports getting clear.

With `potentials’ now seen in binary response via the freed elec
tron (EPR experiments) as appears goads finite changes in DNA
choice– as only mtDNA fragment from the human male, even the de
coupled anterio corpus callosum of the human female begins to say
something– however that `gentler sex’ refutes same (p.4 below)
as many other anomalous differences between the human gender.

Without repeating myself in recent `tirades’, a few letter copies
herewith might set my pace as direction of research these past 50
years– doing aerospace R&D as college teaching along the way.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy
CC: past comments below:

7/18/95
Time
Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10020-1393
Re: Bent thinking– p.51; 7/17 issue)
Sirs:

What a travesty! Your Gorman is attempting to gore men and I am
betting she herself doesn’t perceive it any more than the twisted
text with scans shown– as likely twisted face lacking any left
facial smile! This folly can be expected now, especially with
naive editors as publishers in love with the academic programmed
corrupt promulgating half truths for an even more stupid public.
Little wonder our pending but needed ethnic cleansing looms so
close– to put to shame the one now in Yugoslavia!

Mere examination of what you pro-offered of which brain have has
the full corpus callosum (obviously left image) as independent
lateral excitation (right) defines the reversed (laterally!) as
worded text implied. You people must also own Ph.Ds!

Until, but won’t happen now, science perceives what Sperry* un
covered between spatial and temporal complementals in mass-time
between those two lateral cerebral hemispheres, we the conscious
mind (RAS) is doomed to annihilation, just as Prof. Renoux sees**
with AiR (Autoimmune Response) of the left brain half to conclude
any further mental evolution on the human specie. It is sad that
the scriptural dogmas are more correct than science yet the
empirical obvious is the only means to extricate the believers from
their twisted dogma!

As my prediction over twenty years ago (after I defined physics
as the precursor to space-time mental faculty) that vowels versus
nouns would define lateral cerebral dichotomies– I also said the
intellectual (reductive left brain) would never tolerate this
obvious– especially by instated authority, as I quickly also
found. (over) These are heady days indeed, especially for those
so few who do think!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `The Human Split-Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
**Renoux; U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER,
Feb.’87; pgs. 57-58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)

cc: Path/IQ; Phys-Psy; 3-dev(over)

2/8/97
S. P. Goff, et.al.
Dept. of Biology/RNA
Columbia University
New York, NY 10027
Re: relative time?
Dear Sir: (“Enzymes illuminate–“; SC.NEWS)

Noting the split-brain data confirming the space-time relative
operants now, your work as conjecture would imply a correlation
between the temporal (historical) oriented right primitive brain
(using the left cerebral hemisphere) or sympathetic CNS, may have
alternate `objectives’, possibly less than a host organism’s pro-
life– in keeping with what Renoux* is looking at. Suspecting DNA
was a priori in the `mechanical’ sense, ensuing questions as pur
pose– beyond Darwinian conjecture, suspicion revolves now around
the mtDNA with its rapid modification with noted psychological
evolution– so begs the question of the amoeba’s epoch?
The above defines the current quandary of virus `need’ beyond
an element of energy conveyance, albeit apparently living with a
goal and/or objective in the deeper sense. Our research, after
predicting the space versus time complemental brain halves before
Sperry confirmed same, indicated a like correlate between DNA (in
keeping with Dawkins) but why an adjunctive aid as RNA to convey
genetic fragments in less than `sincere’ ways if indeed mutates
to become an independent active agent on its own?
Š Further imports well define our left brain half** owns far
less that benign behavioral objectives, albeit with evoluted re
ductive intellect to make Renoux’s data a less then happy spectre
noting AiR (Autoimmune Response)– as viewed from the perspective
of psychology– especially Freudian thought. We suspect that more
in scope of what goes on in mass-time may now be seen.
Whether flawed `enzyme’ or chink in a genetic coded armor, we
may appear bizarre in suggesting there may be far more than meets
the eye under a microscope when some, albeit few weird `healings’
do occur under psychological influence– however done. The child
before puberty appears one of these anomalies– but parasympathe
tic CNS dominance may bias their system, again suggesting a fluke
in its `complemental’ when mental stress begins.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER,
Feb.’87; pgs. 57-58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
** `The Others Side of the Brain’, J.E. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ
CC: Robb; Weiss; D/Z;w:

1/22/97
Dept. of Theology
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: why not the empirical?
Dear Sir:

Your remarks were adroit (NPR TV) but as you know certain `apar
theid’ portions of this country would rather fight that switch–
noted over the now obvious import in human split-brain data*.
Most revealing is our 2D (temporal/non-spatial) left brain, very
likely McDougal’s finding (at your campus; circa 1910?) which
defined mass-loss at a body’s physiological death, to say nothing
of the Anasazi terror of rectilinear `something’ a millennium
ago, as UFO phenomena** now.

It does appear that the human animal’s historical `self’ has some
traumatic plans for we kept naive midbrain conscious mind, but
may be allowed by Nature to clear the deck for the next phase of
completed mental evolution– likely the mtDNA. This could well be
that promised apocalypse– as real holocaust to follow– as many
of my GVSC students some 25 years ago suggested.

At least the sciences do have the answers even if humanity must
await the tenure seeking laggards yet seeking to win the planet–
to teach us as learn some difficult lessons yet!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
Š
* Gazzaniga `The Human Split-Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
`The Others Side of the Brain’, J.E. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.
** Rectilinear travel; MUFON ’83 Symposium Proceedings; p.60>
note :`Anasazi World’, Roberts ’95; as Curtis’ recent TV program
on rectilinear viewing.

1/15/97
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: SCIENCE; on social science
Dear Sir: (again)

As said before (Jan. 5,’93), evolution contains far more in the
right brain than what we neurotic left brain users could imagine
(because it censors; Freud, so no longer use REM `Royal Road’
import after around 7) yet is noted prevalent in a fetus getting
pre-programmed, as all complex brained other animals using same
throughout life.

Granting that split-brain data as the physics of complemental
derivation needs be understood (herewith again) thus developed
(digital temporal) numeracy as the evoluting left brain faculty.
Its benign complemental goads with curiosity up to our neurotic
IQ dominance to define what Sperry and Penfield saw between our
brains. Not oddly, the female’s near severed corpus callosum
defines her malady– as vehemently denied Gorman’s TIME article
last year– inspite the of obvious CAT scans! Since the freed
electron (sorry) offers right cerebral insight almost as the EPR
experiments define `knowing cause from affect’, is Plato’s Poten
tia. This is likely the dogma’s `apocalypse’– where late neuro
tic man refuses to believe up to his bitter end.

The real trauma coming now is to define the mtDNA as evolutes in
the psychological way– and goes back to Lucy in Africa. Maybe
even what McDougal saw with weight loss at death there a Harvard
(circa 1910?) to indicate the extent of the rapid mtDNA change!
Maybe even worse, why the Anasazi packed up and left home about a
millennium ago when not understanding 2D rectilinear travel that
the UFO buffs have been watching. Our demands for profit now and
to hell with tomorrow says it all– yet very timely I fear!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Path/IQ; Phys-Psy
CC: Kacelnik; Moller; Tooby; D/Z

Advertisements
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: