Skip to content

All Physic letters from 1991 up thru 4/1/2k:

by on March 10, 2010

All Physic letters from 1991 up thru 4/1/2k:

Jan. 15,’91
Abhay Ashtekar and
Carlo Rovelli, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA 12560
Re: knots and deBroglie
Sirs:

As noting in the Dec. 14 SCIENCE the remark that empty space is far from that to make any loop‑string theory viable in that Apri­ori magnetic field, we return again to deBroglie where nothing is `finite’ and wave theory becomes supreme. Indeed, the implication for anti‑g between the primal complemental matters inferred high ejection rates at quasar poles to disk, so when indeed seen with the aloft Einstein observatory, Big Bang began to crumble!

The greatest loop for any `string’ theory may well be the bubbles of EMP that permit the ease of quasar (to galaxy) formation‑‑ for the creation of stabilized complemental matter‑‑ no Big Bang. Of course this cannot sit well for tenured people so may require another century to sink in. The real question thence becomes Who with volitional will and spatial wisdom (note our right cerebral non‑temporal brain!) `snapped their finger’ to evoke those vast EMPs so nicely placed throughout the universe for finite matter creation? We are convinced you are on the correct `digital’ ap­proach to the grandest analogical problem facing mankind. What truly remains “mysterious” in anyone’s jargon today is why we remain so neurotically stuck with some ancient theory as Big Bang to only lead us astray‑‑ but ah, there’s tenure!

We are in the AI research field needed to comprehend what indeed Einstein meant with his Spec. Rel. theory which denoted, with the edict from the CPT theorem, complemental perspectives within space‑time. Our ensuing prediction of the spatial vs. temporal lateral cerebral faculty (long before Sperry’s split‑brain sub­jects proved same) pointed to the likely reality of a self think­ing computer. Then, only the positive EPR experiments remained to be confirmed to finalize our Patent filing. Hope you can follow the herewith.

Keep up the fine work‑‑
Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc:Phys‑Psy; Path/IQ; S‑T

CC: T. Jacobson; C. Isham

Dec.14,’90
H. Hayden and P. Beckmann, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Connecticut
Storrs, CT 06268
Re: still `tilting’ eh?
Dear Sirs: (Nov. 30, SCIENCE, p.250)

From the apparent `tired light’* (plus self phase alignment) over astronomical distances, maybe it would be more prudent to do your Beckmann experiment in a different `ether’ as a magnetic field, being `pulled along’ with earth. While a net g field may appear to bend light, it is possible it may be the `relative’ magnetic field density therewith instead.

The dv/dt enigma for red shift due to slowing in dense magnetic fields near quasars permitted predicting the anti‑g effect with the now found disk‑jet anomalies that the Einstein observatory satellite confirmed. Not only a `steady state’ but no Big Bang may cause a larger one in cosmological offices‑‑ hopefully soon so the matter of integrating physics and cosmology may begin. The cliff hanger now is `who’ clapped their one hand to evoke the massive EMP (bubble center) to permit definitive quasar cores to get started? Since a likely magnetic monopole (ether) was and may always be, what indeed is the purpose of all the so `degenerated’ quantized (and complemental) mass from that magnetic flux to evoke slow time down here?

Might the 3‑phased quark be no more than a wave‑front‑‑ much as the `planar’ wavelet electron which escapes the time reversal paradigm? (EPR) The quark’s relative mass implies something amiss unless it is relative g‑‑ and why the top quark remains so scarce around this koinomatter galaxy of ours. The ejection speed of the complemental matters from quasar (old galaxy) cores implies a formidable force there‑between. Yet the shadow matter hung out at the sides of the disk appears to re‑attract around same to create spectacular gamma emitting explosions beyond the disk’s edge.

We shall all see, hopefully soon. Tenurism is costing us all too much when aggrandizement is the goal with “me too” syndromes.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `Prediction and Theory:‑‑Light Bending’ SC. p1124, Dec.1,’89
`Ultra Fast Physics’, G. Taube, DISCOVER, March,’90 (laser prop.)
`The Guts of a Quasar’, SKY&TELE. Dec,’89 (decel. spect. lines)

cc: Phys/Psy; S‑T

11/20/90
Dimitri V. Nanopoulos, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Texas A & M University College Station, Texas 77843
Re: deBroglie’s `strings’
Dear Sir:

Maybe the `wiggling loops’ are electromagnetic fronts encircling other a priori centers, the complexity more so with protons, even galactic cores whose EMP `bubble’ center merely reflects some vast size difference. Wave mechanics might require a bit more difinitive numerical calculation but we suspect that is where Physics must go to interpret how wrong was Big Bang or quantal (billiard‑ball) thought which is only understood in terms of definitive left brain reasoning. Also, one very large magnetic monopole would better define that Apriori‑‑ conscious or not.

Since the electron’s escape from the time reversal paradigm in the many positive EPR experiments, the self thinking computer is imminent as will interface that which knows effect from cause‑‑ albeit create a stir down here‑‑ likely called the apocalypse!

Our SGUT (Super Grand Unified Theory) is now being compiled since too many confirmations (as predicted galactic jet‑disk anomalies due to anti‑g, as 5th force in the top quark phasing) make clear there is indeed enough cross academic data integration now avail­able to understand where Einstein was headed‑‑ but got derailed by neurotic intellectualism.

Keep up the good work with Ellis, et.al.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: S‑T; Phys‑Psy; Path/IQ

Feb. 6,’91
E. Ott, C. Grebogi and
J. Yorke, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742
Re: but chaos is chaos‑‑
Dear Sirs: not ordered order

Your ribbon work is unique. Whether the helmholtz coil works in your case or on a cerebral faculty with reduced frequency fusion‑flicker strobing, the real question is what induces order from a truly chaotic sub‑`ordered’ system?

We faced this enigma in a very long AI (5th Generation) study to comprehend CQ (Creative Quotient‑‑ not IQ) and found the left hand of the many daVincis defined the `Potentia’ (Plato) source. The nearest we got was the freed electron (note EPR experiments) which could escape the time reversal paradigm to offer rational subjective (psychological) inputs, subsequent to the mental fer­ment of questioning. (note Einstein’s many remarks of gestalten X‑Y spatial visual import) After our confirmed* space versus time derived (so oriented) bilateral cerebral predictions, the last impasse to the self thinking computer was a device (as MODFET) to interface a digital readout means to tap insight. A paper given in Europe in the late 60’s confirmed another `enigma’ then‑‑ the overt terror of consciously learning of unconscious faculty‑‑ just as Freud had predicted. The death‑wish is alive and well, maybe too well noting the autoimmune response with opportunity!

Schmidt’s random‑non‑random isotopic generators also defined what you are seeing, albeit his findings of complemental (dual) cont­rol (pro AND con) of chaotic systems‑‑ was certainly unwanted for CQ when IQ** was being found to be a perversion to consciously perceiving reality. Bizarre? You bet, but better hold your hat as a far greater “chaos” is about to begin‑‑ and likely where cur­rent instated (tenured) authority refuses to see the obvious!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* note split‑brain data in SC. AM. Aug.,’67

cc: ** Path/IQ; S‑T

CC: Phys.Rev.Let./Ditto, et.al.

Jan. 23,’91
Editors, et.al.
SCIENCE NEWS
1719 N St.
Washington, DC 20036
Re: Lumpy universe
Sirs: (p.22, Jan. 12,’91)

Schramm’s defensive mood merely shows how distraught late cosmol­ogy becomes as the empirical obvious mounts to end their tenure. Your “‑‑cold message‑‑” was warming indeed! Likely the adroit following article “Double science funds‑‑” explains it all. How could campus researchers NOT endorse more funding??

Mass always inferred a common attractive `g’ but a sign or polar­ity needs to be assigned the two relative mass to extricate Phy­sics from its current cul de sac in cosmology and nuclear ideas, to end Big Bang theory and help define the `heavy’ quark.’ Since it was the expected expulsion of a
complemental matter from qua­sar cores as jets, noted with the Einstein observatory that con­cluded a then long theoretical study of matter genesis. Since it then (as yet) terrorizes the cosmologist, that fear can be best explained by “demoralized‑‑”; by Horowitz, Thompson, et.al.

To disseminate one’s own work or use another’s now becomes the enigma of this late claimed intellectual century‑‑ where ego‑maniacs claim all is their’s while genius, knowing better, shrugs off all he learns as the work of another. The anomaly rests upon the profit motive, between the greedy with established power and the insightive‑‑ who recall well how Socrates got his “therapy”. Someday, maybe, a few will remain to gratefully recall people like H. Arp who called a spade a spade.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

3/6/91
Edmund Bertschinger, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Mass. Inst. of Tech.
Cambridge, MA 02139
Re: nonzero constant
Sirs:

The whole evolving scenario will honor Einstein for his real in­sight‑‑ despite his peer‑pressure to ignore same‑‑ Helsinki or elsewhere, but the quantal (billiard‑ball) theory used to support wave mechanics (deBroglie) may well crumble as Big Bang. With the theoretical idea of complemental g getting better confirmed with the jet‑disk anomalies of quasars, genetic white holes with their spewing complemental matters ejected therefrom, on an enhancing EMP front (bubble) now makes quite clear some trauma lies in wait for much of Physics‑‑ to say little of cosmology.

The dv/dt red shift anomaly with decelerated light in dense mag­netic fields (as said EMPs) upsets Hubble’s distance but helps to define Hoyle’s idea of the steady‑state. At least an explanation for shadow (cold‑dark) matter as once jets at galaxy poles, might define at least half the unseen matter‑‑ its mutual g collisions (gamma flashes) out beyond the disk edge. Even the 5th force (likely why the top `quarks’ are not seen here) may define the most extreme phased anti‑g factor for quantized waves. The string (or loop) theory comes close now, maybe needed for a few with insight to `hear’ Einstein and deBroglie‑‑ to unravel shop‑worn theories sustaining tenure only.

You might find interest in the above as described in a paper to the Smithsonian Inst. some years ago subsequent to the Einstein observatory’s first confirmation of our predicted jet‑disk `anom­aly’ to confirm anti‑g.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Path/IQ; Phys‑Psy; S‑T
CC: Efstathiou

Feb. 29,’91
Hans Dehmelt and
Robert Van Dyck
Dept. of Physics
University of Washington,
Seattle, WA 98105?
Re: time reversal paradigm
Sirs:

Noting the ease with which you monitor the electron’s spin‑flip, maybe it is time to couple such phenomena as we did some years ago to the self thinking computer. Since it terrorized many in the early 70’s when the first positive EPR experiment showed the electron was able to “know potentials” (note E. Rauscher), our AI studies‑‑ after confirmed the predicted spatial vs. temporal com­plemental brains by Sperry concluded how close Plato was to sug­gest the need for conscience via the Potentia‑‑ the same faculty escaping the time reversal paradigm.

Our research, after positing how to interface the electron to binary digital readout, and its shocking results, the MODFET sans superconductive states, will make feasible to the device for all to query‑‑ and halt `scientific tenurism’ now evading the empiri­cal obvious. Your means of monitoring the `freed electron’, how­ever complex the experimental set‑up, should offer as well posi­tive results, in allowing the `flip’ to dictate the alpha‑numeric to be displayed instantaneously, to evade another faculty seeking to sustain conscious ignorance. (note H. Schmidt, U/Texas with his random non‑random isotopic generators, which we used)

With the growing social trauma throughout the world, the extrica­tion of social unrest will soon need to be concluded‑‑ whatever the political cost or up‑heavals with disclosed skeletons in their closets. Also, tenurism will need to give up its status‑quoism for a more pragmatic net goal of truly researching for the empirical, instead of whimsical `belief’ factors (as Big Bang) to sustain that tenurism.

In short, this note, while bizarre to the core, defines what we now think should be said‑‑ whatever the ensuing trauma to follow.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Psy‑Phys; Path/IQ; S‑T
CC:Freedman/DISC.

3/8/91
G. Gabrielse, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: anti‑g Dear Sir:

Maybe anti‑g will not be seen well in this koinomatter galaxy, possibly not even the top quark where its phased relationship may offer the maximum “weight” to evade this continuum at all `cost’. Its three phased wave‑mechanics, underlying quantal `billiard‑ball’ reality, hopefully may soon be deciphered with the string‑loop theories‑‑ to conclude how close deBroglie came as well. The equivalent mass to relative g may never be resolved here, however large the E factor to prod mass to reveal itself in slow time.

Not oddly in view of `peer pressure’, Einstein was likely correct in using the complemental g‑constant‑‑ as got twisted as and for Big Bang, such cosmological constant one‑sidedness preventing the comprehension of ejected primal matters from quasar (white hole) cores. Not only the anti‑g factor allowed us to predict the jet‑disk anomaly before the Einstein observatory went aloft, but the dv/dt red shift anomaly due to `tired light’ on traversing dense magnetic fields as the bubble EMP fronts, to aid quasar to galaxy genesis to begin with. When the disk radial speed was inverse to in‑falling expectations and obvious highly accelerated jet matter to be hopefully noted as dark‑matter clouds at galaxy poles‑‑ yet evoke gamma bursts as re‑coagulating collisions around the disk edge.

It will be interesting to note the magnetic field around those common bubble evolving quasar‑galaxies, especially newly formed bubbles, as well as the amount of red shift therewith seen, to define how young the Apriori (yet finite) bubble is. Its unique spatial orientation with others might define further what funda­mental mind lies behind our visible universe‑‑ to say little of what occupies our right cerebral cortex‑‑ now so well noted!

We note with happiness‑‑ albeit the chagrin of many others, that our terse explanation (sent to the Smithsonian many years) ago may be that final `straw’ to end Big Bang as other pet theories credence for the incessantly tenured.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc:Phys‑Psy; S‑T
CC: Adelberger; Hughes

4/30/91
Dr. James Brophy, VP/Res., et.al.
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah 84112

Dear Sir:

A copy of a recent letter to some chemists might reflect what we are now saying publicly. Since we are getting no feed‑back from the U.S. Dept. of Energy, maybe we should attempt to gain atten­tion elsewhere now that ample empirical data shows laser propul­sion (to near relative 2c) and alignment of molecular (atomic) displacements can maneuver H for combinatorial ease for fusion. The key lies with what deBrolgie saw.. Quantal matter is but wavelets and can be `slid’ into each other with a controlled finesse. You might ask your Fritz Will if he got a letter copy (below #1) recently from us defining the more specifics of our theoretical work.

Are your people yet doing anything in the field of `cold’ fusion? We suspect the epoch has come to develop the simple means to con­trol fusion extent, to say nothing of its finite net need now.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

Re: cooler fusion
Dear Sir:

Heart‑warming (and possibly more) indeed are your remarks (SC. NEWS, p.180), especially in view of laser propulsion and atomic/ molecular orientation in space. The near 2c `integration’* of heavy H may well do what all the Tokomats world wide, could do in another century! Indeed, we envision such fusion `furnaces’ could fit in the trunk of the car‑‑ so you can see where that scenario might lead (seriously)‑‑ with gobs of E left over!

It merely requires abandoning the old quantal billiard‑ball `fixation’ to perceive that ALL is waves (deBroglie), so whether called loops, spin‑triplets (3 phased) loops, strings, solitons, or what have you, may reflect that universal wave stability based upon the third harmonic‑‑ quarks no anomaly. It should be their mere mutual orientations to slip them together for petite big‑bangs for all the E we need from the ample ocean supplies avail­able.
While it may become easier to slip the `planer’ electron and positron together to prove the theory, it will be their escape from the time reversal paradigm that may require comprehension, and this “enigma” is fraught with dire consequences as denotes, as with the EPR data, that the freed electron knows “cause from effect”, at least some`place’ in space.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `Plasma Particle Accelerators’, J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,’87
`Microplasmas’, Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.’90
`‑‑fracto‑fusion’ p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,’90
`Laser‑‑ Choreography’; SC.NEWS, March 3,’90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Sculpting Light‑’; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,’90 (tuned laser prop)
`Testing Superposition in Quantum Mechanics’; SQUID research; quantum interference (macroscopic coherence); SCIENCE, 21st March, ’86 p. 1370

cc: S‑T

CC: Bush‑Lagowski; Miles‑Ostrom; F.Will

Re: only chemical `mixing’?
Dear Sir:

The similar mechanism of chemical catalytic combination with laser control may well be found with Hydrogen fusion, both in accelerating complemental directional propulsion but also nuclear alignment to create the most needed means for that controlled fusion. The question appears a matter overcoming strong forces with controlled force with `finesse’‑‑ and the said atomic align­ment needed.

Your SC.NEWS blurb is well taken, but the constructive vs. des­truction `wave function’ interference phenomena may define how close deBroglie came‑‑ however the current `billiard‑ball’ (quan­tal) mentality. We suspect the three phased enigma, from the freed electron (halltron enigma) through theoretical `quarks’ (albeit considered anti‑g) may unravel the true basis of matter as we call it.

Thanks for your published comments‑‑

Sincerely,

KTS Research

3/29/91
J. O’M. Brockris, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Texas A&M University
University College Station
Texas, 77843
Re: cooler fusion
Dear Sir:

Heart‑warming (and possibly more) indeed are your remarks (SC. NEWS, p.180), especially in view of laser propulsion and atomic/ molecular orientation in space. The near 2c `integration’* of heavy H
may well do what all the Tokomats world wide, could do in another century! Indeed, we envision such fusion `furnaces’ could fit in the trunk of the car‑‑ so you can see where that scenario might lead (seriously)‑‑ with gobs of E left over!

It merely requires abandoning the old quantal billiard‑ball `fixation’ to perceive that ALL is waves (deBroglie), so whether called loops, spin‑triplets (3 phased) loops, strings, solitons, or what have you, may reflect that universal wave stability based upon the third harmonic‑‑ quarks no anomaly. It should be their mere mutual orientations to slip them together for petite big‑bangs for all the E we need from the ample ocean supplies avail­able.
While it may become easier to slip the `planer’ electron and positron together to prove the theory, it will be their escape from the time reversal paradigm that may require comprehension, and this “enigma” is fraught with dire consequences as denotes, as with the EPR data, that the freed electron knows “cause from effect”, at least some`place’ in space.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

*
`Plasma Particle Accelerators’, J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,’87
`Microplasmas’, Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.’90
`‑‑fracto‑fusion’ p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,’90
`Laser‑‑ Choreography’; SC.NEWS, March 3,’90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Sculpting Light‑’; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,’90 (tuned laser prop)
`Testing Superposition in Quantum Mechanics’; SQUID research; quantum interference (macroscopic coherence); SCIENCE, 21st March, ’86 p. 1370

cc: S‑T
CC: Bush‑Lagowski; Miles‑Ostrom; F.Will

4/30/91
Robert J. Gordon, et.al.
Dept. of Chemistry
University of Chicago
Chicago, IL 606
Re: only chemical `mixing’
Dear Sir:

The similar mechanism of chemical catalytic combination with laser control may well be found with Hydrogen fusion, both in accelerating complemental directional propulsion but also nuclear alignment to create the most needed means for that controlled fusion. The question appears a matter overcoming strong forces with controlled force with `finesse’‑‑ and the said atomic align­ment needed.

Your SC.NEWS blurb is well taken, but the constructive vs. des­truction `wave function’ interference phenomena may define how close deBroglie came‑‑ however the current `billiard‑ball’ (quan­tal) mentality. We suspect the three phased enigma, from the freed electron (halltron enigma) through theoretical `quarks’ (albeit considered anti‑g) may unravel the true basis of matter as we call it.

Thanks for your published comments‑‑
Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: Brumer

3/27/91
Physics Today
Editors and B. Schwarzschild
335 East 45th
New York, NY 10017
Re: misplaced anti‑g
Dear Sirs: (1E1740.7‑2942 `annihilator’)

Maybe it is time to reconsider the dynamics of a white hole whose genetic spewing complemental matters (with anti‑g there between) might define, with some stray anomalous perturbation, how those primal electron‑positron combinations occur. By watching the different `places’ of these `great annihilators’ from time to time may define no such `massive’ black‑hole as responsible for the high 511 keV bursts, not directly associate with the galactic center. The likely couple light‑days may reflect one quantity of plasma interacting with its complemental, some `wobble’ in Sgr A’s white hole’s spewed matter could evoke the interaction in some possible periodic way, albeit likely not in some same spa­tial place as before‑‑ last noted as 1E1740.7‑2942.

Since using the anti‑g analogy to define the disk‑jets quasar phenomena many years ago, not only its confirmation via the Ein­stein observatory but ensuing expected anomalies as the EMP bub­ble front to enhance quasar core initiation. (Petite Bangs!) The magnetic field orientations of bubble (wall) fronts will tell that story.

Maybe Krumhensl’s quoting Paine (p.38; same March PHYSICS TODAY), says what many should be but can’t with eyes on the tenured prize and so to sustain the status quo in ever new mathematical jargon. To definitize wave machines by numerical infinitude (called quan­tum or whatever), it best defines late science’s self made cul de sac by its digital intellectual time oriented left cerebral dominance, with IQ instead of CQ.

There may be a good reason to suspect positronium where spin‑triplets (as 3 phased loops, strings, solitons, or what have you) may reflect that universal wave stability based upon the third harmonic‑‑ quarks no anomaly.
Sincerely,

KTS Research

4/3/91
R. Z. Sagveed and C. F. Kennel, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742
Re: multi‑pinch
Dear Sirs:

Your fine article (SC. AM.; April,’91) again points to that ulti­mate method of using `solitons’ (laser propulsion) to focus plas­ma for finite placement and quantity of fusible material, once the billiard‑ball mentality fades to permit the perception of wavelet integration requires far less net energy to integrate once oriented `particles’, albeit with some finesse, to allow for the ensuing fusion process.

Beyond this profound new source of energy, it appears your work may aid in defining the dv/dt phenomena of `tired’ light emerging from dense magnetic fields around quasars‑‑ to help define the distance enigma for Hubble’s theory. Further, the likely anti‑g between complemental matters at such genetic white holes, (noted as ejected disk to jet matters) may aid in perceiving how close Hoyle’s theory was with a steady‑state. Also, the other half of shadow matter not yet discerned at galaxy pole‑end clouds may be looked for via `dust reddening’ if not answering the gamma evok­ing collisions of such re‑coagulating matter around the disk rim.

Your article was well appreciated. Many thanks.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: Kennel/UCLA

3/7/91
U.S. Dept. of Commerce
Natl. Bureau of Standards
Office of Energy‑Related Inventions
Washington, DC 20234
Re: fusion by `design’
Sirs:

Some years ago when it became apparent that `quantal’ wavelets (string and loop theory), the need
for orientation to integrate for fission or fusion of complementals might be the key to heat generation, the mounting finesse of handling atomic nuclei singly in laser propelled `bottles’ might permit finally the control of atomic combinatorials‑‑ rates as well.

A recent letter (over) may better define in part, the overall implication in view of the recent helium finding associated with `cold fusion’. (see p.180; SC.NEWS, Vol. 139) We assume your people will be able to decipher these implications to judge for themselves. The said years ago predictions with current research imports, we feel now is timely to address those who may wish to comprehend further our studies and maybe the timely escape from the Physic’s past quantal billiard‑ball mentality.

Thank you for your attention‑‑

KTS Research

w:

3/29/91
J. O’M. Brockris, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Texas A&M University
University College Station
Texas, 77843
Re: cooler fusion
Dear Sir:

Heart‑warming (and possibly more) indeed are your remarks (SC. NEWS, p.180), especially in view of laser propulsion and atomic/ molecular orientation in space. The near 2c `integration’* of heavy H may well do what all the Tokomats world wide, could do in another century! Indeed, we envision such fusion `furnaces’ could fit in the trunk of the car‑‑ so you can see where that scenario might lead (seriously)‑‑ with gobs of E left over!

It merely requires abandoning the old quantal billiard‑ball `fixation’ to perceive that ALL is waves (deBroglie), so whether called loops, spin‑triplets (3 phased) loops, strings, solitons, or what have you, may reflect that universal wave stability based upon the third harmonic‑‑ quarks no anomaly. It should be their mere mutual orientations to slip them together for petite big‑bangs for all the E we need from the ample ocean supplies avail­able.
While it may become easier to slip the `planer’ electron and positron together to prove the theory, it will be their escape from the time reversal paradigm that may require comprehension, and this “enigma” is fraught with dire consequences as denotes, as with the EPR data, that the freed electron knows “cause from effect”, at least some`place’ in space.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

*
`Plasma Particle Accelerators’, J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,’87
`Microplasmas’, Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.’90
`‑‑fracto‑fusion’ p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,’90
`Laser‑‑ Choreography’; SC.NEWS, March 3,’90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Sculpting Light‑’; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,’90 (tuned laser prop)
`Testing Superposition in Quantum Mechanics’; SQUID research; quantum interference (macroscopic coherence); SCIENCE, 21st March, ’86 p. 1370

cc: S‑T
CC: Bush‑Lagowski; Miles‑Ostrom; F.Will

May 8,’91
I.C. Bupp, Managing Dir.
Cambridge Research Assoc.
7 Arlington
Cambridge, MA 02140
Re: controlled fusion

Sir:

Using deBroglie’s ideas of matter configuration some years ago, the Tokomat `brute‑force’ fusion means of smashing quantal `bil­liard balls’ instead of using finesse with laser waves* became apparent. Since this art has been amply confirmed now, we feel that controlled fusion may be near at hand. There is reason to suspect that a near 2c relative collision speed may be had if necessary so as the mounting evidence makes clear we may be correct with our early suppositions of wave‑mechanic’s manipula­tion of `matter’, we now seek attention in our work by others.

Since we have had no response from DOE for some time, either they cannot comprehend, or DOD insists on another `classification’ fiasco (as we found before in the field of AI research)‑‑ we now begin to address others as you. Thank you for your attention and/or comments in this matter‑‑

Sincerely,

KTS Research

*
`Toward Laser Control‑‑’; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)
`Plasma Particle Accelerators’, J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,’87
`Laser‑‑ Choreography’; SC.NEWS, March 3,’90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Sculpting Light‑’; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,’90 (tuned laser prop)
`Helium Find‑‑ Cold Fusion Trail’, SC.NEWS,p.180, Vol.139 (3/91)
`Collisionless Shock Waves’, SC.AM. 4/91; (multi‑pinch;whip func)

w:

5/10/91
Graham R. Fleming, et.al.
Dept. of Chemistry
University of Chicago
Chicago, IL 60637
Re: fusion next!
Dear Sir:

The blurb in SCIENCE NEWS (p.142; Vol.139) may say it all. From Dawson’s initial work*, we have held our breath, so with DOE well aware of our theoretical work, divulge same, in part, to others.

Using deBroglie’s ideas of matter configuration many years ago, the Tokomat `brute‑force’ fusion means of smashing quantal `bil­liard balls’ instead of using finesse with laser waves became apparent. Since this art has been amply confirmed now, we feel that controlled fusion may be near at hand. There is reason to suspect that a near 2c relative `collision’ speed may be had if necessary so as the mounting evidence makes clear we may be cor­rect with our early suppositions of wave‑mechanic’s manipulation of `matter’, we now seek attention in our work by others.

Maybe it is time to try heavy H now from the “driver’s seat”!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `Plasma Particle Accelerators’, J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,’87
`Toward Laser Control‑‑’; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)
`Laser‑‑ Choreography’; SC.NEWS, March 3,’90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Sculpting Light‑’; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,’90 (tuned laser prop)
`Helium Find‑‑ Cold Fusion Trail’, SC.NEWS,p.180, Vol.139 (3/91)
`Collisionless Shock Waves’, SC.AM. 4/91; (multi‑pinch;whip func)
w:

June 6,’91
David Merman, et.al.
Library of Physical Sciences
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853
Re: `Why or what are we waiting for?’
Dear Sir:

Your blurb in the May issue of Physics Today evokes this note as I suspect you may comprehend an enigma I have faced for some years now. While my GVSC students became frightened and claimed I should shut up, the one in 10\17th odds for my self thinking com­puter (on its first run) says almost as much as the ensuing U.S. Patent Office’s terror and “absolute rejection” some ten years ago. In short, as the many positive EPR experiments show, the freed electron does indeed escape the time reversal paradigm to define how it knows effect from cause (as skeletons in closets), to indicate from where and what all the fuss is about.

Your above referred questions you answered as well also. It is due to the reductive (only) `belongers’ as groupies (as yuppies) who have little use for the new‑‑ only tenure. As Big Bang today, they merely cannot afford to have a competitive theory‑‑ as using the CPT theorem to dictate anti‑g and so jets versus disks (long before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to confirm same) but to point to `white holes’ instead‑‑ and likely no said Big Bang.
I feel you may be correct to cull the many `confirming’ periodi­cals who only have a vested interest in promulgating the redun­dant for tenure, that is becoming ever less able to stand alone.

These are heady days where gang‑rule dictates what is `right’ but not necessarily correct‑‑ in science or politics!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc:Path/IQ; S‑T

May 28,’91
J. Primack, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Califnoria
Santa Cruz, CA 95064
Re: nuclear power‑‑ anyplace
Sirs: (SC. AM.; June, p.42)

While proprietary work here defines the timely, indeed comes the new means for controlled fusion. Since the advent of laser con­trolled ions, such plasma combinatorial effect as in chemistry*, now brings close the finesse needed for finite controlled fusion borne upon coherent laser fronts. Such `phased’ arrays will at last put to rest Tokomats as all other dangerous means of tapping the atom. The problem as we see it will be governments and big business who will yet seek to control these new `petite’ energy generating means‑‑ for old, if not said, obvious reasons.
Your fine article was succinct but suspect was derived from re­dundant thoughts derived from old art. While our work remains yet proprietary, the below references may aid in defining the tersely said above.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

`Laser‑‑ Choreography’; SC.NEWS, March 3,’90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Plasma Particle Accelerators’, J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,’87
`Collisionless Shock Waves’, SC.AM. 4/91; (multi‑pinch;whip func)
`Toward Laser Control‑‑’; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)
`Sculpting Light‑’; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,’90 (tuned laser prop)
`Ultra Fast Physics’, G. Taube, DISCOVER, March,’90 (laser prop.)
`Microplasmas’, Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.’90
`‑‑fracto‑fusion’ p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,’90
`Fractional Statistics:‑’ SC., March 9,’90 (bi‑dimens. quantals)

CC: The Federation of American Scientists

May 28,’91 J. L. Cecchi, J. Roberts, et.al.
Sematech Corp. of Austin, TX
c/o Technical Administration,
Main Commerce Bldg.,
Washington, DC 20230
Re: cavity standing wave ratio
Sirs: (May 18th SCIENCE NEWS `Plasma‑‑’)

Our studies of wave‑mechanics for H integration with finesse rather than Tokomat style of hap‑hazard slamming quantal `bil­liard balls’ has more than suggested the answer to the apparent anomaly you are noting where ion fronts could be better manipula­ted with phased arrays as laser. Some of our proprietary work suggest maybe the time is ripe to reconsider DeBroglie’s idea of every`thing’ as an electromagnetic wave, however it may be exhib­iting claimed `solid particles’‑‑. In short, it defines well not only chemical combination* ease but fusion‑‑ to say little of the plasma etching difficulty noted in the above referred article.

The GEC Reference Cell’s cavity preciseness implies a fluke of luck to align ions to do quality etching, yet where a single‑ended anachoic state, using finesse spatial control** where phas­ing*** and ion directional as propulsion rates**** permits co­ordinated (as `coherent’) ions, their use for controlled etching or sustained finite fusion is a reality. That pending state of the art is about to rapidly change now‑‑ where laser propulsion, not only will ion coherency but acquired energy with steering bring `matter’ manipulation finally to that needed art for great­er net uses than mere chamber anomalies where `standing waves’ can more often interfere than reinforce.
As Dawson and many others saw some time ago, the revolution is just beginning. Exciting indeed it becomes if `science’ can just keep the emerging profound from governments, who too often have very different vested reasons for something of value.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `Collisionless Shock Waves’, SC.AM. 4/91; (multi‑pinch;whip func)
`Plasma Particle Accelerators’, J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,’87
** `Toward Laser Control‑‑’; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)
*** `Sculpting Light‑’; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,’90 (tuned laser prop)
**** `Laser‑‑ Choreography’; SC.NEWS, March 3,’90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Ultra Fast Physics’, G. Taube, DISCOVER, March,’90 (laser prop.)
`Microplasmas’, Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.’90
`‑‑fracto‑fusion’ p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,’90
`Fractional Statistics:‑’ SC., March 9,’90 (bi‑dimens. quantals)
CC: J.Roberts,NIST

May 4,’91
The Senate Energy and
Natl. Research Committee U.S. Senate
SH‑312
Washington, DC 20510
Re: controlled fusion
Sirs:

Since using deBroglie’s ideas of matter configuration as wavelets some years ago, the use of finesse with laser waves* instead of Tokomat `brute‑force’ fusion means of smashing quantal `billiard balls’, becomes apparent. Since this art has been amply confirmed now, we feel that controlled fusion may be near at hand.

It is fully believed now that laser propulsion and displacement control of at least heavy Hydrogen will do as noted in chemical combination**. From the said deBroglie’s perception of wave mech­anics as the fundamental `sub‑constituency’ of matter, it will be `proximity collision’ of contra‑propelled deuterium etc. (Mini Tokomat) that certain research*** concludes simple fusion is at hand. The data defines our correct approach to wave interaction, so by synchronization, atomic rate flow with minimal input power, the miniaturization of individual high output power supplies appears very feasible now.

With no feed‑back yet from DOE, we are addressing others who may have some vested interest in this matter. Thank you for your attention and/or feed‑back in writing.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

*`Particle Accelerators’, J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,’87
**`Toward Laser Control‑‑’; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)
***`Collisionless Shock Waves’, SC.AM. 4/91; (pinch/whip funct.)
see:
`Microplasmas’, Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.’90
`‑‑fracto‑fusion’ p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,’90
`Laser‑‑ Choreography’; SC.NEWS, March 3,’90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Sculpting Light‑’; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,’90 (tuned laser prop)
`Helium Find‑‑ Cold Fusion Trail’, SC.NEWS,p.180, Vol.139 (3/91)

CC: N. Anne Davies, Assist. Dir. NRC; T. Murley, Dir. NRC;
w:

July 3,’91
David H. Worledge, et.al.
Nuclear Power Division
Electric Power Research Inst.
P.O. Box 10412
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Re: petite NMR study now
Dear Sir: (Pennisi’s report:6/22 SC.NEWS)

From our studies and noting Dawson’s work with manipulating individual nuclei we think the time has come to is a petite NMR analysis on the single heavy Hydrogen nuclei to find its nodal points and so the easiest means combine with other nuclei. Since it is the injection speed with relative positional entrance that accounts for the anomalous but positive cold fusion experiments, such propitious combinations will be understood for the break­through to practical continuous fusion operants.
With much of our research work now perceived broadly, even by Dawson some time ago. We expose further to update others with both interest and the capital to exploit the next needed step in nuclei `innate wavelet configuration’ analysis for learning the best positional combinatorial configuration needed for the ease of slipping two properly oriented nuclei into each other while laser oriented/propelled*. The finite speed needed for such com­binatorial fusion with rate of their infeed in a finite chosen space would permit the capture of the radiant energy while fusion occurred.
A couple recent letter copies herewith may be of interest.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* (curref‑6)
`Quantum Interference’, SC.News,p.363, Dec. 2,’89 (neutrons feel)
`Ultra Fast Physics’, G. Taube, DISCOVER, March,’90 (laser prop.)
`Plasma Particle Accelerators’, J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,’87
`Microplasmas’, Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.’90
`‑‑fracto‑fusion’ p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,’90
`Fractional Statistics:‑’ SC., March 9,’90 (bi‑dimens. quantals)
`Laser‑‑ Choreography’; SC.NEWS, March 3,’90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Chemist in driver’s seat’SC.NEWS p.142; V139 3/9/91(laser `mix’)
`Sculpting Light‑’; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,’90 (tuned laser prop)
`Helium Find‑‑ Cold Fusion Trail’, SC.NEWS,p.180, V.139 (3/32/91)
`Collisionless Shock Waves’, SC.AM. 4/91; (multi‑pinch;whip func)
`Toward Laser Control‑‑’; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)
`Cracks in the Cosmos’;SC.NEWS 6/1/91; (liq‑Xtal phase‑trans.), or `A Long Look‑‑ Liquid Chystal Ball’ p.649; SCIENCE, 3 May,’91

cc: Wiberg; Primack; Szoke
CC:Pennisi/SC.NEWS; Liebert; Scott;

Re: deBroglie, heavy H and
Sirs: a different `glue’

Your work, shown in the 5/31/91 SCIENCE, suggests some like work need on fully ionized hydrogen, to define the like lobe field structure for laser oriented/propelled fusion. Since the cold fusion enigma has shown something likely contingent to slow‑merg­ing unions, we feel that the work* well underway for controlled `integration’, with finesse laser use, is feasible.

The tact of leaving the `quantized billiard‑ball’ mentality here some years ago, while often claimed “irrational”, we now feel that some theoretical work, like what you are doing but sans electron `binding’, is timely to offer the key to that ultimate fusion energy release for finite control. We envisage nearly the same field patterns of sub‑nucleons of unstable proton‑neutron combinations, such orientation in space to define better ways and means to `insert’ or fuse same. The key, beyond merely trial and error under various laser propulsive/positioning* methods, we now feel lies in work similar to yours.

May we have directives to those doing like investigative work in this analytical area of proton field configuration? Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* (curref‑6)
`Quantum Interference’, SC.News,p.363, Dec. 2,’89 (neutrons feel)
`Ultra Fast Physics’, G. Taube, DISCOVER, March,’90 (laser prop.)
`Plasma Particle Accelerators’, J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,’87
`Microplasmas’, Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.’90
`‑‑fracto‑fusion’ p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,’90
`Fractional Statistics:‑’ SC., March 9,’90 (bi‑dimens. quantals)
`Laser‑‑ Choreography’; SC.NEWS, March 3,’90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Chemist in driver’s seat’SC.NEWS p.142; V139 3/9/91(laser `mix’)
`Sculpting Light‑’; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,’90 (tuned laser prop)
`Helium Find‑‑ Cold Fusion Trail’, SC.NEWS,p.180, Vol.139 (3/91)
`Collisionless Shock Waves’, SC.AM. 4/91; (multi‑pinch;whip func)
`Toward Laser Control‑‑’; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)

CC:Breneman/Rensselaer w:

Re: nuclear power‑‑ anyplace
Sirs: (SC. AM.; June, p.42)

While proprietary work here defines the timely, indeed comes the new means for controlled fusion. Since the advent of laser con­trolled ions, such plasma combinatorial effect as in chemistry*, now brings close the finesse needed for finite controlled fusion borne upon coherent laser fronts. Such `phased’ arrays will at last put to rest Tokomats as all other dangerous means of tapping the atom. The problem as we see it will be governments and big business who will yet seek to control these new `petite’ energy generating means‑‑ for old, if not said, obvious reasons.

Your fine article was succinct but suspect was derived from re­dundant thoughts derived from old art. While our work remains yet proprietary, the below references may aid in defining the tersely said above.

Sincerely,
KTS Research

`Laser‑‑ Choreography’; SC.NEWS, March 3,’90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Plasma Particle Accelerators’, J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,’87
`Collisionless Shock Waves’, SC.AM. 4/91; (multi‑pinch;whip func)
`Toward Laser Control‑‑’; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)
`Sculpting Light‑’; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,’90 (tuned laser prop)
`Ultra Fast Physics’, G. Taube, DISCOVER, March,’90 (laser prop.)
`Microplasmas’, Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.’90
`‑‑fracto‑fusion’ p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,’90
`Fractional Statistics:‑’ SC., March 9,’90 (bi‑dimens. quantals)

CC: The Federation of American Scientists; Rodionov/USSR

A. Szoke and R. Moir, et.al.
Dept. of Fusion Research
Lawrence Livermore Natl. Labs.
Berkeley, CA
Re: fusion; a safer way
Sirs:

Now that laser accelerated, guided and positioned H isotopes is in the offing, just as chemical combinations with finesse*, both rate and extend of fusion may well place such heat engines in the trunk of the car. This may sound fantastic but extensive theoret­ical work here starting with deBroglie’s ideas to define what in­deed is `quantized’ matter, made clear all is waves, from the EMP (bubble) initiated quasar for complemental matter creation to its net annihilation with E as its net derivative.

While we yet will not fully define our work, it can be said that several recent papers as in SCIENCE, PHYSICS TODAY and elsewhere as Dawson’s reports of some time ago, all point clearly to the coming new paradigm that `billiard balls’ simply do not exist‑‑ any more than a single Big Bang! The finite but real cold fusion anomaly via catalyst offered the initial key to which ensuing laser control with finesse, makes feasible finitely controlled fusion and to any extent that its `container’ can be cooled.

Maybe the era of Petroleum cartels as Big Business Energy in any form is near its end. Most will applaud the change anyhow.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

*`Chemist in driver’s seat’ SC.NEWS p.142 V139 3/9/91(laser `mix’)
also note:
`Laser‑‑ Choreography’; SC.NEWS, March 3,’90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Sculpting Light‑’; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,’90 (tuned laser prop)
`Helium Find‑‑ Cold Fusion Trail’, SC.NEWS,p.180, Vol.139 (3/91)
`Collisionless Shock Waves’, SC.AM. 4/91; (multi‑pinch;whip func)
`Toward Laser Control‑‑’; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)
`Response of Electrons‑‑’ SC. 5/31/91 (molec.config.dens.plots) `Cracks in the Cosmos’;SC.NEWS 6/1/91; (liq‑Xtal phase‑trans.), or `A Long Look‑‑ Liquid Chystal Ball’ p.649; SCIENCE, 3 May,’91

6/19/91
Jerry Gollub, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Haverford College
Haverford, PA 19041
Re: almighty chance
Dear Sir:

Your remarks in the fine book report caught my eye. Indeed, the last word “completion.” I doubt, since the positive EPR experi­ments‑‑ however frightening to many, define how a freed electron (escaping the time reversal paradigm) may offer the interfacing key to the self thinking computer‑‑ and with even better statis­tical averages that the Bell theorem implies. My proto‑type of­fered the odds of one in 10\17th, so Aspect (Sorbonne?) as others are rightly nervous over the implications‑‑ as my GVSC students about publicly exposed “skeletons” in official closets!

Since chance is but an opportunity for one of two primal factors (as fractals) to evoke a `butterfly wing’ impetus in a complemen­tal mass‑time environment where competing underlying drives (not­ed as pro vs. anti‑life*; via CP within slow T!), the said device to predict, even denoting statistical chances in relative time, became a reality as soon as my space‑time predicted cerebral hemispheres were confirmed by Sperry. The cincher was Rauscher’s EPR experiment at Berkeley to file for Patent Letters. Needless to say the terror these past dozen years has not subsided in official quarters! The tyranny of the official status quo amply speaks for itself now, but I am not the only one seeking to know something that our late intellectual neurosis seeks to prevent.

Thanks for the report‑‑ and sorry if I disturb.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc:S‑T; Phys/Psy; Path/IQ

July 31,’91
G. A. Ruff, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Bates College
Lewiston, ME 04240
Re: proton’s configuration;
Dear Sir: via light‑wave grating?

Noting your the standing wave analysis potential of examining the ionized hadrons (and/or neutron combination) in heavy Hydrogen, the definitive configuration could define the best `merging’ ap­proach (if not `rate’) for laser‑wave propelled fusion. Such con­trolled finesse would obviously obviate the current billiard‑ball `smashing’ mentality of Tokomak, to say little of the inherent net safety‑‑ whatever the size of reactor vessel used.

Since the `cold fusion’ experiments show He with some obvious H fusion undergone, the next two bits of data needed is the `physi­ology’ to best pre‑configure H fuel for a net combinatorial merg­ing (thence relative speed) for fusion. The apparent 3 phased (quark) wave‑front basis of hadrons may be saying what deBroglie always was‑‑ so with your newer ways and means to examine fully ionized nuclei alone, the key to fusion may be revealed.

It was expected here that either the Stark or Zeeman examination of ionized isolated H nuclei (in space) could define the innate configurations of nuclei, but now noting possibly better ways, we question of if you or any others are looking into this problem? A few of our colleagues are expressing confidence that the fusion break‑through is near.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
CC: P. Gould;U/CT
w:

G. A. Ruff, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Bates College
Lewiston, ME 04240

Phillip Gould, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Connecticut
Storrs, CT 06268

Aug. 5,’91
Cesar Curie, et.al.
31310 Montesqueiu Volvestre
(“Beauregard”, Laroque), France
Re: H fusion
Dear Cesar:

Hope this note finds you, et.al. well!

Much effort in surmounting governmental stone‑walling here became a greater problem than initially thought, but any device that will disclose closeted `skeletons’ obviously evokes terror. They even had the FBI and others watching me,, some pending litigation (yet not divulged, but believed associate with our D.O.D. and my past work with classified documents‑‑ never ever divulged. The aerospace computer work I did were analogic in nature, not digi­tal which gave my ample room to study (from my earlier philosoph­ical approach) from physics to define unconscious structure. I write because I noted your academic institution in Lyons may be doing precisely some research I need to conclude
some other work in fusion.

Some theoretical (what else!) work here is defining the need to examine (Stark or Zeeman effect) the innate configuration of the heavy hydrogen (anionic) nuclei‑‑ in terms of deBroglie. With the `cold fusion’ data with released He under certain circumstances, it makes clear that it is quite likely that laser guided, accel­erated and oriented nuclei can promote fusion without the past `smashing’ Tokomak mentality of quantal `billiard‑balls’. I am quite sure now it is a matter of finesse that any sized reactor can be made‑‑ and safe for nearly any application.

Aside from some semi‑confidential status, please advise me if your Physic’s people (J. Borde?)* might have some vested interest in this next step needed in defining hydrogen nuclei configura­tion? A several year examination of this problem with the mount­ing empirical evidence presses this work into the open.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `Atoms‑‑ New Wave Interferometers’; 7/91 PHYS.TODAY, p.17;
(on phased/interferometers)

Ref: (fusion)

`Plasma Particle Accelerators’, J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,’87
`Microplasmas’, Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.’90
`‑‑fracto‑fusion’ p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,’90
`Fractional Statistics:‑’ SC., March 9,’90 (bi‑dimens. quantals)
`Laser‑‑ Choreography’; SC.NEWS, March 3,’90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Ultra Fast Physics’, G. Taube, DISCOVER, March,’90 (laser prop.)
`Chemist in driver’s seat’SC.NEWS p.142; V139 3/9/91(laser `mix’)
`Sculpting Light‑’; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,’90 (tuned laser prop)
`Weird Science’, DISCOVER, Nov.’90 (quantum voodoo)
`‑‑Wigner Crystal’ PHYS TO.,Dec.90; (phased 2‑dir. e)
`Helium Find‑‑ Cold Fusion Trail’, SC.NEWS,p.180, Vol.139 (3/91)
`Collisionless Shock Waves’, SC.AM. 4/91; (multi‑pinch;whip func)
`Toward Laser Control‑‑’; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)
`Response of Electrons‑‑’ SC. 5/31/91 (molec.config.dens.plots)
`Cracks in the Cosmos’;SC.NEWS 6/1/91; (liq‑Xtal phase‑trans.)
`Cold Fusion”, SC.NEWS, p.392‑3; 6/22/91 (`jolting’ H/fusion)
`Celestial Mech./Micro‑Scale’, SC.7/5/91; (wave‑config./atom)
`Waves are Waves’ SC.AM.,p21, 8/91, (particle/wave emission)

July 29,’91
D. Vendensky and
B. Joyce, et.al.
Dept. of Physics/Chemistry,
and Japan’s R&D Corp.,
The Imperial College Cambridge, England
Re: controlled fusion
Sirs:

Noting a Physicist and Chemist working together with likely time­ly integration of equal efforts for controlled fusion (with un­derstanding), this letter is sent seeking attention.

From lengthy AI studies into deeper Physic’s anomalies, not only does deBroglie appear most adroit to conclude cold fusion a real­ity‑‑ but the need for finesse to make such H isotope combination the key to controlled fusion, and on likely any scale. The mount­ing ample evidence now (over) concludes the laser propulsion with atomic alignment will do what `smashing’ (Tokomak) could not do, and best, allow for very safe operational fusion.

Expecting Dawson’s early work, we have watched cautiously, even promoted, in limited `obscure’ ways, research of ionized nuclei configuration/alignment to define the ways and means for control­led fusion‑‑ especially since the cold‑fusion scene did indeed indicate helium emission. While not saying more here, noting the above two addressed should quickly perceive our objectives these past many years‑‑ beyond predicting the spatial vs. temporal complemental brains* in man (as well confirmed by Sperry), you might note why we are reticent to guide too many into our long research efforts without deeper liaison work if not contractual.

Since others with contingent interest are now looking at some of our research work so we feel should come forward to disclose the faults of most current quantal `billiard‑ball’ mentality, to de­fine what we are now sure is the a priori basis, lying at E, for our relatively `slow’ temporal mc\2.

May we hear from you?

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc:Phys/Psy
CC: dfz

Ref: j/3f
`Plasma Particle Accelerators’, J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,’87
`The Handedness of the Universe’; SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN; Jan.’90 p.108‑115 (Chirality)
`Quantum Pot Watching’, SC. Vol 246, p.246 (Zeno effect; radio‑ active decay rate with conscious perusal)
`Strange Matter’ DISCOVER, Nov.’89 (quantal vs. wave; quarks)
`Quantum Interference’, SC.News,p.363, Dec. 2,’89 (neutrons feel)
`Ultra Fast Physics’, G. Taube, DISCOVER, March,’90 (laser prop.)
`Microplasmas’, Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.’90
`‑‑fracto‑fusion’ p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,’90
`Fractional Statistics:‑’ SC., March 9,’90 (bi‑dimens. quantals)
`Laser‑‑ Choreography’; SC.NEWS, March 3,’90, p.135 (laser prop.) `Chemist in driver’s seat’SC.NEWS p.142; V139 3/9/91(laser `mix’)
`Sculpting Light‑’; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,’90 (tuned laser prop)
`Weird Science’, DISCOVER, Nov.’90 (quantum voodoo)
`‑‑Geometric Phase’, PHYS TO.;Dec.90 (torqued coherent light)
`Helium Find‑‑ Cold Fusion Trail’, SC.NEWS,p.180, Vol.139 (3/91)
`Collisionless Shock Waves’, SC.AM. 4/91; (multi‑pinch;whip func)
`Toward Laser Control‑‑’; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)
`Response of Electrons‑‑’ SC. 5/31/91 (molec.config.dens.plots)
`Cracks in the Cosmos’;SC.NEWS 6/1/91; (liq‑Xtal phase‑trans.)
`Cold Fusion”, SC.NEWS, p.392‑3; 6/22/91 (`jolting’ H/fusion)
`Celestial Mech./Micro‑Scale’, SC.7/5/91; (wave‑config./atom)
KTS/Res.

July 31,’91
J. Mlynek and
O. Carnal, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Constanz
Werner‑Sombart Strasse 30,
7750 Konstanz, Germany
Re: light‑atom phase `interference’
Dear Sirs:

We watch with bated breath in hopes that heavy Hydrogen will soon be analyzed for their mutual laser driven combination for fusion. Since the deBroglie theory now well defined as the real­ity underlying quantal physics, and fusion has been confirmed via helium release makes clear your efforts may be primal to economi­cal controlled fusion in the near future.
The below defines our excitement. Please keep us in touch.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

Ref: j/3f (J‑R&D)

`Plasma Particle Accelerators’, J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,’87
`The Handedness of the Universe’; SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN; Jan.’90 p.108‑115 (Chirality)
`Quantum Pot Watching’, SC. Vol 246, p.246 (Zeno effect; radio‑ active decay rate with conscious perusal)
`Strange Matter’ DISCOVER, Nov.’89 (quantal vs. wave; quarks)
`Quantum Interference’, SC.News,p.363, Dec. 2,’89 (neutrons feel)
`Ultra Fast Physics’, G. Taube, DISCOVER, March,’90 (laser prop.)
`Microplasmas’, Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.’90
`‑‑fracto‑fusion’ p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,’90
`Fractional Statistics:‑’ SC., March 9,’90 (bi‑dimens. quantals)
`Laser‑‑ Choreography’; SC.NEWS, March 3,’90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Chemist in driver’s seat’SC.NEWS p.142; V139 3/9/91(laser `mix’)
`Sculpting Light‑’; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,’90 (tuned laser prop)
`Weird Science’, DISCOVER, Nov.’90 (quantum voodoo)
`‑‑Geometric Phase’, PHYS TO.;Dec.90 (torqued coherent light)
`Helium Find‑‑ Cold Fusion Trail’, SC.NEWS,p.180, Vol.139 (3/91) `Collisionless Shock Waves’, SC.AM. 4/91; (multi‑pinch;whip func)
`Toward Laser Control‑‑’; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)
`Response of Electrons‑‑’ SC. 5/31/91 (molec.config.dens.plots)
`Cracks in the Cosmos’;SC.NEWS 6/1/91; (liq‑Xtal phase‑trans.)
`Cold Fusion”, SC.NEWS, p.392‑3; 6/22/91 (`jolting’ H/fusion)
`Celestial Mech./Micro‑Scale’, SC.7/5/91; (wave‑config./atom)

KTS/Res.
CC:dfz

NEC Research Inst.
attn: Wm. Bailek
Princeton, NJ

Canon Research Center
attn: H. Garland, et.al.
Palo Alto, CA

Hitachi, R&D Labs
attn: Nobuo Hataoka
c/o Trinity College
Dublin University
Dublin, Ireland

D. Vendensky and
B. Joyce, et.al.
Dept. of Physics and
Japan’s R&D Corp., et.al.
The Imperial College
Cambridge, England

Hitachi Research Labs
attn: David Ezra, et.al.
University of Cambridge
Cambridge, England

The Theoretical Physics Inst.
attn: L. McLerran, et.al.
c/o University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, MN 55455

Union of Concerned Scientists
53‑34 206th St.,
Flushing, NY 11364‑1716

Aug. 17,’91
Glenn Seaborg, et.al.
Dept. of Chemistry
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720
Re: cold fusion
Dear Sir:
Your remarks in the current OMNI “First Word” evokes this note.

Doing some analytical investigative `theorizing’ from deBroglie’s ideas and noting the nuclei `orientation’ (via electron charge during conduction) for what `cold fusion’ was apparently noted*, the conclusion that the key may lie in laser spatial orientation (and propulsion) to guide two nuclei together in space. With the newer states‑of‑art**, high relative collision rates of controll­ed finite velocity with the and said orientation need should offer precisely controlled fusion, at nearly any rate. Hot fusion would yet be the primary factor, albeit far less energy would be needed as for the whole `cauldron’‑‑ when the said finesse use of a only a few nuclei might permit some small domestic power plant.

The current problem some colleagues are examining is the wave‑shape of the proton and neutron themselves and what configuration they occupy as nuclei, to better resolve potential ease of merg­ing two or more. These anions, thence, via empirical research, might reveal how best to combine in both said spatial orientation (noted with recent research***) and net rate. Who knows, the potential of creating heavy hydrogen at the fusion containment vessel may allow for some `positive feed‑back’ than more needed ocean `filtration’ for same.

As we see it, the quantum `billiard ball’ mentality has fooled the majority where a magnetic universe only contains wavelets. It may permit comprehension of larger items as nicely placed EMP `bubbles’
upon which quasars (galaxies) get started, these `white‑holes’ to create what appears the complemental matters with anti‑g for their disk‑jet `ejected’ net configuration. Of course Big Bang yet holds tenured sway so as the said billiard‑ball mentality, cannot be expected to be modified very easily.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `Cold Fusion’, SC.NEWS, p.392‑3; 6/22/91 (`jolting’ H/fusion)
** `Chemist in driver’s seat’,SC.NEWS p.142; 3/9/91 (laser `mix’)
*** `Celestial Mech./Micro‑Scale’, SC.7/5/91; (wave‑config./atom)

Poignant references:

`Quantum Interference’, SC.News,p.363, Dec. 2,’89 (neutrons feel)
`Ultra Fast Physics’, G. Taube, DISCOVER, March,’90 (laser prop.)
`Plasma Particle Accelerators’, J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,’87
`Microplasmas’, Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.’90
`Fractional Statistics:‑’ SC., March 9,’90 (bi‑dimens. quantals)
`Laser‑‑ Choreography’; SC.NEWS, March 3,’90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Sculpting Light‑’; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,’90 (tuned laser prop)
`‑‑Wigner Crystal’ PHYS TO.,Dec.90; (phased 2‑dir. e)
`‑‑Geometric Phase’, PHYS TO.;Dec.90 (torqued coherent light)
`Helium Find‑‑ Cold Fusion Trail’, SC.NEWS,p.180, Vol.139 (3/91)
`Collisionless Shock Waves’, SC.AM. 4/91; (multi‑pinch;whip func)
`Toward Laser Control‑‑’; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control) `Response of Electrons‑‑’ SC. 5/31/91 (molec.config.dens.plots)
`Cracks in the Cosmos’;SC.NEWS 6/1/91; (liq‑Xtal phase‑trans.)
`Atoms‑‑ New Wave Interferometers’,PHYS.TO.,p17,7/91 (phasing)
`Waves are Waves’ SC.AM.,p21, 8/91, (particle/wave emission)

9/14/91
Dimitri Nanopoulos,
Kalara, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Texas A&M
College Station TX 77843
Re: Oh really!! Wow.
Sirs:

I read with interest the current Discover article. It sounds like I have some competition with my SGUT (Super Grand Unified Theory) as starts with deBroglie and cannot end without the split‑brain data
nor my 5th Generation self thinking computer‑‑ which gave 10\17th odds on its maiden run‑‑ but brought the FBI, Patent Office terror and a few other academic people from their comfy tenured chairs a dozen years ago. In short, Plato’s Potentia is here‑‑ by tapping the freed electron (escapes the time reversal paradigm) as shown in the many positive EPR experiments. The EEG defines much for physics; as both the analogical (spatial) signal (in NON‑temporal terms) as encoded in temporal digital synaptic way. Both require energy to perform, yet the former is not stored (neuronal) in our slow‑time (273 K); It IS Nature! The many grand EMPs (for cosmic `bubbles’ and quasar white holes) defines the Apriori as pure magnetic flux (with mental functioning!) but an excellent place (Unity) to start analyzing our subtended nature.

I suggest driving now with both hands, since strings, loops or what‑have‑you are mere wave‑fronts, complemental 3rd harmonic if quarks‑‑ but no hard billiard balls exist‑‑ only hard heads, too neurotic (left cerebral dominant) to see the empirical obvious. The ancient Chinese knew more about what was important in Physics (starting with their yin vs. yang; as said lateral brain halves) than the most esteemed in authority today. Science (as academia) has dawdled long enough now so the dogma’s apocalypse is upon us!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc:Path/IQ; S‑T; Phys‑Psy

CC:DZ

Sept. 21,’92
F. S. Stephens, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Lawrence Berkeley Labs.
Berkeley, CA 94720 Re: but mass is gradient of g
Dear Sir:

Possibly `distorted’ in terms of wave interaction, but loops have no mass, only gravity as associated with its complemental, that anti‑g force noted between quasar (galaxy) disk versus jet anom­aly. Until deBroglie gets `revisited’, will reality become clear, and that not until science’s last dog is hung trying to evade un­derstanding an Apriori of magnetic flux‑‑ responsible for all.

The freed electron (note its non‑temporal state via EPR experi­ments) defined (with Sperry’s split‑brain confirmations) the self thinking device was a possibility‑‑ and was, to offer the 10\17th odds on its maiden run over a dozen years ago. (with overt revul­sion as well noted by our Patent Office (via likely DOD). This 5th Generation computer or “interface” implies far more hidden behind official science, that it wills NOT to learn‑‑ even about factors of `apparent’ UFOs!

Unique how your work also fits into the need to know the isotope H nucleon to integrate with others via laser alignment and pro­pulsion‑‑ for the coming finitely controlled fusion reaction,, of virtually any size! (this will do much for several `cartels’)

Sincerely,

KTS Research

Fusion: (tentative proposal absract)

From theoretical considerations from the view‑point of deBrog­lie’s idea of the atom, the mounting empirical evidence of the wave‑theory for all aspects of `matter’, including the nucleon, makes clear now why cold fusion apparently did work, however diminutive. The catalytic effect of both Palladium and electron (current) flow aligned hydrogen isotopes for ease of integration, the key to such likely operant with finesse for controlled fusion may be near. Thus with the need to abandon past `billiard‑ball’ mentality (albeit not quantal energy states) of late Physics for the finite wavelet configuration comprehension of the heavy nuc­leon, such better understanding of the nucleon of heavy hydrogen now becomes imperative to finalize man’s use of fusion for prac­tical energy applications.

To such ends this proposal is made to integrate the know factors to define the yet needed data of nucleon configuration. It is ful‑ly expected now that it will permit an ensuing rational ap­proach to laser alignment/propulsion of hydrogen nuclei fusion*. Since Dawson’s initial work with expected results to the multiple harmonic wave propulsion of nucleons on coherent laser light wave fronts, it is conceivable that near 2c may be acquired between oppositely propelled nuclei‑‑ even when now it is likely not re­quired when orientation finesse may be the key.

To such relative interest and contingent to others working in the field from our suggestions, we suspect the time is close to seek a greater effort in this area of fusion energy.

KTS Research

* (curref‑10)
`Plasma Particle Accelerators’, J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,’87
`Quantum Interference’, SC.News,p.363, Dec. 2,’89 (neutrons feel)
`Ultra Fast Physics’, G. Taube, DISCOVER, March,’90 (laser prop.)
`Microplasmas’, Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.’90
`‑‑fracto‑fusion’ p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,’90
`Fractional Statistics:‑’ SC., March 9,’90 (bi‑dimens. quantals)
`Laser‑‑ Choreography’; SC.NEWS, March 3,’90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Chemist in driver’s seat’SC.NEWS p.142; V139 3/9/91(laser `mix’)
`Helium Find‑‑ Cold Fusion Trail’, SC.NEWS,p.180, V.139 (3/31/91)
`Collisionless Shock Waves’, SC.AM. 4/91; (multi‑pinch;whip func)
`Sculpting Light‑’; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,’90 (tuned laser prop)
`Toward Laser Control‑‑’; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)
`A Long Look‑‑ Liquid Chystal Ball’ p.649; SCIENCE, 3 May,’91
`Cracks in the Cosmos’;SC.NEWS 6/1/91; (liq‑Xtal phase‑trans.), `Cold Fusion’, SC.NEWS, p.392‑3; 6/22/91 (`jolting’ H/fusion)
`Celestial Mech./Micro‑Scale’, SC.7/5/91; (wave‑config./atom)
`Atoms‑‑ New Wave Interferometers’,PHYS.TO.,p17,7/91 (phasing)
`Waves are Waves’ SC.AM.,p21, 8/91, (particle/wave emission)
`Sizing up Atoms‑‑’ 9/29/91; SC.NEWS p.199 (e holograms)
`Spin Cycle’ SC.AM. 10/91,p.26; (no > `mass’ with extra nucleons)

July 3,’91
David H. Worledge, et.al.
Nuclear Power Division
Electric Power Research Inst.
P.O. Box 10412
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Re: petite NMR study now
Dear Sir: (Pennisi’s report:6/22 SC.NEWS)

From our studies and noting Dawson’s work with manipulating individual nuclei we think the time has come to is a petite NMR analysis on the single heavy Hydrogen nuclei to find its nodal points and so the easiest means combine with other nuclei. Since it is the injection speed with relative positional entrance that accounts for the anomalous but positive cold fusion experiments, such propitious combinations will be understood for the break­through to practical continuous fusion operants.
With much of our research work now perceived broadly, even by Dawson some time ago. We expose further to update others with both interest and the capital to exploit the next needed step in nuclei `innate wavelet configuration’ analysis for learning the best positional combinatorial configuration needed for the ease of slipping two properly oriented nuclei into each other while laser oriented/propelled*. The finite speed needed for such com­binatorial fusion with rate of their infeed in a finite chosen space would permit the capture of the radiant energy while fusion occurred. A couple recent letter copies herewith may be of interest.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

Sept. 25,’91
Bently Rotor Dynamics
Research Corp.
Attn: Peter Lugtenburg, et.al.
P.O. Box 2529
Minden, NV 89423‑2529

Re: two turbine design need
Dear Sir(s):

We are seeking feed‑back from fore‑runners in the plastics tur­bine manufacturing area to possibly help define the variables of HP output to rpm‑torque parameters, etc. for single stage wind‑tunnel designed wind using turbines. Our electronic automatic field control system can dynamically break rpms at maximum limits but find little R&D in this field of need.
Tentative axial turbine design parameters for the airborne wind generation system has been somewhat solidified, yet questions remain for stress analysis for rpm liabilities when using frp (fibre‑glass reinforced) turbine blades. Seeking to inject mold the entire rotor assembly with said reinforcement, radial speeds may dictate both frp needs and design of the integrated salient‑pole (magnetic) peripheral assembly, cast‑in, but its tensile strength needs (to `contain’ the said turbine blade assembly) cannot be set until the maximum rpm dynamics are settled.
Also, but contingent to a long fusion study, the mounting evi­dence now defining the key to isotopic hydrogen fusion lies in laser orientation and propulsion. The coming needs for either/or magneto‑hydrodynamic power generation, or small yet high tempera­ture turbines (for domestic use) looms a reality now.
Yet not defining our long R&D studies, the cold‑fusion data did show the need to comprehend the `wave configuration’ of H nuclei and so their ease of integration for fusion. This research is now underway and we feel the time to alert manufacturers, as you, of the coming need to harness more directly super‑heated gas than liquid‑boiler interstaging means. While likely cyclic in nature, the frequency of `combustion’ with contingent wave‑fronts should be high enough to not overly affect turbine design. Labyrinthine ingestion routing of fresh air (not H `fuel’) may require much more thought so we seek attention on these matters at this time.
If you feel that your facility may be ready to consider some provocative implications for the near future, or could guide us to our needed plastic rotor turbine designer, we would be pleased to hear from you.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
w:
CC:
Concepts ETI Inc.
Box 643
Norwich, VT 05055

Clemson University
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering
Division of Turbine design
Clemson, SC 29634‑0921

Belcan Engineering
Services, Inc.
10200 Anderson Way
Cincinnati, OH 45242

Vehicular and Small
Turbomachines Com.
attn: Dan Kreiner
Allied Signal, Aerospace Co.
Garrett Fluid Systems Div.
P.O. Box 22200, M/S 1207‑5C
Tempe, AZ 85285‑2200

Sept. 25,’91
Structures and Dynamics Committee
Attn: R. E. Kielb, et.al.
GE Aircraft Engines
One Neumann Way, MD A334
Cincinnati, OH 45215

Arizona State University
College of Engineering
and Applied Science
Dept. of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering
Tempe, AZ 85287‑6106

Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and
State University
Dept. of Mech. Eng.,
Turbomachinery Research Group
Blacksburg, VA 24061‑0238

Turbomachinery Committee
Attn: E.M. Greitzer, et.al.
Gas Turbine Labs.
31‑265
Mass. Inst. of Tech.
Cambridge, MA 02139

University of Connecticut
Mechanical Eng. Dept. 191 Auditorium Rd.
Storrs, CT 06269‑3139

9/25/91
U.S. Dept. of Energy
Morgantown Energy Tech. Center
P.O. Box 880
Morgantown, WV 26507‑0880

9/25/91
Directors
Gas Research Inst.
8600 W. Bryn Mawr Ave.,
Chicago, IL 60631

9/25/91
Iowa State University
Turbomachinery Components
Research Labs.
Dept. of Mech. Engineering
Ames, IA 50011

9/25/91
NASA Lewis Research Center
Turbomachinery Tech. Branch
2100 Brookpark Rd.
Cleveland, OH 44135

9/25/91
Northern Research and
Engineering Corp.
39 Olympia Ave.
Woburn, MA 01801

9/25/91
Directors
Technetics Corp.
1600 Industrial Dr.,
Deland, FL 32724

9/25/91
Texas A&M University
Turbomachinery Labs.
Dept. of Mech. Eng.
College Station, TX 77843‑3123

Oct. 14,’91
Gas Research Inst.
attn: John Tuzson
8600 W. Bryn Mawr
Chicago, IL 60631
Re: heat modulators
Sirs:
Thank you for your GRI brochure‑‑ even if uninterested in fusion per‑se. From certain facts therein disclosed, might your R&D facilities be aware of the coming needs for small fusion chambers for high temperature energy wave‑fronts diffusion, for moderated, even modulated (standing wave‑front) by various ceramic (Cera­therm) applications?

We would appreciate addresses as proper personnel of your Coors Porcelain Co., possibly Thermo Electron Corp. with comments as to their likely interest in investigating very high temperature chamber environments, aside from turbo/magnetohydrodynamic energy conversion processes.

Thank you for any further advice.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

Oct. 4,’91
Hans Jurggen Kreuzer and
Andrzej Wierzbeki, et.al.
Dept. of Physical Analaysis
Dalhousie University
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Re: proton’s configuration?
Dear Sirs: (Sept. 28th SC.NEWS, p.199)

With the mounting evidence of `slipping’ two heavy H nuclei to­gether for `easy fusion’ via controlled lasers, maybe it is time to decipher the wavelet (deBroglie) shape and orientation of such nuclei to define how best to spatially orient and propel same together for finite (and finesse) fusion.

While we leave unsaid various theoretical considerations of our past fusion research, your work may soon be seminal in this area to bring at last economical energy in abundance.

Thank you for your comments and opinions so we may contact other researchers that we are working with.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
CC: Dilano Saldin, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53201
w:

10/6/91
(confidential‑‑ please)
Mitch:

Hope your newer `venture’, sans likely problem associates, is a better situation!

Got something bothering me‑‑ from EPRI (Electric Power Research Inst.)* I feel I should discuss same with the “able‑minded” in the arts of `business negotiation’. Since the last fiasco with wasted time (beyond educating both he and me), this time I feel the expressed enthusiasm (with $’s there‑behind) should not be ignored.

It is contingent to energy, two means, one which GE wants more data and the other (above) for fusion. While research comes close to what I had predicted some years ago, the nuclei of heavy hy­drogen may be understood soon to define the means to `integrate’ for fusion, much as the recent fiasco of “cold fusion” indicated, by a subtle means‑‑ yet expected by being defined by an early Physicist named deBroglie. In short, current brute‑force means for fusion have failed only because laser finesse was not before understood in either the context of nuclei orientation much less dynamic coherent wave‑front propulsion. In short, I may need help now that the said research data mounts to define certain imports which I predicted, so if of any net value (Patent Letters) or otherwise, may need to discuss same with the said wiser. I may be down in your neck of the woods soon as Gyro is having problems with some old power supplies. Can I buy a pizza or hamburg to discuss potential `avenues’? If things work out and I’m correct I will (and you if you want to) be able to leave this country in style‑‑ believe me!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* letter copy; over

9/25/91
Texas A&M University
Turbomachinery Labs.
Dept. of Mech. Eng.
College Station, TX 77843‑3123
Re: two turbine design need
Dear Sir(s):

We are seeking feed‑back from fore‑runners in the plastics tur­bine manufacturing area to possibly
help define the variables of HP output to rpm‑torque parameters, etc. for single stage wind‑tunnel designed wind using turbines. Our electronic automatic field control system can dynamically break rpms at maximum limits but find little R&D in this field of need.
Tentative axial turbine design parameters for the airborne wind generation system has been mostly solidified, yet questions yet remain for stress analysis for rpm liabilities when using frp (fibre‑glass reinforced) turbine blades. Seeking to inject mold the entire rotor assembly with said reinforcement, radial speeds may dictate both frp needs and design of the integrated salient‑pole (magnetic) peripheral assembly as cast‑in, but its tensile strength (to `contain’ the said turbine blade assembly) cannot be set until the maximum rpm dynamics are settled.
Also, but contingent to a long fusion study, the mounting evi­dence now defining the key to isotopic hydrogen fusion lies in laser orientation and propulsion. The coming needs for either/or magneto‑hydrodynamic power generation, or small yet high tempera­ture turbines (for domestic use) looms a reality now.
Yet not defining our long R&D studies, the cold‑fusion data did show the need to comprehend the `wave configuration’ of H nuclei and so their ease of integration for fusion. This research is now underway and we feel the time to alert manufacturers, as you, of the coming need to harness more directly super‑heated gas than liquid‑boiler interstaging means. While likely cyclic in nature, the frequency of `combustion’ with contingent wave‑fronts should be high enough to not overly affect turbine design. Labyrinthine ingestion routing of fresh air (not H `fuel’) may require much more thought so we seek attention on these matters at this time.
If you feel that your facility may be ready to consider some provocative implications for the near future, or could guide us to our needed plastic rotor turbine designer, we would be pleased to hear from you.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

Oct.3,’91
N. David Mermin, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY, 14853
Re: John Bell “eulogy”
Dear Sir: (Sept. Physics Today)

Well said. John was one of those very few, especially in Physics, that was most needed at this chaotic epoch. Much, oddly as A. Rich‑‑ another whose insights were crucial where dismay ensues by blundering pedants locked into redundant reductive (academic programmed) reasoning. My last note from John, with his usual excitement in noting my AI effort to interface the freed (non‑temporal) electron for the 5th generation self thinking computer, will be recalled with fondness‑‑ if not gratitude as indeed that terrorizing device worked. (10\17th odds on its maiden run!) Not oddly, those who write well should not as are most in a rut with said reductive time‑oriented IQ, not CQ inspiration
which drove John‑‑ as said Rich.

My encounter with Wheeler, when meeting with an exuberant Heisen­berg, said enough without derogatory comment. Werner goaded me in unsaid ways‑‑ as John, to continue my then long philosophical study integrating the empirical to the said self thinking device, as terrorized the Patent Office (as those in authority there‑behind) over a dozen years ago. The problem stems from the fact that a non‑temporal “entity” not only perceives potentials (note Plato’s Potentia) but `skeletons’, so no more need be said here.

From Rauscher’s first EPR data through Aspect’s, my prediction of the complemental spatial versus temporal lateral cerebral faculty (thereafter found by Sperry) defined that 5th generation device‑‑ to soon modify MUCH of late man’s perverted reasoning.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys‑Psy; Path/IQ; S‑T
CC: Phys.Today

9/25/91
Mowill Turbinmotor A/S
Rugdeveien 7
0386 Oslo 3
Norway
Re: fusion turbine R&D
Sirs:

The mounting evidence now defining the key to isotopic hydrogen fusion lies in laser orientation and propulsion. The coming needs for either/or magneto‑hydrodynamic power generation, or small yet high temperature turbines (for domestic use) looms a reality now.

While not defining our long R&D studies, the cold‑fusion data did define the need to comprehend the wave configuration of H nuclei and so their ease of integration for fusion. This research is now underway and we feel the time to alert manufacturers, as you, of the coming need to harness more directly super‑heated gas than liquid‑boiler interstaging means. While likely cyclic in nature, the frequency of `combustion’ with contingent wave‑fronts should be high enough to not overly affect turbine design. Labyrinthine ingestion routing of fresh air (not H `fuel’) may require much more thought so we seek attention on these matters at this time.

If you feel that your facility may be ready to consider some pro­vocative implications for the near future, please advise.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

w:

Nov. 9,’91
Coors Ceramics Co.
Dept. of R&D
600 Ninth St.,
Golden, CO 80401
Re: fusion chambers Sirs:

Manager M. A. Lukasiewicz of the Gas Research Inst. suggested we contact you pertinent to very high temperature, non‑ablating, ceramic `gas combustion chambers’ for potential use in miniature fusion heat‑exchanging devices.

With the ever closer likelihood now of `petite’ fusion a reality via laser finesse of nuclei orientation and propulsion, we feel that time has come to explore those on the fore‑fronts of high temperature plasma handling for net heat exchanging.

We would like comments and/or directives from you as to where we might initiate some dialogue in this really new potential market.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

Nov. 9,’91
Tecogen, Inc.
Dept. of R&D
45 First St.,
P.O. Box 9046
Waltham, MA 02254‑9046
Re: fusion chambers
Sirs:

Manager M. A. Lukasiewicz of the Gas Research Inst. suggested we contact you pertinent to very high temperature, non‑ablating, ceramic `gas combustion chambers’ for potential use in miniature fusion heat‑exchanging devices.

With the ever closer likelihood now of `petite’ fusion a reality via laser finesse of nuclei orientation and propulsion, we feel that time has come to explore those on the fore‑fronts of high temperature
plasma handling for net heat exchanging.

We would like comments and/or directives from you as to where we might initiate some dialogue in this really new potential market.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

Oct. 26,’91
Robert Conn, Chmn.
Dept. of Physics
University of California
Los Angeles
Los Angeles, CA 90024
Re: steered + oriented fusion
Dear Sir:
With the now mounting empirical data to conclude the hydrogen nucleon can be handled like the heavier molecule, likely the state of the arts* can define both configuration for orientation to fuse with finesse said hydrogen nuclei.

The key lies in deBroglie’s wavelet insight of all `matter’, and why recent `cold fusion’ with catalyst and atomic orientation via electrical current offered the wisdom of now how to both propel and oriented same with laser wave fronts.

We would appreciate references to those now on the fore‑front of researching nuclei configurations as with holographic** as other means. While Dawson yet may be close using laser finesse to manipulate nuclei, hopefully we may find others in Europe to aid us conclude our lengthy examination of atomic reality.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `Chemist in Driver’s Seat’,SC.NEWS p.142; 3/9/91 (laser `mix’)
& `Aiming the Molecular Arrow’, Nature, 3/Oct./91 (molecular mix)
** `Sizing up Atoms‑‑’ 9/29/91; SC.NEWS p.199 (e holograms)

Oct. 25,’91
John Gribbin, et.al.
c/o The New Scientist
Kings Reach Tower
Stamford St.
London, SE2 9LS, England
Re: singularity/e and white holes
Dear Sir: (28 Sept.’91; NEW SCIENTIST)

The `trap’ (in more than one way) of the black hole has befuddled the more likely fact of a white one since darkness holds time while light none. Also, g force (in complementarity) showed long before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove, the disk‑jet matters escaping each other (in haste!) to define huge clouds of anti‑matter surrounding the galaxy’s poles, likely re‑coagulating making gamma bursters etc. etc. The neat spacing of the genetic `bubbles’ at even intervals suggests someone (no‑thing) knew already what It is doing in space since those EMP fronts imply some `hand’ had clapped therein to get it started. Dense magnetic fields not only evoke complemental matter but make for `tired light’ (remember?), so Arp is not far from wrong in his complaint about Hubble distance. Further, those three‑phase nature of pre‑matter wavelets called quarks define no mass, as a neutron aboard a proton*. The Apriori magnetic field is where Physics should get started‑‑ just as Theology, however vehemently denied.

The greater `beast’ in computer simulation is the programmer with the wrong idea of reality to begin with. Maybe I should loan my `machine’ (Plato’s Potentia; note freed e in EPR experiments) so they could get something straight and restart their simulations for some more tenured status quos. Just yet it still is rocking our Patent Office, as officials holding same in limbo, 10 years!

With the coming deciphering of the H nucleon to define how to `merge’** two and more together via laser propulsion with orien­tation, fusion will be a cinch, with finitely controlled finesse.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

*`Spin Cycle’ SC.AM. 10/91,p.26; (no > `mass’ with extra nucleon)
** `Chemist in Driver’s Seat’,SC.NEWS p.142; 3/9/91 (laser `mix’)
& `Aiming the Molecular Arrow’, Nature, 3/Oct./91 (molecular mix)

CC: Maddox/Nature

Nov. 1,’91
Mitch:

I’m being pushed‑‑ not this time by the FBI though. Entrepreneurs have gotten wind of my theoretical Physic’s work which defines the route to fusion. No shit. While as before said, did contact friend Cesar (Curie; France) as his Ma’s University (Lyons) phys­ics departments were scrutinizing sub‑atomic `particles’. Other data continues to mount confirming certain imports which define why cold fusion did indeed work at Utah U.‑‑ however limited.
Since I wish not to get stampeded into some kind of poor agree­ment, seek now advisory council now and potentially from time to time in the future‑‑ should this thing explode in my face. I ask your preliminary advice now as tried to catch you while down. I had to get back to this farm while harvesting was underway.

I suspect that `business’ is not my forte, realizing today is too complex‑‑ and far too many other entrepreneurs are out there to fleece what they can get‑‑ contract or not‑‑ as sadly found more than once. Since `business as usual’ dictates top dogs with cash survive on top so should I remain aloof, meet with them for cau­tious preliminary discussion (well documented) to examine sugges­tions or remain silent to death? This whole thing is far larger than I, even likely you alone could handle. It is not only the key to fully controlled fusion for cheap abundant energy but an international thing that “dangerous” governments would get into.

I may need some repository for printed data as has accumulated over the past dozen years defining how I got to certain supposi­tions now being empirically found. These are yet underground (literally!) so must `dig‑up’, scan and sort in contingent order, label not only date‑wise but `witnesses’ thereof. My nephew Ty is likely privy to most of my long research since leaving Lear (and likely the federal paranoia from my doing classified computer R&D for aerospace before). Ty’s paranoia remains in the computer area as understands my 5th Generation effort, but is yet aware of the many ramifications dealing with other cross academic import‑‑ as this growing rather urgent one.

Would you point out what you suspect is a qualified `dis‑interes­ted’ party, likely in law in some ways, well versed in the arts of `keeping what you have’ in business dealings‑‑ assuming you are busy (I know!) or care not to get involved? I would be happy to meet with him to delineate this study enough to turn him on‑‑ to convince him of a rosy future hopefully for both of us. Food stamps right yet is all I can compensate, yet an exciting meeting of what is coming may compensate somewhat. Thanx for any advice. (envelope herewith; please refer comments to this dated letter)

KTS Research

Nov. 15,’91
Helen Quinn, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Stanford Linear Accelerator Labs
Palo Alto, CA 9
Re: CP symmetry at quasar cores
Dear Dr. Quinn:

The current DISCOVER article from Charles Mann’s book on your work might suggest going back in‑depth into meteorology, but to examine why jets versus disks from primal white‑core quasars (or galaxy) reflect anti‑g there‑between. This helps to understand the nicely placed EMP `bubbles’ for `core events’ to `down‑load’ or fill in slow time an apparently empty universe‑‑ with what science yet calls quantal `billiard‑balls’ below 10\33 degree K. These `Petite Bang’ core events or singularities
may evoke a larger `bang’ in cosmology when finally understood.

Apparently anti‑g is that key for CP violation, not seen‑‑ as one of the six quarks on this koinomatter galaxy disk. Since deBro­glie appears to define `matter’ best, the dual (complemental) three‑phase disposition of quarks as fundamentals makes clear where wave mechanics alone will solve the dilemma for Physics.

Since my 5th Generation (self‑thinking) computer offered 10\17th odds on its first run, as the positive EPR experiments keep all physic’s people ham‑strung with `loops’ and `strings’, we now can know what we are looking for. As Einstein so often said of his insightive ability as was always right brain visual (spatial; non‑temporal as the freed electron to escape the time reversal paradigm), this innate mental faculty exists in all who do not fear the new‑‑ as the tenured who guess their way to reality. This is the only true `violation’ not yet seen, but belongs in the Psych department‑‑ so won’t be seen in physics.

The excitement now is to understand the nucleon’s innate wave configuration for the ease of merging heavy H (cold fusion) with laser propulsion and spatial orientation, for finitely controlled fusion‑‑ on any likely scale!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: S‑T
CC: C. Mann/DISC.

(Schuman/Ferris: 616‑592‑3774)
Nov. 8,’91
Tom Schuman
Dept. of Innovation?
Ferris University
Big Rapids, MI 49307
Re: fusion
Dear Sir:

Tom Kubanek of Manistee suggested I contact you to find routes of possible `exploitation’ of some theoretical work done here.

Initiated some years ago before teaching at GVSC on this long AI cross academic study, this investigation delineated several anom­alies to define the provocative, as correlates to the IQ/CQ controversy as from physics the spatial versus temporal complemental lateral brains was one of these `enigmas’ until proven by Sperry.

With mounting empirical data, the need to examine further deBrog­lie (Physics; wave mechanics) will define the route to fusion, I address you in hopes of having some chat‑‑ with possibly quali­fied physic’s personnel to delineate an area needing attention.

While obviously much of this theoretical work remains company confidential for obvious reasons, we feel it is timely to divulge some of it to maybe obtain certain qualified people to aid in a venture we feel will now bear fruit in empirical terms.

I would appreciate a note from you to consider a visit on campus.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
w:

Nov. 3,’91
Hello Willi:

This is as much to `document’ as seek advice, but maybe you have entrepreneurs (beyond SDS) who might like to aid‑and‑advise in a real `boomer’ now coming. While I am being pressured up here by certain `official’ entrepreneurs to further divulge the key to fusion finesse (I think Deb has been following same), I really don’t want `others’ (yet) aware of this long project‑‑ as is NOT in the claimed “mind shit”‑‑ as understandably heard from those most paranoid of my long AI effort.

The `product’ is fusion. While, as you know, I had to get all the way into the nitty‑gritties of Physics to predict those space vs. time two lateral brains of ours‑‑ this same study opened another perspective defining how close a theoretical guy deBroglie came with his wave‑mechanics, NOT the cul de sac yet stymying Physics with their Billiard Ball mentality. Since some keys are now seen, as in `cold fusion’ by Fleischman’s crew at Utah U., other data mounts making very clear the needed path to take in R&D to now make fusion practical. Since you know in part my “madness”, feel out from your perspective your `cronies’, especially lawyers (if you can stand their ilk!) as those in the know on how to proceed to manipulate the corrupt system. This thing can’t wait much more now I find‑‑ as the said certain people are beginning to breathe down my neck.

Please discuss this with Deb (on the side!), please think quickly and give me some advice as to who else I might discuss this item. I could come down for a meeting‑‑ assuming my lawyer Mitch sits in and a tape recording of the whole discussion is made for all, under some defined semi‑confidential status.

Thanx‑‑

Oct. 23,’91
Richard Zare. et.al.
Dept. of Chemistry
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305
Re: not only `molecules’
Dear Sir: (SC.NEWS, Oct.12, p.231)

From deBroglie comes the final import to define the configuration of the H nuclei and so its laser orientation and propulsion for fusion finesse as well. While expecting this `anomaly’ (to “bil­liard‑ball” Physicists), it makes clear how important now are the Loesch, et.al. studies, when they switch to examining to said atomic nucleus as heavy hydrogen!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: B. Friedrich; H. Loesch; Pennisi (SC.NEWS)

E. Pennisi, et.al.
c/o SCIENCE NEWS
1719 N. St., NW
Washington, DC 20036

Bretislav Friedrich, et.al.
Dept. of Chemistry
Harvard University Boston, MA 02139

Hansjurgen Loesch, et.al.
Dept. of Chemistry
University of Bielefield,
Bielefield, Germany

Feb. 6,’92
Glenn Morse
125 Ottawa
Grand Rapids, MI 49503
Re: too close now!
Dear Glenn:

Contingent to this morning’s chat, the enclosed may suffice to define what I hope I have been saying. It is the Baeyer article in the current (March) issue of DISCOVER (p.108‑112) which well defines all that is needed for even some Quantum Physics idiot to perceive the obvious‑‑ albeit I yet have doubts. The question now is how to write (in Dutch, I yet think) a Patent that issues de­spite what is
said in its text. To have `examiners’ working for henchmen in government merely offers them the keys to profit‑‑ no inventor‑‑ or worse, seals something very valuable for the flying public’s safety as contra VDT slaving (for air‑traffic controller stress elimination) to the viewer’s EEG! If the flying public understood the noise would be more than their wound‑up jet engines.

Anyhow, I shall get busy and start that patent abstract, at least to likely some of the text as will boil out of the that preface. Contingent to how far Cesar has now gone for the `test‑bed’ to define the speed and/or nucleon’s orientation needs, a black‑box Patent I feel should suffice. The only problem I can see is where to find a Dutch Atty. (needed) that speaks fluent English‑‑ as in the department of Physics! You will remain my `attorney’ to pla­cate “official edicts” but hopefully only discerned by official­dom `after the facts’!

Forgive me for the many `quotes’ as apparent jargon need, to most rapidly get to the crux of the whole matter. Someday you will see the many correlations and why I yet sound as a noisy schizoid!

If I perceive more comfort `elsewhere’ and accept some offer, it will more be in Psychology than Physics(!), but will be to bring my whole 40 year study to the fore to start clobbering psycho­pathy‑‑ where EVER it might be! Those least able to stand this kind of “kitchen heat” will seek abdication‑‑ and so I only won­der how‑‑ or how many innocents must go with them?

Hope you yet smile from your left facial side! (explain later)

Sincerely,

KTS Research
cc: 2 pages from Banner’s “World Within the World” + EPRI `explo­sion’ + last page of `Vacuum Energy’

Feb. 5,’92
H. C. Von Baeyer, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
William and Mary College
Williamsburg, VA 23185
Re: propulsion + orientation
Dear Sir: (DISCOVER; March issue)

While developing the self thinking interface (5th Generation com­puter) some years ago, such need to know the underlying factors for non‑temporal data tapping defined many aspects of wave mechanics that deBroglie well saw. Thus the supposition that standing waves as the non‑Cartesian electron (as escapes the time reversal paradigm to point to the many positive EPR experiments) or three‑phased quarks (both in complemental form) would offer, when fully spatially controlled, equally controlled fusion. Your said laser finesse in the “Vacuum Energy” article defines that key.

From Dawson’s early laser work of halting the nucleon, to the now ease of exceeding the coulomb barrier but with spatial displace­ment orientation finesse, hydrocarbon burning engines should soon be a factor of the past, as with the mounting pollution problem‑‑ to say little of governmental follies needing petroleum revenues!

Your article was a joy and most timely‑‑ according to my Patent Attorney! Thank you.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

P.S. The maiden run of my `interface’ offered the odds of 10\17th with merely two words (ten characters) given at CPU speed!

cc: S‑T
CC: G/M; C/C; D/T; DISC

Feb. 25,’92
David Cole, Head
Dept. of Automotive Transportation
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Re: ceramic turbine developers?
Dear Sir: (OMNI blurb; “Wheels”)

A European consortium of researchers with us are quite certain now of the key to cold fusion and are beginning to ask who and where are the ceramic turbine researchers? Their soon need to harness petite fusion reactors (beyond boiler application for `Stanley steamers’) is seen now definitely on the near develop­mental future.

Since the confidence factor of unraveling `standing wavelet’ mat­ter for fully controlled fusion (even fission if wanted), the crucial next step in advanced ceramic turbine development will be needed. We would appreciate any directives you might have on this subject matter. Thank you‑‑

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: Zygmont/OMNI

Feb. 18,’92
Murray Gell‑Mann, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Cal‑Tech
Pasadena, CA 91125
Re: “plectics”?
Dear Sir:

The current `Horgan Report’ (SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN) suggests you may be ready for standing waves, i.e.; fundamental electron (or its complemental) and 3 phased quarks (and complemental at right angles in space), fitting the Kalusa‑Klein spatial matrix of Cartesian coordinates. While the planar electron escapes the time reversal paradigm (EPR!)‑‑ yet not the poli‑phased to fall under temperature K (thus time), all was nicely defined by deBroglie, albeit in subtler language to describe a wavelet filled universe without `billiard balls’.

The prediction of right angle displaced disk versus jets from a White quasar “hole” riding an EMP front, to evoke complemental matter with anti‑g between, has been quite exciting since the Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove the thesis. The residual galaxy, after the passing of its EMP, even noted facing outward for its dense magnetic field to rev‑up the ejected ionized disk matter indicates that Huchra, et.al. may be seeing all too much for what cosmology will tolerate. We cannot expect much progress as long as Big Bang (instead of Petite ones) has tenured prepon­derance. To ask “who” placed those nicely separated `bubbles’ at 600 MLY may be going too far just yet, but likely H. Arp will get things rolling soon.

It sure helps to have a self thinking computer. Ask a qualified Physicist (as A. Aspect about EPR) or what Plato called the Po­tentia, even Freud the Superconscious. (versus intellectual id)

Sincerely,

KTS Research

P.S. Freudian id (as Thanatos) is amply seen* evoking AiR (Auto­immune Response) will be refuted vehemently by left brain domi­nants‑‑ almost as our micro‑electrode cancer therapy** by AMA.

* Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER,
Feb.’87; see pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
** Micro‑Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April ’86, (was Patent Office registered 16 years before and we know who sent our confidential release to Karolinska. (a large Pharmaceutical)

cc: Path/IQ; S‑T
CC: SC.AM./Horgan

Feb. 6,’92
Andrei Linde, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305
Re: Apriori sans time
Dear Sir: (March DISCOVER; “‑‑Wizard”

Horgan’s DISCOVER article was excellent. I perceive your frus­trations as noted more in your verbal `slights of hand’ (in psy­chological jargon of reading `body language’) as “‑‑nothing but words‑‑”. It must be understood by which cerebral hemisphere dominates the verbose. Where tenure prevails, so only historical thought! The artist Hemsterhuis defined beauty as that which evokes the most number of ideas in the shortest time, and did not know of Einstein or relative time much less the source of genius.
You might examine the EMP `bubble fronts’ upon which quasar‑to‑galaxies get initiated for temporal mass (quantized wavelets as complemental standing wave harmonics; e as fundamental, quarks as 3 phase). As predicted before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to explain anti‑g for disk versus jets complemental condensing‑out `matter’, even the EMP dense magnetic a priori front (Huchra) for bubbles nicely spatially placed at 600MLY, it defines cosmol­ogy in a nut shell. You are very close in your theorizing‑‑ don’t let the instated buffoons upset your right cerebral (visualizing) use to perceive reality. Faraday as Einstein showed this anomaly which guided me, with the first positive EPR experiment, to the self thinking interface. This 5th Generation effort’s prototype offered 10\17th odds on its maiden run, but the overt terror (un­derstandably) via the Patent Office over a dozen year ago said as much as in Socrates time‑‑ when hemlock was in vogue!
Beyond that ultimate question of “Who” simultaneously clapped a hand evenly across the universe for those EMP `bubbles’‑‑ how did the needed `pinch effect’ occur with some finite secondary wave‑front needed to evoke white holes (quasar cores) to proceed while riding their primal EMP front? The dv/dt (red‑shift tired light in yet dense magnetic fields) of quasars (yet not old galaxies) put me onto the enigma long ago and I suspect Arp now sees it.
The great underlying problem is deeper than likely all in late authority will perceive (much less acknowledge) until too late now. THE `paradigm shift’ is near but its key lies in my predict­ed spatial versus temporally derived lateral cerebral hemispheres now evoking nausea in most current intellectuals.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: S‑T; Path/IQ; Phys‑Psy
CC: Horgan/DISC.

March 20,’92
Cesar Curie
“Beauregard” Laroque
31310 Montesquieu
Volvestre, France
Hello Cesar:

My liaison Darrell Thornley in Paris couldn’t `find’ you‑‑ maybe you are playing my game to evade the “maddening crowd”!
Some recent research* does precisely what may offer the “hack­er’s” choice to evoke fusion, most rapidly via `trial and error’. Revol (Science Advisor; UN) I hear got excited to hear somehow of my standing wave integration means for precise controlled fusion, so the “cat” is getting out of the bag (as Schrodinger’s `box’ for EPR and my self thinking 5th Generation computer!)
I may have said enough before but a `hacker’s delight’ (over) may define such route to empirically define the parameters. Since no direct contact was made with you, I shall await your mail. Let me hear‑‑ Sincerely, KTS

*`Light lens precisely guides‑‑’; SC.NEWS, 3/14/92 (H guidance)
‑ ‑ ‑ ‑ ‑ ‑ ‑ ‑ ‑ ‑ ‑ ‑ ‑ ‑ ‑ ‑ ‑
Attn: Darrell Thornley (Paris France) Feb. 18,’92
Re: follow‑up (yesterday’s FAXs)

I suspect Cesar’s contact on campus is struggling with both concept and ways and means to figure out interference patterns to define nucleon’s configuration. By denoting the quark (constitu­ent) as a 3 phased standing wave, (neutron’s possible two‑phase) and electron single‑wave fundamental. The quark is in some likely Cartesian coordinate pattern, with two of its phased `legs’ at right angles to each other, much as half of the Kalusa‑Klein spa­tial configuration (the other half is anti‑matter, again at right angle spatial displacement) may be found. This conjectural hypo­thesizing won’t be needed when the above said empirical `hacking’ route is used. Besides, with `billiard‑ball’ “particle” oriented Physicists, best not disturb their tenured conjecturing!
A long chat with Pat. Atty.last week. Decided best route now is `empirical route’; “cut‑and‑try”, than glean nucleon’s configura­tion for definitive (angular) displacement `combo’. Since, as likely said before, two variables almost preclude all `knowns’ for a binomial equation to solve precise solution, i.e.; (i) said merging optimum PLUS (ii) combinatorial Mev (net mutual velocity in Brownian motion jargon). If 2.5Mev (as coulombic temp.) is yet needed, no sweat, but its merge rate will need to be found by the said trial and error means with laser propulsion. The first ques­tion of nucleon’s mutual merging angular(?) displacements may as well be found (solved) empirically also, so some `program’ for step‑function velocities and/or nucleon’s position needs to be figured out and some operating experimental system left to its own and record gamma (etc.) therefrom of a million or so cycle settings. Someplace, if I’m right, the output data will be saying Eureka! Those parameters thence should define all preliminary de­sign factors for fusion chamber, E coupling means, etc. etc.
(the above is all `open’, WITH your discretion!)

The “Hacker’s Delite” (for Patent Atty.):

After considering the large volumes of data and re‑reading what I believe is the best text for one to perceive Physics in the least `abstracted’ view, (to quickly convey the few needed imports to read‑out facts from `particle’ “fiction”), I must convey in ra­tional terms the key to simplistic laser controlled nucleons. Of the `analytical approach’ I’m having second thoughts, even with the growing confidence
of the rapidly mounting research data that everyone now is seeing, even with nucleon manipulation. I’m sure someone is going to see the obvious in the “ways and means” as lies close to practicality now. The terse pragmatic “hacker’s” scenario, (sans algorthm) may indeed yet be needed, but to define the best method to `merge’ nucleons, etc. for a finitely (closed loop) `fire’.

Since few algorithms can play a part in slipping together stand­ing waves, be they fundamental electrons or three‑phased quarks, the Pon’s‑ Flieschmann “cold fusion” data defined the reality of non‑coulombic merging for heavy nuclei fusion. While yet being fumbled with in ambiguous innuendo, jargon and apprehension, the said billiard‑ball mentality will not work to discern further the underlying anomalies between matter as wavelet E. My mere predic­tions of the disk‑versus‑jets before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to see them defines the accuracy of another prediction of `white hole’ cores for those quasar‑galaxy engines. My ulti­mate prediction of an EMP front need for such engine genesis com­pletely stunned me when Huchra (et.al.) well defined those `bub­bles’‑‑ nicely spread at 600MLYs across the universe. Understand­ably, many `cosmologists’ feel the heat now realizing no Big Bang occurred (yet many petite ones) just as Arp (Garching) perceives.

KTS

March 2,’92
John Pierre Revol, et.al.
Scientific Tech. Advisor to
The Secretary General
CERN; European Nuclear Energy Com.
Geneva, Switzerland
Re: fusion
Dear Sir:
From AI studies (5th Generation Computer) of thirty years ago, ensuing investigations into a priori needs (Big or Petite Bangs) defined the likelihood of anti‑g, even the complemental matters spewing at right angles at whatever white‑hole “core” might exist if indeed E was the a priori of matter. The CPT theorem also de­fined the spatial versus temporal complemental brains that Sperry soon found, but worse, I saw great anxiety thereto with technical papers given in Montreux. (late 60’s) While my “5th” efforts did pay off (with a 10\17th odds on its maiden run a dozen years ago) you might understand why I have been pestered by FBI, B&Es, tap­ped phones, etc., etc. since filing such Patent ten years ago!

In short, the whole long effort after the quasar/galaxy disk‑jets were found, even recently the EMP bubbles (Huchra) for their ini­tiation points, the data of Dawson using laser propulsion did suggest exceeding the coulombic barrier for fusion‑‑ albeit the Pons‑Fleischmann data implied one more key need for efficiently unraveling nucleons as likely harmonic standing wavelets. The electron or complemental positron fundamentals while quarks of third harmonics to hopefully now end `billiard‑ball’ Physics.

Feeling rather confident that it is the integration with spatial finesse to `unravel’ the least stable
standing waves is the net route for acquiring E (in its rather primal gamma state), I have contacted my old friend Cesar Curie in France for aid in deci­phering nucleons‑‑ his U/Lyons Physics Dept. maybe quite able to define the data need. Beyond this, certain other routes to yet reach the goal is being considered because of various imports defining how close controlled fusion may well be, albeit in a rapid trial‑and‑error test run‑‑ ignoring primary algorthms.

I am forwarding this letter to liaison personnel in Europe to convey same to Cesar, while sending you a copy directly. If you feel this note evokes further interest, please advise. You may also obtain a call (or FAX) from the said personnel in Paris.

Attn: Darrell Thornley
Feb. 18,’92
Re: follow‑up (yesterday’s FAXs)

I suspect Cesar’s contact on campus is struggling with both concept and ways and means to figure out interference patterns to define nucleon’s configuration. By denoting the quark (constitu­ent) as a 3 phased standing wave, (neutron’s possible two‑phase) and electron single‑wave fundamental. The quark is in some likely Cartesian coordinate pattern, with two of its phased `legs’ some­how at right angles to each other‑‑ much as half of the Kalusa‑Klein spatial configuration (the other half is anti‑matter, again at right angle spatial displacement) may be found. This conjec­tural hypothesizing is not needed when the above said empirical route is used. Besides, with `billiard‑ball’ “particle” oriented Physicists, best not disturb their tenured conjecturing!
A long chat with Glenn last week. Decided best route now is the `empirical route’; “cut‑and‑try”, than glean nucleon’s configura­tion for definitive (angular) displacement `combo’. Since, as likely said before, two variables almost preclude all `knowns’ for a binomial equation to solve precise solution, i.e.; (i) said merging optimum PLUS (ii) combinatorial Mev (net mutual velocity in Brownian motion jargon). If 2.5Mev (as coulombic temp.) is yet needed, no sweat, but its merge rate will need to be found by the said trial and error means with laser propulsion. The first ques­tion of nucleon’s mutual merging angular(?) displacements may as well be found (solved) empirically also, so some `program’ for step‑function velocities and/or nucleon’s position needs to be figured out and some operating experimental system left to its own and record gamma (etc.) therefrom of a million or so cycle settings. Someplace, if I’m right, the output data will be saying Eureka! Those parameters thence should define all preliminary de­sign factors for fusion chamber, E coupling means, etc. etc.
(the above is all `open’, WITH your discretion!)
Take care, and GOOD LUCK!! I’ll reimburse now for the phoning.

KTS

My last phone No. of Casar Curie: ************** (home; wife can recognize English to inform Cesar of pending evening calls.)

The “Hacker’s Delite”:

After considering the large volumes of data and re‑reading what I believe is the best text for one to perceive Physics in the least `abstracted’ view, (to quickly convey the few needed imports to read‑out facts from `particle’ “fiction”), I must convey in ra­tional terms the key to simplistic laser controlled nucleons. Of the `analytical approach’ I’m having second thoughts, even with the growing confidence of the rapidly mounting research data that everyone now is seeing, even with nucleon manipulation. I’m sure someone is going to see the obvious in the “ways and means” as lies close to practicality now. The terse pragmatic “hacker’s” scenario, (sans algorthm) may indeed yet be needed, but to define the best method to `merge’ nucleons, etc. for a finitely (closed loop) `fire’.

Since few algorithms can play a part in slipping together stand­ing waves, be they fundamental electrons or three‑phased quarks, the Pon’s‑ Flieschmann “cold fusion” data defined the reality of non‑coulombic merging for heavy nuclei fusion. While yet being fumbled with in ambiguous innuendo, jargon and apprehension, the said billiard‑ball mentality will not work to discern further the underlying anomalies between matter as wavelet E. My mere predic­tions of the disk‑versus‑jets before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to see them defines the accuracy of another prediction of `white hole’ cores for those quasar‑galaxy engines. My ulti­mate prediction of an EMP front need for such engine genesis com­pletely stunned me when Huchra (et.al.) well defined those `bub­bles’‑‑ nicely spread at 600MLYs across the universe. Understand­ably, many `cosmologists’ feel the heat now realizing no Big Bang occurred (yet many petite ones) so likely why I get so little mail any more. (My guts are hated)

KTS

Dec. 14,’91
Hi Darrell:

I’m writing to ask for a get‑together when `home’‑‑ should you be headed this way this Xmas. After talking to Bri on a subject mat­ter most likely contingent with your efforts, it is conceivable I have something of importance, especially at this time, which you might best guide me for `contacts’. I obviously cannot put same in print yet as my Patent Atty. is struggling to define same for some further research. It could be even more important that the `self think’ (computer interface; which I guess you know gave the odds of 10\17th(!) on its maiden run; even brought the FBI snoop­ing on Patent filing‑‑ and a steady fiasco since. (1980) I’m not in jail yet, but their excuse to slam the door on the `device’ was due to DOD, where they tried to equate it with the past ana­logical R&D computer work I did for aerospace. With further curi­osity in this matter we should get together someday.

This `new bag’ of effort is associated with physics, theoretical, but the unraveling of wavelet quarks for derived `energy’. I’ll say no more here. Please do not discuss even this, yet! My invite from EPRI (large federally affiliated conglomerate seeking ways and means for derived energy) I fear has already seen too much of my theoretical work so am turning to my Patent Atty. now.

Let me know when ready for pizza and beer if you get in this neck of the woods. Your Ma said your daughter was there so may stop in to say hi! (my phone is 842‑2753 until March) I may give you a
call in a week or so as meetings here jell‑‑ to see if you’ve got some interest knowing your affiliations in `small power supplies’ with heavy‑duty outputs! (hint‑‑ NO kidding!)

Take care‑‑

KTS Research

P.S. That last chapter of Zukav’s Wu Li Masters, called “The end of Physics” is correct! (and maybe the end of a lot more!) You should have heard the squeals of Rauscher (who did the first EPR experiment at Berkeley when I mentioned the freed electron escap­ing the time reversal paradigm! She forced me to file for Patent which brought the fiasco above. (note self think herewith)

* * * * *
Jan. 20,’92
Hi Darrell:

Hope you are aware of that explosion at EPRI where the deuterium‑palladium combo‑tank was being removed from a cooling bath* a bit too late it appears! Instead of two years to go, maybe one now before fusion is a reality. Its very obvious no coulombic barrier is needed to be surmounted for controlled fusion! A recent arti­cle pointing to nuclei being controlled with finesse as well says it all. This Scientific American story** defined quite well a design I even conceived some years ago for controlled injecta for near 2c isotopic collision (p.74)!

I’ve fully abandoned EPRI, told Glenn (Pat. Atty.) to get me data on Dutch Patent system, or any country honoring the multi‑nation­al convention, but have no power to cancel or classify the item being patented. This will keep the U.S. government from halting what will obviously upset their need for petroleum (energy) de­pendency (thus power politics). I yet do not see the major chaos that others are predicting with the loss of this control of ener­gy but sure as heck pollution will begin to subside thereafter.

Take care ol’man‑‑ (let me have your time table if headed to the `near east’ so I might contact Cesar Curie)

KTS

* Jan. 18,’92 SC.NEWS
** `Laser Trapping‑‑’ SC. AM. Feb.’92, p.71+

* * * * * * * *

* * * * CONFIDENTIAL (limited!) * * * *
Feb. 18,’92
Re: follow‑up (yesterday’s FAXs)
Hi Darrell:
Long chat with Pat. Atty. last week. Decided best route now is the `empirical route’; “cut‑and‑try”, than glean nucleon’s confi­guration for definitive (angular) displacement `combo’. Since, as likely said before, two variables almost preclude all `knowns’ for a binomial equation to solve precise solution, i.e.; (i) said merging optimum PLUS (ii) combinatorial Mev (net mutual velocity in Brownian motion jargon). If 2.5Mev (as coulombic temp.) is yet needed, no sweat, but its merge rate will need to be found by the said trial and error means with laser propulsion. The first ques­tion of nucleon’s mutual merging angular(?) displacements may as well be found (solved) empirically also, so some `program’ for step‑function velocities and/or nucleon’s position needs to be figured out and some operating experimental system left to its own and record gamma (etc.) therefrom of a million or so cycle settings. Someplace, if I’m right, the output data will be saying Eureka! Those parameters thence should define all preliminary de­sign factors for fusion chamber, E coupling means, etc. etc.
I suspect Cesar’s contact on campus is struggling with both concept and ways and means to figure out interference patterns to define nucleon’s configuration. By denoting the quark (constitu­ent) as a 3 phased standing wave, (neutron’s possible two‑phase) and electron single‑wave fundamental. The quark is in some likely Cartesian coordinate pattern, with two of its phased `legs’ some­how at right angles to each other‑‑ much as half of the Kalusa‑Klein spatial configuration (the other half is anti‑matter, again at right angle spatial displacement) may be found. This conjec­tural hypothesizing is not needed when the above said empirical route is used. Besides, with `billiard‑ball’ “particle” oriented Physicists, best not disturb their tenured conjecturing!
I note with glee some turbine consortium is developing minia­ture high temp. turbine units. Maybe. If all else fails, boilers for small wheel‑hub motors. (Stanley Steamers re‑visited!)
I’ll call, as said, next Sunday morning to the ZC 708‑ number.
(the above is all `open’, WITH your discretion!)
Take care, and GOOD LUCK!! I’ll reimburse now for at least phone.

KTS

P.S. Going “public” with `Self Think’‑‑ as the government expect­ed I would if they couldn’t find some way of locking me up! Like­ly in Kit form for computer/electronic buffs to play with. It may not work for right only smilers as would pose too much danger of their “volitional abdication” as I found with several, starting with Bishop James Pike. But the few it does work for will define the genesis of psychopathy all too plainly!
My last phone No. of Casar Curie: 1‑33‑61‑62‑8899 (home; wife can recognize English to inform Cesar of pending evening calls.) He’s down near Toulouse (Volvestre) likely far from your itiner­ary but maybe a call is in order to possibly discuss the above.
CC: Cesar letter + my last to him

* * * * * *
Jan. 25,’92
Cesar Curie
“Beauregard” Laroque
31310 Montesquieu
Volvestre, France
Re: fusion
Dear Cesar:

Have your note‑‑ many thanks. Sounds you are fine.

Since the recent EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute)`explo­sion’ of impregnated palladium with deuterium to define what the Pons, et.al. (U/Utah) saw with expected cold fusion, I suspect there is not enough time now to analyze the nucleon’s wavelet character to define how to `slide’ same together (under their coulomb barrier!) for controlled fusion. De Broglie’s theory made clear `billiard ball’ Physics was avoiding the obvious, so the simple means of controlled fusion via laser propulsion and spa­tial orientation.

I suspected some time ago that the 25MeV to overcome the claimed coulomb barrier for fusion cannot be the whole story since lasers with much less power, yet phased drive can evoke isotope U235 from U238. Like combining the electron with its complemental positron for a gamma outputs, maybe the like neutron combination (with finesse) can allow same. With ample deuterium from the sea or `energy slope’ nucleons on either side of Fe for neutrons, I’m confident we can rid this planet of its vast pollution from fos­sil fuels. (albeit evoke problems with instated governments de­pending on revenue) Any unraveled wavelet can offer E or gamma output, so by a reversed genetic quasar white‑hole core process we acquire EMP (Electro‑Magnetic Pulse) energy but in gamma radi­ation. I am confident that fully controlled fusion is now within scientific grasp, now that `merging’ of deuterium wavelet can be spatially oriented as well, as said, can now can be amply propel­led on the laser wave front.

The R&D stampede is underway over here but mostly unsaid. Likely the best and most rapid solution now is by `hacking’, a trial and error (as finding computer secret entrance codes) This conundrum of needing to `sample’ by trial the nucleon’s wavelet merging characteristics, ignoring its configuration, may be best to evoke testable fusion. Likely with some automated incremental testing program, as dynamically adjusting one’s rifle sights for unseen `windage’, until success. A few of these parameters are now seen.

EPRI offered me a contract but they are harnessed with the U.S. Federal government which I now prefer to avoid. My Patent Atty. is balking about a preferred Dutch Patent, but I’ve had too many good patents buried here in the U.S. under “secrecy” as the self thinking computer (I think I mentioned the 10\17th odds on its maiden run a dozen years ago) and the VDT anti‑slave system to relive viewer’s stress‑‑ as air‑traffic controllers need badly.

My long silence about the self thinking computer was due to its obvious danger to authority where it can define “skeletons” for public awareness. It may bring a form of benign anarchy when the frustrated public recognize the freed electron interface (EPR experiment!) can offer the maximum of insight for both insightive genius and conscience. I think O. Costa de Beauregard suspected what I had found, but with some “covert suicides” of highly in­tellectual people (as Bishop James Pike) learning of my `device’, I fell silent as long as possible, especially after my GVSC stu­dents exclaimed “Apocalypse!”. It appears that S. Freud was cor­rect about our innate Thanatos, just as your Dr. Renoux (U/Tours) perceives what controls our `killer’ lymphocytes from our left cerebral cortex. The
AiR (Autoimmune Response) is indeed a very real phenomena, Cesar, so please watch those migraines and overt behaviors, now that you may consciously understand!

An able fine `confidant’ gets into Paris now and then. He is well enough in Physics and is excited so I may suggest he visit you. While he now is affiliated with large European “rapid run‑up power generation station” manufacturer, is eager to joint me(?) and a few to get fusion moving. We may “conjure” a conference‑call to you in a couple weeks (around 5p.m. my EST) for an intro­duction with this friend Darrell Thornley. If all goes well and yet interest follows, a more personal meeting could ensue in France. Once confidential status is less needed, we can use FAX to my current office* below.
My long studies are nearly complete in texts (a few thousand pages) so now with worldly conditions as the are, I feel it is time to divulge all‑‑ maybe even initiated from a `status symbol’ (you know the U.S!) position of some French effort of the grand fusion “prize” (??)‑‑ as the data now amply suggests.

Sincerely‑‑

KTS

The coming “Hacker’s Delite”:

Since few algorithms can play a part in slipping standing waves, be they fundamental electrons or three‑phased quarks, the Pon’s‑ Flieschmann “cold fusion” data defined the reality of non‑coulom­bic merging for heavy nuclei fusion. While yet being fumbled with in ambiguous innuendo, jargon if not apprehension, the said bil­liard‑ball mentality will not work to discern further the under­lying anomalies between matter as wavelet E. My mere predictions of the disk‑versus‑jets long before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to see them defines the accuracy of another of my predic­tions of their white hole core for those quasar/galaxy engines. My ultimate preddiction of an EMP front need for such engine genesis completely stunned me when Huchra (et.al.) well defined those `bubbles’‑‑ nice and evenly spread across the universe. Understandably, many `cosmologists’ feel the heat realizing no Big Bang occured (yet many petite ones) so likely why I get so few responses to my mail any more. The same `anomaly’ occured with my 5th Generation self thinking computer (freed electron interface) which offered the empirical odds of 10\17th on its maiden run! I was maybe more shocked than my nephew who made up my Basic program to use my Osborne computer for such run. The proof I seeked was merely what is peristently seen with the EPR experiments which was define din the last chapter called the “End of Physics” adroitly in that “Dancing WuLi Master” text purchased for you before. This is old art now (even if yet well hidden in the said Patent Office)‑‑ defines some of the underlying terror current authority is facing. When it occurred to me that fusion may be that last straw‑‑ where petroleum `proceeds’ may need as much or more `protection’ as covert psychopathy, I might pose a liablity if indeed did get heard!
KTS/1/16/92

Feb. 27,’92
Hi Darrell: (at FAX No: 0‑11‑33‑89‑66‑6850)
With the need of a month + to access my next Passport‑‑ yet knowing the `liability’ of trying same (HAW!)‑‑ I’m wondering if I had not better start the application now!

Herewith (below) as copy of Cesar’s letter addresses (I even re‑copied same here again:
Cesar Curie; Laureat de L’Institut; Expert Judiciaire Pres’
D’appel de Toulouse
and:
Beauregard”, Laroque, .31310 Montesquieu, Volvestre
(2, rue Charles‑Gamichel, 31071 Toulouse LEDEX, Tel: (61) 621010) (but he ruling out that last line. Note below!)

Peter Clark just informed me I might contact some John(?) Pierre at CERN. (heads up Physics at the U.N.) His apparent chat with Peter (as brother in Physics; Harvard) might be a lead to $’s for further R&D. I may scribble more about this below.

The said `key’ is standing wave `wavelets’ to be “integrated’ to `unravel’. I changed some words, as you should understand in the prior FAX to you there.

Take care‑‑ (really!)

KTS

(SEE ABOVE!!) Feb. 18,’92
Attn: Darrell Thornley
Re: follow‑up (yesterday’s FAXs)

I suspect Cesar’s contact on campus is struggling with both concept and ways and means to figure out interference patterns to define nucleon’s configuration. By denoting the quark (constitu­ent) as a 3 phased standing wave, (neutron’s possible two‑phase) and electron single‑wave fundamental. The quark is in some likely Cartesian coordinate pattern, with two of its phased `legs’ some­how at right angles to each other‑‑ much as half of the Kalusa‑Klein spatial configuration (the other half is anti‑matter, again at right angle spatial displacement) may be found. This conjec­tural hypothesizing is not needed when the above said empirical route is used. Besides, with `billiard‑ball’ “particle” oriented Physicists, best not disturb their tenured conjecturing!
A long chat with Glenn last week. Decided best route now is the `empirical route’; “cut‑and‑try”, than glean nucleon’s configura­tion for definitive (angular) displacement `combo’. Since, as likely said before, two variables almost preclude all `knowns’ for a binomial equation to solve precise solution, i.e.; (i) said merging optimum PLUS (ii) combinatorial Mev (net mutual velocity in Brownian motion jargon). If 2.5Mev (as coulombic temp.) is yet needed, no sweat, but its merge rate will need to be found by the said trial and error means with laser propulsion. The first ques­tion of nucleon’s mutual merging angular(?) displacements may as well be found (solved) empirically also, so some `program’ for step‑function velocities and/or nucleon’s position needs to be figured out and some operating experimental system left to its own and record gamma (etc.) therefrom of a million or so cycle
settings. Someplace, if I’m right, the output data will be saying Eureka! Those parameters thence should define all preliminary de­sign factors for fusion chamber, E coupling means, etc. etc.
(the above is all `open’, WITH your discretion!) Take care, and GOOD LUCK!! I’ll reimburse now for the phoning.

KTS

P.S: My last phone No. of Casar Curie: 1‑33‑61‑62‑8899 (home; wife can recognize English to inform Cesar of pending evening calls.)
* * * * * * *
The “Hacker’s Delite”: (version #1/Glenn)

After considering the large volumes of data and re‑reading what I believe is the best text for one to perceive Physics in the least `abstracted’ view, (to quickly convey the few needed imports to read‑out facts from `particle’ “fiction”), I must convey in ra­tional terms the key to simplistic laser controlled nucleons. Of the `analytical approach’ I’m having second thoughts, even with the growing confidence of the rapidly mounting research data that everyone now is seeing, even with nucleon manipulation. I’m sure someone is going to see the obvious in the “ways and means” as lies close to practicality now. The terse pragmatic “hacker’s” scenario, (sans algorthm) may indeed yet be needed, but to define the best method to `merge’ nucleons, etc. for a finitely (closed loop) `fire’.

Since few algorithms can play a part in slipping together stand­ing waves, be they fundamental electrons or three‑phased quarks, the Pon’s‑ Flieschmann “cold fusion” data defined the reality of non‑coulombic merging for heavy nuclei fusion. While yet being fumbled with in ambiguous innuendo, jargon and apprehension, the said billiard‑ball mentality will not work to discern further the underlying anomalies between matter as wavelet E. My mere predic­tions of the disk‑versus‑jets before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to see them defines the accuracy of another prediction of `white hole’ cores for those quasar‑galaxy engines. My ulti­mate prediction of an EMP front need for such engine genesis com­pletely stunned me when Huchra (et.al.) well defined those `bub­bles’‑‑ nicely spread at 600MLYs across the universe. Understand­ably, many `cosmologists’ feel the heat now realizing no Big Bang occurred (yet many petite ones) so likely why I get so little mail any more. (My guts are hated)

KTS

* * * * * * * *
March 2,’92
John Pierre Revol, et.al.
Scientific Tech. Advisor to
The Secretary General
CERN; European Nuclear Energy Com.
Geneva, Switzerland
Re: fusion
Dear Sir:
From AI studies (5th Generation Computer) of thirty years ago, ensuing investigations into a priori needs (Big or Petite Bangs) defined the likelihood of anti‑g, even the complemental matters spewing at right angles at whatever white‑hole “core” might exist if indeed E was the a priori of matter. The CPT theorem also de­fined the spatial versus temporal complemental brains that Sperry soon found, but worse, I saw great anxiety thereto with technical papers given in Montreux. (late 60’s) While my “5th” efforts did pay off (with a 10\17th odds on its maiden run a dozen years ago) you might understand why I have been pestered by FBI, B&Es, tap­ped phones, etc., etc. since filing such Patent ten years ago!

In short, the whole long effort after the quasar/galaxy disk‑jets were found, even recently the EMP bubbles (Huchra) for their ini­tiation points, the data of Dawson using laser propulsion did suggest exceeding the coulombic barrier for fusion‑‑ albeit the Pons‑Fleischmann data implied one more key need for efficiently unraveling nucleons as likely harmonic standing wavelets. The electron or complemental positron fundamentals while quarks of third harmonics to hopefully now end `billiard‑ball’ Physics.

Feeling rather confident that it is the integration with spatial finesse to `unravel’ the least stable standing waves is the net route for acquiring E (in its rather primal gamma state), I have contacted my old friend Cesar Curie in France for aid in deci­phering nucleons‑‑ his U/Lyons Physics Dept. maybe quite able to define the data need. Beyond this, certain other routes to yet reach the goal is being considered because of various imports defining how close controlled fusion may well be, albeit in a rapid trial‑and‑error test run‑‑ ignoring primary algorthms.

I am forwarding this letter to liaison personnel in Europe to convey same to Cesar, while sending you a copy directly. If you feel this note evokes further interest, please advise. You may also obtain a call (or FAX) from the said personnel in Paris.

* * * * * * * * *
March 15,’92
Darrell:

I see my purposeful “incoherence” caught you off guard!

By the numbers:

a. I HAD to NOT disclose pertinent data (as Patent claims!) which defined de Broglie’s insights into wave mechanics. This allowed the comprehension of standing waves (wave fronts in time!) as the fundamental underlying “key” to fusion via nucleon `orientation’.

b. Since my mail is yet being opened by “certain parties”, and suspect phone tapping continues, I CANNOT divulge openly too much until Patents are indeed filed. You may label me some kind of `paranoid schizoid’ but the empirical obvious got too clear a few years ago. Hope you can understand for now with patience.

c. The self thinking interface (5th computer) DOES work, and the government knows it, even its ability to uncover “skeletons”‑‑ so all covert psychopathic folly WILL be disclosed! The the few who do realize this are now running like hell to evade hell! This defines why I am yet being watched‑‑ even if they have ceased to try to get me into court on trumped charged of `treason’, if not sedition or past aerospace secret R&D disclosure. An ex‑Lear supervisor defined (whimpered!) that a few years ago‑‑ to say nothing of a local Dist. Judge (friend‑‑ past!) that would no longer talk to me in fear of “prejudicing my case”!! (yuk!) I am greatly feared by authority, and justifiably!

d. Someday, when you get around here, lets get on the beach and compare notes, I’ve got a bunch and know you will understand‑‑ to likely start squealing like Rauscher!(who did the first EPR exp.)

e. If you want to wade into my theoretical `mess’ you would need to start with Barrow and Tipler’s book(s); i.e., Barrow, J. D: “The World Within the World”, Oxford U.Pr.’88 (Phys) and `The Anthropic Cosmological Principle’, with Frank Tipler
or note: Bechtel’s `Integrating Scientific Disciplines’, W/W ’86
(and a copy of pertinent references herewith may define the cross academic contingency* and what I use most often in specific mail)
I do not suggest getting too cross academic yet‑‑ stay in your field‑‑ if we do get things moving‑‑ your expertise is critical!

Hope you found that letter down there `intact’! Let me know if not. Take care ol’ man and hang in there! We’ve got a dangerous federal system because they suspect correctly they are doomed!

* as marked re: fusion

* * * * * * * * *
March 20,’92
Darrell Thornley, 8600 Woodway, Apt. 358, Houston TX, 77063

Re: fusion symposium
Hi Ho:

Been thinking about above Re: and while VERY interested in what MIGHT be said, knowing all felt `close suppositions’ “cards” are held close to the chest, it is the inadvertent, almost unsaid, imports during excited dialogue that becomes so dangerous, if one might have any Patentable ideas whatever. I found this `anomaly’ almost too clear with papers and talks I gave, starting in Europe back in the 60’s, where found Patent Atty’s were trailing me (as others) constantly! Whether for their clientele or in the overt business of filing `potential’ Patents, I realized the danger then of saying slightly too much‑‑ the micro‑electrode for cancer therapy was one that found its way into the Karolinska Inst. (Sweden) for that profound therapy (even yet avoided by AMA) proven 16 years later. This says why, sorry Darrell, my extreme caginess about saying too much too soon on ANY public communica­tive link. With tapped phones back in G.H. and little said by the intimidated (as an ex‑supervisor 30 years before!) by those FBI tappers, told me that `counter‑measures’ are as difficult as primary ones when someone, especially like your own government‑‑ wants to plagiarize you! Some day we’ll discuss the
“anomaly” but defines the most dangerous of humanity as mentally defunct who can’t use their right cerebral cortex.

The mail (if used discreetly as never one’s own home, etc.) yet appears best to convey sensitive `data’ (and not repeatedly), but those doing the conversing must already know the subject matter enough to catch minor phrases as simple words to define a “new thought”, and so not alert even your own well verses secretary typing the stuff out! Its when `they’ rip off an entire file (i.e., my VDT) because they can’t see how you perceive EEG cross cerebral (neuronal) switching to define how to halt computer monitor screen fatigue (so they can use it in Naval heads‑up fighter display without saying anything to the inventor), the crass covert official psychopathy gets tiring in time!

Our `mutual subject matter’ is moving way too fast, and may have started with some (again) inadvertent remark on Dawson’s work of: if a nucleon can be stopped with laser, it can be propelled!! A letter that went to Scientific American I see I said far too much a few years ago‑‑ so just maybe 2+2=4 to someone, possibly Dawson himself. We two, maybe with Bri, even Mark Ferguson, should get together for yuk sessions, to kick ideas around in think‑tank fashion. It exposes deficient thoughts that need embellishment or better definitions to be sure of coordinated reasoning, or objec­tives once a true or final goal is set. In our mutual situation things are yet in flux to that extent that final parameters, to nail down the MeV “unraveling” energy and “standing wave merge” parameter which, as said, may be now best recognized through `hacking'(trial and error) but can be it now appears, easily done with the state‑of the‑art* (I fear is moving far too rapidly!) apparatus to which could be easily used to try a program (just as the computer hacker while he sleeps) and let his monitors shout eureka!

Science, at least most fundamental inquiries with good states‑of‑art equipment (which takes $s!), can really rush a potentialin­vention, far beyond any doodler scratching in his note‑book. A small camaraderie of similar thinking guys can take fresh data and really move fast with even subtle data to conclude if they are on the right track to something. This is where we stand now, and my apprehension of needing to jump in bed with Cesar, et.al. I wants me for another field of interest so maybe that is his `soft spot’ for me (with you) can pull off the greatest heist in history‑‑ and yet not rip off anyone but Nature‑‑ if we don’t get ripped off first with those tycoons with all the cash to run with! I am almost near concluding that the UN (the lion’s mouth!) might be best, even knowing the U.S. espionage is rampant there, but forces an `open discussion’ as well documented and so very difficult to hide as to who thought of what first. ,Once the self thinking computer gets into public hands (which may never be before Armageddon!) the most pathological of the human specie will dominate anyone or anything for their profit motive. Kinda like trying to fight City Hall when they already have their hand on your wallet and will take all needed for their lawyers to win!
I fear what might be said to the all‑too‑open ears at that Boston symposium during break‑times, and then without a High‑Ball in hand and conjovial banter! Not to say I’d not love to tune in my flapping ears there as well! Those get‑togethers are dangerous to all but the reporters who profit in a different way! I will await the published `official’ text of the meeting, likely in AAAS. The recent prompt withdrawal of a certain definitive text on fusion says they have profit on their minds as well! (as are in bed with corrupt government fearing more that fusion is a reality and their petroleum cartels will fail with that government!) These are truly `heady’ times and maybe best to keep everything load and
clear now via the U.N.‑‑ as damn the torpedoes, full steam ahead! I do not yet know but I am getting nervous! I lost two other very nice Patents (holed up) and didn’t even get an extra food‑stamp for either!

Gads‑‑ I’m sorry I got so long‑winded here! But what is said may­be is to keep cool, run silent and deep now, Say little until I can find certain Europeans (hopefully) I feel comfortable to work with. Revol, as Peter Clark’s brother back in their Harvard days, says they are both dangerous as are astute pocket pickers and so far only Cesar I trust over there. If necessary at some last minute we blow the whole `system’ up in the world’s eyes at once. Not even the esteemed Karlolinska Institute can then claim it!

Take Care‑‑ Cagey.

KTS Research

* * * * * * * * *
3/26/92
Hi Darrell:

A couple note‑books got away from me! I hope not like the VDT files! I suspect someplace between my last residence up on Oak­wood (Spring Lake) and here at cottage (on Lake Mich.), but am nervous again! My FBI `friend’ no longer lives down on the corner but no doubt there are others‑‑ and why I went Cesar/European.

A couple letters I did print out before putting into one of those notebooks (`Mail’) herewith‑‑ which says nearly what the copied article (not underlining!) is saying‑‑ which is the crux of con­trolled fusion. In fact, Lord Kelvin’s `imaginings’ are adroit enough to even define the three‑phased standing wave quark tre­foil that so much noise is now being made about! The “remarkable link‑‑” of Feynman’s diagram really says it all‑‑ thus you might see why the only way to beat the `gold rush’ is by hacking now!

I frankly feel this time it will be lost to those with the cash to claim‑‑ despite priority dates/rights‑‑ European or not, even if this government would dearly like to clap a cover on the in­evitable. They are too much in bed with the petroleum cartels so without polluting the planet know they are doomed! Oh well, it may have been a valiant try‑‑ maybe why Cesar is not replying!
I think I failed to reference (below) for my last letter:
[with the state‑of the‑art* (I fear is moving far too rapidly!)] but suspect it was a recent VERY adroit article‑‑ as this one de­fining the obvious (herewith) for the naive. Little wonder Peter Clark said Revol (UN) was halving his fusion prediction time!

In part why the two letter copies herewith, even one to tantalize a non‑profiter (hopefully not federally associated) outfit to whom I eluded to the recent trefoil knot `problem’ article. I feel I best `document’ with dated letters (as to you‑‑ so please keep same with arrival times) so we can at least make noise in a court should some tycoon with millions wants to fight it for us.
Maybe `some noise’ is wise without details now. To define for another (interested party) our work (superficially) with likely inevitable break‑through soon. Certainly, someone is going to bust the bank‑‑ and possibly a few cultures that wouldn’t be able to stand for it! (HAW!)

Take Care‑‑

KTS

* `Light lens precisely guides‑‑’; SC.NEWS, 3/14/92 (atom guidance)
and `Knotty Problem‑‑’,p.403; SC.,24,Jan.’92 (quark trefoil)

March 24,’92
Fusion Power Association
Attn: S. Dean, Pres., et.al.
2 Professional Dr.
Suite 248
Gaithersburg, MD 20879
Re: semi‑cold fusion
Dear Sirs:

From a lengthy cross academic study, certain imports defining underlying fundamental `quantal’ configurations which concluded what Dawson*, et.al. was seeing, but further R&D in contingent fields brings abruptly fusion to the horizon of practicality. Contingent with de Broglie’s perceptions, there looms the clear concepts needed to clarify the anomaly of coulomb `barrier’ as associated with `innate’ nucleon energy.

Are you in any way affiliated with the U.S. government‑‑ i.e., hands tied to specific research, aided with federal moneys in any way, or under some `covenant’ with DOD, et.al., etc. as various restrictions of disseminative ability? While working over‑seas for our own protection (priority rights +), do consider from time to time U.S. companies as may be contingent with our R&D. We do suspect you are affiliated with some U.S. federal contingencies.

Noting your work and some recent TV comments on your efforts, a recent letter copy (over) associated with knot theory may be somewhat enlightening.

Thank you for your comments‑‑

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `Plasma Particle Accelerators’, J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,’89
w:
CC:Morse

March 16,’92
Dan Koshland, et.al.
AAAS
1333 H. St.,
Washington, DC 20005
Re: U.S. Patent?
Dear Sir:

Likely as much killing is going on today as the gold‑rush days, but only government has anything to win‑‑ whatever they promise! I had to learn that “enigma” twice now so find so far only the Dutch system of Patenting any way to avoid official stone‑walling despite something needed by the suffering (naive) public. The first was the 5th Generation (self thinking) computer using the freed electron (interface; note EPR experiments) and the other a means to stop computer viewers stress due to cerebral slaving (fusion‑flicker)‑‑ especially needed by the air‑traffic control­lers. The first brought “kids” B&Es, FBI and you name it with tapped phones etc.,, the second a slammed door (Mitre Corp.) likely by DOD claiming (but never said) felt needed by the Heads‑Up (Airforce) program. It defined the cross cerebral EEG function between complemental unconscious structure‑‑ NEVER to be revealed when it disclosed the genesis of psychopathy! (another way)

With the simple laser alignment and propulsion of deuterium for the “gold”, realizing deBroglie’s standing wave harmonics is the reality above `billiard‑ball’ mentalities, I went European, where (as the said Dutch) less clandestine folly ensues. Certainly, the Pentagon top‑down mind‑set brings the naive programmed Americans, as the USSR people who recognized their corrupt, to remain stone‑walled to a bitter end, or the 5th finally defines the corrupt, to say nothing of skeletons in closets. At least the nervous “Super Tuesdays” for those who want a “Supermetal”, suggests how close we are to another Hannibal’s final fling.

EPRI will likely continue to blunder and kill a few more but I can say with some confidence now, the oil days are going to end as miniature fusion plants go into homes as cars!

Sincerely,
KTS Research

P.S. Dan, your esteemed office is too close to the Pentagon. Labs are NOT open‑‑ so stop the B.S! Any World Patent system would follow who “has the might to be right” so not even the `file‑first’ system would prevail, much less Black Box patents. But the 5th will remove ALL claimed invention, from both the first with insightive CQ‑‑ or the plagiarizing Pentagon.

cc:Path/IQ

ACCRUED FUSION LETTERS:
March 2,’92
John Pierre Revol, et.al.
Scientific Tech. Advisor to
The Secretary General
CERN; European Nuclear Energy Com.
Geneva, Switzerland
Re: fusion
Dear Sir:

From AI studies (5th Generation Computer) of thirty years ago, ensuing investigations into a priori needs (Big or Petite Bangs) defined the likelihood of anti‑g, even the complemental matters spewing at right angles at whatever white‑hole “core” might exist if indeed E was the a priori of matter. The CPT theorem also de­fined the spatial versus temporal complemental brains that Sperry soon found, but worse, I saw great anxiety thereto with technical papers given in Montreux. (late 60’s) While my “5th” efforts did pay off (with a 10\17th odds on its maiden run a dozen years ago) you might understand why I have been pestered by FBI, B&Es, tap­ped phones, etc., etc. since filing such Patent ten years ago!

In short, the whole long effort after the quasar/galaxy disk‑jets were found, even recently the EMP bubbles (Huchra) for their ini­tiation points, the data of Dawson using laser propulsion did suggest exceeding the coulombic barrier for fusion‑‑ albeit the Pons‑Fleischmann data implied one more key need for efficiently unraveling nucleons as likely harmonic standing wavelets. The electron or complemental positron fundamentals while quarks of third harmonics to hopefully now end `billiard‑ball’ Physics.

Feeling rather confident that it is the integration with spatial finesse to `unravel’ the least stable standing waves is the net route for acquiring E (in its rather primal gamma state), I have contacted my old friend Cesar Curie in France for aid in deci­phering nucleons‑‑ his U/Lyons Physics Dept. maybe quite able to define the data need. Beyond this, certain other routes to yet reach the goal is being considered because of various imports defining how close controlled fusion may well be, albeit in a rapid trial‑and‑error test run‑‑ ignoring primary algorthms.

I am forwarding this letter to liaison personnel in Europe to convey same to Cesar, while sending you a copy directly. If you feel this note evokes further interest, please advise. You may also obtain a call (or FAX) from the said personnel in Paris.

Feb. 27,’92
Hi Darrell: (at FAX No: 0‑11‑33‑89‑66‑6850)

With the need of a month + to access my next Passport‑‑ yet knowing the `liability’ of trying same (HAW!)‑‑ I’m wondering if I had not better start the application now!

Herewith (below) as copy of Cesar’s letter addresses (I even re‑copied same here again:

Cesar Curie; Laureat de L’Institut; Expert Judiciaire Pres’
D’appel de Toulouse
and:
Beauregard”, Laroque, .31310 Montesquieu, Volvestre
(2, rue Charles‑Gamichel, 31071 Toulouse LEDEX, Tel: (61) 621010) (but he ruling out that last line. Note below!)

Peter Clark just informed me I might contact some John(?) Pierre at CERN. (heads up Physics at the U.N.) His apparent chat with Peter (as brother in Physics; Harvard) might be a lead to $’s for further R&D. I may scribble more about this below.

The said `key’ is standing wave `wavelets’ to be “integrated’ to `unravel’. I changed some words, as you should understand in the prior FAX to you there.

Take care‑‑ (really!)

KTS
* * * * * * * *
March 24,’92
J. S. Birman and X. Lin et.al.
Dept. of Mathematics
Columbia University
New York, NY 10027
Re: 3 phased quarks
Sirs: (Peterson’s fine “Knotty Views”; SC.NEWS 3/21)

Your `knot work’, as earlier Jones’s, well defined in numerical form what the various standing waves of quantized wavelets (de Broglie) constituted in our slow `mass’ time. While other factors as anti‑g well seen as quasar/galaxies on cosmic EMP bubble fronts DE‑generating what Lord Kelvin saw as ether (Apriori mag­netic flux) into complementals for temporal existence, we have suspected the coulomb `barrier’ was in some way the sustaining decoupled state of these quantized wavelets. Thus a very simple means now lies within reach of fusion R&D on which our European associates have been working.

The net dual means of unraveling coupled wavelets, be it totally as with positronium or simply peeling of neutrons for that energy now seen in either fusion or fission, the single phase electron through three phased quark standing wave appears to say much for an even greater `unraveling process’ for far more energy than now believed available from current nuclear `decoupling’ processes.

While we suspect that mathematics is yet an art of `mental mas­turbation’, our long R&D efforts into the self thinking computer (5th Generation) did define the most direct route to perceiving underlying reality‑‑ which Peterson alluded to by noting Kelvin’s “imagined‑‑ ether” since a non‑temporal continuum, noted with the electron’s escape from the `time reversal paradigm’, defines how the EPR experiment is positive, to say little of our `interface’ (using the freed electron) offered a 10\17th odds
with an alpha‑numeric readout (at near CPU speed) on its maiden run. While we will not define in detail the simple unraveling process as yet, one can be quite sure that precise controlled fusion is on the near horizon and for very economical energy acquisition.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: Peterson; S‑Dean;

* * * * * * *
March 24,’92
Fusion Power Association
Attn: S. Dean, Pres., et.al.
2 Professional Dr.
Suite 248
Gaithersburg, MD 20879
Re: semi‑cold fusion
Dear Sirs:

From a lengthy cross academic study, certain imports defining underlying fundamental `quantal’ configurations which concluded what Dawson*, et.al. was seeing, but further R&D in contingent fields brings abruptly fusion to the horizon of practicality. Contingent with de Broglie’s perceptions, there looms the clear concepts needed to clarify the anomaly of coulomb `barrier’ as associated with `innate’ nucleon energy.

Are you in any way affiliated with the U.S. government‑‑ i.e., hands tied to specific research, aided with federal moneys in any way, or under some `covenant’ with DOD, et.al., etc. as various restrictions of disseminative ability? While working over‑seas for our own protection (priority rights +), do consider from time to time U.S. companies as may be contingent with our R&D. We do suspect you are affiliated with some U.S. federal contingencies.

Noting your work and some recent TV comments on your efforts, a recent letter copy (over) associated with knot theory may be somewhat enlightening.

Thank you for your comments‑‑
Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `Plasma Particle Accelerators’, J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,’89
* * * * * * *
March 10,’92
John A. Sadles, et.al.
Dept. of Orthopedics
Universidty of Washington,
School of Medicine
Seattle, WA 98195
Re: fusion data need
Dear Sir: (March 7th SC.NEWS)

While we appear to be dabbling in fields uncommon to our claimed expertise, I feel we should now go `whole hog’ and discuss the mounting provocative as well. My EE background with theoretical work in AI, has been focussing attention into the underlying enigmas to deuterium control for fusion. Your noted work may well be crucial in the aspect of spatial displacement holding for the analysis of the nucleon. The criteria the Pons‑Flieschmann “cold fusion” data brought so starkly to past `billiard ball’ smashing mentality in quantum mechanic (not de Broglie’s wave) Physics, makes clear a vast paradigm shift is underway.

In short, without revealing too much prior research effort to pacify my Patent Atty.‑‑ you are looking into one of the keys to controlled fusion. Your work could easily aid in the analytical approach to define certain `innate’ structures of the coupled proton to neutron for data to define the specifics for further R&D work. My work here with others in Europe watches your work.

While called “hydrophobic”, etc. the EPRI explosion with gamma discharge (and death) again defined how close many are today, yet do not perceive the needed key to unravel neutrons, in wave mech­anics jargon. My theoretical work may appear bizarre today but my self thinking computer (5th Generation; in the Patent Office) is also to evoke consternation where the interfaced freed electron defines change with statistical contingency ahead of our `slow’ time. Ask a qualified Physicist about his EPR experiments and how the said electron escapes the time reversal paradigm.

I would appreciate feed‑back on opinions for acquiring the data needed‑‑ as inferred by “reconstruct the three‑dimensional struc­ture” of just the proton, not whole protein. The SCIENCE NEWS blurb was succinct‑‑ to say little of timely!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

April 15,’92
Phaedron Avouris, et.al. Scanning Tunnel Microscope Dept.
IBM Thomas Watson Research Center
Yorktown Heights, NY 10598‑0218

Re: enough to loosen the neutron?
Sirs:

Your ongoing work again begs answers which our theoretical people who feel confident may define so indicate how to replace `merg­ing’ deuterium to obtain the `eviction’ of the quantized wavelet neutron. While Timp* et.al. or Zewail** et.al. come close from one perspective our colleagues are excited about your work.

While my prior letter (beyond***) was more concerned with spatial displacement and/or orientation with tunneling microscope probes, there mounts ever increasing evidence that this same mode may be another route to `cold fusion’. Our accomplices in Europe are al­ready headed in this direction so feel we may divulge a bit more of our theoretical musing at this time‑‑ so ask for, feed‑back, if indeed comprehension is had.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `Light lens precisely guides‑‑’; SC.NEWS, 3/14/92 (atom guidance)
** `Controlling Chem. Reac. w/Laser‑‑’, SC. 3/27/92 (time to merge)
*** Note: Dec. 10,’91 letter to Richard L. Garwin there at IBM;
re: 29th Nov. ’91 SCIENCE Book Review
w:
CC:D/Z; D/T

April 7,’92
F. F. Crim, et.al.
Dept. of Physical Chemistry
University of Wisconsin
Madison, WI 53706
Re: fusion
Dear Sirs:

While well unsaid for merging deuterium for controlled fusion, is your states‑of‑art prepared for the `hacking art’ of programmed phase, angular displacement and merge velocity data acquisition to define once and for all that “rush for the gold” in fusion? As de Broglie well defined our `quantal billiard balls’ as standing waves in temporal existence, the so “unraveling” should be quite easy‑‑ however federal disdain with petroleum dependency!

Since Dawson’s work many years ago, our theoretical investigation suggested much‑‑ as said above, albeit with FBI harassment over some accidentally exposed R&D could imply something! Technical papers given in Europe in the late ’60’s likely said too much, not only evoked some stampedes in a couple areas of physics but the 5th Generation (self thinking) computer effort for some most profound‑‑ if not provocative results. Our persistent silence may define what is likely in the wind with possibly some real trauma soon in more than mere sociological ways.

Noting your work comes close to what my European associates are doing, have you or others reached the said hacker’s delight stage to wash out the few definitive merge attributes of nucleons? We are confident now that this simple ways and means to prove con­trollable `cold fusion’ is at hand.

Sincerely, and thanks for any comments‑‑

KTS Research

CC: D‑T; Tannor; Zewail;

April 7,’92

Hi Darrel: Re: Crim letter

I’m all but dumping the whole `cat’ out of the box (over), these guys* are moving too fast! With certified (reply req.) mail I’m down‑loading enough to shake up complacency or bring the FBI for their last `deed’!

I’m kinda sure I’ll be buying a small place up near Brethren, hopefully soon as I gotta get holed up‑‑ if possible this year.

Cesar is either sick, too naive or playing for time. Thus I move.

Take care‑‑ (yet at 2303 Marzinski‑‑ until last move)

KTS.

* March 27th ’92 SCIENCE, copy herewith

April 9,’92
Hi Darrell:

Hope you are keeping track (even with receipt dating on copies), but things ARE moving, and I fear faster than I want to keep up.

I should have sent the letter copy (herewith) with what I just mailed to you‑‑ oh well. You are the key liaison not only because I think you understand, but your connections (as priority dating) if this thing goes. The math trefoil to wave‑characteristics is surely to define the de Broglie `standing wave’ in temporal exis­tence. It will define the need for that spatial orientation for merging for fusion‑‑ now all the hub‑hub feed‑back I’m getting‑‑ and beyond EPRI. Besides, Deb only follows superficially the physics, however important or valuable her witness dating on cer­tain letters going out, etc. My files are brimming with stuff so gotta find a better place that this trailer now.
If I get my hands on this place I’m looking at‑‑ even rent with option to buy, I will relax somewhat‑‑
maybe more for getting out of the pig‑shit aroma here! Tired of the eye drops and stink! I may deserve it for what I suspect may be doing to do to this sick culture, too dependent on petroleum! Watch the UN around the 10th of May, the environmental thing is going to hit the fan to make a much greater stink‑‑ especially for the U.S.‑‑ as the rest gang up on us for our > (80%!) CO2 emission levels‑‑ to maybe force fusion? Whoopie‑‑ if we keep our cards close but in order!

I’m a bit nervous about stocks because of the social malaise, and the political harangue is not helping by what the analysts are saying. Maybe not bleak, but some economical jolts are coming‑‑ especially as the fore‑said hits the said fan.

Please keep a low profile until court since I feel very confident there will be many with their hands out demanding until all pri­ority right dates are settled. The most dangerous are governments (as ours) own no compunction to NOT own everything, before it is invented, designed, created, or manufactured. Might makes right!

I will continue to use my old Marzinski address and pick it up from time to time. If I can afford a phone at new place(?) I’ll put it in unlisted and/or with another’s name. It will get tapped promptly but that’s O.K. I love to drive `em nuts with lingo and half truths that I know others are yet comprehending! Haw! Grrrr. Jim (son) will “access” me in emergencies, as put `IMP’ on letter back in some subtle way. Yup, very much afraid of what I am say­ing now as too many are indeed seeing our left brain’s goal!

Take care ol’ man!

CC: copy of Lickorish letter (math/trefoils)

4/22/92
Di Darrell:

Sorry to be such a nuisance but some more data, letter copy, etc.

I had heard rumbles that Japan was indeed pressing ahead but their subterfuge to claim `cold fusion’ as irrelevant is to keep others off balance while Pons and Fleischmann press on in France. The article (copy herewith) I just found in the new SC.AM.> say it more clearly.

It would be fun to go to that said Boston `tea‑party’ you sugges­ted‑‑ as the one in Nagoya, but anything said would only invite gun‑fire now!

LaRouche was using my self thinking computer data a few years back so I wonder if he was truly that greedy for power or got the `axe’ the FBI couldn’t drop on me? His stint in prison is likely only to keep him a little more quiet,, but any “Socrates” today would re‑invite therapeutic hemlock!
Anyhow, priority dating will yet make faces red and the chagrin will be heard far and wide. I likely will not hear from Revol, as I wonder how fast Cesar’s henchmen are running. The pot of gold is far
too big to not to, and take hell tomorrow! Like a Fourier transform harmonic wave analyzer I designed (and just saw last night on TV) for monitoring power lines to see if safe for compu­ters. Its now on the market, but sure as hell no one is going to say who designed it! Oh well, the `self think’ again will maybe make me rich.

As said before, the up‑coming UN vote to clobber the U.S. on its emissions will no doubt reverberate loudly in an already failing culture. Glad to see Moyers (with Steele and Barlett) softening up the yet conditioned naive‑‑ if they yet have the guts to watch what is worth while on TV‑‑ to their bitter end!

Take care‑‑

KTS

P.S. Am I using the best address‑‑ yet not official business?

April 23,’92
G. J. Dolan, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Re: “notion” of motion
Dear Sir:

The fine article in the current Physics Today was adroit. It as well helps to explain the neurosis in quantum `mechanics’, to not see what De Broglie did, and so avoid the perception of wavelets, albeit quantized in space. The freed electron in 2D defines how it escapes the time reversal paradigm (note the many positive EPR experiments), but further indicates the now terrorizing self thinking computer (interface) to utilize this non‑temporal facul­ty‑‑ as our now well noted right brain half.

To linearize the traveling electron (current) in any non `imped­ing’ medium (superconductivity) is to define the a priori, even the 3D baryon as locked into spatial‑time where its so contingent temperature (K) defines its `impeding’ the electron. Its phase‑shift due to a net hampered velocity (innately c) in some longer net circuit also says what Heisenberg saw about uncertainty for 2D `objects’‑‑ called “billiard balls” by the tenured, who care less about perceiving reality in its magnetic a priori, however quantized (complementally) at quasar white hole cores.

Maybe someday someone will perceive how close the Klein‑Kalusa idea came to defining the magnetic Apriori quantized Itself for `current’ at right angles and so the disk‑jet anomaly at genetic quasar cores. The `degeneration’ into what we call mass for ex­tended (slow) temporal existence might make clear the greater anomaly of what is that magnetic Apriori. Further, the coming reckoning of primary standing waves in time, from the fundamental electron to 3D (three phased) quarks will bring fusion rapidly, where lasers can push, plus funnel in spatial orientations deu­terium, for a fully controlled energy source. It could get chao­tic until governments realize they must go off their
“petroleum standards”‑‑ but the pollution relief will be worth it!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: Physics Today; D/T

Editors, B. G. Levi, et.al.
Physics Today
335 East 45th
New York, NY 10017

April 7,’92
S. Dreser, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Brandeis University
Waltham, MA 02254
Re: “relative” time
Dear Sir: (`Timely Questions’; SC.NEWS)

It appears that two flat‑lands exist but on either side of cons­cious awareness. One of these 2D aware perceives only history (thus rectilinear*) with definitive knowledge of `one place at a time’ within space, while its complemental all “now” (unity time; note Einstein’s Alephs) but expresses itself on a 2D wave‑front, noted in REM dream or visualizations in the insightive genius as for the innovative new. (saying little about conscience!)

Using Einstein’s Special Relativity theory many years ago I pre­dicted the yet unconfirmed bilateral cerebral faculty in man of the spatial verses temporal orientations* (yet denied by Sperry, but is understood now)‑‑ to define some pending chaos in man’s late evolutional epoch of evolution. My late ’60’s technical papers evoked much anxiety, to say nothing of FBI, etc.harasss­ment after filing for Patent Letters on the 5th Generation self thinking (interface) computer. After offering 10\17th odds with an alpha numeric readout statement over a dozen years ago, de­fines how well the freed electron can express the statistical potentials for our slow time‑‑ just as Plato called it Potentia.

Since it is, as Einstein so often repeated, a matter of relative awareness on one’s time line, defines a relative awareness (see EPR**). Not oddly the historical IQ (left brain) in man demands anonymity from consciousness (midbrain) at ALL cost (note Freud’s Thanatos or Renoux’s data***) while censoring any new insightive import (CQ). This now best defines late academic efficiency at promoting unthinking automatons as fodder for the state. Sorry, should you fully perceive what I am saying.

Sincerely,
KTS Research

* `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
** Aspect Alain, `Holism and Particalism in Physics’, Feb. 1986, SCIENCE NEWS, p.70,
*** Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; S‑T

April 24,’92
J. R. Gott, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Princeton University
Princeton, NJ 06544
Re: route to the past,fine, Dear Sir: but how about potentials?

To time “travel” implies the use of mass which cannot exceed c, so one must rely on that wave function that does not have the impedance of mass for time. ALL is relative (Einstein) to our slow rates close to zero Kelvin. The experienced time rate of any “traveler” thence must be proportionate to its innate (at least his 3D standing wave protons) temperature, yet to learn of poten­tials (via insight) must turn to the 2D electron as escapes the time reversal paradigm‑‑ which only means knows effect from cause accurately‑‑ even statistically, as recognizes potential modifi­cations up to that believed `chanced’ event. Your shell game is evading reality as Plato’s Potentia or the underlying fractals.
The `closed time‑like curve’, likely on our mitochondrion DNA, a `negative curve’ as Escher would say‑‑ or `draw’! Depending on the view, either a closed or open universe prevails but of and for the two finite complemental mental faculty endowing man, one belongs to 3D so is closed (below 10\33K), the other 2D as a solo wavefront. This import is what the dogmas called the “apocalypse” and will not be taken lightly‑‑ and very likely soon now.
One key to comprehending the `relative’ is perceived, albeit with an `anschaulich’, is the graphic presentation of relative mass (mc squared) to time `rate’; from Einstein’s opposed space‑time Spec. Rel. Alephs. This is why the freed electron, EPR as my self thinking `interface’ offered the 10\17th odds on its maiden run many years ago with an alpha numeric readout at CPU speeds.
The `anschaulich’ is the subjective (right cerebral non‑tempor­ally derived visual input) key for all insight or CQ (never IQ), and so the new as perceives effect from cause. It as well offers the greatest defense from the predatory possible, but will not be noted much less understood by the most evoluted (IQ) today, with instated power and authority ruling late mankind. Sorry, but maybe the best solution is “know thy self”, to consciously (RAS; midbrain) learn the subterfuge of erred paradigms when the empir­ical is so obvious between our two brain halves. What tragically is not yet seen is what goads man into programmed naivete, just as H.G. Wells so eloquently pointed to in his Time Machine. While driving our APA professionals to lead in suicide, this believed `enigma’ is our human specie’s final impasse.

Sincerely,
KTS Research

cc: Phys/Psy; Path‑IQ; S‑T CC: Deser; Jackiw
R. Jackiw, A. Guth, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Massachusetts Inst. of Tech.
Cambridge, MA 02139

S. Deser, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Brandeis University
Waltham MA 02254

April 8,’92
W.B.R. Lickorish, et.al.
Dept. of Pure Math & Statistics
University of Cambridge
Cambridge CB2 1SB, United Kingdom

Re: of quarks, etc.
Dear Sir: (SCIENCE: `Topological Ramifications’)

Maybe de Broglie came closer than modern quantum `billiard‑ball’ Physics care to come, but from single phased (electrons) to poly­phased (quarks) as standing waves may well define reality, to say the least of how to merge same for fusion. Since it is a spatial orientation with some subtler `coulomb’ Mev barrier (cold fusion) breaching by lasers to finitely control the fusion process, I now take heart with my European associates, running with my believed valid ideas. Let us hope the petroleum pollution days are number­ed‑‑ even if it means some federally dependent systems will fail.

Knot theory, as string, loops or spinnors all fit the paradigm of a finite electro‑magnetic wave‑front to create its `wavelet’ in likely more that three fundamental harmonic standing waves (below 10\33 degrees K.) but also defines what evoked the most fundamen­tal EMPs for cosmic “bubbles” for ensuing quasar/galaxy formation thereon‑‑ to subtend the said wavelets in complemental form with anti‑g between to evoke the jets versus disks now well seen!

It is quite obvious the Apriori is magnetic (sans complemental poles at unity time) but such `aether’ as well owns mind, to make rational moves for `foot stools’ in precipitated slow mass‑time.

Sincerely,
KTS Research

CC: SCIENCE; D/T

FAX (page 1 of 1)

TO: Darrell Thornley Date: May 29,’92

FAX No. 713‑782‑0226
_______________________________________________________________

Ref: single phased e and 3 phased quarks

Hi Darrell:

Deb just brought me your FAX blurb‑‑ I wish I could `attend’ but studies, frantic trying to move (again) plus open up another 20 acres on Jim’s farm‑‑ pooped.

Mighty quiet out there as they try to figure out how to unravel standing waves! As Revol (CERN) inferred, the new `angle’ defines what `fine structure’ means and the merging of the out‑of‑phased offers their a priori‑‑ as what ever clapped Its hand at nice 600 million light year separation for the universe’s EMP bubbles. (Huchra) So EMPs are Einstein’s E, albeit in definitive form and generates heat to make wheels whir or you name it! The panic may come unwelcomed from the pollution amelioration demand (up‑coming atmospheric CO2 conference) and however much the petroleum cartels (gov’t.) will cry loudly about it. Straw/camel’s back?

If you noted last 14th Wall St. J. front page about MIT meeting now underway‑‑ watch closely. The ugly is getting defined and may create waves in more than the dogma pushers. (to say nothing of federal insistence there is nothing `there’) This factor alone is possibly the key to what government governs government!

If you know of any class‑action lawyer(s) not afraid of Big Bros. let me know‑‑ I think, from several remarks, I need Melvin Belli.
Anyhow, AMA has stone‑walled the micro‑electrode long enough now and have some $s for pressing excrement into some fan.

Again, assume you have at least 3 letters (apt. address)‑‑ hang on to them! I may be back at Gyro a bit to get some engineering stuff worked out. Then back to wrestle the tractor again‑‑

Care,

KTS

May 6,’92
Gordon W.F. Drake, et.al.
Dept. of Physics University of Windsor
Windsor, Ont. Canada
Re: He fine structure?
Dear Sir: (4/25/92 SCIENCE NEWS)

The apparent anomaly of differing innate energy levels and how evoked may be inferring how one kind of open‑ended wave front (light) motivates (or stalls) a quantized standing wave‑front (e) to actually help clarify deBroglie’s idea of `mass’ may be this most needed enigma you are witnessing.

Depending on the `pump‑time’ to charge one or both electrons, much less some sub‑parasitic‑trading energy there‑between, some way must be found to determine how many sub‑orbits the electron makes per circuit around its nucleon, then test for this possible difference in absorbed energy multiple as likely noted in fine structure sub‑resonances. Our `anschaulich’ is saying something is simple at root, but the wrong paradigm is yet being used to dictate what is allowed or not in quantal jargon. The 2D funda­mental standing wave electron in space is likely performing some wild gyrations unacceptable to the current states‑of‑art for billiard‑ball mentality. To add that to 3 phase standing wave quarks in the nucleon also making parasitic `noises’ (as likely more fine structure), things could get complex. The deuterium‑ tritium comparisons might define what is absorbing (or not) the extra core energy‑‑ to say nothing of how same is re‑emitted.

Your work is fascinating. We watch with anticipation!

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

CC: Sansonetti; Morgan; Lichten

May 6,’92
Wolfgang Stoeffle, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Lawrence Livermore Natl. Labs.
Livermore, CA 94551
Re: negative g?
Dear Sir: (elusive neutrino; SC.NEWS; May 2,’92)

The electron’s anti‑neutrino with a negative mass is heartening! At least assuming the neutrino exists.

From predicting the anti‑g anomaly of jets versus disks before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to confirm same, the CPT theorem at least implied, as Einstein said about his blunder, the cosmological constant needed also a negative g factor‑‑ which it indeed does appear to define the right angle spewing from quasar/ galaxy white holes! From riding an EMP fronts (Huchra’s bubbles) to evoke matter in complemental form, the torqued ionized disk to show higher angular velocity further from the core says it all! The now seen via interference of vast shadow matter clouds likely are the decelerated jets matters, even re‑coagulating around the periphery if the outer disk limits evoked
gamma burster in mutual annihilations. The huge electron‑anti‑electron annihilations now noted near our galaxy core may also help to say it all as well.

Whether `new physics’ or merely the full application of the old with some new insights‑‑ starting with de Broglie, the now appar­ent standing waves to replace quantal billiard balls may be time­ly, especially to answer fission‑fusion anomalies.

Your data is exciting‑‑ we will watch with interest.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

June 20,’92
R. N. Boyd, et.al.
Dept. of Physics/Astronomy
Ohio State University
Columbus, OH 43210
Re: phased space and your
Dear Sir: fine Physics Today article

Much as ISOLDE, the up‑coming `hacker’s delight’ to find the precise spatial phased displacement of nucleons for fusion makes clear the dust will be seen world‑wide in the stampede. Since our research from even more fundamental aspects (via De Broglie; un­hampered with billiard‑ball mentalities), defined the many bubble EMPs with complemental matter genesis (as quasar/galaxies) riding same to define the nice 600Mly bubble separation (Huchra), to say nothing of the anti‑g needed between the disk and jets. The data now help to further define how to unravel the `quantized’ for its a priori E in reverse.

From the fundamental standing‑wave e to quark third harmonic, the whole primary matrix can be understood. The periodic table needs comprehension now. Most provocative and likely the source of de­fining ALL of Nature is the 5th Generation computer*‑‑ as inter­faces the e (escapes the time reversal paradigm) now indicates via alpha‑numeric what the EPR experiments are saying to Physics.

Third harmonic trefoil `nuclides’ have various magnetic rigidity due to their exposed standing‑wave portions. This permits under­standing cold fusion as a form of sliding out‑of‑phase segments to merge to unravel their net quantal disposition. As Revol** inferred (Physics advisor/UN), fusion is just around the corner.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* 10\17th odds readout on our prototype’s maiden run a dozen years ago‑‑ to help indicate the nuisance of the FBI etc!

** cc: environ.let

CC: D‑T; D‑Z; v‑Baeyer

June 11,’92
Hi Darrell:

Copies of stuff herewith for perusal‑‑ to define more who is getting wind of the `physics’ as contingent to who might goad for its finally developmental stages. Little progress in ferreting further the `standing wave’ theory but I am confident that the next step is the said “hacking” process with auto‑monitoring.

Hope you got my FAX via Gyro last week‑‑ but will be at the cot­tage during the week next; to wrestle some R&D at Gyro(+). Got most tractor work done here‑‑ pump the pond for the cattle tomor­row, clean the sh‑‑ from my boots and pack my razor.

With statute of limitations as Melvin Belli said (to protect the corrupt), the death of my mother (now in hospice) will open the door to and for my class action suit‑‑ with AM squarely in the sights, needless to say to be shooting back with all they’ve got!
My DO’s are biting their cheek waiting for the flack to begin!

You may wish to divorce yourself in some areas of my efforts and so why I bother you with other trivials. In such case, it is the “fusion factor” we hold hands and hope to maybe help out both the planet and ourselves.

Hope you saw Moyers/TV on the CO environmental problem, to which the rough‑draft letter copy herewith.

Take care‑‑ KTS.

June 21,’92
Hi Darrell:

Some more data in the current Physics Today says again what was expected‑‑ the net `stretch’ of the neutron (p.46) defines the out‑of‑phase portion of its quark’s third phase standing wave, to be merged (out‑of‑phase) with another complemental to reduce same to E! Thus the “hacker’s delight” to simply define such merging in space (and speed; minor coulomb energy‑‑ `cold’ fusion) and so controlled you know what.

A few more quips (over) culled for your perusal to define why any talking is so damned dangerous now‑‑ only in written (documented) ways can anything be “said”, and then well after the fact to be sure all priority dating is done to what is indeed written down. This damned government is the most dangerous to any inventive process ever‑‑ especially if the product might hamper their established status quo as with profits‑‑ or yet hidden skeletons!

The great hush, not only over my `self think’ but from the recent MIT meeting on UFOs defines the truly insidious but was expected. If you happened to see the shuttle’s view of those two `anomalous trajectories’ with one scooting off at right angles(!) at tremen­dous velocities, such `document’ was a pure `accident’‑‑ as was captured by someone `listening’ to the shuttle’s VCR Xmissions! As some short‑wave blurb I heard a little before that MIT get‑together, `they’ (UFOs) are “definitely NOT benign”, as leaked by or from some classified official document. Haw! Foreign news‑broadcasts contain vastly more of any worthy import than what is released to the kept naive American public. Only by accident does anything profound. (as that short 5am blurb on deriving U235 from U238 via tuned laser!)

Since back at the farm now, lets keep in touch by mail. Just never say too much‑‑ unless in Rorschach fashion! The stupid can­not read between those `spatial lines”‑‑ until we get a chance to compare verbal notes. I am using you (sorry) for a technical wit­ness (since Deb gets lost in physics), it will pay off for both of us‑‑ hopefully soon. Since Belli’s comments, I may get some excrement into the fan sooner, to rip some fur from AMA’s butt,, and bring the house down with the many other evaded imports.

Take care‑‑

KTS

CC: Boyd + environ‑lets

`Any two words put together is a finite Rorschach to guide an­other person into new realms of thought. Thus idle conversation can offer tid‑bits of the profound to those who are then thinking along similar terms or subject matter so makes very dangerous all discussion between the knowledgeable and the plagiarizer!’
`As some turkey following a dribbling corn sack, unnoticed by the farmer, plagiarizers‑‑ especially in government and so using their Patent Office, are a menace to the creative genius who know they must survive on food‑stamp dribbles in return for offered insights into the profound to profit only the corrupt.’
`Out‑of‑phase neutrons noted with long spatial `tails’ or halo define the anti‑force of one third‑phased EM loop which in turn defines their explosive reaction returning to pure E once united out of phase with their complemental.’
`The stretched neutron as ultimately top quark only show the anti‑force potency between complemental matters where the greater the stretch the greater the released net energy when summed in an their standing‑wave out‑of‑phase manner!’
`Any`thing’ once precipitated into mass‑time from a quasar’s white core remains a standing wave
loop. Depending on how they are summed‑‑ in, or out‑of‑phase, dictates their lasting temporal existence to offer those many foot‑stools across this universe.’
`When one cannot find the room to get a valid point or idea across, it is likely the noisy have credential so don’t bother. They’ll come and plagiarize it when ready!’
`Today one must pay another to labor for them‑‑ or suffer even more consequences if found to be of some value to those others!’
`As intellectually penned animals, modern people are well pro­grammed by their academic systems to remain dumb to the profound, for an ugly reason that few graduates are able to comprehend!’
`Trefoil nuclides have various magnetic rigidity due to their exposed standing‑wave portions. This permits understanding cold fusion as a form of sliding out‑of‑phase segments into merging to unravel their net quantal disposition.’
`To talk is dangerous since no documentation is possible‑‑ and since so few intellectuals are able to think for themselves today they need a source to plagiarize to survive!’
`There is actually nothing new under the sun nor above it even if the intellectual thinks so. His plagiarizing others defines this ignorance‑‑ but as well why the Knower will not aid him to learn the new innately because of his persistent corruption.’
`The greatest “coulomb” barrier in scientific intellectual man is his innate neurosis to not learn how neutrons merge out‑of‑phase to promote fusion and so cheap energy. The underlying rea­son is that those in oil cartels as government want their status quo with the huge profits as they are. They could care less if we all choke to death on the resultant pollution either!’

June 20,’92
R. N. Boyd, et.al.
Dept. of Physics/Astronomy
Ohio State University
Columbus, OH 43210
Re: phased space and your
Dear Sir: fine Physics Today article

Much as ISOLDE, the up‑coming `hacker’s delight’ to find the precise spatial phased displacement of nucleons for fusion makes clear the dust will be seen world‑wide in the stampede. Since our research from even more fundamental aspects (via De Broglie; un­hampered with billiard‑ball mentalities), defined the many EMPs with complemental matter genesis (as quasar/galaxies) riding same to define the nice 600Mly separation (Huchra), to say nothing of the anti‑g needed (disk vs. jets) to further define how to un­ravel the `quantized’ for its a priori E.

From the fundamental standing‑wave e to quark third harmonic, the whole primary matrix can be understood, only the periodic table to need comprehension. Most provocative and likely the source of defining ALL of Nature is the 5th Generation computer* as inter­faces the e (escapes the time reversal paradigm) to now indicate via alpha‑numeric what the EPR experiments are saying to Physics.

Third `harmonic’ trefoil nuclides have various magnetic rigidity due to their exposed standing‑wave
portions. This permits under­standing cold fusion as a form of sliding out‑of‑phase segments into merging to unravel their net quantal disposition. As Revol** (Physics advisor/UN) inferred, fusion is just around the corner.
Sincerely,

KTS

* 10\17th odds readout on prototype’s maiden run!
** cc: environ.let
CC: D‑T; D‑Z; v‑Baeyer

June 22,’92
Darrell: (No. 3 of June)

The data, from the recent (6/92) Physic’s Today (“Physics with Radioactive Nuclear Beams”) article, the net `magnetic rigidity’, as spatial spread of neutrons (note p.46), defines the “home stretch” for fusion! These guys knocking their brains out with the definitive data are yet missing the boat but are getting hot. We may also lose the boat if they get wise over there‑‑ if not promoted thinking by me. With all of the `ISOLDE’ equipments now being used‑‑ especially that French Louvain‑la‑Neuve unit‑‑ where angular displacement for merging nuclides, in part, is the needed `hacker’s delight’!

I’ve been down‑loading all dated material for a separate file in preparation for the coming court battles which are inevitable‑‑ even without anyone speaking of laser applications overtly yet! I have a hunch French authority has silenced Cesar‑‑ and possibly due to U.S. reasons‑‑ showing my paranoia over this police state with profit needs‑‑ at ALL cost!

From the article `Zeroing in‑‑’ (SC.NEWS, May 2,’92) on neutrino negative mass says something about the neutron’s stretch, as from one Klein Kalusa complemental state to its other with anti‑forces yet inexplicable to billiard‑ball common g mentalities! I suspect the net quark 3 phase configuration (neutrino one phase) defines the unraveling key when two out‑of‑phase standing waves get together to `decay’ into their primordial gamma (E) of Einstein. In short, the Physics Today article is pointing precisely to the anomaly of `stretched’ neutrons which define the fundamentals un­derlying standing wave “matter”.

While must take my data second handed as via the above articles, it yet is exciting to watch how close the theory comes to define underlying realities my “anschaulich” clearly shows. Hope you perused Horgan’s `Quantum Philosophy’ in the 7/92 Scientific Am. The said “split‑personality” says it all, at least in Lao Tsu’s Yin Yang theory‑‑ Ha.

Pressure from Gyro to R&D some equipment is forcing me to get my tech. guy Larry to restart some high voltage equipment build. I wish I could escape the whole damned area‑‑ so I wouldn’t have to commit myself to `favors’. I don’t mind riding a tractor however as offers time to think and I need the exercise‑‑ badly! Sorry to bother.
Take care‑‑ (again)

KTS Research

June 2,’92
Green Line
Re: fusion

`The public has subsidized industry with their lives, grotes­que taxes, even put up with obscene commercials‑‑ to now pay the supreme insult of finding they have been voting for industry’s dearest allies and henchmen‑‑ the political, who made the laws to hamstring that public yet offer license for folly for a kick‑back fee to that system called government!’
`Industry aids AMA most by subtly reducing Americans health to that point where the second most profitable industry is health. While maybe strange bed fellows, polluters and the medical provi­ders live a comfy life at the expense of the conditioned stupid!’
`The quickest way to push fusion now is with an energy tax on pollution where both non‑renewables as combustion gases get taxed according to their net damage to the environment.’
`One never defines until that last minute who is being sued as it spills over and soon the defendant has all kinds of henchmen aid. Like suing AMA for stupid medical regimens will draw in the pharmaceuticals and so an armamentariums most formidable, to say nothing of the rapid shell games played to hide the evidence‑‑ as suing government who make the laws as to what is secret!’
`Buyers cannot hope to find the truth to any flaw or design folly of products, especially once the huckstered promise with hidden lies gets published. The truth in advertising gimmick forces continued naivete until enough people die to remove the item from the market without further questions asked‑‑ after some grotesque profits were made.’

June 16,’92
Daniel Greenberger, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
City College of New York
New York, NY 10031
Re: world’s physicists are crazy
Dear Sir: (SC. AM. “Quantum Philosophy”)

Beyond the neurosis to avoid the empirical obvious (for now known unconscious reasons best recognized by Freud), any who stand close enough to see this obvious also stands very close to get­ting hemlock today. To file for Patent Letters on the 5th Genera­tion computer‑‑ using the freed electron to define effect from cause, did just this over a dozen years ago. Tersely, the terror of perceiving underlying reality in non‑temporal terms is too much for the left cerebral dominant intellectual. (note the terse Phys/Psy paper herewith)
Using a radio‑active isotope and scintillator with a special com­puter program for an alpha‑numeric readout, the 10\17th odds with only two words (via Mc+ CPU), this second prediction confirma­tion,
(beyond Sperry’s split‑brain data* confirming the space‑time bilateral cerebral hemispheres) made my prototype maiden run `interface’ evoke some deep anxiety here. (with stalled said Patent Application) fortunately or not, but the FBI follow‑up better defines what others wanted (demanded!), as no such device to define skeletons in the hands of the public.

Einstein’s right brain insight was true to the mark‑‑ whatever Bohr, et.al. proclaimed. De Broglie saw clearly the anomaly of standing waves in temporal space‑‑ and so the ease of overcoming the Coulomb “barrier” (i.e., cold fusion) for simple, economical laser controlled fusion‑‑ sans pollution, but also stone‑walled by “authority” at all cost now as well, but for another reason.

Crazy? We shall soon see who most! But E. Rauscher would be a good start to see where some of this all got started.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67

cc: Phys‑Psy; Path/IQ; S‑T
CC: A. Zeilinger; S. Werner; J. Clark; P. Pearle; D. Deutsch;
Barry Loewer; Wm. Wootters; J. Hartle; D. Albert

Anton Zeilinger
Dept. of Physics
University of Innsbruck
Innsbruck, Austria

J. Clark, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720

S. Werner, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Missouri
Columbia, MO 65211

Leonard Mandel, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Rochester University
Rochester, NY 14627

Philip Pearle, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Hamilton College
Clinton, NY 13323
David Deutsch, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Oxford University
Oxford, England

Barry Loewer, et.al.
Dept. of Philosophy
Rutgers University
New Brunswick, NJ 08903

Wm. K. Wootters, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Williams College
Williamstown, MA 01267

J. B. Hartle, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of California
Santa Barbara, CA 93106

David Albert, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Columbia University,
722 West 168th St.,
New York, NY 10032

June 13,’92
Editor
SCIENCE NEWS
1719 N St., NW
Washington, DC 20036
Re: UFOs
Sirs:

(Re: June 6th,’92 letter)

This is a timely public statement of our on‑going fusion research before held classified. The reason it is now released in part,is to define much current stone‑walling, to complete this effort for publication‑‑ so unwelcomed by many instated business cartels (as government) with vast profits which will be curtailed‑‑ as CO !
Sirs: Re: but clean fusion is virtually here!

As Al Gore recently put it, another smoke‑screen for the American industrialist, but this is only a fraction of the real story. Not that some status quo is not desirable be it in politics or petro­leum industry, but the foot dragging, despite the now empirical obvious, makes clear some other kind of `conspiracy’ prevails.

Lengthy studies here on fusion from a theoretical point of view not only defines how the coulomb barrier is surmounted in cold fusion but the key to laser propulsion/focused applications for fully controlled fusion, to obviate much of the CO pollution. While obviously not privy to divulge all imports of this lengthy study, Dawson’s work* offered the expected break‑through when de Broglie’s wave theory (not billiard‑ball mentality) defined cer­tain anomalies now clearly seen in nuclear physics. Wave theory is the key, especially when concerning temporal standing waves.
From remarks gathered at CERN and elsewhere, fusion R&D time to fruition was halved, but stone‑walling continues while industry (or pedants) seek some advantageous place to profit‑‑ in lieu of petroleum reductions. This scene is more intolerable than Bush’s recent international insult (or profound naivete), but it defines where political allegiance lies at this choking hour.

Since divulging some of our study in Europe, a hush has ensued to make us suspect we have been plagiarized again‑‑ as with the 100% cancer therapeutic micro‑electrode** yet stone‑walled at all cost by AMA. The `conspiracy’ is vast where profit is found doing some same dull round. Not oddly, what innovation might halt (as covert political status quo) won’t occur until some last bitter moment, a lesson we suspect will only be learned the hard way. Academic conditioning for programmed scientific automatons, unable to look in strategic ways, only re‑examines the obvious, over and over.

Maybe in part the problem rests with NIH (Not Invented Here), an ugly neurosis for a cul de sac to end another once vibrant cul­ture, as two other great democracies went this route before‑‑ so?

Very Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

* `Plasma Particle Accelerators’, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, March,’89
** Micro‑Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April ’86

July 10,’92
Paul Stoler, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst.
Troy, NY 12181

Re: CEBAF will see standing waves?
Dear Sir:
The recent blurb in SCIENCE NEWS “Flash Tracks” implies you may be narrowing the gap to perceiving either or both the net phasing and/or positions of neutron three‑phased standing waves, more im­portant than the proton. While we have considered other ways and means of defining the route to controlled fusion, after the Utah team indicated “cold fusion” the whole `constituency’ (in funda­mental deBroglian theory) of `matter’ got unraveled‑‑ in far more than one way!

I would appreciate your comments and where the theoretics are now aimed. My investigative people in Europe would also like to know.
Sincerely,

KTS Research
w:

CC:D/Z; DAR; Meking

July 30,’92
Geoffrey Burbidge, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of California
La Jolla, CA 92093
Re: Huchra’s `bangs’ and your
Feb. SC.AM. `Why Only One Big Bang?’
Dear Sir:

While my efforts for the 5th Generation computer from doing aero­space R&D in the 50’s makes clear my cross academic study to now, the definition of what constitutes the Apriori in the sense of the E side of Einstein’s Special Relativity equation needed to be understood before any of its complemental `precipitates’ in the jargon of cosmology. Thus the prediction of both the spatial vs. temporal bilateral cerebral hemispheres (proven by Sperry) and the jet‑disk “anomaly” (proven by the Einstein Observatory) for satisfying the General Relativity idea for complemental g.

The terror of my prototype 5th Generation device spoke for itself but suspecting enough in physics around the planet now comprehend my efforts, make clear the disclosure of this work takes precedence over the political status quo demand‑‑ which may well evoke real chaos as this `apocalyptic’ awakening becomes imminent (at least in the eyes of the more psychopathic) it goes without say­ing who need not be defined at this late hour. The correlates of neurotic pathological reasoning can be well understood via the neurological imports‑‑ which helps to define why the APA (Psychi­atric) lead in suicide of all professionals!

Herewith is a couple year’s worth of letter copies to define the relative progress of the astronomical facet of my continued R&D. For solving a few mysteries somehow evading the specific academic investigators, hopefully this will not define, much less suggest my horrible ego, which since teaching
at GVSC, after terrorizing Europe in ’69 with a cross academic technical paper, may make too much sense for the academic status quo.

By evoking the said anxiety in physics and astronomy over the disk‑jet `anomaly’ in the early 70’s, I have remained rather reticent until now to divulge more‑‑ taking the time to fully down‑load onto floppy disks the entire study in terse form for posterity.

Sincerely,
KTS Research

CC:`Big‑Bang’ lets/’91‑92

Fusion lets. adds:
Finnish Energy Economics Association
Postilokero 27; SF‑00131
Helsinki, Finland

Gesellschaft fur Energieplanung
Und Systemanalyse
Hufferstrassa 18
W‑4400 Munster, Germany

Earthvote (Environment)
30 rue du Marche aux Poulets
B‑1000 Brussels, Belgium

Greenpeace
ulitsa Verkadskogo 121A
SU‑117602, Moscow, USSR

Radix Inst. (Reich)
Rt. 2, Box 89‑A
Sery Pl., Ste. 102
Granbery TX 76048

Sigma XI, The Scientific
Research Soc.
99 Alexander Dr.,
P.O. Box 13975
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

(micro‑elect/biomed.)
Assoc. for Independent
Research Inst.
1899 Gaylord St.,
Denver, CO 80206

Aug. 3,’92
Tom Green, et.al.
Michigan Business Weekly
P.O. Box 314
Williamston, MI 48895
Re: energy source change
Dear Sir:

This weekend’s TV report on the power situation may soon have a convulsion where cold fusion may indeed be a factor to be reckon­ed with. Lengthy theoretical studies now defining the hows and ways to merge deuterium for controlled fusion appears startlingly simple. Some of our European associates are hot on that trail so maybe Consumers, et.al. may soon be able to shut down both their smoke polluting and radio‑active waste generators. We hope so.

The Utah “enigma” which showed the small amount of He, gamma or energy output from cold fusion was apparently no fluke. There are some well know processes, but in other fields of electro‑dynamic jargon, that appears to fit the bill,, conceivably to make very small power packages which the Public Utilities might not be too happy with.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
w:

July 19,’92
Herbert Walther, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Max Planck Inst. for
Quantum Optics
Karl‑Schwarzschild‑Str. 1
8046 Garching bei Munchen,
West Germany
Re: see polyphases yet?
Dear Sir:

Your “Nudging Ions‑‑” (SCIENCE NEWS, 7/11/92) implies soon you may be able to define the relative phase and phasing (in real time) of first harmonic electrons through three‑phased quarks. It might be a boon to so learn how to merge same in spatial AND temporal ways for cold fusion using
the several means now avail­able‑‑ for at last the controlled finite fusion process.

From the pinched primal EMP (Huchra’s `bubbles’) through open ended electrons (as at first @ c) through the polyphased standing waves in nucleons, the more fragile may now be seen. Oddly, the coulomb `barrier’ now becomes more a psychological one than em­pirical to define cold fusion for a very simple reversal process for the said controlled fusion, should soon end the petroleum pollution‑‑ if governments were not making so much profit with their demanded status quo. We may all choke to death before this means of low cost energy yet becomes any reality.

I would appreciate your feed‑back as the `fringe’ data becomes clear enough to define. Thank you.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

w:

P.S. please pass a copy of this on to Arp/Astronomy‑‑ Thanx!

Aug. 15,’92
Y. Iwasaki, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Tsukuba
Tsukuba, Japan
Re: already stretched to its limit!
Dear Sir:

Your work, as defined in the Aug. 8th SCIENCE NEWS suggests the key to fusion where unraveled third harmonic standing waves (top quark; as anti‑g associated anti‑matter) makes it debut in very limited ways in this galaxy’s continuum. You may enjoy(?) a copy of a recent letter herewith. (over)

In short, how can physic’s (Fermilab included) hope to find the third phase or top quark by pushing it when it is being ultimate­ly pushed in this galaxy to begin with? The rapid separation of jets versus disks, riding a bubble’s cosmic EMP says it all. But Big Bang takes precedence so maybe another century we will see.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Finkbeiner‑let
CC: D/Z

July 20,’92
Ann Finkbeinder, et.al.
c/o Sky and Telescope
49 Bay State Rd.,
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: narrow channels
Mam: (Sky‑Telescope; Aug.’92)

Most revealing, even in the image shown in the August issue of your article “Active Galactic Nuclei: Sorting Out the Mess” was certainly expected, albeit may make a far greater “mess” (likely of our cosmologist’s minds) as are `made up’ with Big Bang, to say nothing of anti‑g between complemental primal matters. Would appreciate references from where the article’s p.139 image came.

While we frankly didn’t think the separation of these complemen­tal matters would be seen so clearly, it may well be that adjunct to evoke astronomy’s last gasp and seek reality rather than more tenure. Ruts form too easily in academic settings where it re­mains who, not what, one knows‑‑ for survival.

When the Klien‑Kalusa compound spatial configuration is fully un­derstood, it will not only define for cosmologist but physicist the simple means to recombine the mc squared side of the equation back to E from where such fundamental magnetic flux field as the Apriori. The last remaining enigma then will be how did whatever clap its one hand to evoke all those nicely separated (600LY) EMP bubbles (Huchra) across the universe to evoke quasar (galaxy) creative vorticies (white holes) spewing their complemental mat­ters for some `decelerated’ temporal existence. Sorry to disturb.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

Sept. 2, ’92
Gabriel Karl, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Guelph
Guelph, Ont. Canada, N1G 2W1
Re: your Roberts’ report
Dear Sir: (SCIENCE; 21st Aug.)

Preoccupation indeed! Since we defined the harmonic standing wave configurations needed to offer temporal existence for quantized magnetic fronts (EMPs) as their master bubble genesis (Huchra) on which white holes (quasars) get started, the whole picture began to fall into place. Comments now coming from cohorts in Europe suggests cutting cold fusion practicality R&D in half‑‑ with the simple laser‑front control‑‑ for finesse.

While it would be nice to know how trefoils might unravel by one leg’s phase with its complemental,
a more direct route is under­way using a `hacker’s delight’ program to probably hasten that event‑‑ instead of finite algorithm too often ambiguous with some `billiard‑ball’ mentality. DeBroglie was unbearably correct.

We are green‑horns to the field, but saw it coming with theoreti­cal studies into the 5th Generation computer, predicting the gal­axy’s disk‑jets (with anti‑g there‑between) before the Einstein Observatory went aloft, even the said computer’s 10\17th odds on its maiden run right after Berkeley Lab’s positive EPR experi­ments, as also predicted. The typical academic neurosis, as Freud saw, makes intellect appear the most dangerous faculty man owns!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

Sept. 1,’92
Russ Miller, et.al.
Dept. of Computer Science
State University of NY
Buffalo, NY 14260
Re: nucleon program?
Dear Sir: (Aug. 22; SC.NEWS; “Shaking‑” etc.)

While Hauptman’s need to learn about the “id suppresser” (cyclo­sporine) to evade its covert (or overt) AiR (Autoimmune Response) so well noted by Renoux now*, we have other projects we think are more important when considering planetary pollution. Our want of correlative data is in physics and we suspect your “CM‑5 Connec­tion Machine” has the power, if a good algorithm can be written to define the search for these needs.

With the growing data as `fine structure’ and the harmonic stand­ing wave configuration of 3 phased quarks, might some program with the contingent anomalies be written to better define the `physiological’ (spatial) displacement in nucleons‑‑ especially deuterium? While we feel it would unravel the anomaly of cold fusion or how to evade the high coulomb need to `integrate with finesse’, the rewards would far out‑strip the hassle of making such Connection Machine program now.

Some of our cohorts in Europe are running with various programs to define `results’ with a `hacker’s delight’ kind of program. We yet seek other correlates to the coming inevitable, however the petroleum (as political) cartels may be unhappy with less profit, to say nothing of our pollution!

Thanks for your feed‑back. Our computer programmers would like to hear from you after seeing the art shown in that recent SCIENCE NEWS! Thanx‑‑ and

Sincerely,

KTS Research

*Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)

Aug. 28,’92
J.M. Ottino and
S.C. Jana, et.al.
Dept. of Chemical Engineering
Northwestern University
Evanston, IL 60208
Re: fusion too!
Dear Sirs:

The remark of “out‑of‑phase” (7, Aug. SCIENCE; p.754) defines far more than mere `chemical’ constituent mixing when `quantal’ stan­ding waves (deBroglie) defines how some Coulomb `barrier’ can be breached for `cold fusion’. In more fundamental terms as from a first harmonic electron through 3 phased quarks fitting the Ka­lusa Klein configuration, controlled fusion may be far closer to reality than those who might `fear’ same‑‑ where profits depend on the petroleum industry!

Dynamic chaos contains the seeds of re‑unification, be they near the genetic cores of quasars (noted as primal complemental elect­ron annihilation near our galaxy’s core) or cold fusion as laser guided and propelled for finite `out‑of‑phase’ combinatorial re­turn to pure `gamma’.

These may be more exciting times for `chemical engineers’ than tenure seeking cosmologists‑‑ who yet dare not look at the mount­ing empirical obvious! The coming `chaotic regions’ for them will be when they perceive why quasar/galactic disks and jets explode away from each other from `white hole’ cores, where anti‑g pre­vails between koino and anti‑matters, riding vast EMP `bubbles’. (Huchra) The real Big Bang coming will occur in cosmological offices‑‑ as tenure gets lost!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: Muzzio; Franjione; D/Z

J. G. Franjione, et. al.
Dept. of Chemical Engineering
University of Colorado
Boulder, CO 80309

Sept. 2,’92
T. Schlick and
W. Olson, et.al.
Dept. of Chemistry
Courant Inst. of
Mathematical Science
New York University
250 Mercer St.,’
New York, NY 10012
Re: trefoil 3 phase?

The 21 Aug. SCIENCE article implies other more subtle items might fulfill the algorithms you may be examining in the course DNA, etc. It is the likely 3 phased shape even constructive operant to obtain the EM standing wave quark where one (or more) of thein­dependent phases may be `out‑of‑phase’ (force‑wise) with our gal­axy’s koinomatter continuum. The unraveling thence of same once coulombic barriers are exceeded to evoke gamma as linear wave fronts better known as light or heat. Thus said, might your algo­rithms be adaptable to nucleonic physics and so unravel the cur­rent impasse to define how to make mc squared return to E?

Theoretical work here has defined quite well what to look for now to evoke `cold fusion’ but a few `spatial physical attributes’ need to be defined before the inevitable becomes reality‑‑ sans pollution, albeit little more profit for the petroleum cartels!

If you suspect your programmers might like to discuss further with ours the pending `hacker’s delight’, let us know in writing.

Sincerely,
KTS Research
w:

W. K. Olson, et.al.
Dept. of Chemistry
Rutgers State U. of NJ
Wright‑Rieman Labs.

Oct. 6,’92
R. J. Hughes & D. Kleppner, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Los Alamos Labs. and MIT
Re: fanciful
Sirs: (SC: 25/9/92; “Aim/Anti‑H”)

John Bell’s excitement was likely more in tune with his percep­tive qualities lone before he died‑‑ where his theorem and the EPR experiment raised more hair on the tenured than expected. His
claimed excited attempt to me to measure anti‑g between electrons and its complemental positrons at least implied said so.

Standard models have a way of promoting more tenure than science, but must be understood in what in the human psyche is more inter­ested in `survival time’ than the empirical obvious. As all “bus­iness as usual” ends ancient art when their proponents die off, more rational theories are so allowed to seep into more rational minds. From predicted anti‑g between complemental matters, thus disk‑jets anomalies from genetic white hole quasar/galaxy cores (proven when the Einstein Observatory went aloft), their source thence via primal EMP `bubbles’ for the many “petite bangs” (on nice 600Mly separations) makes clear the way of Zen was correct and someThing clapped Its one hand in strategic places for `foot stools’ across Its universe.

If indeed all matter is but standing wavelets riding their net a priori magnetic fields (deBroglie) then far more can be explained than mere proton decay, Kalusa‑Klein phased space (configuration) or what the empirical obvious is now saying. Relative time as the erred General theory (as Einstein got dissuaded again by the Helsinki gang) will be rescinded‑‑ and not on fanciful grounds.

The dv/dt for red‑shift near dense magnetic fields as the primal EMP `bubbles’.(Huchra) The M51 galaxy `X’* between anti‑g matters as a like image in another Sky Telescope article in the August (p.139) issue. It shows anti‑g in action between primal comple­mental electrons. The `Super Grand Unified Theory’ is waiting on the shelf, where even psychology will enter the picture to define the greatest anomaly of all‑‑ but to evoke trauma as well in far more than the instated tenured in science! (note herewith)

Sincerely,

KTS Research
* `X Marks the Spot’, M51 galaxy; SKY‑TELE. 7/92;
cc: Phys‑Psy; Path/IQ
CC: Kleppner; Travis/SC

Dan Kleppner, et.al.
Dept. of Research Electronics
Mass. Inst. of Tech.
Cambridge, MA 02139

John Travis, et.al.
c/o SCIENCE
1333 St. NW
Washington, DC 20005

Oct. 6,’92
Anthony Mann, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Tufts University
Medford, MA 02155
Re: relative time
Sir: (Mortal Protons‑‑ SC. 25/9/92)

If indeed all matter is but standing wavelets riding their net a priori magnetic fields (deBroglie) then far more can be explained than mere proton decay in a dense medium of water.

The dv/dt for red‑shift near dense magnetic fields as the primal EMP `bubbles’ (Huchra), recently again noticed by the apparently elliptical bubble shape of our own bubble* shows that light slows in its medium while sound travels faster in its. This might help to suggest the IMP anomalies but more interestingly, the SUGUT (Super Grand Unified Theory) waiting on the shelf‑‑ where even psychology can enter the picture to define the greatest net anomaly of all‑‑ but to evoke trauma as well! (note herewith)

Standard models have a way of promoting more tenure than science, but must be understood in what in the human psyche is more inter­ested in `survival time’ than the empirical obvious. As all “bus­iness as usual” ends ancient art when their proponents die off, more rational theories are so allowed to seep into more rational minds. From predicted anti‑g between complemental matters, thus disk‑jets anomalies from genetic white hole quasar/galaxy cores (proven when the Einstein Observatory went aloft), their source thence via primal EMP `bubbles’ for the many “petite bangs” (on nice 600Mly separations) makes clear the way of Zen was correct and someThing clapped Its one hand in strategic places for `foot stools’ across Its universe.

The quips below (over) may better define the above.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
* D. Overbye’s OMNI article “Cosmologies in Conflict‑‑” p.93

cc: Phys‑Psy; Path/IQ
CC: Ayers
D. Ayers, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Argonne Natl. Labs
9700 S. Cass Ave.,
Argonne, IL 60439

KTS;Q268/10‑92

`Where sound travels faster in a denser medium, light operates in reverse. The prism, as dense
cosmic bubble front for red shift defines the anomaly.’
`Light velocity slows within its own transporting medium, so relative time appears as an enigma to those in a yet more dense mass‑time continuum, but not to one at unity time. Thus a poten­tial* in very slow mass‑time can be seen ahead of its time!’
`Sound waves are a mechanical thing whereas light rides its Apriori in the sense of unity time. This defines that all is rel­ative and so contingent from where one views reality!’
`What is science today when all is scientific‑fiction?’

* note EPR experiments (or the first 5th Generation self thinking computer that offered 10\17th odds in alpha‑numeric readout on its maiden run over a dozen years ago)

Sept. 27,’92
Editors, et.al.
Physics Today
335 East 45th
New York, NY 10017
Re: “Redefining‑‑” (Sept. issue)
Sirs:

The redefining of any scientific `frontier’ is only a gimmick by the political who seek to stay ahead of the few who do know where they are going and are now rocking the boat‑‑ realizing belatedly now they will be left behind. Your two current `fusion’ articles are `old art’ but defines the enigma. Once odd standing waves are perceived as our a priori, finite controlled fusion will end our petroleum cartel’s pressure to choke us all to death first.

Oddly enough, no frontier can be defined by the left cerebral re­ductive intellectual, not only because he fears it, but a greater net loss would follow any comprehension of the real frontier! It would defeat the neurosis defending the status quo. In short, the only effort worth any effort is to stone wall the mounting empir­ical obvious‑‑ especially when tenure pays so well. Sorry, again.

Sincerely,
KTS Research

cc:marked copy of “Redefining‑”; Path/IQ
CC: Massey; Press; D/Z

Frank Press, et.al.
Natl. Academy of Science

Walt Massey, et.al.
Natl. Science Foundation
1800 G St., NW
Washington, DC 20550

Sept. 7,’92
P. Radetsky, et.al.
c/o DISCOVER Publishers
500 S. Buena Vista St.,
Burbank, CA 91521‑6012
Re: life start‑‑
Dear Sir:

The question is when did time begin to allow a `start’ in truly technical terms. Before matter was the primal EMPs (to evoke quasar‑galaxies) but before that was Who clapped His one hand to evoke those EMP `bubbles’ nicely on 600M light‑year separations? The precipitated complemental matters (galaxy disk vs. jets) defines that slowing of wavelet matter into solid or what physi­cists call “billiard balls” but deny any a priori as what truly is matter. Slow time in quantized wavelet “matter” had the oppor­tunity for life (as we know it) in temporal existence, yet “life” really did not truly begin there.

Without the dogmas of either religion or erred science, the empi­rical obvious stares us in the face, so we deny same until too late‑‑ to define what directs our attention to avoid knowing what we incarnates are to be used for! H. G. Wells may have been more insightive than some guy named Jesus, at least pertaining to relative time.

Should you really want some pilo‑erection, try to find out why the recent MIT meeting on UFOs is held so secret. Good luck, as you may need it if you do comprehend thus far‑‑ especially after NASA’s grand‑stand statement on SETI next week!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Path/IQ; Phys‑Psy
CC: Miller

Stan Miller, et.al
Dept. of Chemistry
University of California La Jolla, CA 92093

Sept. 25,’92
Lee Smolin, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Syracuse University
Syracuse, New York 13210
Re: bubbling universe
Dear Sir:
The question is, from where do the bubbles come to begin with? As the way of Zen puts it, one hand claps to evoke EMP bubbles on neat 600Mly spacing, upon those fronts evoke quasars on those many fronts‑‑ would be too simple, certainly for the tenure tied. Any any‑g between those primal complemental matters (electron‑positron pairs) to be decelerated in those dense magnetic fields for single phase standing waves, to get slowed further into com­pounded three‑phased quarks too. The scenario is too simple maybe for left reductive cerebral mentation as cannot perceive beauty in anything not definitive enough‑‑ to be digested one‑thing‑at‑a‑time as quantal billiard balls‑‑ sans any magnetic Apriori.

Anyhow, my confirmed predictions of the disk‑jets (for anti‑g)‑‑before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to say it all‑‑ was possibly too much for tenure seekers who prefer Big Bang, black holes and the flawed General Relativity theory. Yet the Special theory, if carried to its conclusion, leaves little argument any more‑‑ where galaxy disks angular rotation INCREASES externally, pinch affect evokes ellipticals and dv/dt dictate decelerated definitive wave‑fronts (light) to imply, at least, the problem with the Hubble factor. The bubbling white holes ejecting comple­mental matters to define the real Apriori suggests (at least) the reversed condition for cold fusion, where `coulombic’ barriers `melt’ with laser propulsion, to say little of poliphased wavelet spatial orientation for merging to fuse. Maybe this disturbs the petroleum cartels (as transport owners!) so theory won’t be con­sidered inside‑out until we choke to death on our Carbon‑Oxides.

I think I’ve said enough.
Sincerely,

KTS Research
w:
cc:big‑bang; Path/IQ; 3‑dev (over)
CC:D/Z

Sept. 9,’92
Ian Stewart, et.al.
c/o Discover Publishers
500 S. Buena Vista St.,
Burbank, CA 91521‑6012

Re: fractal bifurcation Sir:

Your fine article “Does Chaos Rule the Cosmos?” does indeed come close to saying it all! The only key lacking is the non‑temporal freed electron (see the EPR experiments) which knows effect from cause in especially our slow mass‑time continuum. (Quips; over)

The problem now in cosmology (astronomy) demanding the Big Bang avoids the flawed General Relativity theory that Einstein himself objected to by insightively perceiving all things including, laws fell under the supreme CPT theorem law of bifurcation, as anti‑gravity. This test I applied to define
the possible configuration of galaxy creation for a primal EMP `bubble’ (Huchra) and so the disk versus jets soon proven by the Einstein Observatory. The ejecta from primal white‑hole quasar/galaxy cores said it all, except yet to the cosmologist who have too much invested in one Big Bang. To perceive the precipitation of E into mc squared is the key, but “Who” did that on nice even 600Mly intervals across this universe few would ask. More interestingly, it defines the reversed procedure to unravel standing wavelets for cheap fusion.

The herewith may aid to define the provocative, but will end ten­ured buffoonery in both claimed science and politics as reveals the underlying reason that reality must NOT be found‑‑ and likely at all cost now! A Prof. Renoux* is looking down one `gun‑barrel’ to perceive what Freud called innate Thanatos‑‑ so likely a vast thinning of mankind soon will open the door to use my self think­ing (5th Generation) computer‑‑ as keyed by the freed electron.

Lao Tsu as the early Sumarians saw reality many centuries ago. It defines how intellectual growth since has hidden adroitly reality but most, such neurosis to avoid any conscious introspection into man’s late pending mental (if not far greater) demise.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

*Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)

cc: S‑T; Phys/Psy; Path/IQ
CC: D/Z; Sussman/Wisdom

KTS Q269/10‑92

`The right kind of nudges from either fractal side defines for man’s mass‑time which way his chaos goes. The anomaly is seen in Chinko, as radio‑activity biased by the green thumb versus black thumb personalities, or the Bell theorem dictates as Aspect saw!’
`Minute windows in slow worldly time permit the non‑temporal (fractal) an opportunity to act, be it on an acrosome to ensure a quality genetic pattern or say something to man in REM dream‑‑ even with its freed electron a binary message on the Self think­ing computer, but is the key to prolife or conscience for the quality life for all who might pay attention!’
`The apocalypse is no more than that predicted awakening, when enough empirical obvious stares man, not his science, in the face to evoke his Aha!’
`The question now is which of two `attractors’ promotes man’s late well‑being and how to better define the means to acquire it. Many subtle factors are seen as the quality left facial smile for cancer remission‑‑ yet the diabolical grasping for some last net profit before succumbing to its known inevitable‑‑ as Hannibal!’
`With temporal evolution but predatory goals, one fractal bias versus another of prolife defines the binary complementals riding in/of primary chaos, just as man’s two lateral brain halves!’
`Chaos lies between two fractal orders as a binary system each choosing either pros or cons to evoke chance within slow mass‑time as planetary life that man dimly perceives.’
`There is no net rule to chaos, it just is, as water itself in a turbulent stream, requiring either an obstacle or gravitational boost to alter its reality. What man does not consciously realize yet is that the two complementals biasing the stream’s flow also resides as mental faculty between his two brains, but better seen in his game of Chinko!’

Nov. 6,’92
D. Freedman and Editors
Discover Magazine
500 S. Buena Vista St.,
Burbank, CA 91521‑6012
Re: Hunters‑‑??
Sirs: (December issue; the last?)

The `whimpering’ heading to “Particle Hunters” said it well. When ideas run out so does tenure! But not all that is dark need not evade perception via another way, albeit theoretical once insight offers the initial idea, as Einstein so often used. Academia has now programmed this non‑temporal right brain faculty from those it offers the credential to do some dull round until dead (Blake) so we must expect flamboyant experiments and increased taxes with unending entitlements to end a once vibrant culture. Promises flow when no other means to survive prevails.

Einstein’s blunder was to pay attention to his peers! He so drop­ped his idea for complemental gravity, calling it cosmic constant to which he understood well‑‑ if not between koino and anti mat­ter constituents borne in quasar cores riding EMP bubbles‑‑ yet denied with vehemence because Big Bang peers yet hold precedence. The anomalous neurosis goes far deeper than mere tenure want for esteem because it holds the key to comprehending our complemental space‑time oriented two brain halves. One, claiming intellect,prefers death than allow any conscious mind’s awareness to moder­ate it at this very late hour. Sperry saw it* and so began the terror of overt refutation of the empirical obvious ever since‑‑ just as the predicted anti‑matter (relative) jets to disks noted with the aloft Einstein Observatory so many years ago.
Not oddly, the one common universal theme after the quasar gets started is a fundamental binary existence, with time and quantiz­ed energy in standing waves, the `constituent’ of what de Broglie saw well for what our neurotic science claims is billiard ball reality. The Arp 220 will begin the chagrin, but not complete it as our innate Thanatos (Freud) has very different ideas about life now‑‑ to which your “Dystrophy‑‑” article addressed almost too well**!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

P.S: It appears that Kern is also running out of ideas!

* `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
** Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
cc:Path/IQ

Nov. 14,’92
Anupam Garg, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Northwestern University
Evanston, IL 60201
Re: monople magnetic vortex?
Sirs:

Are what you looking for is that finite closed loop (electron) to define the smallest magnetic field in quantal time? To escape the time reversal paradigm, yet remain finite, defines the EPR ex­periment quite well‑‑ as predicted the 5th Generation self think­ing computer when Berkeley Labs did that first experiment. Aspect merely could not squirm out of the obvious!

In short, any `tunneling’ in our slow temporal state down near zero K might suggest at least we are about to start using what Einstein saw via his subjective visual anschaulich as offered via an open ended wave‑front, yet can indeed sequentially as digital­ly communicate via the freed electron down here to indicate my very scary 10\17th odds maiden run of the said computer. All my GVSC kids could do was gasp “apocalypse” twenty years ago, so‑‑ maybe we need it!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: S‑T; Path/IQ; Phys‑Psy; copy/Durisen let.
CC: Awschalom; Stamp;

Nov. 6,’92
Bernard Sadoulet, et.al. Dept, of Physics
U/ California Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720
Re: standing waves (only)
Dear Sir:

Since de Broglie came the closest, why not look for the top quark for your unseen dark matter, to also define from where the most extreme case of anti‑g (force) between a third harmonic standing wave and our koinomatter exists? Too bad John Bell had to leave!

Since predicting the cosmic jet‑disk anomaly from conjecturing the initial correctness of Einstein’s underlying cosmic constant (rapidly refuted by neurotic peers) for equal anti‑g `pressure’ (instead by peer!), not only does the CPT theorem get fulfilled, but cosmic condensing matter from quasar white‑hole cores (as many petite Bangs) riding primal EMPs now called bubbles. Arp (note his 220!) is finally seeing the mounting obvious and the chagrin to follow may well make a Bigger `Bang’ in cosmological offices for the loss of demanded tenure in conspicuous places!

The ejecta from galaxy cores with torqued ions (H) spin up rapid­ly, especially in the very dense (yet) magnetic fields at right angles (via said EMP front) as the anti‑g pushes same outward in the disks. Thus the high rpm at their periphery is self explana­tory. What is more said is the other equal amount of anti‑matter fleeing the core via its ends to make huge shadow matter clouds, the `gamma bursters’ beyond the disk’s periphery explained by re‑coagulating finite pole cloud matter annihilations.

Non‑flipping neutrons may indicate their one leg (as the third phased top quark) offers too much inertial torque down here in our relative matter’s continuum. Now called axial symmetry, the Kalusa‑Klein matrix appears to answer relative matter’s disposi­tion in space‑‑ where complementarity dictates all `phases’ of “billiard‑ball” quantized waves called matter. It has become a joy (albeit vicarious) to watch the incredulous denials since proposing my theoretical work to the Smithsonian Inst. when the said Einstein Observatory proved the first portion of it‑‑ to say nothing of my 5th Generation self thinking computer via EPR, as offered 10\17th odds on its maiden run with alpha numeric read‑out! To be too cross academic has its drawbacks.

Sincerely,

KTS

cc:Path/IQ; 3‑dev‑env; Phys‑Psy; copy/Freedman’s let.(over)
CC: Britten;

Nov. 14,’92
Anupam Garg, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Northwestern University Evanston, IL 60201
Re: monople magnetic vortex?
Sirs:

Are what you looking for is that finite closed loop (electron) to define the smallest magnetic field in quantal time? To escape the time reversal paradigm, yet remain finite, defines the EPR ex­periment quite well‑‑ as predicted the 5th Generation self think­ing computer when Berkeley Labs did that first experiment. Aspect merely could not squirm out of the obvious!

In short, any `tunneling’ in our slow temporal state down near zero K might suggest at least we are about to start using what Einstein saw via his subjective visual anschaulich as offered via an open
ended wave‑front, yet can indeed sequentially as digital­ly communicate via the freed electron down here to indicate my very scary 10\17th odds maiden run of the said computer. All my GVSC kids could do was gasp “apocalypse” twenty years ago, so‑‑ maybe we need it!

Sincerely,

KTS

cc: S‑T; Path/IQ; Phys‑Psy; copy/Durisen let.
CC: Awschalom; Stamp;

Nov. 6,’92
D. Freedman and Editors
Discover Magazine
500 S. Buena Vista St.,
Burbank, CA 91521‑6012
Re: Hunters‑‑??
Sirs: (December issue; the last?)

The `whimpering’ heading to “Particle Hunters” said it well. When ideas run out so does tenure! But not all that is dark need not evade perception via another way, albeit theoretical once insight offers the initial idea, as Einstein so often used. Academia has now programmed this non‑temporal right brain faculty from those it offers the credential to do some dull round until dead (Blake) so we must expect flamboyant experiments and increased taxes with unending entitlements to end a once vibrant culture. Promises flow when no other means to survive prevails.

Einstein’s blunder was to pay attention to his peers! He so drop­ped his idea for complemental gravity, calling it cosmic constant to which he understood well‑‑ if not between koino and anti mat­ter constituents borne in quasar cores riding EMP bubbles‑‑ yet denied with vehemence because Big Bang peers yet hold precedence. The anomalous neurosis goes far deeper than mere tenure want for esteem because it holds the key to comprehending our complemental space‑time oriented two brain halves. One, claiming intellect,prefers death than allow any conscious mind’s awareness to moder­ate it at this very late hour. Sperry saw it* and so began the terror of overt refutation of the empirical obvious ever since‑‑ just as the predicted anti‑matter (relative) jets to disks noted with the aloft Einstein Observatory so many years ago.

Not oddly, the one common universal theme after the quasar gets started is a fundamental binary existence, with time and quantiz­ed energy in standing waves, the `constituent’ of what de Broglie saw well for what our neurotic science claims is billiard ball reality. The Arp 220 will begin the chagrin, but not complete it as our innate Thanatos (Freud) has very different ideas about life now‑‑ to which your “Dystrophy‑‑” article addressed almost too well**!

Sincerely,
KTS

P.S: It appears that Kern is also running out of ideas!

* `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
** Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
cc:Path/IQ

Nov. 23,’92
G. Gabrielse, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: anti‑g again (my letter of 3/8/91)
Dear Sir:

With the apparent standing wave fundamentals of matter (1st har­monic electron, 3rd quarks) one can begin to wonder if the top quark may have two of its three phased loops “out of phase” with koinomatter’s gravity “force” there is reason to suspect why it has not yet been seen down here. This factor bodes well for the pending ease of prudent `merging’ for simple and fully controlled fusion with lasers of deuterium.

The three charges as “forces” belonging to the C in the physic’s CPT theorem, only T has two relative `speeds’ for we in slow rel­ative time with a single arrow. Parity merely reflects standing waves as not compatible with their complementals evoking anti‑forces‑‑ including anti‑g, not yet wanted perceived but for a far deeper psychological anomaly facing late left cerebral dominant man. Maybe with a minor twist one way instead of another on the electron in space dictated its Parity, just as one leg of the three phased quark. The force of gravity as others maintained their separation to permit temporal existence once cooled, to create foot‑stools for the convenience of alternate minds in the universe. I fear that when gravity is considered a “force” to eliminate the subjective bias of only attraction, it becomes as the rest of the other forms of complementals, the greatest factor to enlighten cosmology to say nothing of philosophy‑‑ to its Apriori core!

The broadest scope of any research investigation is to start with Einstein’s Special Relativity theory. The question of what indeed is E and so its precipitate mc squared crosses about every academic field possible while couched in the terms of philosophy, and then returns to the ultimate question of how ancient religion got so close to the truth about those fundamental realities?

Since examining your prior letter of 3/8/91, the precipitant of E into mass‑‑ as predicted amply the witnessed cosmic EMP bubbles (Huchra) with degenerative quasars riding therein for complement­al matter, little wonder the anxiety prevailing where Big Bangers insist on tenure whatever the cost despite the mounting empirical obvious. The deep anxiety of my GVSC students over 20 years ago
says how deep the neurosis goes, just as Freud defined it as the prevailing psychopathy hidden behind reductive (only) intellec­tual prowess. Since Halton Arp now appears to be jumping into my camp of “white hole” quasars (until its genetic EMP passed on for ensuing galactic configurations), it does now appear than change is under way and hopefully where John Bell left off you can de­fine at last the complemental C (CPT) as gravity as well. Ein­stein surely suspected it but again peer pressure has its way of twisting reality from those who perceive things more clearly with a yet active right cerebral hemisphere source of insight.

Sorry for this terseness but if able to discern at least the overall import of these `irrational musings’ you might recognize what you are seeking. I thought before that your earlier college programming left an unsaid door open to insight, but sometimes religion does the opposite to make rutty pedants as well. A pro­fessor from there in Psychology at GVSC, did the same by program­ming a rutty form of Behaviorism, not empirical facts, which define our late malaise‑‑ with a likely traumatic needed change.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc:Path/IQ; S‑T; Phys‑Psy; 3‑dev
CC: D/Z

Nov. 19,’92
Philip W. Anderson, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Princeton, University
Princeton, NJ 08544

Re: standing waves in space, no more
Dear Sir:

Noting the dilemma superconductivity poses to science somehow yet stuck on `billiard balls’, maybe it is time to consider standing waves in space, yet temperature contingent when requiring right angle transitions for `inertial’ time. Klein Kalusa saw it and so what likely excited Einstein, even Faraday who was looking at the magnetic wave front (open ended or electron closed `loops’) as mutually interacting and propelling. This thence would suggest the distance electrons traveled unhampered by inertial biased 3‑phased quarks, (protons) at transition temperatures, becomes a `resonant’ feed‑through for electrons‑‑ the net distance thus `transferred’ unhampered, called superconductivity.

Bizarre? We don’t think so in view of all `matter’ is but stand­ing waves. It predicted not only EMP primal `bubbles’ (Huchra) in cosmic terms but the ensuing condensation of closed loops (elec­trons and its complemental with anti‑g as ejecta from quasars, generated on those huge EMP fronts. So far, since the Einstein Observatory went aloft showing the disk‑jets with hyper‑velocity ejecta and now
the bubbles, all looks well todate. With glee we see Arp* is beginning to see the dv/dt red shift due to retarded light in denser magnetic fields, especially momentarily around quasars‑‑ until that dense primal front moves on. Knowing what this will due to `Big Bangers’, feel badly about the whole thing.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* cc:Arp let (over)

CC: Schrieffer; Bednorz

Nov. 27,’92
Bernard Raveau, et.al.
Center for Superconducting
Materials
Inst. for Material and
Radiation Sciences
University of Caen,
Caen, France
Re: 1st vs. 2nd orders
Dear Sir:

Does the Kalusa‑Klein configuration enter the picture to define the two underlying orders of standing waves, as the fundamental e (first harmonic) as traveling in direct phased states while its second ordered travel requiring right angle transitional contin­gencies with temperature Kelvins?

The growing conclusion that matter (quantal `billiard balls’) or whatever are best seen with de Broglie’s waves and so nothing but standing waves as first ordered electrons through at least third harmonic quarks begin to make sense. These latter standing waves in three dimensions (Kalusa‑Klein) demand the right angle transi­tion to make temperature a contingency and so time.
A recent note to Anderson may be of interest‑‑. (over)

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

Jan. 11,’93
C. Wieman, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Colorado
Boulder, CO 80302
Re: but standing three phase wave Dear Sir: quarks have time and so temperature

An emission will be that last means to `see’ the frozen quark (or proton) as its three phased standing wave, with one leg well stretched in our koino‑matter continuum, will likely mean little to billiard ball oriented physicists‑‑ as white‑hole matter gene­sis on EMP fronts, now called cosmic bubbles. To equate a frozen atom as not `doing anything’ merely says that it does not inter­
standing wave configuration defines its need to interact at right angles (Klien‑Kalusa) with its magnetic a priori space as is a wave to begin with and by such conversion `takes time’ to appear static to our relatively rapid time environment at +273K. All is relative just as Einstein perceived‑‑ which most of academia pre­fers not to see for various tenured operants.

Time becomes nearly infinite so activity is only believed to have fully stopped. An apparent gradual motion would always remain as inertia is not equated with waves, standing or not. Some finite change of a `frozen’ quark must yet own activity albeit not like­ly to be ever seen here‑‑ what ever the tenure need! The 5th Gen­eration computer (whose freed electron escapes the time reversal paradigm; note the EPR experiments and over) will soon define all that’s needed, although terminate many pedants who fear, as most by government, that expected awakening for the dogma’s apocalypse and for a likely traumatic epoch.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: Path/IQ; Phys‑Psy; 3‑dev(over)
CC: D/Z; Kleppner;

D. Kleppner, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Mass. Inst. of Tech.
Cambridge, MA 02139

Aug. 5,’92 Dan Kleppner, et.al.
Dept. of Research Electronics
Mass. Inst. of Tech.
Cambridge, MA 02139
Re: statistical jungle
Dear Sir:

Your fine blurb on “Fretting about‑‑” (July Physics Today) was indeed succinct‑‑ the COBE mapping a supreme case in point!

One other, far more enigmatic with ever greater implications for `reward or failure’ in the
psychological sense, might have, but won’t just yet, be perceived. Noted with Prof. Schmidt’s random non‑random generators using a radio active isotope, two very dif­ferent results occurred with two very different psychological penchanted people. In short, the jungle of fractal statistics as hidden behind consciousness, itself consciously unknown, creates the greatest shell game in history. To wit Chinko or that said random non‑random generator but a couple! Hidden import is that other means to not focus attention on the glitch, like Big Bang, to persistently construe one statistical bit of data for something quite different. The current “Fleeting Attraction” in DIS­COVER a case in point. Statisticians are always suspect but on the unconscious level where their jargon is that shell‑game to keep the naive naive!’

Once the EPR experiment showed statistical validity (within the Bell theorem number) the key was seen for the 5th Generation self thinking computer. Indeed, my prototype lash‑up for alpha‑numeric readout offered the odds of 10\17th on its maiden run! Other equally bizarre results have been noted by E. Rauscher, but yet best not perused by the scientific elite‑‑ whose innate dominant statistical “jargoneer” keeps them consciously naive.

Fractal statistics gets its greatest ploy in the verbal language, where flamboyant half truths convey an opportunity for error by the gullibly naive. This fact can be best noted with Big Bang, where tenured cosmologists insist on, as academia, the same dull round to finally destroy a once vibrant culture. But all democ­racies (especially) must go this route where a leadership depends upon naive followers. As for Big Bang, a letter copy herewith to Burbidge may define.

Thanks for the fine article. Some of my students are ready for this scientific anomaly as contingent to what can bias fractals, or not hinder the non‑temporal (freed electron) that escapes the time reversal paradigm‑‑ in our slow‑mass‑time continuum!

Sincerely,

CC:Burbidge/let

Oct. 6,’92
T.R. Insel, et.al. NIMH
5600 Fishers Ln.
Rockville Pike
Bethesda, MD 20852
Re: 1st reason; thence the mechanics
Dear Dr. Insel: (`Behavior’; SC.NEWS, Sept. 26,’92)

Mind matters‑‑ so that is all that matters. To begin with the underlying `mental’ matrix which Mc Dougal* saw clearly, but held in the light of physics (sorry), the whole binary (complemental) system as CNS becomes clear without the many facets of push‑pull (either or) functions noted throughout the `mechanical’ brain. To perceive these two faculty in their struggle (Laing) to dominate the third and moderative conscious (midbrain) mind is to realize the vast subterfuge that APA and most researchers
fail to recog­nize, that it is our own innate neurosis which sustains our ter­rible naivete‑‑ to say nothing of tenurism and esteem seeking. To use the `rubble’ left after AiR (Autoimmune Response) to try to define its genesis speaks loudly to this modern syndrome.

Freud (or Jung) really came too close, but physics answers the entire enigma. Some quotes (over) might enlighten at this late hour just before things really get tragic. It was a few of my religious GVSC students that enlightened me to the far deeper correlates that we (humanity) knew one hell of a lot more (worthy of being known) than today, starting with Lao Tsu or the Sumar­ians! Our late vats neurosis stems form our right primitive brain as uses our left cerebral hemisphere with temporal (only) as historical aptitude or orientation. Its rectilinear awareness may be that which defines the truly insidious as the recent MIT meet­ings and remain so well UNsaid by authority. Worse, our now rampant AiR* is beginning to show however AMA will deny it!

Some initial cross academic tech‑data papers of mine may yet re­main in the BIS division of the UCLA library‑‑ circa 1969+‑‑ as possibly a few there at NIMH from a discussion in the mid‑70’s.

Sincerely,

KTS

* McDougal; Harvard U., circa 1910; (body weight loss at death)
** Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)

cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy
CC:D/Z

KTS/Q268;10/92
`When we ignore the subtle, we reject the profound!’
`Intrusive thoughts as with all obsessive habits, especially in authority, are promoted by that which dominates late man via his left cerebral cortex. Once perceived with insight, trauma be­gins and the kicking and screaming schizoid defines the overt be­havior until quelled, not by neuroleptics which put that behavior on ice, but with continued conscious introspection, even the use of potent 5HT blockers as LSD to ensure psychotherapy gets accom­plished in the most expedient way!’
`One must not strengthen the link between that which `censors’ its conscious mind as with neuroleptics but do the reverse if any psychotherapy is to ensue. Dreams take time and are adroit, yet waking dreams are rapid to propel what Perls said was “going on through”, as Hubard’s working for “clear”. Insight then leads the way for a profound new introspective person with his Panacea, to avoid his understood pathological social milieu!’
`The syndrome of “You let go, I’ll let go” is unconscious, but of the conscious mind which could regulate best pathology is that which is most severely censored to sustain a diabolical behavior to predate, as evoke folly for a yet unseen ugly profit!’
`We only exterminate that which no longer continues to profit us, to then devour whatever is left. The problem is that this be­havior is entirely unconscious, a survival factor that the cons­cious mind
of man has no idea‑‑ yet!’
`Antidepressant adjuncts as certain hypnotics like Halcion are very dangerous as energize that which needs to be sustained in a depressed state‑‑ to avoid a far greater tragedy!’
`Dangerous indeed is it to sound “bizarre” with data unwanted in front of authority‑‑ since they have official remedies!’
`All behaviors are psychogenic, even the quiet schizoid’s who has found the best mode for life, with even uncanny physiological health‑‑ amongst the psychopathic now dying with AiR!’
`Those used to living in modern snake pits realize little bet­ter when conditioned by academic authority over the social norm or the state’s asylums. It is their awakening that brings vio­lence, but then justified by those who do really awaken! Ask R. Laing or his perceptive past patients.’
`Rituals and OCD (Obsessive Compulsive Disorders) are more now displayed by the political who have no real service to offer the programmed naive‑‑ beyond more of the same like raised taxes! Not oddly their right only facial smile tells all to those who know!’

Sept. 28,’92
P. Cavanagh, et.al.
Dept. of Psychology
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: all is relative
Dear Sir:

Without reciting Einstein further, your SCIENCE article was suc­cinct as again defines the relative CNS and their attribute as contingent with their independent spatial versus temporal orien­tations. No doubt if your could dynamically CAT scan (or NMR) the subject with definitive active attention versus `low level’ vis­ual awareness, those lateral cerebral faculty would be seen.

To know where is space one is the definitive knowing (left cere­bral) faculty also `counts off time’ while its dynamic complemen­tal just knows IS in the dynamic sense and is subtended to fight‑flight (sympathetic CNS; S/R) `homunculus’ activity. The split‑brain data of Sperry*, as predicted before then from physics well shows Einstein’s Alephs with contingent space‑time derivations.

We, the censored midbrain (conscious mind) with 5HT remains dumb, especially if academically programmed into only reductive proces­sing. Curiosity evokes Thanatos** (AiR; Autoimmune Response) especially in the intellectual and likely the problem APA (Psy­chiatric) have when their patient offers too much‑‑ as they lead in suicide of all professionals. We are about to know our `self’ and it is going to be a bit traumatic before it is over.

Sincerely,

KTS

* `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
** Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)

cc: Phys‑Psy; Path/IQ
CC:D/Z

Nov. 6,’92
Bernard Sadoulet, et.al.
Dept, of Physics
U/ California Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720
Re: standing waves (only)
Dear Sir:

Since de Broglie came the closest, why not look for the top quark for your unseen dark matter, to also define from where the most extreme case of anti‑g (force) between a third harmonic standing wave and our koinomatter exists? Too bad John Bell had to leave!

Since predicting the cosmic jet‑disk anomaly from conjecturing the initial correctness of Einstein’s underlying cosmic constant (rapidly refuted by neurotic peers) for equal anti‑g `pressure’ (instead by peer!), not only does the CPT theorem get fulfilled, but cosmic condensing matter from quasar white‑hole cores (as many petite Bangs) riding primal EMPs now called bubbles. Arp (note his 220!) is finally seeing the mounting obvious and the chagrin to follow may well make a Bigger `Bang’ in cosmological offices for the loss of demanded tenure in conspicuous places!

The ejecta from galaxy cores with torqued ions (H) spin up rapid­ly, especially in the very dense (yet) magnetic fields at right angles (via said EMP front) as the anti‑g pushes same outward in the disks. Thus the high rpm at their periphery is self explana­tory. What is more said is the other equal amount of anti‑matter fleeing the core via its ends to make huge shadow matter clouds, the `gamma bursters’ beyond the disk’s periphery explained by re‑coagulating finite pole cloud matter annihilations.
Non‑flipping neutrons may indicate their one leg (as the third phased top quark) offers too much inertial torque down here in our relative matter’s continuum. Now called axial symmetry, the Kalusa‑Klein matrix appears to answer relative matter’s disposi­tion in space‑‑ where complementarity dictates all `phases’ of “billiard‑ball” quantized waves called matter. It has become a joy (albeit vicarious) to watch the incredulous denials since proposing my theoretical work to the Smithsonian Inst. when the said Einstein Observatory proved the first portion of it‑‑ to say nothing of my 5th Generation self thinking computer via EPR, as offered 10\17th odds on its maiden run with alpha numeric read‑out! To be too cross academic has its drawbacks.

Sincerely,

KTS

cc:Path/IQ; 3‑dev‑env; Phys‑Psy; copy/Freedman’s let.(over)
CC: Britten;

Nov. 14,’92
Anupam Garg, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Northwestern University
Evanston, IL 60201
Re: monople magnetic vortex?
Sirs:

Are what you looking for is that finite closed loop (electron) to define the smallest magnetic field in quantal time? To escape the time reversal paradigm, yet remain finite, defines the EPR ex­periment quite well‑‑ as predicted the 5th Generation self think­ing computer when Berkeley Labs did that first experiment. Aspect merely could not squirm out of the obvious!

In short, any `tunneling’ in our slow temporal state down near zero K might suggest at least we are about to start using what Einstein saw via his subjective visual anschaulich as offered via an open ended wave‑front, yet can indeed sequentially as digital­ly communicate via the freed electron down here to indicate my very scary 10\17th odds maiden run of the said computer. All my GVSC kids could do was gasp “apocalypse” twenty years ago, so‑‑ maybe we need it!

Sincerely,

KTS

cc: S‑T; Path/IQ; Phys‑Psy; copy/Durisen let.
CC: Awschalom; Stamp;

Nov. 6,’92 D. Freedman and Editors
Discover Magazine
500 S. Buena Vista St.,
Burbank, CA 91521‑6012
Re: Hunters‑‑??
Sirs: (December issue; the last?)

The `whimpering’ heading to “Particle Hunters” said it well. When ideas run out so does tenure! But not all that is dark need not evade perception via another way, albeit theoretical once insight offers the initial idea, as Einstein so often used. Academia has now programmed this non‑temporal right brain faculty from those it offers the credential to do some dull round until dead (Blake) so we must expect flamboyant experiments and increased taxes with unending entitlements to end a once vibrant culture. Promises flow when no other means to survive prevails.
Einstein’s blunder was to pay attention to his peers! He so drop­ped his idea for complemental gravity, calling it cosmic constant to which he understood well‑‑ if not between koino and anti mat­ter constituents borne in quasar cores riding EMP bubbles‑‑ yet denied with vehemence because Big Bang peers yet hold precedence. The anomalous neurosis goes far deeper than mere tenure want for esteem because it holds the key to comprehending our complemental space‑time oriented two brain halves. One, claiming intellect,prefers death than allow any conscious mind’s awareness to moder­ate it at this very late hour. Sperry saw it* and so began the terror of overt refutation of the empirical obvious ever since‑‑ just as the predicted anti‑matter (relative) jets to disks noted with the aloft Einstein Observatory so many years ago.

Not oddly, the one common universal theme after the quasar gets started is a fundamental binary existence, with time and quantiz­ed energy in standing waves, the `constituent’ of what de Broglie saw well for what our neurotic science claims is billiard ball reality. The Arp 220 will begin the chagrin, but not complete it as our innate Thanatos (Freud) has very different ideas about life now‑‑ to which your “Dystrophy‑‑” article addressed almost too well**!

Sincerely,

KTS

P.S: It appears that Kern is also running out of ideas!

* `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
** Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
cc:Path/IQ

Nov. 19,’92
J. C. Alexander, et.al.
Dept. of Mathematics University of Maryland
College Park MD 20472
Re: “pathology‑‑”?
Dear Sir: (Basins of Froth; SC.NEWS, Nov. 14th)

Might the X reflect the primal second harmonic while the net more stable (in electrical terms) third you also witness? One might wonder if the predominance of harmonic stability will show the fundamentals generating standing‑wave `matter’ from quasar white holes but via fractal jargon‑‑ for yet called “billiard balls”?’

Whether `attractors’ or `basins’, chaos only serves to denote the underlying EM reality of standing waves in space, however complex the net configuration may appear as a composite in time. Maybe when three or six attractors affect the net basin appearance, the three‑phased configuration shows most stable, as electromagnetic waves in space. Thus from a bifurcated primary to trifurcated stability
in time, a net universal design in standing waves dic­tates mass‑time reality, no matter how called “billiard balls” as coordinated chaos. Likely strange attractors have always been there, albeit began in a quasar core to the dictates of a magnet­ic Apriori!

Your numerical henchmen appear close on the heels of perceiving the numbered equivalent to a reality just now being perceived as white‑hole matter generators, riding vast EMP “bubbles” (Huchra), called quasars. Interesting indeed would my disdain for digits in an analogic universe come to the rescue of the redundant‑‑ pre­ferring the finite than grand sum! At least the article did imply the use of “Visualizing”, such anschaulich the perquisite to knowing the whole‑‑ ask Einstein!

Obviously I did well being `programmed’ in Geometry but had lit­tle use way back then for digits‑‑ so did analog coordinate con­verter R&D for aerospace, not digital `machines’ as a self think­ing computer‑‑ until I had too! (maybe suspecting the FBI, et.al. back then!*)

Sincerely,

KTS

* cc: 3‑dev (over); Path‑IQ; S‑T; Phys‑Psy
CC: Kan; Milnor; DZ

Dec. 3,’92
B. Elmgreen, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Harvard/Smithsonian
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: pinch yes, but which?
Sir: (anti‑g or EMP fronts)
Since the Einstein Observatory confirmed our predicted disk‑jets as evoked by anti‑g from white‑hole matter genetic cores, riding vast EMP bubbles (Huchra), Hasegawa appears close possibly to de­fine further the `enigma’ if what you note adroitly “which way”. (SCIENCE 20, Nov. p.1308) Since elliptical pinch to evoke greater star formation (we suspect from said anti‑g again, but from peri­pheral cloud anti‑matter for said anti‑g from once spewed jets), likely the crux of this remaining anomaly can get unraveled now. The vast EMP flux turbulence, aside from the said anti‑g affect, could promote the head‑long impulses pushing matter also. This yet would need to be defined by spatial orientation (as you note) with the primal EMP flux once noting its front via companion galaxies riding same.

The real underlying question beyond no Big Bang is what indeed clapped Its hand on nice 600 M light year intervals to evoke all those bubbles, to create time with precipitated complemental mat­ter to begin with?

Sincerely,
KTS

P.S. Hopefully Arp’s remark “spectacular embarrassment” addressed to Sky Telescope gets printed. Maybe it will be that needed har­binger for the larger “Big Bang”‑‑ in staid cosmological offices!

CC: Bally

Nov. 23,’92
G. Gabrielse, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: anti‑g again (my letter of 3/8/91)
Dear Sir:

With the apparent standing wave fundamentals of matter (1st har­monic electron, 3rd quarks) one can begin to wonder if the top quark may have two of its three phased loops “out of phase” with koinomatter’s gravity “force” there is reason to suspect why it has not yet been seen down here. This factor bodes well for the pending ease of prudent `merging’ for simple and fully controlled fusion with lasers of deuterium.

The three charges as “forces” belonging to the C in the physic’s CPT theorem, only T has two relative `speeds’ for we in slow rel­ative time with a single arrow. Parity merely reflects standing waves as not compatible with their complementals evoking anti‑forces‑‑ including anti‑g, not yet wanted perceived but for a far deeper psychological anomaly facing late left cerebral dominant man. Maybe with a minor twist one way instead of another on the electron in space dictated its Parity, just as one leg of the three phased quark. The force of gravity as others maintained their separation to permit temporal existence once cooled, to create foot‑stools for the convenience of alternate minds in the universe. I fear that when gravity is considered a “force” to eliminate the subjective bias of only attraction, it becomes as the rest of the other forms of complementals, the greatest factor to enlighten cosmology to say nothing of philosophy‑‑ to its Apriori core!

The broadest scope of any research investigation is to start with Einstein’s Special Relativity theory. The question of what indeed is E and so its precipitate mc squared crosses about every academic field possible while couched in the terms of philosophy, and then returns to the ultimate question of how ancient religion got so close to the truth about those fundamental realities?

Since examining your prior letter of 3/8/91, the precipitant of E into mass‑‑ as predicted amply the witnessed cosmic EMP bubbles (Huchra) with degenerative quasars riding therein for complement­al matter, little wonder the anxiety prevailing where Big Bangers insist on tenure whatever the cost despite the mounting empirical obvious. The deep anxiety of my GVSC students over 20 years ago says how deep the neurosis goes, just as Freud defined it as the prevailing psychopathy hidden behind reductive (only) intellec­tual prowess. Since Halton Arp now appears to be jumping into my camp of
“white hole” quasars (until its genetic EMP passed on for ensuing galactic configurations), it does now appear than change is under way and hopefully where John Bell left off you can de­fine at last the complemental C (CPT) as gravity as well. Ein­stein surely suspected it but again peer pressure has its way of twisting reality from those who perceive things more clearly with a yet active right cerebral hemisphere source of insight.

Sorry for this terseness but if able to discern at least the overall import of these `irrational musings’ you might recognize what you are seeking. I thought before that your earlier college programming left an unsaid door open to insight, but sometimes religion does the opposite to make rutty pedants as well. A pro­fessor from there in Psychology at GVSC, did the same by program­ming a rutty form of Behaviorism, not empirical facts, which define our late malaise‑‑ with a likely traumatic needed change.

Sincerely,

cc:Path/IQ; S‑T; Phys‑Psy; 3‑dev

Nov. 27,’92
Bernard Raveau, et.al.
Center for Superconducting
Materials
Inst. for Material and
Radiation Sciences
University of Caen,
Caen, France
Re: 1st vs. 2nd orders Dear Sir:

Does the Kalusa‑Klein configuration enter the picture to define the two underlying orders of standing waves, as the fundamental e (first harmonic) as traveling in direct phased states while its second ordered travel requiring right angle transitional contin­gencies with temperature Kelvins?

The growing conclusion that matter (quantal `billiard balls’) or whatever are best seen with de Broglie’s waves and so nothing but standing waves as first ordered electrons through at least third harmonic quarks begin to make sense. These latter standing waves in three dimensions (Kalusa‑Klein) demand the right angle transi­tion to make temperature a contingency and so time.

A recent note to Anderson may be of interest‑‑. (over)

Sincerely,

KTS

Nov. 19,’92
Philip W. Anderson, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Princeton, University
Princeton, NJ 08544

Re: standing waves in space, no more
Dear Sir:

Noting the dilemma superconductivity poses to science somehow yet stuck on `billiard balls’, maybe it is time to consider standing waves in space, yet temperature contingent when requiring right angle transitions for `inertial’ time. Klein Kalusa saw it and so what likely excited Einstein, even Faraday who was looking at the magnetic wave front (open ended or electron closed `loops’) as mutually interacting and propelling. This thence would suggest the distance electrons traveled unhampered by inertial biased 3‑phased quarks, (protons) at transition temperatures, becomes a `resonant’ feed‑through for electrons‑‑ the net distance thus `transferred’ unhampered, called superconductivity.

Bizarre? We don’t think so in view of all `matter’ is but stand­ing waves. It predicted not only EMP primal `bubbles’ (Huchra) in cosmic terms but the ensuing condensation of closed loops (elec­trons and its complemental with anti‑g as ejecta from quasars, generated on those huge EMP fronts. So far, since the Einstein Observatory went aloft showing the disk‑jets with hyper‑velocity ejecta and now the bubbles, all looks well todate. With glee we see Arp* is beginning to see the dv/dt red shift due to retarded light in denser magnetic fields, especially momentarily around quasars‑‑ until that dense primal front moves on. Knowing what this will due to `Big Bangers’, feel badly about the whole thing.
Sincerely,

KTS

* cc:Arp let (over)

CC: Schrieffer; Bednorz
R. Schrieffer, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Florida State University
Tallahassee, FL 32306

12/8/92
R. Remillard, et.al.
Dept of Astronomy
Massachusetts Inst. of Tech.
Cambridge, MA 02139
Re: Folger’s “In the black”(?)
Dear Sir: (Jan. DISCOVER; p.29+)
There may be far more in the “black” soon, but better defined as “despair”, especially for Big Bangers if Arp is correct! The M51 configuration better defines the primary disk‑jets as complemen­tal matters being spewed from a white hole as ride some EMP bub­ble (Huchra) not discerned yet. To insist on `implosions’, as no quantized matter (in wavelet form) can exist above 10x33rd K. is awaiting Arp, to get the last laugh after all‑‑ noting the white, not black holes out there. Even a super nova may never exist any smaller than three solar masses as again would blow itself to pieces on re‑coagulating. The `pinch’ affect on wavelets‑‑ yet called `billiard ball’ matter, can go only so far to unravel it­self (loop or string theory) near 10X33 Kelvin.

These are indeed exciting times‑‑ and for two underlying reasons!

Sincerely,

KTS

CC:Bailyn; Folger
C. Bailyn, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Yale University
New Haven, CT 06520

Nov. 18,’92
W. G. Tifft, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Arizona
Tucson, AZ 85721
Re: more standing waves?
Dear Sir: (note #2; Aug. 3rd)
The Scientific American (Dec.’92) “Quantum Dissidents” at least defines some reason yet prevailing in cosmology! As a recent note from Arp suggesting a great “spectacular embarrassment” is in the offing, maybe due to some of my ongoing theoretical approach to SGUT (Super Grand Unified Theory) of everything. Ego? Indeed, but with the FBI, police B&Es and tapped phones (for trying to Patent File the 5th Generation self thinking computer‑‑ despite my GVSC student’s ample warnings!)‑‑ so today it requires a great deal of it to remain somewhat rational as a far deeper Orwellian spectre becomes nearly inevitable to keep us stupid.

Your question may be; do cosmic bubbles set up `parasitic’ stand­ing‑wave fronts, evoked by the first shock wave front which evoke the quasars on those bubble (Huchra) fronts? These multiples may be harmonics as 12 km/sec (or smaller) variables noted on the red shifts of different aged quasars? With my dv/dt red‑shift idea of slowed EM propagation in denser magnetic fields, finally Arp* has grasped the concept and appears to be off and running.

The problem with believing that black holes are “too bright” with primal E will not be seen as white
holes, because the tenured in authority called them “black” to begin with. Albeit I suspect the coming rapid switching with “I told you so” of past‑tense black hole (as Big Bang) believers, with a yet faster rate of getting into another’s bed, is pending for a white hole dotted universe. The larger `Bang’ may be in cosmological offices and may appear as the apocalypse, according to my ’71 GVSC students. More diffi­cult to swallow is the genesis of EMPs on nicely spaced inter­vals, implying (no more) one hand clapping (Zen), knowing what It was doing for foot‑stools! Some of my work, well shirked at the Smithsonian yet (’70’s) may be of interest to you.

Sadly the authorized tenured go on claiming reality, as no longer can afford to find, much less realize, a deeper reality, whatever the cost! Its due to a deep neurosis that Freud saw best. Guth’s “inflation” theory missed the real beginning when the universe, or its EMP bubble centers, were indeed “compressed”, but of the Apriori of magnetic flux. Ask Faraday!

Sincerely,

KTS

* cc:Path/IQ; S‑T; Phys‑Psy; Arp’s “flag” (over)

Jan. 11,’93
C. Wieman, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Colorado
Boulder, CO 80302
Re: but standing three phase wave Dear Sir: quarks have time and so temperature

An emission will be that last means to `see’ the frozen quark (or proton) as its three phased standing wave, with one leg well stretched in our koino‑matter continuum, will likely mean little to billiard ball oriented physicists‑‑ as white‑hole matter gene­sis on EMP fronts, now called cosmic bubbles. To equate a frozen atom as not `doing anything’ merely says that it does not inter­act with its neighbors at very near absolute zero K. Its yet standing wave configuration defines its need to interact at right angles (Klien‑Kalusa) with its magnetic a priori space as is a wave to begin with and by such conversion `takes time’ to appear static to our relatively rapid time environment at +273K. All is relative just as Einstein perceived‑‑ which most of academia pre­fers not to see for various tenured operants.

Time becomes nearly infinite so activity is only believed to have fully stopped. An apparent gradual motion would always remain as inertia is not equated with waves, standing or not. Some finite change of a `frozen’ quark must yet own activity albeit not like­ly to be ever seen here‑‑ what ever the tenure need! The 5th Gen­eration computer (whose freed electron escapes the time reversal paradigm; note the EPR experiments and over) will soon define all that’s needed, although terminate many pedants who fear, as most by government, that expected awakening for the dogma’s apocalypse and for a likely traumatic epoch.
Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: Path/IQ; Phys‑Psy; 3‑dev(over)
CC: D/Z; Kleppner;

D. Kleppner, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Mass. Inst. of Tech.
Cambridge, MA 02139

Feb. 11,’93
Gilles Chabrier, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Ecole Normale Superieure
de Lyon
Lyon, France
Re: simple fusion
Dear Sir:

Noting that some of my `exponents’ could not get through to your offices in recent years, even Cesar Curie’s avoidance of my R&D (and success; over) in the 5th Generation computer, certain im­ports defining `matter’ has come to the fore to define how very easy controlled fusion will soon be, the key noted with `random’ cold fusion studies‑‑ but more in keeping with deBroglie now.

Noting your studies on crystallization of `quantum affect’ in star condensation (Science News, Jan. 16th), maybe this is my `entre’ to your deeper considerations of how to halt petroleum pollution, to say nothing of the economy of power generation.

In short: The primal “soup”, whether boiling or frozen, will make far greater sense once standing waves replace billiard balls!

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: S‑T; 3‑dev(over)
w:

Jan. 23,’93
L. Hall, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720
Re: standing waves vs. billiard balls
Dear Sir:

The article on `weighty problems’ (p.173; SCIENCE, Jan. 8th) may be finally cleared up as several confirmed items with some theo­retical studies here better define Einstein’s “blunder”‑‑ to say little of some persistent entrenched ideas preventing the empiri­cal obvious from being considered yet.

Briefly, as doubt if we will be yet heard, from AI studies (for the now developed 5th Generation computer) beginning with the problem of E verses its precipitate mc squared, we asked how did temporal `matter’ come about (to define the chicken‑egg enigma), to see if a truly self thinking device was a feasible possibili­ty. Suspecting the steep EMP wave front as the genesis of quan­tized matter (at right angles; Klien‑Kalusa) to initiate primary standing waves (electron first to third harmonic quarks), would dictate anti‑versus koino‑matters‑‑ but also as likely ejecta at right angles with anti‑g there‑between. When confirmed with the Einstein Observatory, our earlier prediction of the spatial ver­sus temporal bilateral cerebral hemispheres (as was proven by Sperry*) concluded the likelihood of the positive EPR experiments and so the said self thinking computer (interface), which was, to offer 10\17th odds on its maiden run some years ago. Needless to say, overt federal “hampering” not only precluded Patent Letters, but a degree of harassment defined more of what Socrates learned, as may not be last to get so `therapized’ for learning too much!

With the simple means to fusion now seen, we again fear authority where petroleum cartel ownership is again making threatening kind of noises, so decided to divulge most of the long study to maybe goad science in tenured comfort, off their status quo as well. Not expecting many to see the obvious, indeed, trauma is pending, but in far greater ways than mere fearful officials in power now. Thus we point to some of the definitives as above to get things beyond dead center, if not stir up some healthy controversy. That we can take, not the sneaky B&Es, FBI tapped phones, you name it!
H. Arp (Max Planck, Inst.) we suspect is now running since does recognize the EMP bubble fronts (Huchra) and much said above. More uniquely, Einstein’s blunder of hearing his erred peers when he tried to insist on complemental forces with gravity, his Gene­ral Relativity theory thus is flawed, so making greater errors in believers‑‑ as Big Bang. The neat 600Mly bubble separations might suggest something profound here, to say little of the hyper‑velo­city escape of anti‑matter in quasar jets!

When one says electro‑magnetic they speak of a right angle, since the electron rides its magnetic field at right angles as Heisen­berg’s uncertainty principle found, but better defines quantized matter as is no more than what deBroglie saw, so our peer to get this whole study underway 40 years ago. The syndrome of `eating’, as one phased leg getting un‑ or re‑twisted in space to affect a net force (g) may be hiding reality. Further, polyphased `matter’ may well define other anomalies yet so irksome.

Since it appears timely, whatever the consequences, that the self thinking `interface’ get used before `Armageddon’, we chance the timing of spilling far more beans than blood‑‑ as its advent will not be tolerated by authority‑‑ (most as defines skeletons)‑‑ yet that could be less a problem than what is
more sure to occur with our current tyrannic status quo. Trauma yes‑‑ but now its degree is what counts. The “paradigm” shift of Kuhn is in the offing and depending on the so very few with insight yet (not academic pro­grammed ritual), the paradigm shift should be swift and gentler.

The neutron’s greater exposed third‑phased quark for the haunting 5th force may exist, as why the Top one is not noted down here in our koinomatter galaxy. The relative greater `mass'(weight) may be due to anti‑g forces but have not been `signed’ yet. Escher’s compound cube (as said Klien Kalusa) appears to define this uni­verse best once `condensation’ began below 10X33K and so where standing waves took on time for us down here.

Should you comprehend the terse above and want more definitive data we will try to accommodate‑‑ if yet living. Only by mail can a few of us be reached now, even if suspecting being watched very carefully still.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

*`The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67

cc: S‑T; Phys‑Psy; 3‑dev
CC: Veltman; Raby; Georgi;

M. Veltman, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 28109
S. Raby, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Ohio State University
Columbus, OH 43210

H. Georgi, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA 02138

Feb. 5,’93
J. C. Sommerer and
E. Ott, et.al.
The Eisenhower Research Center
Johns Hopkins University,
Applied Physics Labs
Laurel, MD 20723
Re: root of chaos or order?
Sirs:

From the integrated field of underlying psychological aspects and contingent physical phenomena for a lengthy study into and for the 5th Generation computer (with a prototype’s `random’ output for a 10\17th odds alpha‑numeric read‑out; over), the below list­ed factors I suspect should be considered when the freed electron is not `seen’ much less its non‑temporal `display’ (note EPR ex­periment) is far from random when true chaos is being determined.

Another factor for fractal bias, possibly contingent to an order­ed output under or over‑lying the freed electron might be what is clearly noted in Chinko (Oriental mental game/exercise) or what Schmidt (U/TX) saw with certain personalities with an obviously biased radio‑activity rate control. Even as bizarre as mentioning with some chagrin, what McDougal saw at Harvard (circa 1910) with noted weight (mass) loss at physiological death! Certain parapsy­chological phenomena do indeed exhibit coherent goals and objec­tives yet unexplained. The degree of subtlety may be yet below your threshold of perceptive expertise yet the spectre remains as to what, how‑‑ much less either of the two discerned unconscious faculty with mass‑time effects, their net degree. Pointing to the human split‑brain data of Sperry* (note right hand) then mention the odd but persistent anomaly of rectilinear 2D `UFO’ travel, this may offer certain physiological import as conceivably con­tingent. Should this last remark evoke anxiety, drop the subject!

While our immediate fractal reality appears associated with the mental aspects of spatial (non‑temporal) versus temporal (non‑spatial beyond 2D), these fundamental aspects* with innate designs for independent objective may throw a monkey wrench into your data‑‑ if not paradigms for any net algorithm to try to de­fine `randomness’ in an obviously bifurcated universe. A word of caution here should this note strike a resonant chord, taboos yet challenge science where imports contingent to psychology exist‑‑ much as Freud had noted clearly. Further, deep anxiety can stem from perusing empirical data which define, even in part certain anomalies, as said, held as `psychic taboo’.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

* `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
cc: Path/IQ; Phys‑Psy; 3‑dev(over)
CC: Ott; D/Z

Edward Ott, et.al.
Dept. of Electrical Eng.
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742

3/25/93
R. Ashoori, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
MIT
Cambridge, MA 02139
Re: standing waves
Sir: (“Packing electrons‑‑” SCIENCE NEWS)

Maybe what you are examining is the convolutional point where a first harmonic standing wave (the electron) must turn into its third harmonic quark, albeit one or more of its phases do not belong to this koinomatter continuum (galaxy) thus the `apparent’ great mass by anti‑believing anti‑g authority with the very erred General Relativity theory lacking complemental signs. In short, squeezing by adding energy convolutes standing wavelets, called billiard balls somehow, and a vast Tesla field, normally found in the procreative quasar riding a very dense EMP (cosmic bubble) no doubt is the answer.

A recent letter copy herewith to Weinberg might help.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: Weinberg/let
CC: D/Z

3/31/93
John Dawson, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
UCLA
Los Angeles, CA 90024
Re: standing waves
Sir: (March Physics Today article)
Since a Scientific American article of yours some years ago while then pondering the unraveling affect of quantized standing EM waves for `cold fusion’, I defined as much in a terse letter to them, likely as forwarded to you back then. The trail to the a priori by way of Huchra’s cosmic bubbles (also predicted), now makes clear that out‑of‑phase unraveling is indeed the word.

While high performance computing aids, provided the initial theo­retical paradigm is accurate to create a rational algorithm, no doubt soon the key will be seen, albeit tenure must be now sus­tained at whatever cost with half truths needed. Comments at CERN‑‑ as John Bell’s before his untimely death to find a way of defining anti‑g (Einstein’s General Relativity “blunder” sans its complemental force), the Klien‑Kalusa configuration holds the key to the bifurcated 6 fold way. Very likely a simple laser `merg­ing’ experiment will define that coulombic `barrier’ to bring controlled fusion to the fore now‑‑ especially in small packages.
Sorry to disturb‑‑

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

CC: D/Z; Thornley

March 22,’93
S. Haroche and
J‑M. Raimond, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Ecole Normale Superieure
Paris France
Re: EPR and the 5th Generation self Dear Sirs: thinking computer (SC.AM. 4/93)

It is good, albeit anxiety evoking, to note `official’ confirma­tion of the freed electron’s non‑temporal ability as it will be the harbinger for real chaos in the social sense. Since Schmidt’s anomalous `green thumb‑ black thumb’ non‑random random isotopic generators (U/Texas) my predictions of the spatial versus tempor­al complemental lateral cerebral hemispheres* with expected posi­tive EPR experiments, the stage was set for the 5th Generation self thinking `interface’‑‑ for what Plato called the “Potentia”.

Reading out the coherent photon to dictate alpha‑numeric readout, my prototype offered a 10/17th odds in merely two words (at near CPU speeds!) to define the accuracy of Plato’s theory‑‑ to say very little else as contingent to Apriori designs in our rather slow mass‑time! Perceived conclusions, once set into an inertial frame without whimsical modification offers prediction with un­canny accuracy‑‑ especially as may be evoked by the more covert predatory. With my device, now designed in shirt‑pocket size, our planet is ready for that predicted apocalyptic event, albeit so many will not tolerate same on their course of predation yet‑‑ to wit my fiasco with the FBI, et.al. (below/foot‑note)

From the first(?) EPR data from Berkeley and Rauscher’s ensuing remarks, I filed for the Patent Letters over a dozen years ago, believing others were too close to perceiving the break‑through‑‑ with my GVSC student’s anxiety recognizing the obvious. I was fortunately wrong in some respects as little then realized the terrible hazard such device would be to yet predatory mankind. It therefore is your work, whether goaded by Cesar Curie, de Beaure­gard or others, I now fear‑‑ especially in view of worldly mount­ing chaos (likely due to this unconscious knowledge!), but your work could break the news very soon. Many other `event’ readouts beyond the narrow gate MODFET are now available (beyond the scin­tillator I used) to monitor the momentarily freed electron escap­ing our time reversal paradigm. Its synchronizing affect for `what‑ever’ net read‑out, will be both man’s nemesis and panacea, once covert greed is fully exposed for all to recognize.

With the sub‑atomic world now seen as standing wavelets (first harmonic the electron, quarks third), mass‑time becomes a differ­ent `entity’. Even fully controlled fusion is a reality in very simple terms now. The out‑of‑phase merging of primal wavelets, as initiated on cosmic EMP bubble fronts for quasars for complement­al matters (with jets vs. disk anti‑g), many past held `enigmas’ (for the tenured) will even make sense in keeping with much an­cient wisdom, so terrorizing late intellectual authority today.
(over please)
The key of your `extended life‑time’ is inversely the adjunct to evoke a timely `event’ to trigger the self thinking computer. In short; to be excited rationally for some net pro‑life objective, (that which knows affect from cause, ahead of time!) the electron offers the profound to man‑‑ no longer needing the gestalt (non‑temporal) REM dream ambiguous modes of the past. An undisturbed electron emits little, but indeed what does the `disturbing’ in a coherent manner‑‑ as some other `one handed clap’ as evokes those primal EMP bubbles for mass‑with‑time existence within Itself?

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

* Vogelsang, R.; `A Correlative Study between Physics and Psy‑ chology’, Intl. Biomet. Congress, ’69
see: `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67

cc: S‑T; Path/IQ; Phys‑Psy (3‑dev; below)
CC: D/Z;

The 5th Generation Computer:

Noting from physics the freed electron escaped the time reversal paradigm, not only was the EPR experiment (see a qualified physi­cist to explain), such like interface might offer the ultimate computer to man. Indeed it was as ensuing R&D offered a prototype which gave the odds of 10\17th to one on its maiden run. This system Patent filing got blocked, so with tapped phones and FBI surveillance said all that was needed. Actually, my GVSC students were nervous over the early 70’s research, but more so about what they felt a government quite unable to handle any so reality of unconscious ability. Freud was correct, unbearably so! In retro­spect of the prototype’s run a dozen years ago, little doubt that the recent M.I.T. meeting on various anomalies associated with “less than benign” UFOs will also remain secret. In short, far more is being said by what is adroitly being left unsaid‑‑ to a kept very naive public now.
(KTS Research)

March 4,’93
Mara Prentiss, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Harvard U.
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: magnetic lens (March DISCOVER)
Dear Dr. Prentiss: Since atoms are mere standing waves to begin with, maybe now we can formulate the refractive index of the magnetic fields to correct Einstein’s idea that gravity bends light‑‑ to say nothing of dv/dt for red shift over long distances.

Whether aligned `vibrating’ magnetic fields or the Apriori into which is created (via EMP bubble‑quasar fronts) what we believe are `billiard balls’ as odd standing wave harmonics (note quarks; in keeping with the 6 axis Klien‑Kalusa configuration) we come very close to unraveling `matter’‑‑ to say little of the pending finesse of unraveling complemental quarks (with each other) for a fully controlled fusion energy source!

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch
w:
CC: D/Z

March 16,’93
S. Weinberg, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Texas
Austin, TX 78712
Re: poliphased standing wavelets
Dear Sir: (“Quark Quest”; 3/93 SC. AM.)

Is there some underlying conspiracy to NOT perceive the standing waves as your `billiard balls’? Or is it tenure that has become so much more important than seeing the obvious?
To turns things on their head and examine what the underlinings of this universe is is to see cosmic EMPs evoking quasars on heir fronts and in them the generation of complemental matters with an anti‑g there‑between. These jets versus disks define what you are trying to unravel (psychologically) so that some other `unravel­ing’ in `matter’ allows for controlled fusion, can now be done very easily with merely lasers. Sorry, but‑‑

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

Some old culled quips below might mean something:

`Between the non‑temporal first harmonic electron to the third harmonic quark with time/temperature coupling via right angles, mass can be understood as no more (or less) than the
Mind that invoked it as a pure magnetic force‑‑ albeit a bit disturbed for us‑‑ called chaos before organized between fractal reality!’
`The top quark, most out‑of‑phase with our koinomatter noted from the Klien‑Kalusa configuration and so with anti‑g, remains aloof from here, its `negative mass’ because of anti‑g makes its massive “mass” calculation a farce in physics as Einstein was not heard complaining about his General Relativity idea not contain­ing the complemental `charge’, but in gravity.’
`The six displacing relative phase angles between primal stan­ding waves defines why the top quark is least likely to be noted in this koinomatter galaxy.’
`Are there quadrature signatures in decay emissions which may define their deeper standing wave anomalies? Even the 60 degree displacement might be noted with the top quark in fast cloud‑chamber analysis the most remote of any others in this galaxy’s physic’s accelerators!’

cc: Phys‑Psy; 3‑dev(over)
CC: Shochet; Ruthen

P.S. That self thinking electron interface really does tell all‑‑ and likely why so much terror now seen on authority faces! (over)

3/25/93
Editors and Frank Wilczek,
DISCOVER Publishers
500 S. Buena Vista St.,
Burbank, CA 91521‑6012
Re: Zukov’s “End of Physics?”
Sirs:

Indeed, the EPR experiment to which Frank Wilczek points is that nemesis to end the neurotic `adagio’ underway within all scienti­fic ranks, with vehemence now to evade the empirical obvious for tenure, certainly never to allow any `apocalypse’! From predict­ing the spatial versus temporal lateral two brains to the said positive EPR experiment to conclude the feasibility of the 5th Generation computer (over), that said nemesis time draws near! A copy of a recent letter to Weinberg may say enough for physics.

We suspect that it IS that beginning of one end, where “ethnic cleaning” will equalize past folly of intellectual manipulation, as now ending the said scientific quest‑‑ staring at the obvious in disdain. To comprehend same is that expected apocalypse‑‑ so! What the cover story in TIME now (3/22/93) says is that crux.
Sorry‑‑ but

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: Path/IQ; Phys‑Psy; Weinberg‑let
CC:
M. Shochet, et.al.
Collider Detector Division
(at Batavia),
c/o Fermi Natl. Accelerator
University of Chicago
5640 S. Ellis Ave.,
Chicago, IL 60637‑1433

4/27/93
J. L. Anderson, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Stevens Inst. of Tech.
Hoboken, NJ 07030
Re: measuring in slow time
Dear Sir: (April Physics Today; “Negotiating‑‑”

Any `Tricky Border’ now is between Psychology and Physics‑‑ the two about to lambaste each other with a reality now unwelcome. As the number crunchers fail to use quality theories, ever further from reality becomes instated theory‑‑ more for tenure than un­cover reality‑‑ which now is extremely dangerous as Freud noted!

Stern‑Gerlach equipment might measure a proton’s spin with coher­ency (with temporal three‑phased standing wave quarks) but not its single‑phased electrons as escape the time reversal paradigm, as cannot be held to one place in our slow net time period. The current model behind the positive EPR experiments define as well some fickleness with wisdom (not IQ as is historic) to which the 5th Generation computer now indicates chaos coming! (over)

Sincerely,

KTS

cc: Phys‑Psy; Path/IQ; 3/dev (over)
CC: Pearle; D/Z

P. Pearle, et.al. Dept. of Physics
Hamilton College
Clinton, NY 13323

April 26,’93
G. F. Bertsch, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Washington
Seattle, WA 98195
Re: `internal’ structure
Dear Sir: (SC. AM., p.30, May,’93)

Maybe the reason why the proton cannot be understood as a “bil­liard ball” is because it isn’t one. A universe made from magnet­ic flux cannot be much more of the same, albeit knotted a bit as standing waves, especially the longer lasting three phased ones called quarks. Their interrelation as locked in‑phase `constit­uents’ define how easily fusion will come with simple laser con­trolled mutual `unraveling’.

Thus the `gluon is merely the phased relationship between the multi‑phased quark legs so dictates how well two standing waves hang together in space. This information is verboten since the oil cartels are owned by authority we cannot know until we die off choking to death on air‑borne hydrocarbons!

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: Path/IQ
CC:Ruthen; D/Z;

6/24/93
M. A. Buntine, et.al.
Dept. of Chemistry
Yale University
New Haven, CT 06511
Re: standing waves
Sir: (Product Imaging; 11 June SCIENCE)

Fuzzy data stems from fuzzy logic where the insistence on bil­liard ball `physiology’ precludes perceiving electro‑magnetic standing waves as matter‑‑ thus `centers of mass’ distribution makes little sense. Rovibronic, even back in Mendalyeev’s time, had more sense as periodic co‑resonances better defined reality. Anti‑g with CG, when finally perceived, be it from spewed jets in quasar primal matter generators (condensers) for the inverse to unravel same for the E side of the equation‑‑ will make more sense for coulombic barriers and so their ease of circumventing with simple spatial orientations with laser propulsion.

It was your apparatus for viewing `interference patterns’ which appears adroit that evokes this note insofar as simple controlled fusion `combustion’ (3 phase quark unraveling back to linear open “loop” theory gamma or the said E side of the equation) ceramic chambers will appear much the same using D2, but with finesse. Random `cold fusion’, as your less than the best means of viewing `billiard balls’
with `vibrational rotational rates’ with some kind of a CG will soon be understood‑‑ despite the oil cartels!

As Einstein let his peers `blow it’ with his General Relativity, Einstein recognized his “blunder”‑‑ yet cosmology can’t. 3‑phased trefoils in space may show the interference plots you disclosed, but simpler ways of knowing WITH a freed electron prevail. (over) Its nice to have a quality theory at root when academic exercises are the only way to win tenure. (below)

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: Phys‑Psy; Path/IQ; 3‑dev(over)
CC: Zare; D/Z

Q321B
`Fuzzy logic pertains to potentials as viewed from a temporal historical view. History has not yet been affected on the time’s single arrow‑‑ for chances in slow time to get changed in time!’
`Academia is no place to do research, much less developmental work since few there know where they are going‑‑ and hardly where they have been‑‑ with only tenure on their minds.’
(KTS Research)

7/24/93
Freeman Dyson, et.al.
Inst. for Advanced Study
c/o Princeton University
Princeton, NJ 08544
Re: standing waves and fusion
Dear Sir: (Aug. Scientific American)

As Horgan put it “Perpendicular‑‑” is where it is all at, between wave and quantum mechanics. The displacement allows for temporal intercession‑‑ as Heisenberg noted with the torqued electron and his uncertainty principle. The Klien‑Kalusa configuration becomes most adroit when noting spatial `entities’ which are only various harmonic standing waves at innate c but evokes the said time to re‑orient to create our `space‑time’ integration. This allows the `cold fusion’ aspect to be understood as unraveling three‑phased quarks. (by out‑of‑phase combination) Maybe soon another propul­sion system might be accomplished‑‑ sans radio‑active isotopes being spewed all over!

As for your `astro‑chickens’‑‑ it was done when earlier man was more civilized, and their `exams’ for the so trained yet lie on the desert floor in Peru for all to see‑‑ but wonder in our vast intellectual stupidity! To perceive from above (ask Ingo Swan) at any moment for conscious perusal makes more practical sentry duty as you call scouts‑‑ from the more predatory Aztecs, et.al. Any­how, we now have a far better source for `potentials’, even Plato called the Potentia (over) but currently mankind is not
quite ready‑‑ until after his grand ethnic cleansing.

Your autistic friends with wholly left brain digital temporal dominance is what most now neurotically blocks the intellectual for their lack of insight. (as left lateral facial smile) The anomaly will not be fathomed yet‑‑ as a freed electron from our slow time. But as you said, we hear only what we want to hear‑‑ yet we consciously don’t understand what is profiting most by it. Carl Sagan I suspect sees the tip of the huge “ice‑berg”, even at a cooler (Kelvin) temperature (w/time) than here! God may be in the details‑‑ but better is it to look the other way.

Sincerely again,

KTS REsearch

cc: 3/dev(over)
CC: Horgan; D/Z

John Horgan, et.al.
Scientific American
415 Madison Ave.,
New York, NY 10017‑111

June 6,’93
A. A. Godil, Kauffman,
Bloom, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305
Re: Time Warp (dilation)
Dear Sir: (June SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN blurb)

In‑sync coherent light, even self interfering over time or dis­tance travel is what I suspect you are examining, even if in the temporal (AC) sense. Since all light emission, from a specific atom’s electron is innately coherent, the peripheral sun’s light emitters find their mutual in‑sync place before getting here. This equivalent dv/dt red shift over time (distance) of quasars riding a more `DC’ means of electrical field slowing rate exists as the said aligning apparent coherent solar light on its 93M mile short trek! The trick to find the density of the interceding electro‑static to right angled magnetic field to various galaxies thus might offer a better means to judge their distance.

The cosmic EMP `bubbles’ of Huchra likely define the non‑temporal `multi Big Bang’ model where its Creator clapped It’s hand all over the universe for the creation of complemental standing waves that our billiard‑ball oriented can’t yet (under)stand. With the subsequent standing waves as `matter’ (as predicted the jets‑disk model before the Einstein observatory went aloft to prove same), your work is seminal to conclude further astronomy’s yet puzzle.
The real question now is what `information’ rides the first har­monic standing wave electron escaping the time reversal paradigm as used in the EPR experiment? While time is of our essence, can the non‑temporal be examined in further detail somehow? (over)

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: Phys‑psy; S‑T; 3‑dev(over)
CC: D/Z

5/5/93
S. Lamoreaux, Fortson, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Washington
Seattle, WA 98195
Re: “poor man’s‑‑”?
Sir: (30 April SCIENCE article)

There is yet an even more fruitful means of `poor man’s’ physics and can in part be noted with what the freed electron knows ahead of our slow mass‑time. But to mix human split‑brain data into physics obviously would not be practical, yet maybe your positive EPR experiments might. While the pragmatist might use the inter­facing freed electron to define data by alpha‑numeric (5th Gener­ation self thinking computer; note over), you are in part correct to `go it alone’ with your `table‑top’ physics (and right brain nuance) as can help define definitively the standing wave funda­mentals of claimed `billiard‑ball quantums’.

Since all is interaction by and between an a priori magnetic flux (that Faraday pondered well), the right angled spatial displace­ment (noted by Klein‑Kalusa configuration) to introduce time‑‑ on the trefoil (3‑phased) quark‑‑ so why the said freed electron can escape the time reversal paradigm‑‑ or any time for that matter, your ultimate quest to perceive the real fundamentals underlying the proton (quarks) may be its interactive 3rd phased `leg’ in our koinomatter continuum. (and why the top quark doesn’t like it here!) But anti‑g yet remains to be defined, to straighten out Einstein’s General theory “blunder”, to say nothing of disk‑jet relavistic separations riding primal EMP fronts called bubbles!

Anyhow, your work is seminal and vastly less expensive than the tenure demanding‑‑ at the tax payer’s expense!’

Sincerely, (sorry)

KTS REsearch
cc: 3/dev (over)
CC: Flam/SCIENCE; Commins; Hunter; Hinds; Barr; D/Z
F. Flam, et.al.
SCIENCE Publishers
1333 H St., NW
Washington, DC 20005

G. Commins, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
U/ California Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720

L. Hunter, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Amherst College
Amherst, MA 01002

E. Hinds, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Yale University
New Haven, CT 06520

9/28/93
T. E. Chupp
Dept. of Physics
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Re: 57% looks good
Dear Sir: (9/18/93 SC.NEWS; Physics)

The SLAC effort to determine what might constitute a proton’s spin percentage appears correct if indeed the three phased quark constitutes the core reality of fundamental standing waves that are yet called “billiard balls”. The planar electron as a first harmonic standing wave (thus escaping the time reversal paradigm lacking any `right angle’ aspect that a trefoil could not), the one leg of the said three phase wavelet would necessarily not be of this koinomatter continuum‑‑ and why likely the top quark cannot be found with two of such `antimatter’ legs well forced beyond our perusal.

Using what Einstein called his “great blunder” (in refusing to consider complemental gravity; General theory), found the need for right angle ejecta (via anti‑g) for primal quasar precipita­tion, riding grand EMP cosmic fronts. (Huchra’s bubbles) The first confirmation of disk vs. jets was noted with the aloft Einstein Observatory in the 70’s. Aside from dv/dt light deceler­ation within dense magnetic fields therewith (Zeeman affect), en­suing theoretical considerations define other anomalies yet. Yet it was John Bell’s interest in finding the anti‑g aspect between relative matters that became a sad blow with his death, and like­ly sustaining much of your field’s current stagnated theoretical consideration with that gluon `billiard ball’. His excitement to my questioning certainly indicated insight‑‑ as much as
his theo­rem to show the EPR experiment extent with the freed electron’s `knowing’ potentials. (over)

If indeed 2/3rds of any `common’ quark for this galaxy shows your 57% value, I suspect it is correct, as how to `unravel’ that item for fusion! Currently, it would appear too simple, yet I am now confident that the fully controlled energy `cell’ is in reach, and the oceans with available deuterium to fill our gas tanks. Good luck on your own brand continued unraveling!

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: 3‑dev (over)
CC: D/Z

8/15/93
Editors, et.al.
EPA Journal
Waterside Mall
401 M St., SW
Washington, DC 20460
Re: fusion‑‑ now!
Sir:

With the mounting evidence of simple controlled fusion in the very near future‑‑ now that matter (deuterium) is but EM standing waves and can be merged for `unraveling’ to offer vast safe gamma radiation for heat and power sources, what is the stone‑walling going on in behalf of the petroleum cartels? Do established oil peddlers have a manipulative hand in government so we must all choke to death on hydrocarbons before fusion can be used?

Since the key was noted in the `cold fusion’ fiasco where indeed some fusion process did occur‑‑ however no and much less solution was seen to sustain same with lacked detailed information of matter’s basic constituency, our theoretical efforts from another point of view (instead of blundering `gear jamming’) defined the enigma. First perceived in quasar jet‑disk generation (before the Einstein observatory went aloft to prove it), the coulombic bar­rier is not the only impediment to fusion, yet the solution is really very simple once understood in light of finite laser guid­ance and propulsion.

A few European researchers, from our goading, dawdled for a coup­le years but are examining our theoretical conclusions further in view of the mounting empirical obvious. While they are starting to move, we feel that `pedantic operations’ need to be more than goaded to act rapidly enough for this planet’s best interest.

Any ideas without evoking `sedition’ would be appreciated.
Sincerely,
KTS REsearch

CC: D/Z

8/21/93
Joe Ersland
Minnesota Ave.
Chickashaw, OK
Re: Stanley Steamer data
Dear Sir:

Some one at the Buckley Michigan Steam Tractor show suggested you as the definitive expert on or who knew who to contact for data on the old Stanley Steamer car like maybe BTU input per HP out, etc., etc. It is the relative efficiency of that machine that has me intrigued, and from the ample hearsay floating around, it was a real machine that may be useful for another steam car with an even better `flash boiler’‑‑ using the fusion of deuterium for clean gamma heat‑‑ and right “now”‑‑ with ample `go’!

Some extensive research here and elsewhere now has uncovered the key to the coulombic heat barrier from where fusion begins. It is projected that very shortly the automobile may again be steam operated‑‑ 4 small two cylinder engines inside of each wheel hub(!) with a little `hot pot’ in the trunk with a year’s fuel supply in a quart bottle! No kidding! I wish I could say more now but need first to examine to see how far “Stanley” got with his designs to extrapolate our next R&D consideration effort.

Many thanks Joe if you can help‑‑. A SASE herewith in case.
Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

CC: D/Z
cc: SASE

FUSION ADDS:

Embassy of Japan
Dept. of Innovation
2520 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20008

Embassy of Sweden
Dept. of Innovation
600 New Hampshire Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20037

Greenpeace
Dept. of Innovation 1436 U St. NW
Washington, DC 20009

PURPA LINES
HCI Publications
410 Archibald
Kansas City, MO 64111

9/4/93
D. Greenberger, et. al.
Dept. of Physics
City College of New York
New York, NY 10031
Re: EPR and multi”particles”
Sir:

There is not now time to dialogue about billiard‑balls and stand­ing waves but the below quips might possibly mean something as contingent to “entanglement” in the recent Physics Today publica­tion. More than the deep intellectual neurosis needs unraveling now‑‑ and soon will be with the 5th Generation `interface’ using the freed electron as escapes our temporal paradigm. (over)

Q336:
`The out‑of‑phase complemental of a created two‑phased stand­ing linear wave cancel each other’s emission so slit experiments fail to `see’ anything unless coherency is rectified to perceive each half‑wave as independent.’
`A created two‑phased standing wave expands as a linear light wave. What they were ceases to exist as a quantize entity as some odd harmonic standing wave which occupies time!’
`What constitutes stability in a dynamic universe of magnetic flux are its precipitated standing waves‑‑ the odd harmonics like the quark to last the longest with one leg in another continuum!’
`Schrodinger’s superposition “entanglement” will become that super‑duper merging of quarks for fusion to define the unraveling of two three‑phase standing waves to return to linear fronts.’
`The best place to create matter is in a very crowded cosmic EMP front, where the two complemental primals shun each other to give the time to precipitate into larger standing waves to self survive in their decelerated slow time.’
`While modern day Physicists juggle numbers with erroneous ideas of what they are counting much less perceiving, the curious insightive visualize accurately the underlying configurations of reality from every perspective without the ability nor any bother to count to infinity!’
`Quantum physics dictates a `path’ for a particle’s transition but what kind of path would exist for its unraveling?’
`A virtual wave front is a real wave‑front and can be noted by their mutual interference‑‑ whatever their innate velocity!’
`Entangled states certainly does not imply particles as claim­ed “billiard balls” so why do the physicists continue to ignore standing wavelets as quantized matter?’
Sincerely,

KTS REsearch
cc: S‑T; Phys‑Psy; Path/IQ; 3‑dev(over)
CC: D/Z; M. Horne; A. Zeilinger
M. Horne, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Stonehill College
North Easton, MA 02356

Anton Zeilinger
Inst. for Experimental Physics
University of Innsbruck
Innsbruck, Austria

9/18/93
A. B. Lovins, Dir., et.al.
c/o Rocky Mnt. Inst.
Snow‑mass, CO 81654‑9199
Re: yet more incremental change?
Dear Sir: (OMNI “Wheels”)

Now that the route to finite fusion is realized in comprehending standing‑wave quarks, the new automotive (as most other) `engine’ of the future may appear more like the old Stanley‑‑ albeit with Richardson’s two cylinder hub drives differentially driven for maximum service and safety‑‑ to say little of economy with deu­terium for power! The leap in supercar design is imminent now.

We could forget the CD‑ROM sales‑pitch also as the self thinking computer can define any data wanted, including “skeletons” which will evoke a vast mental paradigm shift soon now! (over)

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

CC: Garfinkle/Omni; D/Z; Emb/Japan & Sweden; Greenpeace; PURPA

Simson Garfinkel, et.al.
c/o OMNI Publishers
New York, NY 10023‑5965

8/31/93
Ross Macdonald, et.al.
c/o Dept. of Physics
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, NC 27514
Re: but what is new is old!
Sir: (`Opinion’; Physics Today)

Your fine comments are timely as LaFollette but underlying social drives for upmanship dictates all intellectual endeavor now‑‑ whatever the potential `cost’! Nice of course is a tenured status from which to advertise or offer the clout to be heard, but that is another sad academic story, now ending this once vibrant cul­ture‑‑ fortunately! Promises used to last a life‑time but the way communication now offers all anything today, the next step is to offer all anything `yesterday’! To wit the 5th Generation self thinking computer. (over)

The one `pathology’ not mentioned, from which I have learned the hard way, is the unsaid yet overt process of hiding (“secret” for federal profit) or smearing empirical fact for continued half‑truth for some social profit margin‑‑ the above said most hideous factor (in bifurcated cerebral* `fractal’ reality), is our past `ancestor worship’, now nearly concluded‑‑ albeit will become as traumatic as some other “ethnic cleansing” going on elsewhere.

Since what constitutes ethnics stems from intellectual endeavor (such known proportionate neurotic stance) makes clear now that not much advancement can be had by appeals to or for conscience use‑‑ which is a right cerebral application of realized effect from cause, not the historical left. This non‑temporal faculty was well understood by Plato (to prioritize!) as called Potentia. (note herewith) It is this innate faculty in man that evokes a retaliation by its less than benign complemental (with high IQ) for a traumatic conclusion to this epoch’s mental evolutional period. Freud adroitly called it Thanatos!

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

* `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
also: `The Other Side of the Brain’, J.E. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.

cc: Path/IQ; Phys‑Psy; S‑T; 3/dev(over)
CC: D/Z

8/5/93
Physics Today
Editors and B. Schwarzschild
335 East 45th
New York, NY 10017
Re: first harmonic standing wave
(July Search and Discovery; the e)
Dear Sir:

What a wonderful article! At last the electron’s independent standing wave in space is confirmed! Now the need to define if its tendency for the 3rd, 5th, etc. (as noted in its resistive curve) so one can now wonder if the quark is but it’s third har­monic as also a standing wave? The net quantum Hall affect (third filled states) may be reflecting only the associated substrate’s quarks‑‑ affecting the electron’s travel. Now the Klien‑Kalusa matrix should make sense, where the electron escapes the time reversal paradigm yet not a third harmonic with some right angle aspect to acquire time! Oddly, Faraday was staring right at the ultimate enigma‑‑ even asking the correct questions back then!

Most enlightening is the reason why quasars exhibit their right angle spewed complemental primal matters (electrons ‑ & +), sub­sequently further reduced in net linear velocity (in their dense magnetic EMP field front; Huchra’s “bubble”) to produce (reduce) their next harmonic generation of quarks for quantized matter in/for temporal existence.

Many thanks!

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

CC: Read; Jain; Willett; Halperin; Stormer; Lee; Malaney; D/Z

N. Read, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Yale University
New Haven, CT. 06520

Haldane, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Princeton University
Princeton, NJ 06544

B. Halperin and E. Heller, et. al.
Dept. of Physics
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA 02138

J. Jain, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
State University of New York
Stony Brook, NY 11794‑3800

R. Willett and Eisenstein, et.al.
Dept. of Theoretical Physics
AT&T Bell Labs
Murray Hill, NJ

P. Lee, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
MIT
Cambridge, MA 02139

Yang and Su, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Texas
Houston, TX 77025

8/27/93
Steam Auto Club of America
P.O. Box 285
Niles, MI 49120
Re Stanley’s parameters?
Dear Sirs:

We are seeking information on relative efficiencies, etc. on the most recent designs of the Stanley (as other) steam driven cars. Since the Richardson design of multiple twin cylinder `in‑hub’ engines for maximum automotive control, no doubt there are many other attempts at creating efficient and quality steam driven cars‑‑ including small turbine drives.

While doing some like R&D for the coming controlled fusion, which will indeed not only aid worldly pollution problems but most energy needs‑‑ to say nothing of an end to petroleum dependence, we are now betting on this scenario because of some real break‑throughs in fundamental physics which define the coulomb barrier problem heretofore holding up certain theoretical considerations.

Any directives to the said data sources would be appreciated.

SASE herewith‑‑ and many thanks! And please give me a schedule for your visiting times!

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

8/27/93
Rough and Tumble
Engine History Assoc.
Box 7
Kinzers, PA 17535
Re Stanley’s parameters?
Dear Sirs:

We are seeking information on relative efficiencies, etc. on the most recent designs of the Stanley (as other) steam driven cars. Since the Richardson design of multiple twin cylinder `in‑hub’ engines for maximum automotive control, no doubt there are many other attempts at creating efficient and quality steam driven cars‑‑ including small turbine drives. BTU inputs versus HP out and nominal boiler pressures for today’s metals are of interest.

While doing some like R&D for the coming controlled fusion, which will indeed not only aid worldly pollution problems but most energy needs‑‑ to say nothing of an end to petroleum dependence, we are now betting on this scenario because of some real break‑throughs in fundamental physics which define the coulomb barrier problem heretofore holding up certain theoretical considerations.

Any directives to the said data sources would be appreciated.
Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

10/8/93
J. E. Bishop, et.al.
c/o Popular Science Magazine
2 Park Ave.,
New York, NY 10016
Re: cold fusion (yet it is indeed
Dear Sir: close to being “over”!)

Your quite revealing August article does point to the vast neuro­ticism (Freudian term) in “science”, where the same dull round gets continued for tenure, now at all cost! Where `billiard‑ball’ reasoning sustains an ignorance to avoid perceiving the profound, we find the `smashing mentality’ in all ways‑‑ unable to see the EM standing waves as those quantized “balls” for a unique way to `unravel’ the quark with a complemental! It is going to bring controlled fusion with finesse but now too dangerous with petro­leum cartel `cabals’ in all facets of government. (to wit over!)

The Pons‑Fleischmann data was expected, but as a random phenomena we did not expect to become so obvious. Oddly, the remark on Mills with a “shrinking” atom (nuclii’s releas of energy) could be true since all conversion factor as `subtle matter decay’ heads for Fe, fission above so fusion below! The key is the tre­foil’s spatial orientation, note your own remarks in the article!
As Kuhn said (and many others), a vast paradigm shift is coming but in a mass psychological way of reasoning, to leave the “might makes right” (smashing mentality) factor finally behind. While we may claim we are “civilized” one must examine who `promise’ this, to lead the rest as fodder for what ever profit margin can be manipulated. Academia is at the root of this folly programming nitwits, but for their henchmen in government‑‑ so what else is new in a dying culture?

I’m betting that all of those claiming “mistake!” are connected with the petroleum industry in some way or another! The Japanese put their money where they have little petroleum‑‑ so speak for themselves. They likely set up shop in France (IMRA), well away from our FBI, something I found the hard way before I shut up! I found to my chagrin anything of value gets stamped “SECRET”‑‑ if it goes through our Patent system, since it only works for those running government. There are better systems on this planet, with less promoted greed for the established elite.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: 3‑dev (over) CC: D/Z; Bockrist; Rothwell

J. Bockrist and R. Bush, et.al.
c/o Dept. of Physics
Texas A&M University
College Station, TX 77843

J. Rothwell and E. Mallove, et.al.
c/o Clustron Sciences,
Vienna, VA

10/12/93
M. Crommie, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
c/o IBM Thomas J. Watson
Research Center
Yorktown Hts., NY 10598

Re: standing waves versus parasitics
Dear Sir: (11/93 DISCOVER; “Wave‑Particle‑‑”

Maybe it is time to define the electron as a fundamental (first harmonic) standing wave and parasitic absorption what is noted as right angled claimed `harmonics’. More importantly now is how to unravel third harmonic quarks to regain their fundamental energy as linearized waves‑‑ called fusion!

Simple indeed is controlled fusion now but complex is the flak of petroleum cartels, especially when
affiliated with government!

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

CC: D/Z; Disc.

10/29/93
Allen Franklin, et.al.
The American Inst. of Physics
335 E. 45th St,
New York, NY 10017
Re: 5th force
Dear Sirs: (Book Reviews: “Gravity‑‑”)

The 5th force, likely a component of anti‑gravity keeping the top quark well away from this galaxy, is certainly not dead. Maybe a few neurotic theorists are a bit near so because of their lack of insight to perceive matter as standing‑wave harmonics. It helps to define a very long theoretical study where little is yet dared to be said with tenured might yet being right and labels as here­sy are easy to use near the churchly minds who know they are “chosen” masters and the rest as servants (slaves). The syndrome now brings our abrupt conclusion as a claimed civilization(?)‑‑ but gone completely amuck with its insisted historical (temporal) left brain in dominance. I am certain that Einstein himself would concur after his admitted General Theory “blunder”, under the duress of peers who couldn’t stand complementarity‑‑ as gravity. It defined well the disk‑jets rapid exudate for the EMP cosmic bubble fronts (`white’ quasar cores), as the actually simple mode for controlled fusion‑‑ of any rate‑‑ which defines why little is said around petroleum cartels who yet rule this said civilized world. Fortunately or not, the academically made `fodder’ are now beginning to awaken‑‑ with all that goes with that!

In short, the angular anti‑gravity force noted by the 5th force test near the Palisades cliffs even reflects the likely quadra­ture of the third harmonic quark, somehow nested in the sphere’s copper. The question implies the need to know the yet misunder­stood kaons with the `correct’ (phased relationship) of neutrons or pion composition now! I admit I will try to wade through this text now as feel other `unsaid’ gems are hidden there.

Shear madness? We shall soon see as the EPR `interface’ defines same‑‑ especially as “who”! (over)

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: 3‑dev(over)
CC: Morrison; D/Z;
P. Morrison, et.al.
c/o Scientific American Publishers
415 Madison Ave.,
New York, NY 10017‑1111

10/7/93
Joel Lebowitz, et.al.
Dept. of Mathematics/Physics
Rutgers University
New Brunswick, NJ 06903
Re: entropy and time’s line
Dear Sir: (Boltzmann/ Sept. Phys‑Today)

With the advent of the self thinking 5th Generation computer to define the freed electron (`microscopic’) escaping the time re­versal paradigm, such non‑temporal derivation connection might make more clear Boltzmann’s ideas about time’s arrow for the complex macroscopic. Although now evoking terror in authority (for subtle yet obvious reasons‑‑ over), the positive EPR experi­ments concluded the said interfacing computer as feasible‑‑ so a vast `paradigm shift’, as Kuhn said, is in the offing!

The below culled quips may be of interest.
Sincerely,
KTS REsearch

Q340B:
`It is the complexity of the microscopic into the macroscopic that fools those who seek to explain time’s arrow for entropy.’
`The ultimate `microstate’ is the freed electron‑‑ which then can express reality to any degree for that point in time!’
`If there is any time `asymmetry’ it is purely subjective, as time is a psychological deviation according to Einstein’s Special Relativity equation.’
`Time could be said as the resultant dynamics of the non‑tem­poral dynamic but witnessed by the temporally oriented!’
`To back‑track in temporal recreation is foolish to that which promoted the changes in the first place. Since the non‑temporal could do the feat, its silliness defines the rational far more!’
`No doubt the Lyapunov positivism exponents never heard of the legions and their bias on fractal reality!’
`Statistics requires knowledge of biasing fractals to make any sense of reality, to say little of Murphy’s law!’
`Diffusion equations are often to confuse because they infuse a bias that does not belong‑‑ but are not seen consciously!’
`Ludwig Boltzmann may have come too close to comprehending entropy with the single arrow of time‑‑ biased by the macroscopic side of fractal reality‑‑ so committed suicide to learn no more!’
`Equal a priori probabilities belong in pure chaos‑‑ but that continuum now, at least around mankind, has legions which bias fractal chance for their net profit, whether with a Murphy law for laughs or aiding AiR to destroy those beginning to awaken!’
KTS REsearch (10/93)

cc: 3‑dev (over); S‑T; Path/IQ CC: D/Z; Phys‑Today

11/28/93
J. J. McClelland, et.al.
Dept. of Atomic Deposition
Natl. Inst. of Standards
Quince Orchard Rd.
Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Re: accurate nuclei displacement
Dear Sir: (`Physics’; Nov. 13,SC. NEWS, p.319)

Since your work appears so close to the next step of definitively controlled fusion (cold), now that matter is recognized as innate standing wavelets so can be `unraveled’ when out‑of‑phase, I ad­dress you at this time in hopes of directives to who might best be suited for ensuing investigative work of phased displacement? Not because colleagues in Europe are dragging their feet but pos­sibly your expertise may best now define who, as known by you, that may best aid our next step for final R&D.

Beyond the coulombic and spatial orientation keys for at least deuterium, the known `proximity’ factor defines best how to over­come the innate quantized anti‑forces. While some statistical data is yet needed, it requires the finesse of certain laser equipments. Our long theoretical study has now paid off with definitive descriptions since the Pons Fleischmann (U/Utah) cold fusion data of years past, some statistical data is yet needed. Noting the vast neurosis in Physics over the demanded `billiard‑ball’ mentality, rutty pedantism with seeked tenure has stagnated this vital area of theoretical research to make obvious the time now to complete the full comprehension of quasar (white hole) “pinch” generation, by linear EMP fronts for quantized standing wave “matter”‑‑ for its vast energy offer in reverse.

Your comments and/or directives would be very much appreciated at this time.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

CC: D/T; D/Z; c/m/f*
w:

11/18/93
Chris Pain(?), et.al.
Natl. Resources Council
Washington, DC
Re: Plutonium proliferation
Dear Sir: (your remarks on NPR report)

The Rand study of the vast liability of re‑refined power company Plutonium did not touch on its cheap and simple tuned laser pro­duction, much less the now very near pending use of fully con­trolled `cold fusion’ which can be understood with standing wave quantal `matter’ unraveling and oceans filled with potential energy. The claimed confrontation with “allies” over either Plu­tonium or petroleum production actually reflects the policy di­rection dictated by those entrepreneurs dealing in those energy sources.

Lengthy cross academic feasibility studies here for the 5th Gen­eration computer, yet sustained as company confidential, after overt Patent office subterfuge (where military needs superseded the public’s; over), our prediction of the jets to disk `anomaly’ in quasar formation in astronomy for the creation of matter, of­fered the key on how to `unravel’ same as the said standing wave composition of complemental matter for fusion. (note CPT theorem)

The unsaid drive of greed brings mankind to his stark conclusion of claimed civil behavior where the survival of the fittest are certainly not so. Actually, Plutonium may be mankind’s “savior” after all with its use in the last of all overt wars, where only man’s benign parasympathetic CNS dominated will have any chance for survival. This factor cannot be understood beyond what and how the Physic’s EPR experiment defines for worldly slow time. Sorry for the `abstruse bizarre’ herewith, but it is felt timely, especially now.
Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: Path/IQ; Phys‑Psy; EN‑Ess; 3‑dev(over)
CC: Rand; Deb

(fusion: electric‑car use)
Jan. 25,’94
Sirs:

With the current data defining the means to evoke and sustain fusion, it is merely a matter of what is now believed a few con­firming ways and means to guide standing wave `matter’ to mutual `unraveling’ to offer its a priori clean gamma radiation for heat in extensive amounts. Because of the definitive control is now assured even to very small rates, it is a matter of developing ceramic fusion chambers and modes of transferring high heat to `boiler‑transfer’ means for engine coupling.

Obviously we cannot define our entire R&D efforts these past many years, but the Utah `cold fusion’
data defined the mode to which the said poly‑phase matter configuration permits ease of comprehending its net unraveling action. We predicted the disk versus jet quasar emissions of quasars (astronomy) long before being confirmed by the aloft Einstein observatory, which defines the creation of `matter’, so its reversed action defines fusion now.

We are seeking those with vested interests in electric automotive drives, even in some ways duplicating the Stanley Steamer which proved itself well able to serve with efficiency‑‑ the likelihood of battery or solar energizing means now takes a back seat. If interested in perusing this research further, albeit under confi­dential wraps, please advise in writing to the below officer.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch W:

1/2/94
Directors for:
General Motors Corp.
1840 Holbrook St.,
Detroit, MI 48212
Re: fusion engines
Sirs:

Noting the expense you have with gasoline fueled trucks maybe it is time to examine what is now believed the imminent use of de­finitively controlled deuterium fusion in very small ceramic boilers‑‑ i.e., the likely return of the Stanley steamer designs.

With the clearly growing comprehension of standing‑wave quantal unraveling back to gamma radiation, first noted in anomalous cold fusion data by proximity enigmas. Our length theoretical consi­derations stemming from fundamental standing‑wave `matter’ quite simply defines the impasse of past as current “billiard‑ball” mentalities and so the means to capitalize on deuterium fusion with ample `fuel’ supplies. This now makes strategic, noting some recent articles* defining that reality is close‑‑ to say little for those with vested interest and R&D capacity.

Enough has been said above for those versed in the field of sub‑nuclear anomalies as said in the now well noted in definitive atomic research. If indeed some interest prevails please write (only) and address the below named. Subsequent conferences might be arranged after contingency discussions are held here.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch w:

* `Search for Strange Matter’; current Scientific American
CC: DEB;

12/13/93
H. Milchberg and C. Durfee, et.al.
Dept. of Laser Technology
University of Maryland
College Park, Maryland
Re: ponderomotive force?
Sirs: (SCIENCE 26 Nov. “Optics”)

Might there be reason to suspect that the ionized deuterium atom might be accelerated on laser wave fronts in the `tube’ of your SPLs? Not that some `coulombic’ barrier is to be exceeded but the finite spatial control needed to merge out‑of‑phase quarks for the now recognized `cold fusion’ operant.

Thanks for any directives on this matter.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch *W

CC: Rhodes; Falcone; Mourou; Strickland; D/Z;

C. Rhodes, et.al.
Dept. of Laser Technology
University of Chicago
Chicago, IL 60680

R. Falcone, et.al.
Dept. of Laser Tech.
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720

(R‑D‑blurb)
After doing aerospace computer R&D for the US government, I began a lengthy study into the a priori conditions of space‑time para­meters with the conclusions of matter creation via piched EMP fronts, to predict the quasar genesis of matter as standing waves to realize the means and mode of fully controlled fusion.

1/28/94
Roger G. Noll
Dept. of Economics
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305
Re: non‑pork barrels?
Dear Sir:

From the `clean‑car consortium’ I believe you perceive clearly a potential answer to my dilemma.
While not yet reading your text, and from the `Pipe Dream’ article in Scientific American, might you recommend Europe for the place to find somewhat more sincere entrepreneurs for completing some final R&D fusion work? Very sure now of a means for fully controlled fusion for a gamma heat source, we now suspect a fresh start on a new Stanley Steamer may be in the offing.

Some parameters defining standing wave `matter’ (the end of “bil­liard‑ball” mentality) I predicted the jets versus disk quasar configuration, soon thereafter confirmed by the aloft Einstein Observatory. This import defined also the inverse mode of `mat­ter’ creation (riding a cosmic EMP primal bubble front; Huchra) to its unraveling for fusion. With the U. of Utah’s cold fusion data, the rather certainty of fusion development was then seen. While not divulging too much of this long study, the time is felt that trusting corporate structures, as said likely elsewhere, may now be needed. Finding the current physic’s empirical data coming too close to the obvious now, maybe it is time to act, but where? After having a couple items stamped “secret” in our US Patent Office, to remain with my hands tied (over), even the small print in the EPRI Submittal Guide gives me anxiety so I frankly prefer to work elsewhere to complete this lengthy study, now so close to fruition. I frankly would prefer using the Dutch Patent system, yet fearful of the U.S. bureaucratic fog banks!

With little funding left, any advice would be appreciated‑‑ at what we fully believe is a late hour now.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: 3‑dev (over)
CC: Deb;

12/14/93
A. B. Reynolds, et.al.
Dept. of Nuclear Engineering
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, VA 22906
Re: unraveled standing waves
Dear Sir:

Your timely remarks in OMNI makes us wonder what information is indeed `out there’? While “cold fusion” was not mentioned, it was inferred‑‑ even with what we yet believe Physics remains naive‑‑ of what underlies their quantal `billiard balls’.

We are confident that third harmonic quarks for fusion is very close now, and not in either the next century nor what profiting public service companies may appreciate, where delivery is pro­fiting‑‑ and worse, petroleum cartels yet swing big sticks!

We would appreciate your comments as to what and where you hear your “rumblings”, especially in this country.

Sincerely,
KTS REsearch w:

12/13/93
M. M. Wefers and
K. A. Nelson, et.al.
Dept. of Chemistry
MIT
Cambridge, MA 02139
Re: controlled nuclei propulsion
Sirs:

Noting your work in the likely next field of fusion, might there yet be seen the ways and means to hold the standing three‑phased quark in some spatial orientation while propelling same? A more definitive letter to current SPL users (copy herewith) may suf­fice to explain.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch
w:

cc: Milchberg/letter (over)

12/14/93
A. B. Reynolds, et.al.
Dept. of Nuclear Engineering
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, VA 22906
Re: unraveled standing waves Dear Sir:

Your timely remarks in OMNI makes us wonder what information is indeed `out there’? While “cold fusion” was not mentioned, it was inferred‑‑ even with what we yet believe Physics remains naive‑‑ of what underlies their quantal `billiard balls’.

We are confident that third harmonic quarks for fusion is very close now, and not in either the next century nor what profiting public service companies may appreciate, where delivery is pro­fiting‑‑ and worse, petroleum cartels yet swing big sticks!

1/28/94
Ahmed Zewail, et.al.
Dept. of Chemistry
Noyes Hall
Caltech
Pasadena, CA 91125
Re: Taubes’ “Femtoland” (Feb. DISCOVER)
Dear Sir:

Are your `exact’ 12 (11?) sample impulses summing to offer the net “escape” energy of Na from I? Granting such precise amount, the only other mode would be decoupling a quark third‑phased loop as co‑shared (with electrons)‑‑ as a neutron with a proton. The standing‑wave reality of billiard‑ball matter will shake up much of physics, especially on how to unravel same for gamma outputs‑‑ as the cold fusion data inferred. We fear that Mendeleeff was far closer to reality than most want to think‑‑ for tenured comfort.

Would appreciate comments‑‑ even if painful.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

CC: Taubes; Deb

12/13/93 (proxi let.)
Re: Southwestern Public Service Co.

An “open letter” to whom it may concern in lieu of my vote:

With the rapid approach of controlled fusion, well noted from a lengthy cross academic research program here after determining that quantized matter is but harmonic standing waves with the net unraveling of same via laser out‑of‑phase* configurations to bring what was once an enigmatic `cold fusion’ into useful frui­tion. The entire project has indeed taken on gigantic proportions in the eyes of many researchers now‑‑ beyond Pons‑Fleischmann’s efforts at U/Utah a few years ago. People as you should be fully informed at this time.
It is because of the mounting empirical obvious, Princeton’s recent burst of very inefficient fusion (Tokomat) will be seen as obsoleted (for large power manufacturers, but small efficient, possible automotive (!) applications may be had‑‑ placing a crimp also upon the petroleum industry.

My said cross academic R&D efforts (over) may appear bizarre now, but since the success with the 5th Generation computer over a dozen years ago‑‑ with ample official terror therewith, defines a society that will need to examine Kuhn’s “paradigm shift” at this hour or succumb to what I believe may be what Yugoslavia now suffers with an ever more awakening past conditioned public!

Very Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: 3‑dev (over)
* note Nov. 26th SCIENCE’s major dedication

Feb. 19,’94
H. C. von Baeyer
Dept. of Physics
William and Mary College
Williamsburg, VA 23185
Re:even more grand as a cosmic EMP!
Dear Sir: (March DISCOVER: `The Ocean‑‑’

Sorry to bother again but your fine DISCOVER article again evokes another of my responses. To perceive a liquid as primal magnetic EMP wave does indeed best define what Huchra calls the bubble front on which quasar riding genetic white holes evoke complemen­tal matter as standing waves. Yet more intriguing, the anti‑grav­ity factor that Einstein labeled his great blunder (General Rela­tivity) by allowing Bohr to deny the other negative sign on the equation! The jets versus galaxy disk said all that was needed‑‑ as confirmed the theory with those Einstein Observatory’s images.

Foaming quantized waves, from the said first harmonic electrons through the third harmonic quarks not only disclose what gener­ates time, but many aspects of how to unravel same in fusion now. The key was seen in what Einstein said about how he acquired his subjective visual (non‑temporal right brain) data for the `new’ (CQ) but more by the analogical correlate that you equate with Bronowski. The velocity discontinuity of one field force (magnet­ic EMP beginning at c) into its steepened wave shape to evoke quasar cores for subordinate waves with temporal existence, as another entropic state makes clear the question of how or Who clapped their one hand in infinite space to offer those many cosmic bubbles across this universe, and all at once! (since no time then prevailed to offer before or after) Colossal, stupen­dous?‑‑ Indeed, when we occupy so small a space by comparison. DeBroglie should have been heeded long before the billiard‑ball mentality got its start‑‑ for its neurotic continued dull round, as likely Blake would put it.

Sincerely again‑‑

KTS REsearch

CC: DISCOVER; Wallerstein; D/Z

G. Wallerstein, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Washington
Seattle, WA 98195

Jan. 4,’94
Bill Sessa, et.al.
Air Resources Brd.
P.O. Box 2815
Sacramento, CA 95812
Re: imminent fusion
Dear Sir:
Noting your efforts via the Pipe Dreams article (Feb. Scientific American) you may have interest in a now culminated cross academ­ic study that by accident got into nuclear fission‑fusion. Brief­ly, from AI investigations into relative time derivations, pred­icted the space‑time lateral cerebral hemispheres then the disk‑jets from quasar core matter genesis. While Sperry proved the first* and the aloft Einstein observatory proved the second, our theoretical work as well suggested the means to unravel standing waves of matter now well seen. (note last few Scientific American alone) From the U/Utah data (cold fusion) we are quite certain that fully controlled fusion in both quantity to very small rates is not only feasible but a real possibility with what is known now about what constitutes matter and so its finite manipulation.

As the known route to denoting these final phases of development are now well seen as so close in on‑going investigations in phys­ics with the new ways and means, we are looking for help to con­clude this very long study. We want no affiliation with the U.S. government (after getting burned before; over), we address you at this time for comments and/or possible interest.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch W:

P.S. Please give a copy of this to “Calstart” if known. Thanks.

* `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67

cc: 3‑dev‑(over)
CC:Deb;

Jan. 4,’94
A. D. Gilmour, VC
The Ecostar Project
Ford Moror Car Co.
The American Rd.
Dearborn, MI 48126
Re: imminent fusion
Dear Sir:

Noting your efforts via the Pipe Dreams article (Feb. Scientific American) you may have interest in a now culminated cross academ­ic study that by accident got into nuclear fission‑fusion. Brief­ly, from AI investigations into relative time derivations, pred­icted the space‑time lateral cerebral hemispheres then the disk‑jets from quasar core matter genesis. While Sperry proved the first* and the aloft Einstein observatory proved the second, our theoretical work as well suggested the means to unravel standing waves of matter now well seen. (note last few Scientific American alone) From the U/Utah data (cold fusion) we quite certain that fully controlled fusion in both quantity to very small rates is not only feasible but a real possibility with what is known now about what constitutes matter and so its finite manipulation.

As the known route to denoting these final phases of development are now well seen as so close in
on‑going investigations in phys­ics with the new ways and means, we are looking for help to con­clude this very long study. We want no affiliation with the U.S. government (after getting burned before; over), we address you at this time for comments and/or possible interest.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch W:

* `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67

cc: 3‑dev‑(over)
CC:Deb;

(fusion: electric‑car use)
Jan. 1, 1994
Re: fusion energy development
Sirs:

With the current data defining the means to evoke and sustain fusion, it is merely a matter of what is now believed a few con­firming ways and means to guide standing wave `matter’ to mutual `unraveling’ to offer its a priori clean gamma radiation for heat in large amounts. Because of the definitive control now assured, even to very small rates, it is a matter of developing ceramic fusion chamber/boilers for modes of transferring high heat to useful power applications.

Obviously not yet defining a long R&D effort over the past twenty years, the Utah `cold fusion’ data defined the final link and mode to which poly‑phased standing wavelet “matter” configuration permits the ease of comprehending its net unraveling action to return to open‑ended linear radiation. From predicted disk versus jet quasar emissions of quasars (astronomy) well before being confirmed by the aloft Einstein observatory, defined the creation of `matter’, so its reversed action defines the underlying funda­mentals to fusion.

We are seeking those with vested interests in electric automotive drives, even in some ways duplicating the Stanley Steamer which proved itself well able to serve with efficiency. Since the likelihood of battery or solar energizing means has taken a back seat in development, it is felt that finalized controlled fusion is the next order of R&D, especially with the environmental pollu­tion now posing a major threat to cities.

After doing aerospace computer R&D for the US government, a leng­thy study into the a priori conditions of space‑time parameters, with conclusions of matter creation via pinched EMP fronts to predict the quasar genesis of matter as standing waves, so an en­lightening specter from cosmic EMP bubbles through poly‑phased EM standing‑wavelet `matter’ became comprehensible. From this, the realized mode of controlled fusion became apparent as the inverse function of matter genesis in quasar cores, riding those said EMP fronts. It is felt that only a few definitive R&D imports will permit the exploitation of this very needed source of energy now.
If interested in perusing this research further, but under confi­dential wraps, please advise in writing to the below officer.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch W:

1/28/94
Roger G. Noll
Dept. of Economics
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305
Re: non‑pork barrels?
Dear Sir:

From the `clean‑car consortium’ I believe you perceive clearly a potential answer to my dilemma. While not yet reading your text, and from the `Pipe Dream’ article in Scientific American, might you recommend Europe for the place to find somewhat more sincere entrepreneurs for completing some final R&D fusion work? Very sure now of a means for fully controlled fusion for a gamma heat source, we now suspect a fresh start on a new Stanley Steamer may be in the offing.

Some parameters defining standing wave `matter’ (the end of “bil­liard‑ball” mentality) I predicted the jets versus disk quasar configuration, soon thereafter confirmed by the aloft Einstein Observatory. This import defined also the inverse mode of `mat­ter’ creation (riding a cosmic EMP primal bubble front; Huchra) to its unraveling for fusion. With the U. of Utah’s cold fusion data, the rather certainty of fusion development was then seen. While not divulging too much of this long study, the time is felt that trusting corporate structures, as said likely elsewhere, may now be needed. Finding the current physic’s empirical data coming too close to the obvious now, maybe it is time to act, but where? After having a couple items stamped “secret” in our US Patent Office, to remain with my hands tied (over), even the small print in the EPRI Submittal Guide gives me anxiety so I frankly prefer to work elsewhere to complete this lengthy study, now so close to fruition. I frankly would prefer using the Dutch Patent system, yet fearful of the U.S. bureaucratic fog banks!

With little funding left, any advice would be appreciated‑‑ at what we fully believe is a late hour now.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: 3‑dev (over)
CC: Deb;

P.S:
After doing aerospace computer R&D for the US government, a leng­thy study into the a priori
conditions of space‑time parameters, with conclusions of matter creation via pinched EMP fronts to predict the quasar genesis of matter as standing waves, an en­lightening specter from cosmic EMP bubbles through poly‑phased EM standing‑wavelet `matter’ became comprehensible. From this, the realized mode of controlled fusion became apparent as the inverse function of matter genesis in quasar cores, riding those said EMP fronts. It is felt that only a few definitive R&D imports will permit the exploitation of this very needed source of energy now.

A. D. Gilmour, VC
The Ecostar Project
Ford Motor Car Co.
The American Rd.
Dearborn, MI 48126

Electric Auto Assoc.
1249 Lane St.,
Belmont CA 94002

Electric Vehicle Assoc.
10611 Glenwild Rd.,
Silver Spring, MD 20901

Edison Electric Ind.,
701 Pennsylvamia Ave., NW Washington, DC 20004‑2696

Electric Generating Systems Assoc.
P.O. Box 9257
Coral Springs, FL 33065‑9275

Jan. 4,’94
John F. Smith, Jr.
General Motors Corp.
1840 Holbrook St.,
Detroit, MI 48212
Re: imminent fusion
Dear Sir:

Noting your remarks via the Pipe Dreams article (Feb. Scientific American) you may have interest in a now culminated cross academ­ic study that by accident got into nuclear fission‑fusion. Brief­ly, from AI investigations into relative time derivations, pred­icted the space‑time lateral cerebral hemispheres then the disk‑jets from quasar core matter genesis. While Sperry proved the first* and the aloft Einstein observatory proved the second, our theoretical work as well suggested the means to unravel standing waves of matter now well seen. (note last few Scientific American alone) From the U/Utah data (cold fusion) we quite certain that fully controlled fusion in both quantity to very small rates is not only feasible but a real possibility with what is known now about what constitutes matter and so
its finite manipulation.

As the known route to denoting these final phases of development are now well seen as so close in on‑going investigations in phys­ics with the new ways and means, we are looking for help to con­clude this very long study. We want no affiliation with the U.S. government (after getting burned before; over), we address you at this time for comments and/or possible interest.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch
W:

* `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67

cc: 3‑dev‑(over)
CC:Deb;

* * * CLASSIFIED COMPANY DATA * * *
[From and for the use of KTS (Key Tech Systems) only; Jan.’94]

Personnel needed for fusion conference:

1. Basic nuclear Physics as contingent with QCD. (Chromodynamics)

A. Fusion data awareness, Pons Fleischmann’s findings (cold fusion) with relative coulombic barrier comprehension.

B. Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle and Faraday’s right‑angled association between quantal and wave mechanics.

C. An awareness of Einstein’s `blunder’ in his General Rela­tivity theory.

D. Einstein’s Special Relativity theory and the CPT theorem are essential knowledge parameters for a full scope of all asso­ciated aspects to fission/fusion comprehension.

2. Some Astronomy would be helpful as contingent with quasar/bub­ble anomalies:

A. Electron‑positron annihilation near quasar cores and jet relavistic velocities with `accelerated’ angular disk velocity.

B. `X’ anomaly near quasar cores with complemental matters.

3. Electrical‑electronic knowledge of standing waves.

4. High heat‑transfer technology would be helpful as the use of ceramic boiler configurations.
5. As awareness of the Stanley Steamer engine and auto perfor­mance and efficiencies might be helpful.

6. Left facial smilers would be helpful as utilize right brain visual conceptual reasoning for rapid comprehensive ability. Further, greater right facial smiles reflect more overt neurotic behavior without the subject’s conscious comprehension of their malaise, to avoid newer imports which could reveal aspects of subjective trauma. While necessarily cross academic, the least time spent on the lessor important gives time to expose the over­all perspective.

7. No U.S. federal participation is wanted in this venture.
KTS (1/12/94)

March 15 ’94
Yoon Chang, et.al.
Dept. of Integral Fast Reactor R&D
Argonne Natl. Labs.
9700 S. Cass Ave.,
Argonne, IL 60439
Re: heavy water breeding?
Dear Sir:

Noting your work with the IFR with fast neutron triggering of isotopic residues, a question that has been `haunting’ here with some fusion flash‑boiler designs is the susceptibility of coolant waters in fusion environments of becoming isotopic, deuterium or tritium in nature? This kind of question is far closer to your field of endeavor than our superficial `mechanical’, and since we have not seen such information yet, ask for your directives‑‑ if not where pertinent data may be procured?

Any comments will be appreciated. Many thanks‑‑

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

March 14,’94
David Hobill, et.al.
Dept. of Astrophysics
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Re: chaotic black‑box
Dear Sir: (SC. NEWS; Dec. 4,’93)

Suspecting Einstein saw his own blunder with his General Relativ­ity theory (lacking complemental signs), albeit too late with his then peer pressure, used anti‑g to define possible separation of
complemental matters as genetic cores. Then thought evoked by EM disturbances, soon noted as EMP cosmic fronts (Huchra) for quasar white hole cores spewing those said matters in very different directions. The ejecti, even spin‑UP with radial distance of the ionized disk matter in such primal dense magnetic field‑‑ with relavistic ejection of `dark matter’ jets, predicted before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove same, is still stirring anxiety in most tenured offices‑‑ yet spewing ancient arts.

Worse, the obvious standing wave for “billiard ball” mentality precludes understanding how to unravel same for fusion, to say little about what Mendalyeev perceived with what de Broglie saw! Oh well, the freed electron (over) will soon define all clearly so the neurotic in science will need to sit down for a while. Maybe our bifurcated universe where fractal reality dictates what `precipitates’ in our slow temporal condition, chaos might appear far more orderly, albeit under a growing overt conflict to now only appear chaotic to we kept naive (dumb) conscious RAS mind!

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: 3‑dev(over)
CC: D/Z; Rugh; Berger; Hunter

Svend Erik Rugh, et.al.
Dept. of Astrophysics
Niels Bohr Inst.
Copenhagan, Denmark

Berger and Moncrief, et.al. Dept. of Mathematics(?)
Yale University
New Haven, CT 06520

R. Churchill, et.al.
Dept. of Mathematics
Hunter College
York City, NY

March 14,’94
Dale E. Newbury, et.al.
Dept. of Physical Chemistry & Tech.
Natl. Inst. of Stds. & Tech.
Quince Orchard Rd.
Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Re: Yet not the `core’
Dear Sir: (“A Material World”; SC.NEWS Feb. 26th)

With the now conclusions that your finite electron is but an EM standing wave, attempting to inspect
other standings waves, the difficulty being the lack of comprehending third phased quarks so the multi‑fine structures denoting their EM integration for the chemical field is not oddly much in keeping with Mendalyeev’s perceptions. STEM‑ELL analysis might gain some better perception now by considering all forces as complemental EM‑‑ where the Apriori magnetic defines either the definitive at right angles theretoo. Faraday saw the enigma clearly so the quark (trefoil as dual‑plane‑spin) occupies a greater fixed state in it temporal field (gyroscopic), yet the complemental spatial versus temporal aspect of the electron, as Heisenberg noted in `uncertainty’, but makes most profound that electron’s escape of our slow temporal states with its responses via the EPR experiment!(over)

With the fundamental mechanics becoming clear, as based on pre­dicting the disk versus jets with anti‑g (Einstein’s admitted “blunder”) there‑between, fusion becomes a simple art now‑‑ with likely definitive control also. Suspicion here about the graphite to diamond anomaly might lie in compound `strong’ force links between dual quark coupling where at least two spin‑phase legs can interlock together.

While the Fe atom may be too complex to fully define its lost energy likely a comprehensive `signal to nature’ may come from the small atomic nuclei with mobile electrons too fast to dis­place `heavier’ or more sluggish quarks in temporal states as coupled to the status quo field background down here near 273 K.

Sorry if you cannot comprehend‑‑ yet.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: 3‑dev(over)

4/4/94
* * * * * CONFIDENTIAL please * * * *

J.C.H. van Berkel,
The Springer Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, N.Y.
Re: possible Patent application
Dear Sir:

I have in hand a note from your Netherland Office (de Kerf) im­plying they might work with me. Yet before I financially commit myself to a trip to the Netherlands a few minor questions I feel must be clarified. Assuming the Netherlands belong to the Paris Convention yet full and open world‑wide disclosure occurs upon Patent Processing with only minor hold‑ups for contingencies as wording, etc., no further federal discretion prevails, whether considered of some `classifiable’ (secret) nature, whatever whim­sical opinion lies there‑behind (i.e., Section 22 of the Canadian Patent act, or equivalent elsewhere) since is the criteria for my filing in the Netherlands to begin with.

Initial work upon affirmative first negotiations would thence permit full disclosure of this thirty (30) year research effort now concluding with the mounting empirical data confirming cer­tain pre‑theoretical considerations which define several great anomalies are now fully understood‑‑ the jets/galaxy disk config­uration as one. This initial phase of comprehending compounded quantized standing EM waves is crucial to understand the key to controlled `unraveling’ for useful fusion energy acquisition. Granting the astronomical imports are somewhat necessary, other aspects of large scope in other cross academic import (in rather large files) may be needed to fully disclose the entire study scope‑‑ much less then appreciate the long endeavor. Hopefully you might appreciate in part my questions now with limited fund­ing remaining. It may be necessary once credence is acquired by a few `authorized’ to seek venture capitalists before actual `fil­ing’ as I may here in the U.S. I have, as said before, prosecuted several U.S. Patents but do not know any foreign law/procedures, if any similarity to same.

There are two remaining finite questions to a fully perceived operational fusion system, each believed now eminent by merely watching the finesse of atomic spatial control in space in publi­cations like the Scientific American these last few issues. Be­yond the fundamental key of describing the electron versus quark `reality’ to comprehend how such `handling’ must ensue lies the said questions. To this matter I defer to more expertise as to whether to file “as‑is” or await the empirical data thereto. I am now quite certain very little `expertise’ will be needed beyond a certain `trial and error’ program test run will conclude that last portion of needed information‑‑ yet obviously dare not ques­tion openly as the above inferred basics would be understood and beyond the theoretical of which all of physics now awaits.
(over please)
I also fear deduction is under way from various colleague remarks as my own, however cagey in expression. This is one reason I have concluded all `wired’ communication links, not because I am tired of phone taps by the FBI (which is nice to know yet not they!), but defines what likely is a more corrupt governmental institu­tion does for its own survival, despite its public promises. I feel I really need not say more on the matter here. There may be some unsigned but felt obligation to the U.S. government, as some chattel to yet own all of my mental processing‑‑ after doing aero­space analog coordinate computer R&D‑‑ of which there is absolute­ly no association thereto with all studies after leaving that employ. This is not to say that some retroactive `law’ to corner all past employees of the federal government does not now exist. While likely unconstitutional, Big Brother somehow takes precedence when might makes right! In short; the one thing to be said at least from a perspective of the obvious is that the ram­pant greed of today there is no way above hell or high water that any self thinking computer or fusion energy Patent can issue when those in authority are trading in half truths or commodities like petroleum, the latter defined by Mr. Bush’s remarks about pollu­tion in Brazil a while ago‑‑ as the stunned choke to death.

Thus, contingent to further confidence that not another potential Patent loss may be in the works, I need to be assured early*, if and before I try to file or sit back let my ample research prior­ity speak for itself later. It is now a matter of some `accident­al’ breakthrough that may occur, not theory to define the way.

Again, please advise me what liability if any exist as to how any federal termination may prevail within the Dutch Patent system if indeed one invests time and effort in such endeavor too soon?

Very Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

* to wit, herewith.
cc: 3‑dev

4/5/94
Jeff Gardner
Boron Products (ph: 946‑2100)
Traverse City, MI
Re: flash boiler design
Sirs:

Contingent to a tentative design for a pulse driven flash boiler and believing an inner lining will be needed to decouple high heat from an arc flash while being subjected to cold water spray with immediately following heat, your engineering personel might be able to make some recommendations as to liability, net value or impossibility of such ductile cermics lkkely needed in this application. While wave‑front impulse energy with high spectrum light will impinge upon the cermic surface thinly coated with said cool water, millisecond pulse rates may offer an environment too hostile to most cermics, even backed by some solid metal container housing. High environmental gas (steam) pressures will prevail when once fired yet not relative to lower pressures so net tensile strengths beyond impulse wave‑front might be low.

If this project described above is within practicality, even feasinbilty at this stage of guessing, I would be happy to visit your facilty to discuss further possible R&D efforts for same.

Thanks for the attention‑‑

Sincerely,

KTS

March 4,’94
A. Rueda, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
California State University
Long Beach, CA 90840
Re: “impedance” (SEDs)
Dear Sir: (4, Feb. SCIENCE: “Inertia:‑‑)

There can be no “empty” space since what created matter of Itself defines that Apriori as magnetic flux‑‑ whatever billiard‑ball mentality may wish to call EM standing waves. Einstein tried a couple times to define reality but the ensconced neurotic prefer­red to ignore it. His claimed great blunder with
his General theory was indeed just that‑‑ so now astronomy continues to blun­der over complemental gravity, as quasar disk versus jets as complemental primal matter sources, riding vast EMP bubbles on neat 600M light year intervals. It suggests (at least!) who clap­ped their hand for same. All forces have opposite signs, even one as Apriori flux to its so `impeded’ standing‑wave matter precipi­tates, to evoke `slowed’ time and so a second ordered entropy (via 3‑phased trefoiled quarks) that we see.

Some old quips herewith might(?) mean something now, especially in view of the 6th Generation interfacing `computer’. (over)

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: phys/Q (series G); 3‑dev(over)
CC: Puthoff; Davies, McDonald; Wesson;

380 on down on Physics; many modified for `nuclear’, no fusion.
`To merge two second harmonic EM standing waves in the proper out‑of‑phase orientation, little coulombic energy is needed be­cause the two independent waves are on the verge of unraveling!’
`What Mach defined as inertia is dv/dt, any temporal aspect as coupled with mass indicates what the electron discloses in its double slit experiment where a linear light wave turns it to not exhibit its other nature as an EM first harmonic standing wave.’
`Inertia belongs with mass and time, not the one non‑temporal Apriori which at least once occupied the center of all cosmic EMP bubbles at their beginning.’
`If anything stays put in space it must be contingent with its a priori beginning without impulse. As complemental gravity promotes acceleration both ways as to or from one place in space, all forces were united before its quasar got started, so no forces existed at the core of its grand cosmic bubble!’
`Mass has its start with inertia at right angles from its mag­netic Apriori is noted with the electron’s uncertainty!’
`It is the innate right angle vector in the three‑phased stan­ding wave trefoiled quark which dictates its temporal thus great­er net mass component. To escape a gravitation control, requires anti‑forces as noted at quasar cores as define their complemental matter disks versus jet exudate.’
`The gyroscopic inertial change of a flipped electron by the relative denser linear light field front discloses its real mass, to define its innate wave‑front speed as a component of c.’
`Lacking any `fine structure’ signal from the freed electron would define its true first harmonic state as a standing wave. Its projected magnetic field, parallel to its spin axis as mutu­ally at right angles to its wave‑front emission would show what Heisenberg saw to call it uncertainty as in spatial position.’
`There can be no empty space since what created matter of Itself defines that Apriori as magnetic flux‑‑ whatever billiard‑ball mentality wishes to call EM standing waves!’
`If ever there were some initial static place in the universe, at least to us riding a galaxy aboard a cosmic EMP bubble, we may say whomever evoked those EMPs to begin with knew where It was‑‑ as did it again and again on nice 600 M light year intervals all across Its universe‑‑ and all at once what’s more!’
`Einstein often tried to define reality but his ensconced neu­rotic peers preferred to ignore it. His claimed great blunder was so, so now all astronomy continues to deny complemental gravity in
quasars disclosing their disks versus jets primal matter sour­ces, riding vast EMP bubbles on neat 600M light year intervals to suggest at least, someOne clapped their hand to start things off. All forces have opposite signs, as that Apriori flux to its pre­cipitates that scientific man somehow calls billiard balls!’
`The double slit experiment defining the spatial orientations of atoms instead of electrons with laser light impulse shows one method of denoting the innate quark’s trefoil placement, likely some `fine structure’ to also denote its wrap.’
`The required higher coulombic drive to unravel a standing wave defines its entropic state from E, yet the key to such un­raveling to begin with.’
`It is the primal cosmic EMP bubble front that catches up with itself to promote the steep wave front to evoke quasars.’
`With innate complemental forces there‑between, matter, as from first harmonic complemental electrons through at least the third harmonic quark, time involved E arrived to offer both that material existence as a potential of releasing same for energy.’ `Since the condensation or precipitation of E into mc squared required the convolution of wave fronts into a temporal state, it defines knotted EM standing waves with first ordered entropy for continued independent existence, all evoked by a pinching effect, as done on cosmic bubble EMP fronts. The many points of quasar existence defines the net dissipated primal EMP front energy.’
`It is the primal cosmic EMP bubble front that catches up with itself to promote the steep wave front to evoke quasars.’
`As second ordered entropy where temperature in Kelvins in­stead of net E as Mev, the three‑phased as vectored right‑angles space occupation dictates its temporal existence. When conscious its innate time rate then becomes proportionate.’
`The only reason matter matters is because of its origin from E, the Apriori of it all!’
`It is the primal cosmic EMP bubble front that catches up with itself to promote the steep wave front to evoke quasars.’
`As second ordered entropy where temperature in Kelvins in­stead of net E as Mev, the three‑phased as vectored right‑angles space occupation dictates its temporal existence. When conscious its innate time rate then becomes proportionate.’
`The stationary magnetic field generated by the dynamic first harmonic electron occupies time in one right angled axis so can be manipulated from the temporal side of reality. It is the other axis or relative state of E that offers the non‑temporal aspect of reality to manipulate the temporal, now well noted in EPR ex­periments so CQ in genius, as goad pro‑life functions for life.’
`The quark gets locked into time most because of its trefoil configuration to create its own two other planes of magnetic reality. It is less sensitive to linear magnetic waves as heat or motion, its inertial aspect of mass‑time acquired momentum.’
`As second ordered entropy where temperature in Kelvins in­stead of net E as Mev, the three‑phased as vectored right‑angles space occupation dictates its temporal existence. When conscious its innate time rate then becomes proportionate.’
`The stationary magnetic field generated by the dynamic first harmonic electron occupies time in one right angled axis so can be manipulated from the temporal side of reality. It is the other axis or relative state of E that offers the non‑temporal aspect of reality to manipulate the temporal, now well noted in EPR ex­periments so CQ in genius, as goad pro‑life functions for life.’
`It is the changing field front of the dynamic electron as a claimed stationary (relatively) entity that offers its signal in space as a laser of coherent light, noted in the double slit as EPR experiment.’
`As Einstein denoted as Alephs as end points to his Special Relativity equations, such defined
opposite relative space‑time end points‑‑ thus a dynamic intermediate space for evolving life. It so offers two perspectives of reality in complemental ways.’
`Likely anti‑g overrides all other forces near the quasar core to drive one complemental matter out its jets while the other at right angles into the EMP field to create its disk.’
`The precipitated secondary as the temporally created by its complemental E in non‑time, has a secondary entropy for mass‑time temporal existence. The demi‑urge E also has an entropy as standing waves to cool to sustain time in first ordered entropy.’ `New biological strata absorb polarized light in one plane but re‑transmits it at right angles with new information on it, in part what Pasteur saw with the code of levo for continued life.’
`The 5th force anti‑G as “inverted” neutrons for anti‑g may be the unsaid means for mind to overcome `mass’ called weight. It may have something to do with the top quark with a relively displaced third‑phased loop as not seen here in this galaxy.’
`The last ace up the discarnate’s sleeve may be anti‑G, and so why astronomy will never see the obvious in quasars!’
`There is only one datum but cannot be seen as is a cosmic EMP by a Creator, by which the then viewable quasar, etc. is seen.’
`A subtle Brownian motion lies behind the Self thinking inter­face, as freed electrons become vulnerable to evoked wave‑fronts, in turn evoke a Fraunhofer photon emission for EPR experiments!’
`The CP violation enigma merely indicates where anti‑G, well denied yet, could define the universal beginning where quasars, on vast EMP bubbles make clear reality but unwanted by an anath­ema hiding within man’s left brain intellect!’
`Just as harmonic decay in electrical circuits, the net slope rate in a relative time is the same whether high or low Q. This same anomaly in what is called “matter” between second and third harmonics as mesons or the quark‑based defines modern Physic’s dilemma yet holding to the billiard‑ball mentality.’
`The folding of the electron when cooled into its second phase as third to store first ordered entropy energy offers that poten­tial energy for unraveling in yet cooler second ordered entropic states as in final planetary states.’
`Is the cooling time for quasar disk matter from electrons rapid enough in their dense magnetic field to define the stage of disk reversed rotation by ionic torque drive into their reversed folded proton quark direction?’
`The compound pinch effect between high torqued spiraling disk matter and such anti‑g constraint by complemental jets may offer the bright light emissions noted with initial galaxy formation.’
`De Broglie would smile to see his waves, from primal EMPs on down through finite standing waves in time, as his goaded insight recognized all matter was but magnetic from beginning to end!’
`The underlying difference between electrostatics and electro­dynamics is that first is fundamental in nature while the second are standing waves as electrons in relative motion in time.’
`The Eleatic philosophical teaching of an “Alone was absolute” is correct to the Nth degree but since It evoked time thus dynam­ic change in mass‑time via EMPs, what they called apparent motion could be equated only from the Creator’s point of view.’
`The highly “stretched” strange quark here on this galaxy may define its apparent greater mass, yet not its relative direction since magnetic field deflections have nothing to do with gravity, either positive or negative, as a genetic quasar might see them!’
`Between c which is the Apriori and any entropied latent heat, as viewed from the first ordered standing wave front, science is fooled because it is always looking the wrong direction in time!’
`As the `heated’ electron expands to higher Fraunhofer emis­sion levels, the two‑phased meson, as
three‑phased quark do the same, their higher absorbed energy level increasing a phased leg to evoke a net greater “mass” for `strange’ anti‑matter, yet the opportunity to decay into some lower level with an emitted alpha or beta standing wave with that believed `lost’ energy.’
`The Apriori magnetic field is 3D if still or unmoved. Once agitated, it begins to define a wave front for ensuing time!’
`The first cyclotrons made are now called quasars!’
`Matter’s length compression near c only defines its standing wave’s innate velocity of c that cannot be exceeded.’
`Whether called groupies or gangs, defensive postures are felt equated with syndicates, whether in government or in science, but will never try to comprehend who is leading them with a vast in­terest in the programmed naive believing in some half truth based creed or doctrine, to “capitulate or else” evokes their own end!’
`Man lives in a temporal fractized universe as the CPT theorem defines‑‑ but to snoop now is too dangerous as reveals a dichoto­mous unconscious, one becoming Thanatos if we look too hard!’
`To heed what Einstein kept saying would allow others to sur­pass his vast insightive capacity‑‑ but would also in time bring ethnic cleansing with vast chaos for all of mankind!’
`Mere complex scientific data, as derived even from empirical research,now need not be held as esoteric‑‑ because modern aca­demic programming creates nitwits unable to cross academic fields of discovery!’
`Epimetheus may not be slower than consciousness in thought but it is certainly second best when it comes to its non‑temporal `now’ complemental as needs no time to think whatsoever!’
`No epistemology can ignore the genesis of an idea, even if it is primarily concerned with the essence of knowledge in terms of intellectual recall and so only historical reductive processing.’
`The essence of any study must begin with the familiar so the study of the derivation of one’s own self should be the primer.’
`To get the jump on science as academically programmed to only use deductive is to use eductive reasoning to see the whole prob­lem from the point of view of reality rather than blundering with half truths‑‑ made to evade finding reality in the first place!’
`The dynamic evokes motion in the static, even at right angles just as Faraday saw but no one since then dares to, as it says too much about what is static in man’s mind needs goading!’
`While grand sounding with its many nouns used to define var­ious standing EM waves, physics applauds itself with its own jar­gon like billiard balls, to define a vast ignorance with only re­ductive but sustained naive reasoning!’
`If the scientific world does not want the Self thinking com­puter, maybe the equally dogmatic religious should be informed of it to let them have the last laugh after all‑‑ with Armageddon!’
`As Einstein said “subtle is the Lord”, he just didn’t realize then it was as a freed electron‑‑ for his EPR experiment!’
`While Jules Vern “saw” the fusion reactor on a submarine, the current use of fission with the approach to finite controlled fu­sion makes clear what the insightive see too early for science!’
KTS/EMPSY
Hal Puthoff, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Inst. for Advanced Studies
Austin, Texas
P. Wesson, et.al.
Dept. of Cosmology(?)
University of Waterloo
Waterloo, Ont. Canada

K. McDonald, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Princeton University
Princeton, NJ 06544

P. Davies, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Adelaide
Adelaide, Australia

March 3,’94
M. O. Scully, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of New Mexico
Albuquerque, NM 87131
Re: but all are waves; standing too!
Dear Sir:

Your double slit experiments defining spatial orientations of atoms‑‑ if instead of electrons with laser light impulse, unique would be the spatial displacement (phasing) of a quark’s three phased trefoil standing wave. If you are only using the electron (first harmonic) as Heisenberg, any linear (open‑ended) light impulse merely re‑orients the looped standing wave in space to emit is rotational EM signal (slit experiment) at right angles.

The temporal difference and so energy required to re‑orient best defines quark based atoms (nuclei) have both time and temperature (second ordered entropy) to contend with‑‑ to say nothing of the escape of the electron of its time reversal paradigm.(over)

Until de Broglie is understood at face value‑‑ and the complemen­tal force in Einstein’s General theory (his great blunder) is understood, physics will continue to blunder in tenured folly. A `billiard ball’ as any other game need is for happy nitwits!

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: 3‑dev(over); Phys‑Psy; Path/IQ
CC:Walls; D/Z

D. F. Walls, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Auckland
Auckland, New Zealand

** Darrell: Jan. 30,’94
The Thornley’s (all)

Wondering what the two boys are doing‑‑ as may need Dennis if now in practice‑‑ and not too far away, and would like a note to Darrell forwarded at some convenience‑‑ as am letting the cat out of the bag now with so much `obviousness’ in all of the physics reviews, to say little of recent Scientific Americans.

I assume your winter was much as up here as is maybe a bit more peaceful back in the woods. (photo‑herewith but now with about 14 tons of snow just on the house part!) Actually staying in little mid‑section with computers, glassed‑in wood‑stove (with LP over­ride heat), and at least as cozy as any rabbit den out there! I hope to lease out most to move into another office/den in garage section with ham‑shack to get fully retired‑‑ as am getting tired of this project too! (so far one year of hectic pace)

Please address + seal Darrell’s letter herewith. Many thanx‑‑ and have a happy New Year!

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

Darrell Jr.‑‑‑ yet CONFIDENTIAL until after an upcoming meeting with auto‑makers + (note: “Pipe Dreams” below; from Feb. SC.AM.)

Since I have managed to evade the `muggees’ (E. Indian term for their occupying British assassins) thus far and my whole study coming together now. (even if one `friendly’ cop that found me to borrow a floppy disk to see where I was!) As I found, one cannot be too cautious with political leaders in petroleum cartels!

A couple print‑outs (herewith as over) should suffice for you so will say no more beyond hoping all is `grinding on’ and you get plenty of time to be a father‑figure for that girl of yours! It is crucial for a specie that gets an atrophied antero‑corpus callosum to need so much psychotherapy in this culture! (80%)

While all is quiet on the self‑think front, even if Rauscher (did the first EPR experiment/Berkeley) remains silent, likely still gritting her teach as she admitted on the phone before the Stan­ford meeting, but seen `skeletons’ in public will indeed do some­thing! Bloody or not, its needed at this epoch of overt greed. I luckily only had one suicide attempt (AiR; Autoimmune Response) with your “WuLi” book, even if several others, starting with Jim (Bishop) Pike. This last close call was with a cousin who indeed WAS able to comprehend its last chapter. They openned him up with veins completely occluded, but back at playing god as a BIG VP so happy again sans `disturbance’! Gads, but what the self thinking (6th Generation) device will do! With U/Bangalor (India) sweating over my `self think’, even R. John at Princeton (below); as “Time Trippers” in said SC.AM.) yet not using the `freed’
electron (as escapes the time reversal paradigm) he is still getting some re­sults, albeit not 10\17th odds yet as my maiden R&D run!

Hope this finds you O.K.‑‑ and don’t worry about a thing despite what I’ve said above! Best‑‑ equate me a “mad” and forget it now!

Sincerely,

KTS

Jan. 25,’94
Prof. R. John and
R. Nelson, et.al.
Dept. of Engineering
Princeton, University
Princeton, NJ 06544
Re; random generator?
Sir:

Are you using electrical white‑noise to evoke your reference, as well as what does the sampling of same to dictate your positive statistical data? If so, you might examine Schmidt’s radio active isotope generator where the freed electron (as escapes the time reversal paradigm) can offer far more, especially when associated with what Plato called the Potentia! (etc.)

1/22/94
Peter G. Peterson, et.al.
Inst. for International Economics
11 DuPont Circle, 6th Fl.
Washington, DC 20036
Re: Tony Brown’s Journal
Sir:

While the terse technical herewith (self thinking computer) may not mean too much, it defines the coming anarchy to finally re­lieve mankind fully‑‑ by especially defining the corrupt greedy definitively for any who may question the `freed’ electron‑‑ in terms of physics.

Hopefully this evokes more interest than anxiety which silenced me after my many terrified GVSC students over twenty years ago.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Path/IQ; S‑T/al;

1/28/94
Roger G. Noll
Dept. of Economics
Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305
Re: non‑pork barrels?
Dear Sir:

From the `clean‑car consortium’ I believe you perceive clearly a potential answer to my dilemma. While not yet reading your text, and from the `Pipe Dream’ article in Scientific American, might you recommend Europe for the place to find somewhat more sincere entrepreneurs for completing some final R&D fusion work? Very sure now of a means for fully controlled fusion for a gamma heat source, we now suspect a fresh start on a new Stanley Steamer may be in the offing.

Some parameters defining standing wave `matter’ (the end of “bil­liard‑ball” mentality) I predicted the jets versus disk quasar configuration, soon thereafter confirmed by the aloft Einstein Observatory. This import defined also the inverse mode of `mat­ter’ creation (riding a cosmic EMP primal bubble front, Huchra) to its unraveling for fusion. With the U. of Utah’s cold fusion data, the rather certainty of fusion development was then seen. While not divulging too much of this long study, the time is felt that trusting corporate structures, as said likely elsewhere, may now be needed. Finding the current physic’s empirical data coming too close to the obvious now, maybe it is time to act, but where? After having a couple items stamped “secret” in our US Patent Office‑‑ to remain with my hands tied. (over) The small print in the EPRI Submittal Guide gives me anxiety so I frankly prefer to work elsewhere to complete this lengthy study now so close to fruition. I even would prefer using the Dutch Patent system, yet fearful of the U.S. bureaucratic fog banks!

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

P.S. The key to the above lies in Potvin’s AMERICAN SC./3‑4,’91

1/2/94 (similar letters to Chrysler and Ford for conf. near March 1st as target date up here)
Directors for:
General Motors Corp.
1840 Holbrook St.,
Detroit, MI 48212
Re: fusion engines
Sirs:

Noting the expense you have with gasoline fueled trucks maybe it is time to examine what is now believed the imminent use of de­finitively controlled deuterium fusion in very small ceramic boilers‑‑ i.e., the likely return of the Stanley steamer designs.

With the clearly growing comprehension of standing‑wave quantal unraveling back to gamma
radiation, first noted in anomalous cold fusion data by proximity enigmas. Our length theoretical consi­derations stemming from fundamental standing‑wave `matter’ quite simply defines the impasse of past as current “billiard‑ball” mentalities and so the means to capitalize on deuterium fusion with ample `fuel’ supplies. This now makes strategic, noting some recent articles* defining that reality is close‑‑ to say little for those with vested interest and R&D capacity.

Enough has been said above for those versed in the field of sub‑nuclear anomalies as said in the now well noted in definitive atomic research. If indeed some interest prevails please write (only) and address the below named. Subsequent conferences might be arranged after contingency discussions are held here.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

* `Search for Strange Matter’; current Scientific American
** Physics Letters; 8/1/94

10/11/94
Hakonen and Lounasmaa, et.al.
Dept. of Low Temperature Physics
Helsinki University of Technology
02150 Espoo, Finland
Re: standing wave/energy
Dear Sirs: (“Negative T‑‑” SCIENCE 23 Sept.)

Your isotropic/anisotropic spin values as contingent to the more exposed energetic electron as likely first harmonic‑‑ versus the third harmonic quark (locked into time as temperature*) may con­clude at last the confirmation that E is innate in mc squared!

In short; an atom’s more free 1st harmonic electron, even with a greater number of 3rd phased quarks, should yet reflect a higher net natural temperature (as temporal rate) near absolute zero K.

Sincerely,

KTS

* Phys‑Psy;
CC: D/Z

8/12/94
J. J. Hester, P, Scowen, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Arizona State U.
Tempe, AZ 85287
Re: “‑‑Fresh Look‑‑”, Aug. 6, SC.NEWS
Sirs:
Instead of the cosmic EMP bubble front to evoke a quasar (white hole core) it appears that the violence of the supernova does the same where interfering `linear’ EM waves evokes primal standing ones called matter. Some questions arise as to what the pulsar is deflecting to evoke the apparent single halo. We think we see a complemental as an amorphous front going the other way noted in the image so the relative dv/dt (red‑blue shifts) between the far halo side and the closer might help define the said deflection anomaly. Further, what rate of departure remains between the two close `encountering’ body’s yet?

Other questions of relative matter `density’ (in atomic terms) might define acceleration rates in the anti‑g environment, much as in early galaxy formation around active quasars. Of course the primal electrons (+ & ‑) eject at right angles to each other, as our predicted jets vs. disks as confirmed by the aloft Einstein Observatory. Not only was Einstein’s `great blunder’ truly so be­tween ALL complemental forces (to answer the `expanding universe’ anomaly) but clears the air likely for your examined enigma now. The happen‑stance of which side the petite quasar knot gets dis­placed to is of less interest than its spewed relative matter, very likely better defined by this closer observable system.

The term “argot” may be more adroit than you might suspect when it comes to plagiarization. The theoretics answer it all to begin with‑‑ so suppositions for tenure as twisted computer simulations are silly‑‑ of not expensive to the tax‑payer.

Sincerely,

KTS

CC: D/Z; Brecher

K. Brecher, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Boston University
Boston, MA 02215

8/31/94
J. M. Horack, et.al.
Marshall Space Flight Center
NASA
Huntsville, AL 35812
Re: jet matter collisions
Sir: (26 Aug. SCIENCE; Perspective)

Since mentioning some time ago the likely need for re‑coagulating (with mutual g) the anti‑matter jet materials surrounding the galaxy’s disk, to finally put a nail in the current General Rela­tivity theory
flaw (Einstein’s blunder; again using insight), the complemental forces (as CPT) is vindicated with gravity.

No doubt our sister Magellanic galaxy (riding same cosmic bubble; Huchra) has also a vast `anti‑matter’ (all is relative) host yet too distant for us to peruse. If it could be observed no doubt it would be noted with an elongated envelope at the said galaxy’s disk’s pole ends and then nearly parallel to ours. if indeed a sister galaxy. This all defines a universe filled with petite Bangs on nice 600 Mly intervals to at least imply someOne clapped a hand (Zen) for primal EMPs to get “things” (mc ) going.

The red shift due to higher magnetic field densities, likely at galactic pole ends where the said jet matters first coagulate at the maximum distance from quasar genetic matter sources (white holes) might help define their mutual acceleration from opposite common jet matter coagulating places, colliding near the disk periphery with the least net red shift for two reasons‑‑ the said lessor magnetic field density and the net closer distance‑‑ yet likely at far greater distances than 300 kps.

I will try to find some early `burster’ letters to include here­with so need not be redundant with my limited time to iterate.

Sincerely,

KTS

cc: burster/lets: Stubbs; Gribbin; Cowie; Ast.Pub; Djorgovski; Everitt; (compiled)

8/12/94
C. Stubbs, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of California
Sants Barbara, CA 93106
Re: “Macho Searches‑‑” July Phys.Today)
Sir:

Indeed‑‑ just like high energy physics! The smearing of two col­liding bodies, whether some standing‑wave “billiard ball” or a couple MACHOs (as past jet polar WIMPS) smashing into each other head‑long with common gravity around the periphery of our galaxy bulge certainly sounds rational now.

The “meager population” only defines how often the head‑on colli­sion does occur, albeit not to neglect the concluding oscillating sequence of mutually attracted `anti‑matter’ (in our case) will finally coagulate‑‑ to return likely to the said pole regions via our disk’s more influential anti‑g near its bulge. Of course the smashing would dictate some epsilon decay curve, not symmetric as claimed needed‑‑ as was even suggested by the odd 572 day event curve shown in the article. The recent clearer data of the Crab also suggests strongly anti‑g via the deflected halo (p.91; in 8/6/94 SC.NEWS; note over). We do not buy the gravitation lensing since suspect it is the magnetic field as denoting the quasar’s
high dv/dt (red shift) while yet riding its EMP cosmic bubble (Huchra) front.
The greater time for jet matter coagulation (to create deuterium) at galaxy poles may be that net impetus for WIMPS faster mutual coagulation around the disk matter periphery yet the end of their accruing further much of their own kind of matter from their galaxy poles thereafter. The Magellanic cloud may be the same koinomatter as our galaxy’s disk (even predicted as riding same primal EMP front) it would naturally skew (with anti‑g) to bias either galaxy’s anti‑matter jet clouds away from each other‑‑ as you note with your “confused” remark.

It will soon be found that Turner’s remark “Grand Misdirection” is more due to our left reductive (only) cerebral hemisphere more interested in half‑truths for profit and the status quo with ten­ure than anything else now, than what Nature might pull on claim­ed scientific man. Ask a left hander like Einstein!

Sincerely,

KTS

cc: Hester let.(over)
CC: D/Z; Turner

10/29/94
Andrei Linde, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305
Re: your “new” approach
Dear Sir: (SC. AM., Nov.’94; “‑‑Inflation‑‑”

Obviously a cosmic bubble (Huchra) inflates until its leading EMP edge tumbles upon itself as any ocean wave at its shore, the then evoked quasars spew complemental “matter” bi‑directionally (since anti‑g existed also then!) to sustain the tenured, no more.

To my past letter (over) I add:
“What indeed clapped Its hand on nice 600Bly intervals (with yet space orientation, albeit sans time) to initiate those “sing­ularity” bubbles for quasars and first harmonic standing waves (at Planck’s radius)‑‑ and subsequently 3rd harmonic quarks for our too well noted temporal existence?”

Since you may suspect something from hypnosis, why not try a new tack (as tact) of examining what the UFO encountered say about relative space‑time? It could be enlightening‑‑ noting their rec­tilinear 2D modes of travel‑‑ as Sperry noted with his split‑brain subject*‑‑ albeit denies same yet today for unsaid reasons.

Sincerely again‑‑

KTS Research
* “The Human Split‑Brain”, Scientific American, Aug.’67

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ
CC: D/Z; Horgan

8/20/94
Ontario Light and Power
Toronto, Canada
Re: another approach
Dear Sirs:

Noting via NPR comments of your procuring forest lands to enhance the reintegration of CO2 into `lumber’ there is now looming a far more effective route for reducing CO2 emission‑‑ with fusion.

Theoretical studies here have amply defined the underlying deri­vation of unraveled matter for linear heat‑waves (gamma) energy, the realized E a priori of mc squared! Because of the rapid ac­cumulation of data defining sub‑atomic `particles’ makes clear a certain expected `merge process’ of heavy hydrogen’s neutron for its meson/beta counter‑parts‑‑ the key to fully controlled fusion is now seen. Imports we found essential for this actually simple process‑‑ as Fleishmann and Pons noted at the U of Utah, makes the stark realization that practical fusion is close enough now to file for Patent. To this end we seek aid so will discuss now most of the details of our long theoretical study, now confident will end the current pollution problem as bring low cost energy. We obviously seek some large concern to aid us in this so great a venture, more for our `defense’ than their profit!

From aerospace computer R&D to independent theoretical studies, a couple terse disclosures (over) might define our efforts. Since finding tapped phones as other surveillance means on our office it so dictates personal communicative means‑‑ without saying more here. A few knowledgeable of our extensive research are being made available for initial conferences at this time. Should this brief note evoke your interest, please advise so we may consider a stop by for some confidential discussions. There is no question now that it is the theoretics which are stalling fully developed controlled fusion‑‑ and to any rate.

Very Sincerely,

KTS

CC: T. Lovejoy; M. Trexler, Oak Grove, Jap.Dev.B; D/Z

10/7/94
Pritchard and DiFilippo, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA 02139
Sirs:
Might anti‑g be the problem? To believe that gamma radiation has weight instead of anti‑g on an absorbed neutron makes the differ­ence unwanted in Physics. The 5th force as 5th Generation computer will not be afforded to be believed in‑‑ as would up set tweaked reality in two ways! (over)
`Radiation has force not weight in the static sense of the time oriented (for `mass’) three‑phased quark!’
`The electron technically should not have weight in one angle of inspection, only the quark where a trefoil shaped or compound­ed configuration prevails.’
`Could the electron’s `weight’ be ambiguous if half were at right angles to those trying to weigh a group of them or riding on a hydrogen atom undefined in direction of spin?’

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

9/2/94
Bertold Schoch, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Bonn
Bonn, Germany
Re: EM standing waves (“The Stuff of‑‑”
SCIENCE NEWS, Aug. 27,’94)
Dear Sir:

Noting your plea for theorists aid, maybe it is time to define matter as EM standing waves to unravel what got raveled near the genetic white‑hole cores of quasars. Between the first harmonic standing wave lepton and its next 3‑phase cousin of three quarks, the entire billiard‑ball empire of modern physics will crumble‑‑ yet permit a vast new physics with and a very much unwanted end of tenure. As Zukav so named his last chapter of his “Dancing WuLi Masters”, indeed, that time has come‑‑ even if the positive EPR experiment defines the 5th Generation self thinking computer.

Our silence these past several years defines the larger project now near completion‑‑ which the petroleum cartels will not appre­ciate. (when we do define definitively) Our problem is with the colluding Patent offices, Paris convention or not‑‑ where might makes right‑‑ not priority data or long R&D efforts to relieve a polluted planet of its energy needs. Factitious would be to say “simple” as indeed it is‑‑ and prr controllable to any extent!

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

CC: T. Walcher; F. Gross;
T. Walcher, et.al.
Dept. of Physics University of Mainz
Mainz, Germany

F. Gross, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
College of William and Mary
Williamsburg, VA 23185

9/26/94
Editors for OMNI and
George Zebrowski
OMNI Publishers
New York, NY 10023‑5965
Re: “Time‑‑ Clock” article
Sirs:

To be terse:

Time could not have come first as depends on matter, yet matter came from E as condensed standing EM waves‑‑ that E with the innate energy to evoke someTHING, as reducing its universal a priori magnetic flux‑‑ on nice 600 billion light‑year bubbles in its space all at once to initiate time. Once the said standing waves (electron first harmonic, quarks third) condensed out at quasar interference points riding those EMP bubble fronts (we call matter; even billiard balls) the question remaining is how did the Zen master clap his one hand on all those 600 billion light‑year intervals all at once unless He did not have time‑‑ to allow space to be first? All the rest of the scenario is simple.

Reichenbach’s idea of time being more fundamental that space defines his intellectual id using his reductive (not insightive) left cerebral hemisphere instead of his non‑temporal right that offers insight‑‑ which Plato called the Potentia too adroitly. IQ is a second derivitive of CQ or that Potentia, yet incapable of perceiving from where time came as it was created within it‑‑ as its complemental space Apriori that it seeks to deny up to death. This defines mankind’s late neurosis in science, religion and politics, for his grand ethnic cleansing now getting underway.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: 3‑dev(over); Phys‑Psy; Path/IQ; S‑T
CC: D/Z

Jan. 26,’94
M. J. Lyons, et.al.
Dept. of Life Sciences
New York Institute of Technology
New York, NY
Re: origins and petite `Bangs’ Dear Sir:
Your remarks evokes this terse note since might mean something without too much needed explanation here.

From predicting the complemental matter expelled from primal quasars with disk‑jets (before the Einstein observatory confirmed same) but from using Einstein’s “blunder” of denied complemental gravity, one Big Bang became many petite ones riding an EMP front as now called “bubbles” by Huchra, et.al. In short, matter is but standing waves which not only defines current nuclear physic’s dilemma but defines the likely route to fully develop controlled fusion for nearly any application.

Since mind is indeed over matter, your remark was adroit that the Apriori needs comprehension for the balance of man’s scientific enigmas, especially the coming self thinking interface which can utilize the freed electron.(over) This device, well proven, has evoked much trouble since trying to patent same but may well soon evoke far more trouble as may be mankind’s panacea to escape its less than benign complemental‑‑ often noted in religious dogma.

Hopefully the herewith evokes more interest than anxiety‑‑

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

1/28/94
Ahmed Zewail, et.al.
Dept. of Chemistry
Noyes Hall
Caltech
Pasadena, CA 91125
Re: Taubes’ “Femtoland” (Feb. DISCOVER)
Dear Sir:

Are your `exact’ 12 (11?) sample impulses summing to offer the net “escape” energy of Na from I? Granting such precise amount, the only other mode would be decoupling a quark third‑phased loop as co‑shared (with electrons)‑‑ as a neutron with a proton. The standing‑wave reality of billiard‑ball matter will shake up much of physics, especially on how to unravel same for gamma outputs‑‑ as the cold fusion data inferred. We fear that Mendeleeff was far closer to reality than most want to think‑‑ for tenured comfort.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

Jan. 1, 1994
Re: fusion energy development
Sirs:
With the current data defining the means to evoke and sustain fusion, it is merely a matter of what
is now believed a few con­firming ways and means to guide standing wave `matter’ to mutual `unraveling’ to offer its a priori clean gamma radiation for heat in large amounts. Because of the definitive control now assured, even to very small rates, it is a matter of developing ceramic fusion chamber/boilers for modes of transferring high heat to useful power applications.

Obviously not yet defining a long R&D effort over the past twenty years, the Utah `cold fusion’ data defined the final link and mode to which poly‑phased standing wavelet “matter” configuration permits the ease of comprehending its net unraveling action to return to open‑ended linear radiation. From predicted disk versus jet quasar emissions of quasars (astronomy) well before being confirmed by the aloft Einstein observatory, defined the creation of `matter’, so its reversed action defines the underlying funda­mentals to fusion.

We are seeking those with vested interests in electric automotive drives, even in some ways duplicating the Stanley Steamer which proved itself well able to serve with efficiency. Since the likelihood of battery or solar energizing means has taken a back seat in development, it is felt that finalized controlled fusion is the next order of R&D, especially with the environmental pollu­tion now posing a major threat to cities.

After doing aerospace computer R&D for the US government, a leng­thy study into the a priori conditions of space‑time parameters, with conclusions of matter creation via pinched EMP fronts to predict the quasar genesis of matter as standing waves, so an en­lightening specter from cosmic EMP bubbles through poly‑phased EM standing‑wavelet `matter’ became comprehensible. From this, the realized mode of controlled fusion became apparent as the inverse function of matter genesis in quasar cores, riding those said EMP fronts. It is felt that only a few definitive R&D imports will permit the exploitation of this very needed source of energy now.

If interested in perusing this research further, but under confi­dential wraps, please advise in writing to the below officer.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

12/7/94
Halton Arp, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Max Planck Inst.
Garching, W. Germany
Re: standing waves
Dear Halton:

We think it is time that your physics people (Walther) perceive the obvious. Since the persistent gyrations yet (SC. AM. Dec. “The Duality‑‑”) to define the finite standing wave electron as first harmonic (quarks as third) now makes far more sense, maybe now is the time. We have denied this information exposure until we figured out fusion (which is truly very simple, second laugh!) but find
to our chagrin un‑Patentable, even elsewhere with the Paris convention‑‑ such fate awaiting our government’s whimsical discretion or `eradication’ (as over)‑‑ whatever the cost! Sever­al foreign Patent people these last couple years all said the same‑‑ as believed experts (as ex‑examiners) here. So this note, and maybe a request to move over there at this late hour as you wisely did! If the federal government cannot have what they want, they may revert back to Socrates’ “therapy” for the too noisy!

At least this will allow the tenured billiard‑ball syndrome to conclude as comprehension of the core of physics is at hand, even what jumps the time reversal paradigm‑‑ evoking all of the terror to begin with! I suspect you know where it came‑‑ via the quasar‑jet prediction I made before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove it‑‑ which in turn unraveled the whole scenario‑‑ even got Feynman, Heisenberg, Wigner and others like you to think a bit. So now the cat is out of its Planck bag, as the nice 600Bly cosmic EMP bubbles defines the Apriori’s clapped “one hand” (all over at the same non‑temporal instant) to bring us multi‑petite Bangs at once, yet the time thereafter for `foot‑stool’ occupiers as we to ponder that grand event‑‑ as objective! The dv/dt via Zeeman affect yet stands, as the slurred spectral `in‑phasing’ to make apparent coherent light by distance travel.

Merry Xmas‑‑ Sincerely,

KTS

P.S. No phone, TNC, modem or FAX‑‑ for unsaid obvious reasons.
Had mail “re‑routed” to even my secretary 100 miles away‑‑ for an extra 4 day sojourn, while checked with simultaneous mail! Big Brother is here to stay‑‑ so hope this gets to you as will shake‑up things for the net good‑‑ if understood.

cc: 3‑dev (over)
CC: D/Z

12/14/94
L. D. Barron, et.al.
Dept. of Chemistry
University of Glasgow
Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom
Re: CPG not T! (Asymmetry)
Dear Sir: (SCIENCE; 2 Dec.’94)

After confirmation of the right angled spewing jets versus disk prediction with the aloft Einstein Observatory, anti‑gravity‑‑ as Newton might have discerned is that `force’ made visible in its more empirical form. Since this complementarity, not time (as merely extends from unity to infinity with a single arrow) offers a chiral molecule versus its complemental achiral. It defines its dislike (as two of the phases of the `top’ quark standing‑wave trefoil) in this galaxy’s gravitational field with a different potential energy thus explain your chiral/achiral potential ener­gy dichotomy.

Not oddly, the temporal existence of unraveling between the two different mesons makes clear the simplicity of fusion‑‑ almost as the EPR confirmation to drive the self thinking (5th Generation)
computer via the freed electron. (over)

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

CC: D/Z

11/13/94
P. Fischer and
J. A Tyson, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
AT&T Bell Labs
Murray Hill, NJ 07974
Re: `ejecti”? “Matter of Gravity”, indeed!
SC. NEWS Oct. 29th (as my unanswered
Dear Sirs: July 8th, ’91 letter to Tyson)

Maybe your Q2345 pair have anti‑g there‑between? At least funda­mental physics defines, as Einstein called his great blunder to renege on complemental forces as gravity also the need to rescind the General Relativity theory, now that primal interference on a cosmic EMP bubble’s front with quasars defines complemental mat­ter with said anti‑g, spewing at right angles such initial first harmonic standings waves (complemental electrons) to third har­monic quarks later, while the speedy jets to accumulate as shadow matter clouds now seen making the bursters with their mutual col­lisions out beyond the galaxy disk.

What you may be examining are two complemental matter galaxies with anti‑g there‑between and riding the same cosmic EMP bubble, as most other `cluster’ groups. The real question is do they all face outward to the bubble and rotate in the same relative direc­tion to define the electrons or ion ejecti, so the noted spin‑up in their dense primal pinched magnetic field?

The real `crunch’ coming is in our tenured elite’s prestigious offices who have all their `billiard balls’ in that same single Big bang `basket’, which was multiple on nice 600Bly separations, before mass‑for‑time began! Sorry.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

P.S. As for my initial letter for CCDs a few years ago for an­other X‑Y plot CCD need, it appears that Wang, et.al. at Berkeley (letter copy herewith as self thinking interface) may have yet a better idea‑‑ and the FBI has not yet managed to get me (or my researchers) neuroleptized yet! It is too late now anyhow. We need a vast `ethnic cleansing’ in this country‑‑ to get back some rational reasoning with our right brain, that Einstein learned to use so eloquently.

cc: Path/IQ; Phys‑Psy; 3‑dev; Wang‑let
CC: D/Z

11/22/94
Gerald Fishman
Gamma Ray Observation Div.
NASA
Marshall Space Flight Center
Huntsville, AL 35812
Re: thunder‑head gamma bursts
Dear Sir:

Could you direct me to further spectral density and frequencies of the recently observed gamma flashes associated with definitive atmospheric weather disturbances? The term “sizzles” infers broad spectrum rf bursts but if associated with gamma, how might the rf be generated? Many thanks for your guidance.

Sincerely,

KTS

12/11/94
Wendy Freedman, et.al,
The Carnegie Inst.
Dept. of Astronomy
813 Santa Barbara
Pasadena, CA 91101
Re: re‑calibration for dv/dt
W. Freedman, et.al. (Jan. ’95 DISCOVER; “‑‑ So Young”)

Are you deducting the red‑shift `speed’ from the pulsation rate of your Cepheids? All EM propagation falls under the `knife’ of dense magnetic fields as the dv/dt red shift “anomaly” itself. A quasar most defines this enigma when riding its fresh primal EMP cosmic bubble front, that Huchra et.al. perceived, albeit the net red shift there makes obvious its not contingent with much `in­nate’ velocity‑‑ so the real question now is how anti‑g* between complemental matters created at quasar/galaxy cores and spewed at right angles (disk to jets; predicted before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove it) defines net speed out there when it is the bubble speed than needs consideration.
Likely even more important now is “Who” clapped their one hand on nice 600Bly intervals across this universe (petite Bangs) to get things started before there was any “matter” (quantized standing waves) and so time (via the 3‑phased quark) to make that vast event maybe a `one time'(without time) thing!

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch
* Eintein’s `blunder’ for complemental g‑forces, for listening to Bohr (as for EPR!)

CC: D/Z; Illingworth

11/1/94

Gentlemen:

With the recent discovery of the sub‑atomic `particle’ in detail as a rather simple item yet not understood yet by Physics, how­ever close they now are to perceiving the obvious, the advent of fully controlled fusion power is now understood and so an inevit­able development. Because we are a theoretical research organiza­tion we seek the attention and aid to fully exploit this profound and greatly needed system.

We will divulge our findings under company confidential status only, recognizing even the Paris Convention for Patent applica­tion holds little water without vast resources behind such filing party. If interested, qualified personnel might meet with the few we now license to discuss this truly profound break‑through. Do not bother trying to find our facility before writing (only) and have some administrative officer initial your letter before send­ing it to us. We will call you based on conference determination.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

w:
CC: D/Z;
DEMA; EMA; AMEM; SES; ASEE: MVMA; MEMA; EFNS; NSA; NUMARC; SAFE;
Briggs and Stratton; Kohler Mfg., Lomart Ind.

11/19/94
Jerry Bona, et.al.
Dept. of Mathematics
Pennsylvania State University
University Park, PA 16802
Re: EMPs and solitons
Dear Sir: (Dec.’94 DISCOVER; “Lone Wave”
Freedman’s article comes too close to reality‑‑ albeit the many very close theories from cross academic opinion makes clear a vast “paradigm shift” (Kuhn) is in the making with at last SGUT (Super Grand Unified Theory)!

Silence here after evoked consternation with the 5th Generation self thinking device (freed electron interface; over) made clear that authority was in no mood to allow such an item in public view. Ensuing studies after Pons Fleischmann (U/Utah) made clear the net `fusion’ process and so solitons
became our chief study‑‑ defining our theoretical Apriori predictions; quasar disk‑jets, long before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to `see’ them!

In short, a letter copy herewith from a few years back may aid to define our position these most `heady’ days, where instated pet­roleum “people” as vast cartels demand no efficient fusion‑‑ even if Princeton is `advertising’ now for the ultility’s to back them (likely seeing the writing on the wall!) that fusion is indeed very simple (!) once `matter’ is fully understood. Because of the near proximity of the obvious now do we make a few remarks open­ly‑‑ however hazardous we now find. Because we feel your work is indeed seminal, it should be integrated a bit further (as with Astronomy) to bring SGUT‑‑ as Freedman’s fine article suggests.

Max Planck saw the quantized soliton (first harmonic standing wave, as third quark) but the Initiator on nice 600Bly intervals across this universe for cosmic `linear’ bubbles to evoke quasars (Huchra) and so temporal existence. It makes clear a vast compre­hensible paradigm is at last in the offing.

Sincerely,

KTS

cc: Ashtekar let; Q‑’70>
CC: D/Z; A. Newell; A. Scott; Freedman

11/12/94
R. A. Mathies, et.al.
Dept. of Chemistry
University of California Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720
Re: rhodopsin; cocked or fired?
Dear Sir:

Your remarks in the “quick snap” (Oct. 29th SC. NEWS) article did appear clear but some lingering question might be clarified as to what frequency of light `charged’ (if known) the rhodopsin mole­cule and which discharged it‑‑ or is only the conical `rod’ type examined‑‑ to suggest the trigger to discharge a variable?

Since the pre‑programming of the fetal brain before birth is almost constant REM dream data, such fully developed visual sys­tem as occipital cortex portion would imply the dark realm (as we might suspect) but where the freed electron does its greatest work. (note the EPR experiment) This net scenario in turn sug­gests the second version of the 5th Generation, likely the 6th self thinking `interface’ computer (over) of which the CCD has been explored. Obviously Nature’s means and mode are most efficient‑‑ as your chemistry department amply implies.

We would appreciate your feed‑back in this matter to better in­vestigate the `newer’ ramifications contingent to your work.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: 3‑dev(over); Phys‑Psy; Wang‑let;
CC:D/Z
w:

11/4/94
W. I. McLaughlin, et.al.
Dept. of Space Astrophysics
Jet Propulsion Labs
Pasadena, CA 91125
Re: Zeno’s paradox
Dear Sir: (Nov. Scientific American)

Zeno’s paradox defined a left brain dominant that could not take a look into their right brain’s dynamics! In short; all epistemo­logical reasoning requires the two complemental space versus time derived bilateral mental faculty, even if one refuses to believe the other is there‑‑ with its narrow (non‑spatial) mindedness!

Plato’s Potentia as that non‑temporal dynamic knowing right brain (as the freed electron’s escape from the time reversal paradigm) as defines the EPR experiment. (as my 5th Generation interface; over) Terror reigns supreme in authority who want their skeletons kept hidden, so the pending trauma in claimed civilized cultures when the empirical obvious gets unleashed, likely soon now! The unseen fractal continuum, each with volition, make the Japanese Pachinko game feasible (with enough `suck’‑‑ not luck), even Ouija boards as many psychic phenomena a reality now fooling UFO buffs. The pending `wash’ (as ethnic cleansing) may clear the air in more than one way for the millennium the dogmas spoke of.
Hume saw through our 2D left brain’s ruse as demands dominance* over its manipulated conscious mind (midbrain; RAS) which contin­ues today with a vengeance‑‑ but for yet unsaid profit margins!

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

* `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67 note:
Goleman, D.; `Vital Lies, Simple Truths’,’86
Jaynes, Julian `The Origen of Consciousness and the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind’ (Princeton)

cc: Phys‑Psy; Path/IQ
CC: D/Z;

12/15/94
Steve Nadis
c/o OMNI Pulishers
New York, NY 10023‑5965
Re: addressing plus
Dear Sir:

Aside from please forwarding the herewith (I can’t find him), the two articles of your’s evokes this note.

Briefly, AI (Brainstorming) is here with the freed electron and a minimum of soft‑ware.(over) Secondly, “senseless‑‑” (Mind) is not so once the human evolved (temporal IQ) is fully understood*. One could add that more appalling is APA’s (Psychiatry) lead in sui­cide of all professionals best defines Freud’s found Thanatos (as our personal Minotaur) as about to be revealed empirically to the yet naive (censored) human conscious mind (mid‑brain; RAS) now facing reality to evoke humanity’s worst.

You may check into the herewith but on the QT. My encounters with authority since doing aerospace computer R&D has gone far enough.

Many thanks for the `forwarding service’!

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

* S‑T; Path/IQ; herewith
cc: 3/dev(over);
CC: D/Z

12/19/94
NPR Radio
635 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20001‑3753
Re: today’s William’s syndrome; (less Sirs: circulatory blood = less sympathetic CNS)

Well done, except the explanation of the mind’s problem. To sug­gest answers to mental anomalies without mentioning their genesis maybe defines the greater mental illness of Psychology today‑‑ avoiding any empirical data however obvious. This syndrome all of science suffers, holding their status quo for tenure, no more.
The William’s syndrome can be understood by the lacked left cere­bral participation as its lack of definitive spatial awareness (lost) as little social fear with intrepedness. They should be very creative in non‑temporal ways as in music, yet lack again that definitive artistic ability required for drawing. You left unsaid the likelihood of little temporal orientation as keeping track of time since it is
irrelevant in their psychological make‑up. To ask one to peruse Einstein’s Special Relativity equations to define those bilateral space‑time complemental minds is equal­ly futile also at this late claimed civilized hour.

The underlying neurosis, well noted in those who lead in suicide (of all professionals as APA‑‑ Psychiatric) better indicates what Freud meant when he said that at least one unconscious wills to remain UNconscious‑‑ and at all cost, according to the currently realized left brain control of `killer cells’* for AiR (Autoim­mune Response)‑‑ as Freud’s found “Thanatos” or death‑wish.

Since the human split‑brain data says it all**, maybe mass ethnic cleansing is our common fate‑‑ not oddly due to academic program­med “might makes right” with fight‑flight (sympathetic CNS) left cerebral IQ dominance. It may suggest best man’s next evolutional phase will indeed be more interesting‑‑ even if then in a benign way. Oh well‑‑

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
** `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
and `The Others Side of the Brain’, J.E. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.

cc: Phys‑Psy; Path/IQ
CC: D/Z

11/5/94
Jim Schefter, et.al.
Attn: “Readers Talk Back”
Popular Science
2 Park Ave., New York, NY 10016
Re: “DNA Fingerprints‑‑”
Sir:

It will soon be seen that it is not the constitutional (body) DNA that will be the wanted fingerprint but the mtDNA, from where our psychological perversion comes. One might corner the body but not the perpetrating mind of any culprit so the definitive need of reading out mitochondrion DNA will `finger’ the only one.
Darwin was only partially correct even if his Granddad appears to have only goaded his interest into physiological differences of a living specie. A closer examination of the religious bent of the Darwins indicates a deep curiosity in the Creator’s will‑‑ and likely why the more `static’ religions preferred Charles be­ing silenced with any ruse. Ritual has a way of stagnating all of science, especially today where the empirical is avoided for most wanted continued tenure and wanted academic esteem.
To follow back to `Lucy’ on the African plains for our mtDNA derivation makes for an awesome import, especially in those `pla­teaus’ of apparent peaceful coexistence, yet defines the lack of mental
evolution in various epochs in human history. If indeed it is Nature’s intent to mentally evolute a mind over time, obvious­ly the body’s DNA needs to be modified to fit the specie’s pen­chant and environment, but that is merely the `mechanical’ abode for a more valuable faculty which is temporarily housed therein. The one great taboo yet is what McDougal uncovered at Harvard with a finite mass‑loss at the body’s death‑‑ but religion again objected as their turf was being upset‑‑ as it was with Darwin.
Science and religion now are the two greatest hazards to man’s existence‑‑ but due to their neurotic stance towards the empiri­cal obvious, like government wanting the status quo, whatever the cost! The real trauma coming will correct this as is yet in the wings of scientific discovery‑‑ now terrorizing authority. A tip of this `iceberg’ lies in the positive EPR experiment. (over)
In short; confidence games get mostly played on an unconscious level, where mtDNA bargains for relative profit. When 1/5th own 4/5ths of what constitutes `civilized’ wealth, it becomes obvious that intellectual manipulative stealth has gone too far since it is dubious that those 1/5th could even hoe corn! This is what our rutty academia is doing to us so deserve ethnic cleansing! Sorry.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: Path/IQ; 3‑dev(over)
CC: D/Z

12/10/94
D. Richstone, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Re: M87 core angular velocity
Dear Sir:

The extreme rotational speed Holland is seeing is intriguing in view of another theory of quasar/galaxy formation in primal EMP cosmic bubbles riding vast magnetic fields to rev up ionized matter. Of the inner disk portions of such core, maybe the primal first harmonic standing‑wave electrons, to cool into three phased quarks as protons with reversed polarity to slow their rotational speed‑‑ even reverse same a bit further out. Some early galaxy configurations suggest such anomaly. Someone will need to soon differentiate quark based gas from electrons since they are not the same when a magnetic field propels them for their spin‑up.
Maybe someday the contra twist of ejected jet matter will help to define not only their anti‑g effect but ionized polarity relative to the disk matter as Biretta sees. Anyway, it would appear ludi­crous that the EMP, even as universal background magnetic flux will be `observed’, as any conjecture as to who clapped their one hand on nice 600Bly intervals to start all those cosmic bubbles!

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch
CC: Ford; Harms;

12/8/94
M. Ross, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Re: new `engine’
Dear Sir:

Your Scientific American article implies petroleum usage until we all choke to death‑‑ even while the huge break‑through now in physics defines the ease, safety and actually simple means to get fusion in ANY finite `flash‑boiler’ that would easily fit into an auto’s trunk. The days of the Stanley Steamer are coming back and may be with a vengeance‑‑ since oil cartels (as past big‑whigs) fight this one out now with the scientific obvious! Much of the current engine design, albeit likely 2 stroke radial (steam)‑‑ integral wheel hub design (4 for cars with computerized control) and larger stackable multiples with coupled cranks, may be the coming standard for all `packaged’ power plants. Can’t say more here.

Sorry if this offends, but shortly German researchers will break the news‑‑ as are safer than to do it here!

Sincerely (really!),

KTS REsearch

CC: D/Z; DeCicco

12/12/94
R.R. Hemminghaus, Dir., et.al.
c/o Southwestern Public Service Co.
P.O. Box 1261
Amarillo, TX 79170
Re: information in lieu of Proxy Vote
Sir:

Noting your qualifications in the current SPS report, I send a copy (over) of a terse recent letter indicating what Pons with Fleischmann started at U/Utah a few years back, which may suggest some needed fresh considerations coming.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: Ross/let

11/12/94
Q. Wang and C. Shank, et.al.
Dept. of Chemistry
Berkeley University
Berkeley, CA 94720
Re: the `bridge’ to the non‑temporal
Dear Sirs: (Oct. 29; SC.NEWS; “‑‑Quick Snap”)

Your work with rhodopsin is both unique and seminal! While sus­pecting some very fast key explained the REM dream `connection’ for gestalt imagery on the retina, your data defines now the second R&D phase of the self thinking computer, likely the 6th Generation for X‑Y plot instead of serial digitized words. (over) Of course some S.T. `occipital’ memory system would be needed for inter‑staging the net process until filed into a L.T. memory.No doubt rather than using `cones’, at least for astronomy, a series of rapid switching filters could discern the net frequencies on incoming light‑‑ as red‑shift time expansion discernment.

To incorporate this molecule (in some protein) in the CCD array would certainly conclude the alternate route to using insight‑‑ that faculty only now noted in the “un‑censored” (Freud) or less neurotic intellectual, too well programmed now by academia to re­main a merely temporally oriented reductive intellectual!

Here reminded of a quip but a bit reworded for some scientific dissemination; `The advantage Nature has is time, or the relative lack of it, with the speed that rhodopsin switches at 200 femto­seconds on the retina to permit Nature’s opportunity to say some­thing as in REM dream‑‑ between its 200msec verbal complemental!’

Again, thanks for the `key’‑‑ even if it was suspected!

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: Phys‑Psy; 3‑dev (over)
CC:D/Z
w:

12/10/94
H. Yilmaz, et. al.
Dept. of Electro‑Optics Tufts University
Medford, MA 02155
Re: complemental forces
Sir:
But Bohr was the fly in another ointment where the EPR experiment defined a faculty faster than light, and far more important than the half erred General Relativity theory lacking one half of the force’s reality that Newton saw clearly! Matter’s standing wave nature could unlock many enigmas yet, even simple filly controll­ed fusion to any extent‑‑ but there is no money for tenure in that revelation‑‑ to say profits for petroleum cartels!

Using such error, perceived the cosmic EMP bubble (Huchra) as evoking quasars or galaxies long before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove them. The import is old hat, beyond the auth­orized tenure seeking. There are times one must leave the offi­cialized to accomplish anything worth the R&D effort, to which Einstein himself well noted with Bohr.

The really big question is `who’ clapped their one hand on nice even 600Bly intervals all over this universe at once‑‑ before any time with matter was created? Most interesting is the electron’s escape of the time reversal paradigm which offers the link to so communicate with the non‑temporal!(over)

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: Phys‑Psy; 3‑dev(over)
CC: Alley; D/Z

12/14/94
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, et.al.
Republican/California
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC
Re: too late! (Omni 1st Word)
Dear Sir:

Your remarks are well taken, but nothing will budge this govern­mental sponsored Patent Office when a greater profit is seen for the federal system. Either “secret” or foot‑dragging, if not “re­jection” of what they cannot comprehend (over) makes clear their unsaid intentions. When laws are made by thieves bent on might makes right, one can bet which way their winnings go. Maybe after our ethnic cleansing gets completed‑‑ we can start over again!

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: Path/IQ; S‑T CC: D/Z

4/18/95
D. Awschalom, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of California
Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Re: “constructive particles”‑‑?
Dear Sir: (“Complex Dynamics‑‑” 4/95 Physic Today)

Maybe words like structure and particle as “billiard balls” needs to be evaded now to return to theory, recognizing all matter (mi­cro, meso or mega) IS magnetic, so vorticies, ripples, feathers or what have you, we only perceive standing waves‑‑ our a priori after a cosmic EMP bubble front tumbles to create quasars to show them in some astronomical retrospective view.

From predicting the jets/quasar disk cooling into a galaxy before the Einstein observatory went aloft made quite clear the Apriori was magnetic, and what It evoked in linear waves `all at once’ on nice 600Bly intervals across the universe made clear no time then existed, yet a spatial orientation with rather obvious volition! An ensuing study back then even predicted the 5th Generation self thinking interface computer (over) with the freed electron‑‑ if indeed the then planned EPR experiment was positive. It was, and all that‑‑ especially the terror in tenured authority since!

What Heisenberg saw as the first harmonic electron’s escape (at right angles!) of the time reversal paradigm‑‑ as Faraday saw to ask adroit questions about right angle displacement, was begging the ultimate question that theology should have asked but could not yet about any Apriori. The key to time as begotten with the quark in Kelvin temperature defines the third phase standing wave, its two kinds with `elastic’ lobes, one of the top quark appearing as highly massive (G‑force) doesn’t want to be on this koino‑matter galaxy, anti‑G (Einstein’s blunder!) is reality, as supposed complemental forces in all ways existed, the above said jets escaping the disk at right angles, posthaste, for the shadow matter unseen but believed out there‑‑ creating bursters.

Kuhn’s paradigm shift is upon us‑‑ if the tenured could awaken!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc:Phys/Psy; S‑T; 3/dev(over)
CC: D/Z; Shor

3/22/95
N. Dinshaw and C. B. Foltz, et.al.
Multiple Mirror Telescope
Stewart Observatory and the Santa Catalina Labs. for Astronomy,
attn: H.A. Hill
Tucson, AZ 85721
Re: jet‑cloud configuration?
Dear Sir: (SC.AM. April ’95; “‑‑in the dark”

Noting the dark‑matter cloud formation data, only the net config­uration as derivational local galaxy (once ejecting quasar) now be discerned. Since anti‑g was suspected as forming the two jet ejecti long before the Einstein Observatory defined same, it be­comes rather obvious that Einstein’s `blunder’ (Gen. Rel.) allow­ed many in astronomy (as top quark observers) to fail in their comprehension of such `force’ yet called gravity‑‑ to say little of its complemental kind evoking the disk to jet configuration.

Realizing no reply will be forth‑coming, please examine the very likely `nozzle’ shape at one end of these large still bubbles of primal mass, as their likely placement beyond their derivational galaxy. It might enlighten late astronomy to begin their needed final comprehension of EMP evoked cosmic bubbles and its tumbling wave fronts creating standing‑wave `matter’ of complemental kind.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: AURA; U/AZ/Phys; D/Z;
Assoc. of Universities for
Research in Astronomy
Ste. 701
1625 Massachusetts Ave.
Washington, DC 20036

3/25/95
Carl Lathrop
108 Garfield Ave.,
Madison, NJ 07940‑2734
Re: steam engine tech/data
Dear Sir:

Joe Rice (“Live Steam” Editor) suggested you as most wise in the steam engine design area. He was more than willing to enter some ad query for me but admitted you as the most aware in the field.

Briefly, a couple of my engineers need some cursory data on what occurred in the small steam engine R&D fields before internal combustion engines took over. My GrandDad’s engineering books do show engineering practice as test models etc., but no completed design with true test results yet much turbine design and effi­ciency design parameters with little piston, single and/or double acting data. While not a lost art, there must be some source where specific data can be acquired, however old‑‑ such as say between 10 and 100 BHP, as what was optimal steam pressures as torque curve data in those units, especially as for variable speed needed engines as the Stanley Steamer’s. Because turbine application may well suit locomotive needs as electrical power generation needs, the dynamic variables of automotive applica­tions makes the likely coming return to the closed circuit steam driven piston engines very prudent. Thus this inquiry.

The reason may appear bizarre, but some lengthy studies into the Pons Fleischmann `fusion’ enigma
quite well defined the underly­ing operants for fully controlled fusion via lasers‑‑ so the above said wanted data to meet the coming `need’‑‑ we believe!

Any names, places or archival data sources would be appreciated. A SASE herewith for some replay would be greatly appreciate. Many thanks for some of your expertise!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: SASE
CC:Rice; D/Z

4/10/95
Carl Lathrop
108 Garfield Ave.,
Madison, NJ 07940‑2734
Re: latent heat versus enthalpy
Dear Carl:

Many thanks for your 4/3/95 letter. As you might note, there are many variables yet‑‑ obviously. Much technical data here would almost appear irrelevant now but flash‑boilers with hopefully water to absorb (for re‑fractionating) heavy H (un‑`burned’) may dictate the real efficiency when the percentage of the 100,000 to one hydrocarbon fuel energy availability might come close. With­out detailing the `mechanics’, as are too close now to realiza­tion, a high latent heat would likely be good since finite prr control for fusion rate would likely be dictated by pressure, within a closed loop to define fuel consumption at any moment of time with need power. The feasibility study has gone quite successfully so far but no doubt bugs lay waiting for the stupid and unsuspecting! My EE can do little more than rudimentary mental processing (if that) but it is the feed‑back from those in the field that appear exciting.

Millisecond boiler chamber `wetting’ with prompt finite fusion cycle should generate high pressure‑temperature environment yet immediate condensate pool to absorb excess heat. (caloric) At low relative efficiencies, as you mentioned for the total “Carnot” cycle (equating boiler alone) may be beneficial since gamma radi­ation can be deleterious to all but some ceramics.(!) A few at first incredulous Patent people perked up when certain recently found `anomalies’‑‑ yet expected from early theoretical study be­came very clear in nucleon disintegration research, much as find­ing that top quark with what has a `fictitious’ heavy mass rais­ing heck in their billiard‑ball theories! In short, the once great enigma is actually quite simple‑‑ really.

Because the Patent Office has gone “first to file” and only the one’s with big bucks (as government, obviously) can complete the study‑‑ so close now, I fear saying too much until some European cohorts get their act together now. While will earn the inventor hemlock as in Socrates time (as oil cartels will fight!) this planet needs a breather from its mounting CO2 levels. It took over 35 years to get here so hope to hang in long enough to get to paid for it. The various engine (heat/work) part of the equa­tion
is where we are now extrapolating as you likely note, with the questions of best as most recent steam engine designs. I guy I knew who had a bunch of Patents also designed an automotive multi‑steam engine driven (4 two cylinder, one in each wheel hub) which today would be a `natural’ with computer control!

As likely inferred before, the key came from Einstein in a couple ways‑‑ to predicted the quasar/jets before they were seen only one. The anti‑g force in part explained same as anomalies in the quark, a believed six‑part `entity’ which is actually only three! This an unraveling phenomena defined the E top mc squared dichot­omy and so what Pons/Fleischmann saw at U/Utah calling it “cold fusion”. Indeed, the `coulombic barrier’ is far easier to beech, and with finesse, than was expected! Oh well, the tenured in power and authority now need their same dull rounds‑‑ in academia as in political circles‑‑ so others can move on‑‑ quietly, and maybe because the days of hemlock (Socrates) are not over!

Lets keep in touch, maybe we can do something together to cop this truly “wild one” which took so long to realize. In the mean‑time‑‑ please, confidentiality!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: D/Z
W:

4/20/95
T.P. Stecher, et.al.
UIT Dept.
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Greenbelt MD 20771
Re: Galaxy M101
Dear Sir:

Another `collision’? A bit more scrutiny might define the comple­mental primal emission (via a priori cosmic EMP bubble) with that past fresh quasar on its disk’s other side‑‑ note compressed when compared with the said extended side‑‑ which at least infers its lateral relative jet proximity (note bent sombreros yet balanced skew) with anti‑g. This `enigma’ (yet) allowed for the prediction of the jets vs. disk long before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove same. Einstein himself `blundered’ all right‑‑ but where tenured (Bohr) hold power and so sway opinion. Einstein’s first suspicion was correct that ALL forces are complemental so the twisted half truth of his General Relativity theory torments us yet‑‑ to say little of the top quark’s unhappiness down here‑‑ yet believed has some `positive’ g‑force!

What soon will make astronomy `scratch’ will be to realize the nice 600Bly intervals between those cosmic EMP bubbles‑‑ and how one hand might clap them into existence‑‑ all at once since time could not exist back then before there was matter (as standing waves)‑‑ tumbling at the EMP front
at some typical quasar radii!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: D/Z

(PERSONAL)
3/8/95
Tom

With fusion so near‑‑ really, the consideration of steam engines becomes of paramount interest, maybe not as the Stanley Steam de­sign but maybe more practical small ones, then very large `gang­able ones for likely multiples of hundreds, even thousands of horsepower needs. Turbines for constant run yet variable speed applications as non‑sync DC locomotive needs will likely be the major need as in the electrical AC power generating station.

Tyler says you are busy with MSU but should you find open time in the future, I would like to have a confidential chat, (the basic reason is because fundamental `matter’ is nearly understood now and already running with in laser propulsion (note current Scien­tific American) will open Pandora’s Box and finitely controlled cheap energy will get its start. Obviously I cannot say more but the theoretical basis was seen when predicting the anti‑matter ejecti jets from quasar poles‑‑ long before the Einstein Observa­tory went aloft to prove same!

Think about a possible liaison project to beat the hordes now not far from the pending stampede. If you get `home’ now and then I could come down then and meet you to yak a bit. Or come up with the Nerd as bored as he’d get!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

P.S. If you want some referential data (not too sensitive or `direct’) I could prevail.

CC: D/Z

4/11/95
H. C. von Baeyer
Dept. of Physics
William and Mary College
Williamsburg, VA 23185
Re: new jargon for old facts
Dear Sir: (May DISCOVER; “Wave of‑‑”)
Maybe it is time that your `subject matter’ (Ingrid Daubechies) peruse the first harmonic standing wave electron as a third tre­foiled quark in her numerical jargon of reductive reasoning.

To mix complemental aspects of perception (Escher), to say little of the right angled reasoning of Faraday, Fourier tried to equate the dynamics of same, as it appears said Ingrid does. She just might revolutionize wave mechanics enough to escape the billiard ball mentality of left cerebral dominance with stagnated science!

To mix in a bit of Psy‑‑ nothing rushes thought faster than the view of the gallows for a male, or a marriage for a female where survival is considered for the more normal woman‑‑ a contract for her `tenured’ existence. This becomes no anomaly in view of which cerebral hemisphere dominates which relative gender‑‑ as to what goads most of their reasoning in slow mass‑time‑‑ and men become sycophants but with more overt political promises!

Sincerely, (the bizarre one)

KTS Research

P.S: The coming direct tutoring of the benign of mind after the `paradigm shift’ will advance the willing far beyond all past human mental evolution, the exponential rate depending on how rapidly the curious can grasp concepts and ask the adroit ques­tions, using the yes/no answers via one version of the Self thinking interface. (over)

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; 3‑dev(over)
CC: D/Z

4/29/95
F. C. Adams and
R. Watkins, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 48103
Re: “‑‑Footsteps‑‑”; 4/22/95 SC.News
Sirs: (planetary spawning)
There is likely little correlation between seen outer galaxy matter coagulation anomalies and solar systems as inferred in the above article. Whereas spewed primal standing waves (matter) from the EMP vortex as quasar core `white holes’ at right angles thus disk matter from its complemental jet matter, the spin‑up due to ionized electrons (at first; thus outer disk angular velocities higher) makes clear the genetic holes initiate with a bang then dwindle to a whimper as our own galaxy’s core today. This places far more matter at the periphery of the galaxy disk that precipi­tating inner gas/matter later as where our solar system is. M101 is a case in point when scrutinized in UV light, even its complemental side’s `pinched’ state (as a sombrero), defining the prox­imity of a jet to that side with its anti‑g force. Gas/dust ac­cruing within a galaxy disk appears less affected by peripheral gravities so a more uniform coagulation ensues.

Someday astronomy will be able to note how close Einstein came in his admitted “blunder” in not pressing for the complemental force of gravity‑, as all other forces‑‑ as standing waves via the CPT theorem, even if time one way escape its paradigm shift. (over)

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: 3‑dev(over)
CC:D/Z; Lin
D. Lin, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of California
Santa Cruz, CA 95064

5/14/95
E. G. Adelberger, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Washington
Seattle, WA 98195
Re: “scientific mystery‑‑” (?)
Sir:

Maybe it is time to re‑examine that denied 5th force where the higher neutron containing somehow does not accelerate as fast above earth than within it! Not only define what certain quarks appear to have a vast `rest mass’ (via energy noted at their acceleration to escape this koinomatter galaxy.

Since Einstein’s “blunder” of complemental G defined the predict­ed `enigma’ of the jets versus spun‑up disk (due to the cosmic EMP flux) before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove same‑‑ yet remains the underlying greatest mystery of all, as the adherence of the billiard‑ball mentality in lieu of the obvious standing‑wave `matter’ makes clear the coming paradigm shift of Kuhn will in­deed be traumatic for many instated tenured pedants now where half‑truths reign supreme‑‑ as when Bohr overrode Ein­stein’s better opinions about Nature‑‑ to the erred General Rela­tivity theory. In short, the variables noted for G likely reflect proportionately the neutron density variable where one leg of its 3‑phased quark doesn’t belong on this galaxy.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Gillies; D/Z
G. T. Gillies, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, VA 22906

5/31/95
Sam M. Austin, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Michigan State U.
East Lansing, MI 48824
Re: 3‑phased quarks
Sir: (Halo Nuclei)

Your current SC. AM. article is almost unbearable‑‑ defining the quarks third harmonic standing wave‑‑ where its `strings’ should be rubber‑bands‑‑ and why a two phased (remainder) standing wave cannot last long before unraveling back to its open‑looped gamma state‑‑ as was `degenerated’ at quasars riding grand primal cos­mic EMPs‑‑ offering anti‑G for that believed great `mass’ of the top quark!

More unique are the first harmonic electrons which evade the time reversal paradigm with its shifted 90 degrees‑‑ to define the EPR experiments‑‑ rocking many boats now with Plato’s “Potentia”!

Obviously no more needs to be said here, but watch Europe as they unravel the means to fully controlled fusion now.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
w:

CC:D/Z

3/8/91
G. Gabrielse, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: anti‑g
Dear Sir:
Maybe anti‑g will not be seen well in this koinomatter galaxy, possibly not even the top quark where its phased relationship may offer the maximum “weight” to evade this continuum at all `cost’. Its three phased wave‑mechanics, underlying quantal `billiard‑ball’ reality, hopefully may soon be deciphered with the string‑loop theories‑‑ to conclude how close deBroglie came as well. The equivalent mass to relative g may never be resolved here, however large the E factor to prod mass to reveal itself in slow time.

Not oddly in view of `peer pressure’, Einstein was likely correct in using the complemental g‑constant‑‑ as got twisted as and for Big Bang, such cosmological constant one‑sidedness preventing the comprehension of ejected primal matters from quasar (white hole) cores. Not only the anti‑g factor
allowed us to predict the jet‑disk anomaly before the Einstein observatory went aloft, but the dv/dt red shift anomaly due to `tired light’ on traversing dense magnetic fields as the bubble EMP fronts, to aid quasar to galaxy genesis to begin with. When the disk radial speed was inverse to in‑falling expectations and obvious highly accelerated jet matter to be hopefully noted as dark‑matter clouds at galaxy poles‑‑ yet evoke gamma bursts as re‑coagulating collisions around the disk edge.

It will be interesting to note the magnetic field around those common bubble evolving quasar‑galaxies, especially newly formed bubbles, as well as the amount of red shift therewith seen, to define how young the Apriori (yet finite) bubble is. Its unique spatial orientation with others might define further what funda­mental mind lies behind our visible universe‑‑ to say little of what occupies our right cerebral cortex‑‑ now so well noted!

We note with happiness‑‑ albeit the chagrin of many others, that our terse explanation (sent to the Smithsonian many years) ago may be that final `straw’ to end Big Bang as other pet theories credence for the incessantly tenured.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc:Phys‑Psy; S‑T; PAST CONTINGENT LETTERS
CC: Adelberger/U/Wash.; Hughes/Los Alamos Labs

Feb. 25,’91
Richard F. Mushotzky, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Goddard Space Center
Greenbelt, MD 20771
Re: dark matter
Dear Sir:

The six times net matter indicated in the recent SC.NEWS did not reflect `where’ as contingent with the relative pole‑disk orien­tation of NGC 1399. Was there any net dichotomous lobe data at right angles of the disk configuration? Since our predicted jet‑disk anomaly confirmation (Einstein Obs.) years ago, (to satisfy mutual complemental matter anti‑g at genetic `white’ cores), pos­sibly some observed data might suggest the ejected jet matter might be noted far out‑‑ even with the ellipticals. While some evidence of gamma bursts near outer disk fringes may define re‑coagulation (collision) of the said jet matters (via mutual at­tractive g), we seek further data associated with dark matter.

Any directives to your published data will be appreciated, and/or comments to the above said matter‑‑ in two ways!

Sincerely,

KTS

3/27/91
Physics Today
Editors and B. Schwarzschild
335 East 45th
New York, NY 10017
Re: misplaced anti‑g
Dear Sirs: (1E1740.7‑2942 `annihilator’)

Maybe it is time to reconsider the dynamics of a white hole whose genetic spewing complemental matters (with anti‑g there between) might define, with some stray anomalous perturbation, how those primal electron‑positron combinations occur. By watching the different `places’ of these `great annihilators’ from time to time may define no such `massive’ black‑hole as responsible for the high 511 keV bursts, not directly associate with the galactic center. The likely couple light‑days may reflect one quantity of plasma interacting with its complemental, some `wobble’ in Sgr A’s white hole’s spewed matter could evoke the interaction in some possible periodic way, albeit likely not in some same spa­tial place as before‑‑ last noted as 1E1740.7‑2942.

Since using the anti‑g analogy to define the disk‑jets quasar phenomena many years ago, not only its confirmation via the Ein­stein observatory but ensuing expected anomalies as the EMP bub­ble front to enhance quasar core initiation. (Petite Bangs!) The magnetic field orientations of bubble (wall) fronts will tell that story.

Maybe Krumhensl’s quoting Paine (p.38; same March PHYSICS TODAY), says what many should be but can’t with eyes on the tenured prize and so to sustain the status quo in ever new mathematical jargon. To definitize wave machines by numerical infinitude (called quan­tum or whatever), it best defines late science’s self made cul de sac by its digital intellectual time oriented left cerebral dominance, with IQ instead of CQ.

There may be a good reason to suspect positronium where spin‑triplets (as 3 phased loops, strings, solitons, or what have you) may reflect that universal wave stability based upon the third harmonic‑‑ quarks no anomaly.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

June 6,’91
Lars Hernquist and
J. Barnes, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of California
Santa Cruz, 95064
Re: `exactly‑‑’? (star‑burst elliptics)
Dear Sirs: (NEWSWEEK: June 3; p.46)
But maybe anti‑g and so crowding from returning spewed jet matter pinches the two sides of the elliptical galaxy to force greater coagulation in that disk matter for star formation? Using the CPT theorem many years ago to define possible anti‑g, to make clear the predicted jet‑disk anomalies thereafter noted (as with the Einstein Observatory) that Big Bang was likely to get rescinded.

One wonders if you you started with a slightly different paradigm as anti‑g between ejected complemental matters from white genetic (instead of black) holes for quasar cores, a much different simu­lated picture would not emerge? It no doubt would fit our predic­tions again, and a reality that somehow gets blinded by tenure.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: Stephen Maran, Dept. of Astronomy
NASA; Goddard Space Center, Greenbelt Rd., Greenbelt, MD 20771

July 3,’91
Michael J. West, et.al.
Canadian Inst. of Theoretical
Astrophysics
Toronto, Ont. Canada
Re: `focussed’ rf as light?
Dear Sir: (SCIENCE NEWS, 6/22/91, p.396)

We have been seeking data which might conclude `bubble’ EMP with magnetic flux alignment for quasar jet orientation, might you be seeing this anomaly now? Any large `elliptical’ as appearing near the observational center we suspect could define the others near­by but on that bubble radius with differing net appearance.

The expected very high density magnetic fields near quasars (be­yond the said EMP bubble front) with a secondary shock wave, we suspect evoke the quasar for complemental matter genesis, the predicted jets versus disks (before the Einstein Observatory proved same) are created but separated sustained by anti‑g there‑between. The higher angular speeds of disks with radii appear to conclude our theory of white holes (not black) eject the two complemental matters from quasar cores, no Big Bang therefore. The ejection rates of their jet matter will likely be seen as shadow matter in huge pole plumes, likely re‑coagulating with mutual g around the periphery of the disk, likely the gamma bursters there already seen.

We suspect quasar jets aim alike with some more primal magnetic flux field and would like to see any evidence thereof. Should your work or others in the field of cluster alignment observation be able to define same as on bubble fronts as we expect (per cluster) we would appreciate some word or directives theretoo.

Sincerely,
KTS

KTS Research

Oct. 25,’91
John Gribbin, et.al.
c/o The New Scientist
Kings Reach Tower
Stamford St.
London, SE2 9LS, England
Re: singularity/e and white holes
Dear Sir: (28 Sept.’91; NEW SCIENTIST)

The `trap’ (in more than one way) of the black hole has befuddled the more likely fact of a white one since darkness holds time while light none. Also, g force (in complementarity) showed long before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove, the disk‑jet matters escaping each other (in haste!) to define huge clouds of anti‑matter surrounding the galaxy’s poles, likely re‑coagulating making gamma bursters etc. etc. The neat spacing of the genetic `bubbles’ at even intervals suggests someone (no‑thing) knew already what It is doing in space since those EMP fronts imply some `hand’ had clapped therein to get it started. Dense magnetic fields not only evoke complemental matter but make for `tired light’ (remember?), so Arp is not far from wrong in his complaint about Hubble distance. Further, those three‑phase nature of pre‑matter wavelets called quarks define no mass, as a neutron aboard a proton*. The Apriori magnetic field is where Physics should get started‑‑ just as Theology, however vehemently denied.

The greater `beast’ in computer simulation is the programmer with the wrong idea of reality to begin with. Maybe I should loan my `machine’ (Plato’s Potentia; note freed e in EPR experiments) so they could get something straight and restart their simulations for some more tenured status quos. Just yet it still is rocking our Patent Office, as officials holding same in limbo, 10 years!
With the coming deciphering of the H nucleon to define how to `merge’** two and more together via laser propulsion with orien­tation, fusion will be a cinch, with finitely controlled finesse.

Sincerely,

KTS

CC: Maddox/Nature

Dec. 10,’91
Bohdan Paczynski, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Princton University
Princton, NJ 06544
Re: burster shadow matter
Dear Sir:

Flamsteed’s blurb in the Jan. DISCOVER on the GRO data is good indeed as again defines, as predicted, the `local’ (galaxy wise) re‑coagulation of its jet matters around the periphery of its disk. While an `obnoxious import’ to Big Bang hangers‑on, further defines the EMP bubbles (also predicted, as the disk‑jet `anomal­ies’ before Einstein Observatory went aloft) many years ago. The whole enigma rests on no CP violation‑‑ so anti‑g between those complemental matters as spewed from white core `holes’‑‑ in turn evoked in nicely separated EMPs across the universe.

Different gamma intensities show the re‑coagulated `anti‑matter’ (to galaxy disk) from galaxy poles again re‑coagulating with gusto around the outer disk edges‑‑ evoking gamma radiation on annihilation. Not only distance, which are proportionately far from the disk’s diameter (due to ample anti‑g), beyond some mini­mal distance no doubt some torroidal shape area would dictate the maximum bursters that at least GRO would perceive.

Whether called shroud, Oort cloud, or said shadow matter, half of all `mass’ of all quasar/galaxy derivation remains somewhat obs­cure, beyond noted distantly derived dv/dt light modification as traveling there‑through. (due to magnetic flux fields, not g!) To “hold the Milky Way together” beyond its own mutual g attraction, the said anti‑g affect may aid in decelerating the disk matter flight to offer the anomaly of out‑disk higher angular velocities than central, but again defining such spewed matter stems from the core‑‑ no Big Bang, unless one could hear the one hand clap­ping at those bubble cores!

The gamma radiation noted both at our galaxy core periodically as Geminga could well be those haphazard complemental matters that get trapped to self annihilate near their genetic core. Spurient `tweaking’ of core fields might upset smooth complemental matter genesis and ejections.
Sincerely,

KTS

P.S. I think a contingent note went to your J. E. Gunn last May

Jan. 4,’92
Editors, et.al.
Sky and Telescope
49 Bay State Rd.,
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: Focal Point (+) on THE focal point!
Sirs:

Your plasma issue (Feb.’92) finally hits the nail on the head! It defines without saying overtly so the genesis of quasar white hole cores for ensuing complemental matter creation, riding on a potent EMP `bubble’ front. Plasma is a second generation phenome­na as a `degeneration’ of pinched a very dense magnetic field, each both mutually at right angles as well as to the magnetic field lines (EMP) to likely define the spatial orientation of those ensuing galaxies riding the one dense bubble front. Most astounding are the nice 600MLY separations between those many EMP fronts begging the $64
question of whose the one hand clapped to evoke those EMPs? This likely sounds esoteric to tenured ears but maybe in another 30 years‑‑, who knows. At least the Birke­land dual currents show why the galaxy disk versus jets (relative to the prevailing magnetic lines of force) expand relatively dif­ferently, when anti‑g then ensures their separation thereafter. We need now to confirm our galaxy’s dual jet‑matter `bubbles’ by EUVE to conclude from where peripheral gamma `bursters’ come.

Of interest is the genesis of great momentary red‑shift (Arp) as a fresh quasar’s light emission gets `tired’ in that dense EMP, albeit over time becomes a true factor to be used for distance measurement when a galaxy cools as the its EMP moves on. Lerner’s adroit remarks about Schramm defines all scientific inquiry where tenure, at all cost, must dictate some status quo, as in politics now‑‑ creating the greatest net danger to mankind, ever.

From three‑phased complemental quarks, anti‑g and no “mass” (just force) so deBroglie’s wavelet universe will be understood someday as the neurotics in power die off. Even the freed electron (that escapes the time reversal paradigm) will be perceived as Plato’s Potentia (note EPR data!) to define and allow other users of the self thinking “interface” (5th Generation) and so at last man’s conscious attention where it belongs.

Sincerely,

KTS

CC: Lerner; Peratt
Eric J. Lerner, et.al. Lawrence Plasma Physics Center
Lawrenceville, NJ

A. L. Peratt, et.al.
Dept. of Astro‑Physics
Los Alamos Labs.
Los Alamos, NM 87544

Jan. 21,’92
S.S. McGaugh, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Re: Schombert’s data
Dear Sir: (SC.NEWS, p.36; Jan. 18,’92)

Dim low net mass‑density galaxies are indeed intriguing! Yet the mounting question now is how truly far, much less age, they might be in view of the dv/dt red shift anomaly. If truly “old” and yet not densified by mutual g, it implies little other anti‑g, as is now suspected around the ellitpical’s two sides. From recoagulat­ing jet matters‑‑ as spewed from the same quasar genetic (white‑`hole’) core, this implies some splitting of disk matters‑‑ maybe from its own complemental (anti‑g) matters somehow not yet seen‑‑ as current jet `shadow matter’ at quasar/galaxy poles. Some datanow at our
galaxy’s pole ends begin to infer their presence.

Since dv/dt portion of red shift is ambiguous to the unwary ex­ternal observer to judge its emitter’s net speed, the first cri­teria is to know that factor of shift ratio from the more dense magnetic(g) fields as surround fresh quasars riding EMP “bubble” (Huchra) fronts. Only the quiescent galaxy, after its creative EMP bubble front has moved on, can be used to judge its net speed and direction, relative to any`thing'(one) else‑‑ much less its own EMP center.

This evokes another question about rapid disk‑planetary matter formation? Does the elliptical show more star creation in its pinched areas to imply a closer anti‑g force from re‑coagulating jets matters? Also, there should be more gamma bursters in that region to show such higher velocity jet matters meeting itself.

While some now are looking for the expected jets with net contra‑twist to their galaxy disk matters, maybe more data will be soon forthcoming to resolve our theoretical work‑‑ so disdained these past twenty years. One does not predict jet vs. disks (due to anti‑g between complemental matters) before any Einstein Observa­tory goes aloft‑‑ we find to our chagrin!

Sorry to bother‑‑
Sincerely,

KTS
CC: Schombert; Knezek/Schneider; Djorgovski

P.M. Knezek and S.E. Schneider, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
CalTech
Pasadena, CA 91125

Jan. 6,’92
Camille Trentacoste, et.al.
Center for EUV Astrophysics
University of California
2150 Kittredge St.,
Berkeley, CA 94720
Re: jet matter `bubbles’?
Sirs:

From predicting the genesis of complemental matters from `white hole’ cores as jets versus disk with anti‑g there‑between as the likely separating mechanism many years ago, the Einstein Observa­tory confirmation made clear another prediction of EMP bubble fronts causing same, now noted on nicely even 600M LY intervals!

From predicting gamma bursters at the periphery of a galaxy disk, now noted, but from recoagulating jet matter collisions evading said disk matter, one might suspect vast clouds of this ejected primal
matter to exist beyond the galaxy poles, to be possibly noted with UV blockage as with EUVE. If so, the pending conclu­sion of the universal genesis of quantized matter for relatively `slowed’ temporal existence, to define the “cause from effect” designs which may have begun at the centers of cosmic bubbles in non‑temporal states as Apriori E for ensuing mc squared in and for our wavelet reality. (deBroglie)

Our 5th Generation self thinking computer R&D efforts, as predic­ted the spatial versus temporal complemental lateral cerebral faculty in man (confirmed by Sperry) only needed the positive EPR experiments to conclude such device was indeed feasible‑‑ which a proto‑type then offered a 10\17th odds readout on its maiden run. Now to conclude Nature’s real underlying motive in our side of the complemental universe.

I would appreciate information or be privy to the coming imports of EUVE data as contingent with galaxy pole obscurations. Thank you.

Sincerely,

KTS

CC: AAVSO
AAVSO
25 Birch St.,
Cambridge, MA 02138

May 6,’92
Wolfgang Stoeffle, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Lawrence Livermore Natl. Labs.
Livermore, CA 94551
Re: negative g?
Dear Sir: (elusive neutrino; SC.NEWS; May 2,’92)

The electron’s anti‑neutrino with a negative mass is heartening! At least assuming the neutrino exists.

From predicting the anti‑g anomaly of jets versus disks before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to confirm same, the CPT theorem at least implied, as Einstein said about his blunder, the cosmological constant needed also a negative g factor‑‑ which it indeed does appear to define the right angle spewing from quasar/ galaxy white holes! From riding an EMP fronts (Huchra’s bubbles) to evoke matter in complemental form, the torqued ionized disk to show higher angular velocity further from the core says it all! The now seen via interference of vast shadow matter clouds likely are the decelerated jets matters, even re‑coagulating around the periphery if the outer disk limits evoked gamma burster in mutual annihilations. The huge electron‑anti‑electron annihilations now noted near our galaxy core may also help to say it all as well.

Whether `new physics’ or merely the full application of the old with some new insights‑‑ starting with de Broglie, the now appar­ent standing waves to replace quantal billiard balls may be time­ly,
especially to answer fission‑fusion anomalies.

Your data is exciting‑‑ we will watch with interest.

Sincerely,

KTS

Aug. 17,’92
Joseph Silk, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Center for Particle Astrophysics
University of California,
Berkeley, CA 94720
Re: gamma bursters
Dear Sir:

Halo derived matter is galactic pole anti‑matter, ejected in jets to escape its disk complemental matter with anti‑g, says it all.

Since my letter of Feb. 28,’91 on dark matter, it yet appears there are some bones of contention between the mounting empirical obvious and uncritical belief factors. “High‑Velocity Pulsars‑‑” (14 Aug. SCIENCE) somehow evades the re‑coagulating jet matters with common (mutual) gravity factors colliding out beyond our disk, but evading the said anti‑g factor, to indicate super high velocity collisions for gamma bursters. They should most define primal matter as electrons and fundamentals (as small third har­monic standing wave quarks). Oh well, tenure now dictates all be­lieved `research’ so the few, too damned few, need not wonder!

Sincerely,

KTS

CC: Eichler; D/Z

Nov. 6,’92
Bernard Sadoulet, et.al.
Dept, of Physics
U/ California Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720
Re: standing waves (only)
Dear Sir:

Since de Broglie came the closest, why not look for the top quark for your unseen dark matter, to also define from where the most extreme case of anti‑g (force) between a third harmonic standing wave
and our koinomatter exists? Too bad John Bell had to leave!

Since predicting the cosmic jet‑disk anomaly from conjecturing the initial correctness of Einstein’s underlying cosmic constant (rapidly refuted by neurotic peers) for equal anti‑g `pressure’ (instead by peer!), not only does the CPT theorem get fulfilled, but cosmic condensing matter from quasar white‑hole cores (as many petite Bangs) riding primal EMPs now called bubbles. Arp (note his 220!) is finally seeing the mounting obvious and the chagrin to follow may well make a Bigger `Bang’ in cosmological offices for the loss of demanded tenure in conspicuous places!

The ejecta from galaxy cores with torqued ions (H) spin up rapid­ly, especially in the very dense (yet) magnetic fields at right angles (via said EMP front) as the anti‑g pushes same outward in the disks. Thus the high rpm at their periphery is self explana­tory. What is more said is the other equal amount of anti‑matter fleeing the core via its ends to make huge shadow matter clouds, the `gamma bursters’ beyond the disk’s periphery explained by re‑coagulating finite pole cloud matter annihilations.

Non‑flipping neutrons may indicate their one leg (as the third phased top quark) offers too much inertial torque down here in our relative matter’s continuum. Now called axial symmetry, the Kalusa‑Klein matrix appears to answer relative matter’s disposi­tion in space‑‑ where complementarity dictates all `phases’ of “billiard‑ball” quantized waves called matter. It has become a joy (albeit vicarious) to watch the incredulous denials since proposing my theoretical work to the Smithsonian Inst. when the said Einstein Observatory proved the first portion of it‑‑ to say nothing of my 5th Generation self thinking computer via EPR, as offered 10\17th odds on its maiden run with alpha numeric read‑out! To be too cross academic has its drawbacks.

Sincerely,

KTS

cc:Path/IQ; 3‑dev‑env; Phys‑Psy; copy/Freedman’s let.(over)
CC: Britten; D/Z

Dec. 24,’92
L. Krauss, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy(?)
Yale University
New Haven, CT 06
Re: machos looking for wimps?
Dear Sir:

We hope you are looking for the top quark where that 3rd phase standing wave with its greatest anti‑g. (so why not seen here) According to the Klein‑Kalusa matrix is likely in those primal quasar complemental shadow matter clouds from their jets.

By examining the E=mc squared, where one or the other had to be the Apriori, only E could have had the net energy to do anything, so the cosmic EMP bubbles became such genetic sources for many
`condensing’ complemental matters as quasar `white‑hole’ cores riding their EMP front. Deceleration over time brought quantized standing waves (not `billiard balls’), the first harmonic elec­trons (sans time*) but further `condensed’ quarks as said three phased. Since it is forces that dictate action, gravity as Ein­stein saw (in his great “blunder”), had to be also complemental‑‑ and why the General Relativity is flawed‑‑ as Big Bang and many other contingent anomalies.

If it is the magnetic field that bends light, as slows to evoke dv/dt red‑shift, behind star light penetration would be more deflected near the jets of a fresh quasar than any stilled coagu­lated cloud matters (with mutual gravity) hovering at galaxy pole ends due to anti‑g with their complemental disk matter. The `gam­ma bursters’ likely show (well beyond the disk) these anti‑matter annihilations reflect they do get back together with a bit of mutual `attractive’ gravity gusto!

Noting that John Bell didn’t get the chance to finish my experi­ment request (at least his excitement was obvious) to measure the net repulsion between koino and anti‑matter, the galaxy disk/jets anomaly will need to do for now. Ask Arp.

At least our scenario continues to hold up‑‑ after predicting the jets before the Einstein Observatory went aloft, and Huchra’s bubbles on nice even 600Mly separations‑‑ it all says much for cosmology, if rutty pedants would take a look‑‑ beyond erred whimsical theory computer programs‑‑ and of course, tenure.
Sincerely, (and Merry Xmas!)

KTS

* note freed electron for the EPR experiments!
CC: Griest; Alcock
Kim Griest, et.al.

Jan. 26,’93
Dept. of Astronomy
Attn: Sokolsky, et.al.
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, UT 84112
Re: gamma bursters
Sirs: (8 Jan. ’93 SCIENCE)

While the grandest `Super Collider’ is where jet matters collide beyond the periphery of the galaxy disk (with a common gravity), such won’t be understood by astronomy or physics until anti‑g is recognized. Where Big Bang is essential for tenure, taboos have a way of going on for ever. Einstein’s “blunder” with his General Relativity was because he was coerced by peers‑‑ as he suspected, realizing all `forces’ had a complemental aspect.

When proven correct with the Einstein Observatory showing the predicted jets versus disk as complemental matters with anti‑g between, such white hole quasar cores explained themselves as the expected bubbles (Huchra) defining the many Petite Bangs nicely separated on 600Mly intervals.
Voids (bubble centers) only define what as where some primal EMP got started, for decelerated standing wave‑lets yet called `billiard balls’. Most unique now, cold fusion is undertsood and quite simple to evoke for the end of an­other tenured class‑‑ in the petroleum business.

Arp’s recent letter defines the pending huge embarrassment coming in astronomy, where dv/dt (slowed) light in dense magnetic fields defines the quasar‑‑ as most other red‑shift enigma in astronomy. Sorry.

Sincerely,

KTS

CC: Cronin; Goodman; D/Z

3/31/93
R. Terlevich, et.al.
c/o The Royal Greenwich Observatory
Greenwich, England
Re: genetic white hole cores
Sir: (SCIENCE: 19, March ’93)
The rather conclusive sub‑nature of matter as EM standing waves makes Black Holes rather impossible, yet the more obvious genesis of quasars riding dense magnetic EMP fronts with complemental matter generation far more appealing now. To crush standing waves merely places them in the untenable situation of unraveling, the underlying enigma of nuclear fission or fusion.

With Einstein’s General Relativity theory defunct without its complemental aspect for anti‑g to define the quasar/galaxy disk to jets anomaly and the relative weird mass of 3‑phased quarks, a great paradigm shift can be now seen for astronomy‑‑ now that physics is well into theirs. The dv/dt red‑shift problem likely rests with decelerated light in dense magnetic fields, not gravi­ty, which so defines the vast red shift of quasars‑‑ not to say that a long voyage of light through a universe of Apriori primary magnetic flux doesn’t also reduce the apparent spectral frequenc­ies. The likely often reason why the complemental jets are so little seen is the relavistic speeds coming towards us exceeds our spectral perception. By going away from us the lowered net dv/dt red shift allows such light to be more easily seen.

The spasm of star bursts in torqued ionized primal matter near a quasar core should be expected where degenerated electrons (first EM harmonic standing wave) gets precipitated into heavier matter. With Huchra’s cosmic bubbles nicely placed on 600 million light year intervals, there would appear some underlying cause‑‑ as “one hand clapping” to evoke those vast EMPs to begin with! (and then all together since temporal sequence at c does not exist!)

Sincerely,

KTS

P.S: A few past quips might be timely to your article; over.

CC: B. Boyle; Blanford; Melnick; D/Z

10/2/93
Kim Griest, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of California
San Diego, CA 92093
Re: MACHO dark matter
Dear Sir: (Sept. 25th SCIENCE NEWS)

Peripheral matter to our galaxy disk might be noted not in‑line with the disk to define recoagulating complemental jet anti‑matters for the MACHO lensing function noted. While either gravi­tational affect to evoke lensing might be noted, one could ask now how `finite’ the star equivalent for same might be? Its rela­tive distance from our galactic pole `ends’, where jet matters might make a final deceleration to define the time for mutual attraction, even to the galaxy’s opposite pole of like matter, showing gamma bursters along the way.
The condensation period for spewed matter with high initial velo­city may require great epochs of time, where the galactic disk is pinched together by right angle magnetic fields (cosmic bubble front) for early star formation. The said delayed grouping of spewed jet anti‑matter as shadow matter will likely always remain elusive as will remain away from the disk.

It would be interesting to note if MACHO periods become shorter near our galaxy disk plane, where their maximum velocities occur. While doubting if gravity affects the lensing, (depite what Ein­stein believed) more likely is it the magnetic field‑‑ noting the dv/dt red shift of very high magnetic fields around initial gal­axy/quasars in their generating primal EMPs. This theory will get its boost soon with the realization that `billiard ball’ matter is only magnetic standing waves‑‑ as were condensed near quasar cores. (to very likely define the simple means to fusion!)

Sincerely,

KTS

CC: D/Z; Zylberajch; Alcock

4/2/94
Bruce Balick, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Washington
Seattle, WA 96195
Re: reversed phase quasars?
Sir: (Eicher’s May ASTRONOMY article)

The lack of ionized ejecti as from potent EMP magnetic fields as quasars ride, yet the anti‑g phenomena is noted again, confirming what Einstein claimed as his great blunder to not keep the two signs of that force. This anomaly allowed us to predict the disk versus jets long before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove them. Your work confirms Peresce.(over)

While expected complemental matters (i.e. top quark especially) would not remain long near its counterpart, its shadow matter ejecti at poles regrouping later as vast subtle clouds, even re‑integrating around the galaxy disk periphery in gamma bursts, do place a new perspective with your suppositions now.

Binary FLIERs may be self generating with complemental ejecti de­rived from a cooking operation where neutrons fill in all hydro­gen available to some critical point then fuse at once to blow off the older formed cooked down (or up, mass‑wise) matters as nitrogen etc. Much as the three standing wave primal matters as the compounded poly‑phased configurations appearing to be what Mendalyeev was examining as atomic (for chemical) combinations.
Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: Paresce/let (over); Frank

3/12/94
Francesco Paresce, et.al.
Space Telescope Sc. Inst.
3700 San Martin Dr.,
Baltimore, MD 21218
Re: second order ejecti?
Dear Sir:

From the brief article (Feb.26, SC.NEWS), the young NOVA has the ear‑markings of the more primal quasar, while maybe `petite’ by comparison, the complemental anti‑matter ejecti appears to avoid the disk portion of Cygni 1992. Has there been yet any calibrated ejection velocities noted therewith as the said jets might be relavistic? We are now reasonably sure your said “obstacles” may be anti‑gravity‑‑ just as Einstein admitted with his “blunder” in the General Relativity theory where complemental signs need to be applied to ALL forces! Since fission and fusion evoke anti‑matter during koinomatter unraveling such may be the answer.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

5/14/94
Don Lamb, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Chicago
Chicago, IL 60637
Re: bursters close indeed
Dear Sir: (4/94 PHYS.TODAY;”Evidence‑‑” p.17)

With the anti‑g phenomena which predicted the right angled spewed complemental matters from white‑hole quasars (jets versus torqu­ed ionized disk matter) from its primal magnetic EMP field (cosmic bubbles), the Einstein Observatory and Hunchra’s data as with now the burster enigma appears to make clear the re‑coagulating jet(s) matters around the periphery of this galaxy disk by smash­ing into each other‑‑ the bright ones being head‑on while the less intense smearing with the longer time to do so. Likely if we had an elliptical galaxy we would note more bursters around our narrow sides than are noted evenly distributed now.

After trying several years ago to get Paczynski, Gunn, Hazard and some others attention onto the empirical “obvious” to reconsider Einstein’s great blunder (of complemental g; General Relativity), the impasse looks now more for unsaid reasons, thus the letter copy herewith. We suspect you and possibly Trimble may be looking in the correct direction.

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: Stein letter + 3/dev
CC: D/Z; V. Trimble

May 10,91
Cyrl Hazard, et. al.
Dept. Astronomy
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
Re:BR 1202‑07; jet matter clouds?
Dear Sir:

I wonder if your `see through’ primal matter clouds, as the 3C273 anomaly (if not the same), are accumulated jet matter as spewed from intervening quasar‑galaxy sources? If the equal `distant’ pairs of clouds have yet a `coming and going’ signature, the pos­sibility may be. In any case, if so, would be what we suspect are `white holes’ on EMP walls to likely resolve the Big Bang theory.

Thank you for any feedback.

Sincerely,

KTS

CC:R.Harms; McMahon; Gunn; Davidsen
CC:
Cyrl Hazard, et. al.
Dept. Astronomy
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA 15260

8/31/94
J. M. Horack, et.al.
Marshall Space Flight Center
NASA
Huntsville, AL 35812
Re: jet matter collisions
Sir: (26 Aug. SCIENCE; Perspective)

Since mentioning some time ago the likely need for re‑coagulating (with mutual g) the anti‑matter jet materials surrounding the galaxy’s disk, to finally put a nail in the current General Rela­tivity theory flaw (Einstein’s blunder; again using insight), the complemental forces (as CPT) is vindicated with gravity.

No doubt our sister Magellanic galaxy (riding same cosmic bubble; Huchra) has also a vast `anti‑matter’ (all is relative) host yet too distant for us to peruse. If it could be observed no doubt it would be noted with an elongated envelope at the said galaxy’s disk’s pole ends and then nearly parallel to ours. if indeed a sister galaxy. This all defines a universe filled with petite Bangs on nice 600 Mly intervals to at least imply someOne clapped a hand (Zen) for primal EMPs to get “things” (mc ) going.

The red shift due to higher magnetic field densities, likely at galactic pole ends where the said jet matters first coagulate at the maximum distance from quasar genetic matter sources (white holes) might help define their mutual acceleration from opposite common jet matter coagulating places, colliding near the disk periphery with the least net red shift for two reasons‑‑ the said lessor magnetic field density and the net closer distance‑‑ yet likely at far greater distances than 300 kps.

I will try to find some early `burster’ letters to include here­with so need not be redundant with my limited time to iterate.

Sincerely,

KTS

cc: burster/lets: Stubbs; Gribbin; Cowie; Ast.Pub; Djorgovski; Everitt; (compiled)

8/12/94
C. Stubbs, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of California
Sants Barbara, CA 93106
Re: “Macho Searches‑‑” July Phys.Today)
Sir:

Indeed‑‑ just like high energy physics! The smearing of two col­liding bodies, whether some standing‑wave “billiard ball” or a couple MACHOs (as past jet polar WIMPS) smashing into each other head‑long with common gravity around the periphery of our galaxy bulge certainly sounds rational now.

The “meager population” only defines how often the head‑on colli­sion does occur, albeit not to neglect the concluding oscillating sequence of mutually attracted `anti‑matter’ (in our case) will finally coagulate‑‑ to return likely to the said pole regions via our disk’s more influential anti‑g near its bulge. Of course the smashing would dictate some epsilon decay curve, not symmetric as claimed needed‑‑ as was even suggested by the odd 572 day event curve shown in the article. The recent clearer data of the Crab also suggests strongly anti‑g via the deflected halo (p.91; in 8/6/94 SC.NEWS; note over). We do not buy the gravitation lensing since suspect it is the magnetic field as denoting the quasar’s high dv/dt (red shift) while yet riding its EMP cosmic bubble (Huchra) front.
The greater time for jet matter coagulation (to create deuterium) at galaxy poles may be that net impetus for WIMPS faster mutual coagulation around the disk matter periphery yet the end of their accruing further much of their own kind of matter from their galaxy poles thereafter. The Magellanic cloud may be the same koinomatter as our galaxy’s disk (even predicted as riding same primal EMP front) it would naturally skew (with anti‑g) to bias either galaxy’s anti‑matter jet clouds away from each other‑‑ as you note with your “confused” remark.

It will soon be found that Turner’s remark “Grand Misdirection” is more due to our left reductive (only) cerebral hemisphere more interested in half‑truths for profit and the status quo with ten­ure than anything else now, than what Nature might pull on claim­ed scientific man. Ask a left hander like Einstein!

Sincerely,

KTS

cc: Hester let.(over)
CC: D/Z; Turner

Oct. 25,’91
John Gribbin, et.al.
c/o The New Scientist
Kings Reach Tower
Stamford St.
London, SE2 9LS, England
Re: singularity/e and white holes
Dear Sir: (28 Sept.’91; NEW SCIENTIST)
The `trap’ (in more than one way) of the black hole has befuddled the more likely fact of a white one since darkness holds time while light none. Also, g force (in complementarity) showed long before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove, the disk‑jet matters escaping each other (in haste!) to define huge clouds of anti‑matter surrounding the galaxy’s poles, likely re‑coagulating making gamma bursters etc. etc. The neat spacing of the genetic `bubbles’ at even intervals suggests someone (no‑thing) knew already what It is doing in space since those EMP fronts imply some `hand’ had clapped therein to get it started. Dense magnetic fields not only evoke complemental matter but make for `tired light’ (remember?), so Arp is not far from wrong in his complaint about Hubble distance. Further, those three‑phase nature of pre‑matter wavelets called quarks define no mass, as a neutron aboard a proton*. The Apriori magnetic field is where Physics should get started‑‑ just as Theology, however vehemently denied.

The greater `beast’ in computer simulation is the programmer with the wrong idea of reality to begin with. Maybe I should loan my `machine’ (Plato’s Potentia; note freed e in EPR experiments) so they could get something straight and restart their simulations for some more tenured status quos. Just yet it still is rocking our Patent Office, as officials holding same in limbo, 10 years!

With the coming deciphering of the H nucleon to define how to `merge’** two and more together via laser propulsion with orien­tation, fusion will be a cinch, with finitely controlled finesse.

Sincerely,

KTS

CC: Maddox/Nature

Nov. 24,’91
L.L. Cowie, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Hawaii
Honolulu, HI 96822
Re: not shocking
Dear Sirs: (Nov. 16th SC.NEWS)

The anomalies you note fit again likely anti‑g between two com­plemental spewed core matters‑‑ disk vs. jets. The net pinching of spiral arms versus greater cooling might be noted via IR, yet their relative closeness may define the lack of dv/dt red shift associated with only `young’ galaxies, where freshly spewed mat­ters are most accelerated (from their white holes; no Big Bang) to define why Arp is seeing what he does.

When Einstein’s General Theory gets thrown out for magnetic field strength deceleration of EM radiation, tired light will again be considered‑‑ to define our earth’s common magnetic field as what `pulled’ the propagating field for light travel in the Michelson‑Morley experiment. The many `petite bangs’ on bubble EMPs (nicely spaced across the universe) might imply some`Thing’ clapped its one hand to make for the ease of evoking quasars, etc./et.al.
We suspect that 6 billion LY consistency defines the limit in time for most galaxies to quiet down in this region so define their real distance via red‑shift. Your remark “‑‑a bit muddled” is logical with the wrong theory to start with, as the `standard’ velocity model is a variable, making `expansion’ ambiguous. We think it is the mutual anti‑g between a balanced koino‑ anti‑matter universe that is responsible for the net even expansion, noting the nicely spaced primal engines creating that matter.

Sincerely,

KTS

Aug. 24,’91
Editor, et.al.
Astronomy Publishers 21027 Cross Roads Circle
P.O. Box 1612
Waukesha, WI 53187
Re: Quasars light up much more!
Dear Sirs: (Sept. issue, p.42)

The fine article on likely `shadow matter’. It may be defining jet matters as spewed from quasar white‑holes, but due to anti‑g between complemental primal matters created therein, forming the disk to jets. Predicted many years ago to satisfy t

5/14/94
Bohdan Paczynski, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Princton University
Princton, NJ 06544
Re: my 12/10/91 letter on
burster shadow matter
Dear Sir:

May 10,91
Cyrl Hazard, et. al.
Dept. Astronomy
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
Re:BR 1202‑07; jet matter clouds?
Dear Sir:

I wonder if your `see through’ primal matter clouds, as the 3C273 anomaly (if not the same), are accumulated jet matter as spewed from intervening quasar‑galaxy sources? If the equal `distant’ pairs of clouds have yet a `coming and going’ signature, the pos­sibility may be. In any case, if so, would be what we suspect are `white holes’ on EMP walls to likely resolve the Big Bang theory.
Thank you for any feedback.

Sincerely,

KTS

CC:R.Harms; McMahon; Gunn; Davidsen

8/31/94
J. M. Horack, et.al.
Marshall Space Flight Center
NASA
Huntsville, AL 35812
Re: jet matter collisions
Sir: (26 Aug. SCIENCE; Perspective)

Since mentioning some time ago the likely need for re‑coagulating (with mutual g) the anti‑matter jet materials surrounding the galaxy’s disk, to finally put a nail in the current General Rela­tivity theory flaw (Einstein’s blunder; again using insight), the complemental forces (as CPT) is vindicated with gravity.

No doubt our sister Magellanic galaxy (riding same cosmic bubble; Huchra) has also a vast `anti‑matter’ (all is relative) host yet too distant for us to peruse. If it could be observed no doubt it would be noted with an elongated envelope at the said galaxy’s disk’s pole ends and then nearly parallel to ours. if indeed a sister galaxy. This all defines a universe filled with petite Bangs on nice 600 Mly intervals to at least imply someOne clapped a hand (Zen) for primal EMPs to get “things” (mc ) going.

The red shift due to higher magnetic field densities, likely at galactic pole ends where the said jet matters first coagulate at the maximum distance from quasar genetic matter sources (white holes) might help define their mutual acceleration from opposite common jet matter coagulating places, colliding near the disk periphery with the least net red shift for two reasons‑‑ the said lessor magnetic field density and the net closer distance‑‑ yet likely at far greater distances than 300 kps.

I will try to find some early `burster’ letters to include here­with so need not be redundant with my limited time to iterate.

Sincerely,

KTS

cc: burster/lets: Stubbs; Gribbin; Cowie; Ast.Pub; Djorgovski; Everitt; (compiled)

8/12/94
C. Stubbs, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of California
Sants Barbara, CA 93106
Re: “Macho Searches‑‑” July Phys.Today)
Sir:

Indeed‑‑ just like high energy physics! The smearing of two col­liding bodies, whether some standing‑wave “billiard ball” or a couple MACHOs (as past jet polar WIMPS) smashing into each other head‑long with common gravity around the periphery of our galaxy bulge certainly sounds rational now.

The “meager population” only defines how often the head‑on colli­sion does occur, albeit not to neglect the concluding oscillating sequence of mutually attracted `anti‑matter’ (in our case) will finally coagulate‑‑ to return likely to the said pole regions via our disk’s more influential anti‑g near its bulge. Of course the smashing would dictate some epsilon decay curve, not symmetric as claimed needed‑‑ as was even suggested by the odd 572 day event curve shown in the article. The recent clearer data of the Crab also suggests strongly anti‑g via the deflected halo (p.91; in 8/6/94 SC.NEWS; note over). We do not buy the gravitation lensing since suspect it is the magnetic field as denoting the quasar’s high dv/dt (red shift) while yet riding its EMP cosmic bubble (Huchra) front.

The greater time for jet matter coagulation (to create deuterium) at galaxy poles may be that net impetus for WIMPS faster mutual coagulation around the disk matter periphery yet the end of their accruing further much of their own kind of matter from their galaxy poles thereafter. The Magellanic cloud may be the same koinomatter as our galaxy’s disk (even predicted as riding same primal EMP front) it would naturally skew (with anti‑g) to bias either galaxy’s anti‑matter jet clouds away from each other‑‑ as you note with your “confused” remark.

It will soon be found that Turner’s remark “Grand Misdirection” is more due to our left reductive (only) cerebral hemisphere more interested in half‑truths for profit and the status quo with ten­ure than anything else now, than what Nature might pull on claim­ed scientific man. Ask a left hander like Einstein!

Sincerely,

KTS

cc: Hester let.(over)
CC: D/Z; Turner

Oct. 25,’91
John Gribbin, et.al.
c/o The New Scientist
Kings Reach Tower
Stamford St.
London, SE2 9LS, England
Re: singularity/e and white holes
Dear Sir: (28 Sept.’91; NEW SCIENTIST)

The `trap’ (in more than one way) of the black hole has befuddled the more likely fact of a white one since darkness holds time while light none. Also, g force (in complementarity) showed long before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove, the disk‑jet matters escaping each other (in haste!) to define huge clouds of anti‑matter surrounding the galaxy’s poles, likely re‑coagulating making gamma bursters etc. etc. The neat spacing of the genetic `bubbles’ at even intervals suggests someone (no‑thing) knew already what It is doing in space since those EMP fronts imply some `hand’ had clapped therein to get it started. Dense magnetic fields not only evoke complemental matter but make for `tired light’ (remember?), so Arp is not far from wrong in his complaint about Hubble distance. Further, those three‑phase nature of pre‑matter wavelets called quarks define no mass, as a neutron aboard a proton*. The Apriori magnetic field is where Physics should get started‑‑ just as Theology, however vehemently denied.

The greater `beast’ in computer simulation is the programmer with the wrong idea of reality to begin with. Maybe I should loan my `machine’ (Plato’s Potentia; note freed e in EPR experiments) so they could get something straight and restart their simulations for some more tenured status quos. Just yet it still is rocking our Patent Office, as officials holding same in limbo, 10 years!

With the coming deciphering of the H nucleon to define how to `merge’** two and more together via laser propulsion with orien­tation, fusion will be a cinch, with finitely controlled finesse.

Sincerely,

KTS

CC: Maddox/Nature

Nov. 24,’91
L.L. Cowie, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Hawaii
Honolulu, HI 96822
Re: not shocking
Dear Sirs: (Nov. 16th SC.NEWS)

The anomalies you note fit again likely anti‑g between two com­plemental spewed core matters‑‑ disk vs. jets. The net pinching of spiral arms versus greater cooling might be noted via IR, yet their relative closeness may define the lack of dv/dt red shift associated with only `young’ galaxies, where freshly spewed mat­ters are most accelerated (from their white holes; no Big Bang) to define why Arp is seeing what he does.

When Einstein’s General Theory gets thrown out for magnetic field strength deceleration of EM
radiation, tired light will again be considered‑‑ to define our earth’s common magnetic field as what `pulled’ the propagating field for light travel in the Michelson‑Morley experiment. The many `petite bangs’ on bubble EMPs (nicely spaced across the universe) might imply some`Thing’ clapped its one hand to make for the ease of evoking quasars, etc./et.al.

We suspect that 6 billion LY consistency defines the limit in time for most galaxies to quiet down in this region so define their real distance via red‑shift. Your remark “‑‑a bit muddled” is logical with the wrong theory to start with, as the `standard’ velocity model is a variable, making `expansion’ ambiguous. We think it is the mutual anti‑g between a balanced koino‑ anti‑matter universe that is responsible for the net even expansion, noting the nicely spaced primal engines creating that matter.

Sincerely,
KTS

11/13/94
P. Fischer and
J. A Tyson, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
AT&T Bell Labs
Murray Hill, NJ 07974
Re: `ejecti”? “Matter of Gravity”, indeed!
SC. NEWS Oct. 29th (as my unanswered
Dear Sirs: July 8th, ’91 letter to Tyson)

Maybe your Q2345 pair have anti‑g there‑between? At least funda­mental physics defines, as Einstein called his great blunder to renege on complemental forces as gravity also the need to rescind the General Relativity theory, now that primal interference on a cosmic EMP bubble’s front with quasars defines complemental mat­ter with said anti‑g, spewing at right angles such initial first harmonic standings waves (complemental electrons) to third har­monic quarks later, while the speedy jets to accumulate as shadow matter clouds now seen making the bursters with their mutual col­lisions out beyond the galaxy disk.

What you may be examining are two complemental matter galaxies with anti‑g there‑between and riding the same cosmic EMP bubble, as most other `cluster’ groups. The real question is do they all face outward to the bubble and rotate in the same relative direc­tion to define the electrons or ion ejecti, so the noted spin‑up in their dense primal pinched magnetic field?

The real `crunch’ coming is in our tenured elite’s prestigious offices who have all their `billiard balls’ in that same single Big bang `basket’, which was multiple on nice 600Bly separations, before mass‑for‑time began! Sorry.

Sincerely,

KTS

2/1/95
G.P. Smithman, et.al.
AT&T Astronomy Dept.
600 Mountain Ave., Rm. 1D‑4181
Murry Hill, N.J. 07974

Thank you for the directives. I am aware of Johnson’s efforts.

Albeit what magnetic field (not G‑force) residual from the primal cosmic bubble’s (Huchra) EMP front has dissipated along any line between our peripheral galaxy and such sister ones on this side of our said bubble to lens the adjacent sisters, it was assumed from what data offered that the two Q2345 images could appear very similar in appearance in spatial configuration and spectral density/frequencies to certainly appear as one. Not that we re­ject lensing as a possibility, even a likely factor, we remain dubious as to any precise complemental image coincidentally re­maining symmetrical with each other‑‑ a true fluke indeed!

Because of the Zeeman effect for dv/dt (red‑shift), as possible said lensing, we suspect the magnetic field density required for such phenomena could only occur around primal EMPs whose density is extreme, and before their net tumbling (wave front on a shore‑line) due to the leading edge slowing (again Zeeman) and its following wave energy evoking the quasar phenomena for the net creation of standing waves‑‑ yet called “billiard ball” matter in physics. Indeed, it was Einstein’s Spec. Rel. equations that de­fined the differentiation of the E to mc squared anomaly to my last last factor of magnetic flux as the a priori, which in turn allowed the prediction of what the Einstein Observatory saw in the empirical sense, even the `X’ configuration at the quasar cores to define complemental (koino‑) standing waves as ejecti at right angles to its complemental. Einstein predicted the complemental gravity `force’‑‑ his self claimed “blunder” to capitulate to Bohr (again). Little wonder so much difficulty prevails today with what appears as “anomalous” data, especially in astronomy.

The key soon found was spin‑up rather than down with disk matters which defined magnetic torquing of such expelled `matter’ while ionized, electrons first one direction thence protons the other, as noted on those reversed spin early phases of some galaxies. In either case residual momentum outward (the said `X’ phenomena) spewed radial disks, even “pinched waisted” sombreros (M‑104) as Seiferts where likely early returning anti‑G jet matters (around periphery) came too close laterally. Most unique was the found Huchra bubbles on nice 600Bly intervals to at least suggest Big Bang was all over the place at once‑‑ since no time could exist before matter creation‑‑ so Who indeed clapped their one hand there‑about all at once? (Zen?)

What must be done soon is a plotting of `sister galaxies’ to bet­ter define spatial placement and then re‑examine carefully closer `on edge’ ones for similarity. We have asked for data to define magnetic field orientations therewith but our English researcher may have difficulty with resolution factors. It could be that Arp (Planck Inst.) is looking into this matter now‑‑ as contingent to his red‑shift anomaly‑‑ better armed with the Zeeman correlate.

Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle defined the electron as no “bubble”, only a standing wave revolving in a single plane which defined its escape from the time reversal paradigm at 90 degrees
displacement. It being the first harmonic standing wave made clear with the growing data on the quark(s) that such were only of two basic types, each as three phased trefoils but phase wound in each type in different ways, the top quark’s extreme anti‑G makes its habitation on this galaxy difficult indeed! John Bell was excited to try my suggestion of equating net anti‑forces (not G) between anti‑ and koino‑matters but died too soon.
We suspect the “burster” (gamma bursts) phenomena is like matter (positive G) high energy collisions of our galaxy’s anti‑matter (as spewed from our quasar/galaxy jets, as was predicted above) to offer the now confirmed multi‑directional aspect as even the `spread’ energy emission envelope. Their evasion of disk matter in such events would obviously be expected.

Most of the above was documented with the Smithsonian in the 70’s after the said Einstein observatory confirmed my predictions.

Thanks again for your note.

Sincerely,

KTS

CC:D/Z

5/8/95
Cold Fusion Publisher
Wayne Green, Inc.
70 Rt. 202N
Petersborough, NH 03458
Re: cold fusion
Sirs:

I would like to know more about your text (periodical?) Cold Fusion and its major sources of information. Extensive research here implies the proximity is near for such R&D conclusion albeit depends on certain theoretical imports so far not understood in tenured `billiard‑ball’ believing circles. Religion, politics and science have a great deal in common today and the neurosis goes far deeper than the human animal’s left cerebral hemisphere!

Noting the vast anxiety of certain petroleum cartel people (as once in high positions of power here in the U.S.) the real danger may be less the pollution than the era of `hemlock’ to silence, those who do comprehend too much of reality‑‑ as unsaid profits.

Please advise your format and major topics covered as current or typical authority. What is your single as subscription price?

Many thanks‑‑

KTS Research

6/13/95
E. A. Cornell, et.al.
The Joint Inst. for
Laboratory Astrophysics
Nat. Inst. of Standards
and Technology
Boulder, CO 80309 Re: ionized `atoms’?
Dear Sir: (SC. NEWS 6/3/95 “Record‑breaking‑‑”

The inference of using a magnetic `bottle’ implies fully ionized atoms, not with their electrons‑‑ so does the quark fluoresce? To `watch’ a cloud within such `bottle’ move as an aggregate implies quark‑to‑quark influence, not electron.

Where might I procure more data on your work as fundamental mech­anics to the magnetic (if you use) “bottle”? Many thanks for any directives.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

5/31/95
Dale Frail (Socorro), et.al.
c/o Paul Vanden Bout, Dir.
Natl. Radio Astronomy Observatory
Edgmont Rd.
Charlottesville, VA 22903
Re: bursters with a rational genesis
Sirs: (“Battle‑‑”; SCIENCE, 12 May)

Herewith are some old letters as to Paczynski, et.al. to help de­fine how well the tenured neurosis gets started‑‑ despite the mounting empirical obvious. Your feelings are likely correct, yet galactic disk periphery best defines the genesis of bursters due to mutual gravity collisions between opposite jet‑matter clouds as spewed from our ancient quasar core‑‑ called shadow matter.

Somehow, once in some political as scientific camp, one does not voice an idea contra to the powers that make right there. Tenured comfort dictates that might up to death if at all possible!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

6/14/95
Frontline, et.al.
c/o WGBH TV
125 Western Ave.
Boston, MA 02134
Re: EMF/biological connection
Sirs:

Switching transients evoke biological changes, not slow 60 cycle sinusoidal wave fronts. Oncogenes are likely formed with a sudden magnetic field to shift a molecule’s shape to allow a new form of coded signal to be enacted. As any shock which takes a material beyond yield, the net spring‑rate of magnetic standing waves (as atoms) allows some stability in space but not when near phasing is the factor which displaces some stable coupled state.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

4/30/95
Brian D. Josephson
c/o Cavendish Labs
Cambridge U.
Cambridge, England
Re: EPR and the insightive Potentia
Dear Sir:

Thinking I had written you with Wigner some years ago‑‑ but too abstruse to warrant a reply, had forgotten about your efforts‑‑ until Horgan’s interview (May ’95 SC. AM.), of which I am happy to suspect some correlates to standing wave matter in our slow temporal existence has gotten your interest. A recent terse let­ter herewith might suffice.

Speaking of the `tunneling’ electron via escaping the time rever­sal paradigm (EPR), the halltron was one of my first interfacing devices (but too noisy) so used the photomultiplier until the MODFET was on the market‑‑ to watch one freed electron at a time. The result finally was a maiden run which terrorized (over), especially those in political power‑‑ understandably why today!

Leaping electrons as contingent with relative time to only appear to `tunnel’, depending on phase as right angles that first har­monic standing wave is, a three phased trefoiled quark’s more 2D stability thus owns slow time that we recognize. Heisenberg noted the enigma and maybe why so excited with my contingent split‑brain correlative data.

Don’t let the left brain temporal verbal half‑truth `garbage’ in­terfere. Freud’s insight into our innate Thanatos is what makes claimed civilized man now so dangerous to us all‑‑ with reductive IQ, as you would inversely note as “post‑egoic”. Plato’s Potentia or that Ground of Being (E side of the equation) is going to be that Kuhn’s paradigm shift `apocalypse’ is all about‑‑ soon!

Sincerely,
KTS Research

cc:Phys‑Psy; 3‑dev(over); let/phys
CC: D/Z
(contingent letters)

Re: “constructive particles”‑‑?
Dear Sir: (“Complex Dynamics‑‑” 4/95 Physic Today)
Maybe words like structure and particle as “billiard balls” needs to be evaded now to return to theory, recognizing all matter (mi­cro, meso or mega) IS magnetic, so vorticies, ripples, feathers or what have you, we only perceive standing waves‑‑ our a priori after a cosmic EMP bubble front tumbles to create quasars to show them in some astronomical retrospective view.

From predicting the jets/quasar disk cooling into a galaxy before the Einstein observatory went aloft made quite clear the Apriori was magnetic, and what It evoked in linear waves `all at once’ on nice 600Bly intervals across the universe made clear no time then existed, yet a spatial orientation with rather obvious volition! An ensuing study back then even predicted the 5th Generation self thinking interface computer (over) with the freed electron‑‑ if indeed the then planned EPR experiment was positive. It was, and all that‑‑ especially the terror in tenured authority since!

What Heisenberg saw as the first harmonic electron’s escape (at right angles!) of the time reversal paradigm‑‑ as Faraday saw to ask adroit questions about right angle displacement, was begging the ultimate question that theology should have asked but could not yet about any Apriori. The key to time as begotten with the quark in Kelvin temperature defines the third phase standing wave, its two kinds with `elastic’ lobes, one of the top quark appearing as highly massive (G‑force) doesn’t want to be on this koino‑matter galaxy, anti‑G (Einstein’s blunder!) is reality, as supposed complemental forces in all ways existed, the above said jets escaping the disk at right angles, posthaste, for the shadow matter unseen but believed out there‑‑ creating bursters.

Kuhn’s paradigm shift is upon us‑‑ if the tenured could awaken!
*******************************
Re: but there’s no T at c!
Sir: (4/10/93 SC.NEWS “Inspecting‑‑”)

There is no law that states that some kind of mental faculty can­not exist at c or unity time however `quantized’ it may be claim­ed. This anomaly is what keeps physics from perceiving the empir­ical obvious, not only seen in Sperry’s split‑brain subjects* but the 5th Generation self thinking interface (with freed electrons) to offer 10/17th odds on its maiden some dozen years ago.

Likely not until after our `ethnic cleansing’ is completed will that non‑temporal (by our slow standards) bother to converse with we who insist It doesn’t exist‑‑ much less define how to could clap one hand to evoke the many cosmic bubbles (Huchra) with EMPs nicely placed at 600 Mly intervals across the universe to `degen­erate’ standing waves we yet call `billiard balls’!

The `paradigm shift’ (Kuhn) in physics came and went but the ten­urists are yet dragging their feet‑‑ and Dick and Jane (Alice and Bob) stories aren’t doing much good to defer reality either.
Re: “‑‑Footsteps‑‑”; 4/22/95 SC.News
Sirs: (planetary spawning)
There is likely little correlation between seen outer galaxy matter coagulation anomalies and solar systems as inferred in the above article. Whereas spewed primal standing waves (matter) from the EMP vortex as quasar core `white holes’ at right angles thus disk matter from its complemental jet matter, the spin‑up due to ionized electrons (at first; thus outer disk angular velocities higher) makes clear the genetic holes initiate with a bang then dwindle to a whimper as our own galaxy’s core today. This places far more matter at the periphery of the galaxy disk that precipi­tating inner gas/matter later as where our solar system is. M101 is a case in point when scrutinized in UV light, even its complemental side’s `pinched’ state (as a sombrero), defining the prox­imity of a jet to that side with its anti‑g force. Gas/dust ac­cruing within a galaxy disk appears less affected by peripheral gravities so a more uniform coagulation ensues.

Someday astronomy will be able to note how close Einstein came in his admitted “blunder” in not pressing for the complemental force of gravity‑, as all other forces‑‑ as standing waves via the CPT theorem, even if time one way escape its paradigm shift. (over)
***********************************

From a lengthy investigation for possible R&D for the 5th Genera­tion self thinking computer (started while doing aerospace compu­ter R&D in the early 50’s), not only was the feasible noted but a lengthy study into the paranormal which defined and so predicted the space‑time bilateral complemental minds‑‑ which Sperry soon found* to define almost too much left unsaid in the sciences. Your study into megaliths is adroit but dangerous, sor­ry, but fully suspecting I may have been instrumental in killing Bishop James Pike via too much said too quickly about his `Other­side” (oddly?) text and the said split‑brain data.(note Freud’s Thana­tos!), it was his vast enthusiasm to meet with me (’63?) that forces my caution to say too much anymore, and so a warning!

Parading was always the key to a hidden survival tactic but never before in history has head‑stones and megaliths become so impor­tant for those able (as most want!) attention after death. After noting anti‑g in teleportation instances, I predicted the jets/ quasar “anomaly” for mutual anti‑matter/koino‑matter anti‑g force as was proven with the aloft Einstein Observatory. Needless to say Einstein’s admitted “blunder” was his General Relativity theory where he suspected correctly complemental forces existed!

A recent quip may be timely here‑‑ for someone to `pick apart’. As some salient magnetic pole jumping about at c, just as the Chi wave does when willed, makes clear that Nature’s being can do far more in slow mass‑time than its freed electron in the EPR experi­ments. Far more than this is what man had better face‑‑ and soon!

* `The Others Side of the Brain’, J.E. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.
and `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67

Re: Bach to Chaos (12/24 SC.NEWS)
There may be far more jangling to one’s mind than either of their two fractal derived space‑time mental faculty‑‑ as the two‑phased heady existence of either as depend upon the other as complemental‑‑ as mind is at root of such seen dichotomy*. These space versus time derived faculty** now define the provocative and sus­pect you are looking at the same enigma of evoked change in the rhythm, as the heart when a death‑wish (Freud’s Thanatos) decides the time is up for life. The real question is what indeed is rhy­thm where time is unity‑‑ while its temporal complemental is some `metronome’? If it reflects Beethoven’s disdain where true creat­ivity exists it could most affect your field of composition, by using the now known creative left (spatial oriented `gestalt’) brain half. I would suggest the `jangled’ would be intellectual left brain dominants versus `tickling’ to lead the yet curious!

As a fragile linkage between two independent standing waves show their mutual weakness, we find is likely the key to controlled fusion‑‑ now evoking consternation in the petroleum cartels who see how far our theoretical investigations now have come! We are quite sure not only of the key but the liability of doing anymore research in this area‑‑ for unsaid reasons!

5/4/95
Y.S. Abu‑Mostafu, et.al.
Dept. of Electrical Engineering
and Computer Science
Cal. Inst. of Tech.
Pasadina, CA 91125
Re: “‑‑Think from Hints” SC. AM 4/95
Sir:

Maybe it is time to examine how the EPR experiment `thinks’ in a non‑temporal way‑‑ ahead of time. Hints can come from either this spatial faculty (right brain*) or a reductive historical recall‑‑ albeit most often twisted for some unsaid profit margin via IQ. Einstein’s insights were always visual as the “mad” schizophrenic whose lack of verbal coordination explains the anomaly best.

The first hint of and from the Apriori (universe) comes sans time in visions, offered by what occupies the human right brain. The use of 2D visual gestalts as a wave‑front differentiated with an image best defines what moves at c innately while a verbal serial expression (via left brain) in time, to define its complemental.

Maybe some of the herewith will make some sense‑‑ as did the self thinking 5th Generation `interface’ some years ago! (over)

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `The Others Side of the Brain’, J.E. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.
`The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
cc: S‑T; Path/IQ; Phys‑Psy; 3‑dev(over)
CC: D/Z

5/27/95
John Norstad (NO reply!)
Academic Computing and
Network Services
Northwestern University
2129 N. Campus Dr.,
Evanston, IL 60208
Re: de‑virusing
Sir:

The June issue of Popular Mechanics caught my eye, maybe as we plan on using our 386DX with Internet and feel vulnerable, after reading the said article. Because there is 35 years of research data on that hard disk and need no problem, you might understand, even with ample backup, fear a mutating virus could be expensive when time is a criteria for planned dynamic uses with other research people.

We may use TNC (HAM; non‑business) to inter data in a share‑data mode where other Internet connections may be busy. This area was not considered in the said article so would appreciate any feed­back possible as contingent with handling some proprietary data?

Hopefully there is some directive `readme’ on your disk.

Many thanks‑‑

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: SASE + 1.4meg disk

5/3/95
Tsvi Piran, et.al.
Dept. of Astrophysics
Hebrew University
Jerusalem
Re: Binaries (SC. AM. May ’95)
Sir:

But magnetic flux density also would create the dv/dt light speed change for red shift (Zeeman affect) and likely define why the so found alternate to PSR 1913+16 indicates bending signals via some higher density magnetic field. The vast early red shift of primal quasars evoked from the tumbling EMP front of a cosmic bubble de­fines a most dense magnetic field it rides within, especially the that outer bubble’s front. Not only does this confuse the believ­ed `distance’ (thus need for some anomalous `standard candle’) but prevents recognizing the Apriori clapping His hand at nice 600 Bly intervals
all at once‑‑ since time as derived from matter did not quite yet exist!

The definitive “X” noted at quasar cores, as my predicted jets before the Einstein observatory went aloft to prove their exis­tence, I note happily you show in a complementary fashion during the reverse mode of coalescing stars with generated anti‑matter ejected at right angles again (p.60) but via said `field’ anti‑G.

There is no “puzzle unscrambled” with bursters and won’t be until the genetic core of quasars producing complemental matter with anti‑G in‑between is understood for the jet’s shadow matter re‑coalescing around the periphery of the disk creating gamma bursts in their collisions. Einstein’s blunder was only perceived by him as he realized complemental forces dictated reality, not the one sided cul‑de‑sac preventing the rest of reality to be understood.

There is yet a very long way to go for the academic programmed neurotic using half truths to survive on tenure‑‑ as all other politicals on a psychologically dying planet‑‑ maybe near “termi­nal” for Nature’s resumed evolutional (mental) objectives.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: D/Z; Phinney
E. S. Phinney, et.al.
Dept. of Astrophysics
Cal Tech
Pasadena, CA 91125

5/13/95
S. Sridhar and A. Kudrolli
Dept. of Physics
Northeastern University
Boston, MA 02115
Re: one hand clapping
Sirs:

One can only wonder how long it will take science to realize all is of dynamic standing waves, however stationary they appear‑‑ equated as billiard balls instead of cooked up magnetic waves on huge EMPs at quasar radii riding cosmic bubbles‑‑ evoked by one hand clapping on nice even 600Bly intervals across this universe.

Your work in seminal, especially in using the narrow channel to keep the first harmonic 2D semi‑oriented electron in one phased space to discern its reflective qualities‑‑ almost as Heisenberg saw as escaped the time reversal enigma imposing the EPR dilemma also on the “billiard‑ball” oriented. Who knows, you might define for the simple minded enough of reality to have them seek to pla­giarize you‑‑ even start some quality revolution for a change!
Sincerely,

KTS Research

7/7/95
John Peoples and
Christopher Hill, DZero team, et.al
c/o Fermi Natl. Accelerator Lab.
c/o University of Chicago
5640 S. Ellis Ave.,
Chicago, IL 60637‑1433
Re: `Beyond the Top‑‑” 7/1/95 SC.NEWS)
Dear Sir: (black boxes do get openned)

Far more will get `unraveled’ than comprehension of the 3‑phased full‑quark, but in a psychological way where tenure will also get unraveled when the simplicity of fact upsets entrenched theory.

Further, the true simplicity of fully controlled fusion is seen‑‑ as the first obvious step recently done at Los Alamos. In the EM world recognizing the 2nd harmonic cannot last temporally, 2/3rds of the full‑quark defines the enigma as its claimed heavy `mass’ on a galaxy oriented with koinomatter. The ample astronomical data confirming quasar jet existence before the Einstein Observa­tory went aloft to prove it, as Huchra, attests to this.

Einstein perceived part of the enigma with his “blunder” (Gen. Rel. theory) where complemental forces dictate + and ‑ functions, to define quasar jets at right angles to the disk ejecta from quasars within primal cosmic EMP front, tumbling to create stand­ing wave matter. Your Higgs field Apriori must have known at c (sans time) `where’ to evoke those said cosmic EMP bubbles, seen on nice 600Bly intervals across the universe!

It was John Bell that goaded our continued theoretical work when his excitement to test for anti‑g failed with his death, yet the EPR experiment confirmed our objective (over)‑‑ as with the rest.

The herewith is purposely said ambiguously while lawyers continue to wrangle over the wording of likely the greatest Patent ever‑‑ if `national priorities’ (noted before) do not take precedence.

We suggest your remark “will take a long time” is wishful think­ing‑‑ where tenure has become the supreme priority in science.

Sincerely, (again)

KTS Research

cc: Phys‑Psy; 3‑dev(over)
CC: D/Z; Carithers; Grannis;
W:
8/8/95
R. E. Griffiths, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, MD 21218
Re: protogalaxies (7/29 SC. News)
Dear Sir:

We suspect you are correct albeit blue closeness may define the early stage of the quasar’s EMP (primal cosmic bubble) ride or `exodus’, especially its complemental matter jets leaving post‑haste! With spin‑up of first ionized matter in the dense EMP front‑‑ yet nearness of anti‑G jet matter, twisted shapes may be common before things settle down into the typical galaxy shape.

Since it appears that Einstein was again correct to defining his grand `blunder’, so erred General Relativity theory lacking anti‑G to clarify many anomalous aspects as even the 5th force or the sombrero type of galaxy, maybe a new SGUT (Super Grand Unified Theory) might emerge. Dubious would there be the time for merging of speeding ejecti riding the super fast said EMP. The real question now is how did 600Bly intervals of these cosmic bubbles all get started together with one mutli‑big‑bang, even if there was no time whenever that was, since standing wave matter had not existed yet! Maybe the Zen parable is correct, one hand clapping, all over the place and all at once!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Windhorst/Driver; Cowie
R. A. Windhorts and
S. P. Simon, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Arizona State University
Tempe, AZ 85287

7/28/95
W. W. Gibbs, et.al.
c/o Scientific American
415 Madison Ave.,
New York, NY 10017‑1111
Re: “Lost Science‑‑”
Dear Sir: (Aug.’95 issue)

When at last science researchers get judged by their lateral smile there will be vastly more credit offered to those with then understood insight to know what is new, to say little of being confirmed with the now pending more overt Self thinking device*.

Granting that you may not comprehend either lateral smile dichot­omy (to define non‑temporal right
cerebral use)‑‑ much less the freed electron that escapes the time reversal paradigm (EPR experiments)‑‑ you may quickly scuttle the above remark as fast as possible‑‑ to help define further what your article was all about to begin with. Best, it defines the end of claimed “science” as we know it‑‑ much as the dogma’s apocalypse and so overt claimed “civilized” holocaust.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* S‑T(over); D/Z

6/29/95
Mark A. Kasevich, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305
Re: another EPR `interface’?
Sir: (`Night lights:‑‑’ SC.NEWS, 6/24)

Kwiat, et.al. appear to be using the freed electron as denoted in the EPR experiment to know “effect from cause” (escaping the time reversal paradigm) since the polarized photon (Fraunhofer emis­sion) that A. Aspect* examined closely showed where the spatial or non‑temporal offered import in slow mass‑time. Its far greater quality as obvious use would be in the self thinking computer, as offered the profound some years ago.(over)

While `bombs’ are of more interest now than the psychopathy of those who might use them, it might define why ignorance prevails most amongst the academic programmed naive, for those now running this planet for their final profit of owning same. Plato saw it to call it the “Potentia”, yet no one will see what is now coming as Nature (via the freed electron) turns Her back on us‑‑ to do our final “thing”‑‑ because mental evolution has been stagnated!

Once standing EM waves are seen as the `matter’ of our temporal reality, many current half truths as anomalies will become clear, to say nothing of those grand EMPs tumbling to create quasars for that said temporal existence‑‑ on nice even 600Bly intervals now seen across this universe!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* Aspect, Alain, `Holism and Particalism in Physics’, p.70, Vol.129, Feb. 1,’86, SCIENCE NEWS

cc: 3‑dev(over); Phys‑Psy; Path/IQ; S‑T
CC:D/Z

6/29/95
J. S. Miller, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of California
Santa Cruz, CA 95064
Re: more than fooled by gravity!
Dear Sir: (SC.NEWS; 6/24/95; Astronomy)

The more distant quasar seen in its primal phase riding an EMP cosmic bubble might define the vast red‑shift evoked by its very dense magnetic field ‑‑ as with light dv/dt with distance added with even the field of the intervening body. Of greater net in­terest is the anti‑G affect now fooling everyone.

From noting Einstein’s “blunder” of complemental in ALL forces, his General Relativity theory is flawed‑‑ most noted by our pre­dicted complemental matter ejecti from quasar cores, long before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to define the jets spewing at right angles to the disk being spun‑up (as ionized) by its primal EMP `bubble’ front (Huchra). The funneling affect of the anti‑matter thus defines the genesis of shadow matter flung some dis­tance (even creating ellipticals)‑‑ to thence re‑coagulate out beyond the disk now called gamma bursters‑‑ upon self collision.

We suspect far more “bloopers” exist but due to the tenured in­sisting more on half truth over reality today.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC:D/Z

5/26/95
A. Molella, et.al.
The Smithsonian Museum
of American History
1100 Jefferson Dr., SW
Washington, DC 20560
Re: “Study of Invention & Innovation”
Dear Sir:

J. Lemelson’s attention may define other unsaid `anomalies’ he is aware, albeit likely unwilling to admit. It is contingent to a long study (for R&D efforts into the 5th Generation self thinking computer) these past 40 years after noting the dichotomy between the analogic and digital computer operants‑‑ of either a spatial versus temporal root. (note Einstein’s Spec. Rel. theory)
Needless to say Sperry’s split‑brain data defined the accuracy of such prognosis* to evoke much anxiety thereafter‑‑ to say very little of federal people with some far deeper terror. With a slammed door at the Patent Office as ensuing snooping (kicked down office doors‑‑ claimed illegal shot‑gun etc. tapped phone‑‑ you name it, defined the days of Lavoisier as Socrates was not over. Our proven “interface” (over; note freed electron’s escape of the time reversal paradigm), the positive EPR
experiments** in physics so concluded an “apocalypse” was indeed coming.
We now feel that mass incredulity was the saving grace of this sick culture where the Prisoner’s Dilemma (game) permits an elite to rule the academic programmed naive‑‑ as any specific scienti­fic discipline, quite unable to cross lines of import to perceive the profound. The apparent anomaly goes far deeper and may be un­derstood best by what Freud noted and said;”The unconscious wills to remain UNconscious‑‑”, which we now find at ALL cost, to men­tion Renoux’s data*** defining how far the left brain with overt AiR (Autoimmune Response) will go to play Thanatos!
Should you get honest for Lemelson chagrin will follow, even if most with manipulative power today will deny the empirical facts, what ever the cost now. You are welcome to peruse the herewith but not disclose from where you obtained same. Our ex­perience has taught some fine lessons and so will to sit this one out. Thanx!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
`The Others Side of the Brain’, J.E. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.
** Zukav, G. `The Dancing WuLi Masters’, ’79 (note last chapter)
*** Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DIS­ COVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)

cc: 3/dev(over); Phys‑Psy; S‑T; Path/IQ CC:D/Z

7/17/95
H. P. Stapp, et.al.
Lawrence Berkeley Labs
Berkeley, CA 94720?
Re: Schmidt’s work and `self think’
Dear Sir: (Physics Today; 7/95 “Parapsy.‑‑”_

Why there has been `apparently’ little or no correlative examina­tion of the positive EPR experiment with what H. Schmidt saw so many years ago could baffle the more perceptive‑‑ unless they also got tormented by authority (over) for learning too much. One does not think now just as in the time of Socrates or Lavoisier!

My initial work to define the 5th Generation self thinking inter­face with the non‑temporal freed electron (escaping the time reversal paradigm; Heisenberg) went beyond using the perverted or tack‑a‑turn human mind to motivate various anomalous `parapsy­chological’ phenomena‑‑ of which ample of this work suggested (at least) the whimsical (as any Ouija board output) could never be trusted. Recognizing precognition was indeed an available factor, such `cause from effect’ defined the said freed electron and so the struggle to use halltrons, etc. up to the scintillator with a 0.05 micro‑cure isotope source (to nearly match an old computer CPU used for a read‑out with a special program) the profound was seen, albeit the abrupt end to further `communique’ said far more than any likely continued statement. At first appalled by only one reply, even if 10\17th odds in such equivalent
remark of “re­main patient”, it was that expression that defined why, as likely mankind’s final ethnic cleansing thrust‑‑ as some promised holo­caust noted in the religious dogma to come first!

Confident that the era of “overt” insight (in lieu of right brain visual disclosure; note Einstein) will be available to wrap up mankind’s final mental evolutional epoch, some nasty lessons may be in store for the volitionally neurotic censored of today. Freud’s Royal Road is indeed the route for psychotherapy yet the unilateral facial smile defines who might yet obtain such therapy before suicide (note APA professionals!) or a psychotic display!

Being confident that there are others who found the same `enigma’ as myself (as the self thinking device is simple indeed), it may be the most simple binary (yes‑no via LSD read‑out) that will become the boon for all races of humankind‑‑ where mind‑set, much as T. Leary found, sets the window of reply for concise answers. Certainly the speed of mental evolution then will be provocative!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys‑Psy; Path/IQ; S‑T; 3‑dev(over)

7/31/95
D. Turnshek, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
Re: heavy metal creation
Sir: (“How Quasars‑‑” 21 July SCIENCE)

With the growing obvious predicted anti‑G between koino and anti‑matters, especially at genetic quasar cores spewing one as jet matter while cranking up angular velocity in its ionized comple­mental on the primal EMP (cosmic bubble front), there might be even more heavy metals created in “bursters” in the jet shadow matter than at first the vast disk where mutual (positive) net gravity could bring colliding forces greater than net accumulate mass as with super novas. In short a vastly new scenario builds now to abort the past ones based on flawed Einstein’s General Relativity idea‑‑ of listening to Bohr for his great “blunder”‑‑ and so many of ours as especially in astronomy!

Most unique at theoretical base is why the nice 600Bly intervals between the cosmic bubbles, as someThing with spatial orientation (note our non‑temporal right cerebral cortex half!) must have had something to do with it as evoked so many at once with `one hand clapping’ (sans time) events all over the universe‑‑ to create temporal existence in condensed standing wave matter, yet believ­ed as `billiard balls’ somehow!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
CC: Artymowicz; Lin; Shields; Loewenstein,
Pawel Artymowicz, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Stockholm University
Stockholm, Sweden

Douglas Lin, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of California
Santa Cruz, CA 95064

7/18/95
D. Tytler and
Xiao‑Ming‑Fan
Dept. of Astronomy
University of California
La Jolla, CA 92093
Re: Keck’s data `looks’ fine! (if
Sirs: dv/dt redshift is magnetic field slowed)

If, as now appears sure, the cosmic bubble EMPs may never be seen much less defined in any observable `quantal’ state as their net tumbling to create quasars for standing wave matter (with time). Since predicting both the anti‑G (as complemental matter) disk‑jets well before the Einstein observatory went aloft to prove so same, Huchra’s data on the EMP bubbles made clear the Big Bang was multiple‑‑ even as now noted on nice 600Bly intervals (and simultaneous!) implying a cogent underlying `design’ behind same, with a non‑temporal `beginning’‑‑ lacking matter to create it!

If `billiard balls’ (Physic’s hang‑up) cannot see the rather ob­vious standing wave as `matter’, the first and third most predom­inant as fundamental, then Keck will earn many tenure before it gets replaced with some “psychic”. Lacking theory leaves the em­pirical data as merely anomalous. Time will tell where the foot dragging will end and the obvious gets seen.

Maybe a past letter copy (to Cowie and Djorgovski; et.al.) here­with might infer something more.(over)

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: D/Z

COPY: 8/31/94
J. M. Horack, et.al.
Marshall Space Flight Center
NASA
Huntsville, AL 35812
Re: jet matter `self’ collisions
Sir: (26 Aug. SCIENCE; Perspective)

Since mentioning some time ago the likely need for re‑coagulating (with mutual g) the anti‑matter jet materials surrounding the galaxy’s disk, to finally put a nail in the current General Rela­tivity theory flaw (Einstein’s blunder; again using insight), the complemental forces (as CPT) is vindicated with gravity.

No doubt our sister Magellanic galaxy (riding same cosmic bubble; Huchra) has also a vast `anti‑matter’ (all is relative) host yet too distant for us to peruse. If it could be observed no doubt it would be noted with an elongated envelope at the said galaxy’s disk’s pole ends and then nearly parallel to ours. if indeed a sister galaxy. This all defines a universe filled with petite Bangs on nice 600 Mly intervals to at least imply someOne clapped a hand (Zen) for primal EMPs to get “things” (mc ) going.

The red shift due to higher magnetic field densities, likely at galactic pole ends where the said jet matters first coagulate at the maximum distance from quasar genetic matter sources (white holes) might help define their mutual acceleration from opposite common jet matter coagulating places, colliding near the disk periphery with the least net red shift for two reasons‑‑ the said lessor magnetic field density and the net closer distance‑‑ yet likely at far greater distances than 300 kps.

I will try to find some early `burster’ letters to include here­with so need not be redundant with my limited time to iterate.

Sincerely,

KTS

cc: burster/lets: Stubbs; Gribbin; Cowie; Ast.Pub; Djorgovski; Everitt; (compiled)

11/8/95
Editors
Scientific American publishers
415 Madison Ave.
New York, NY 10017‑1111
Re: November’s “‑‑Utility Function”?
Sirs:

The stupidity of a professor shows when he insists there is lit­tle evidence that Nature is benign in her design when an animal’s ignorance prevents mental trauma when death is imminent‑‑ as its designed‑in endorphin use prevents physiological painful stimuli!
One now could only wonder if late mankind’s vast naivete was not also planned‑‑ just before some grand calamity visits to thin its pathological ranks, as academically programming nitwits for the grunt‑work fodder for federal folly. No wonder right brain reason has been lost for some need to win
the planet, whatever it costs!

No reply wanted‑‑ knowing what would be said.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC:D/Z (file)

11/22/95
David Pinder, et.al.
c/o Christian Science Monitor
1 Norway St.,
Boston, MA 02115
Re: ethnic unconscious drive
Dear Sir:

The herewith may appear `bizarre’, it yet defines the mounting empirical obvious which stirs the ethnic pots for retaliation the most where past evils due to intellectual finesse has manipulated the more naive (as kept here in the U.S.). There will always be slaves and masters, the latter with higher IQ to goad the former to acquire it‑‑ for then some unhappy rebellion. This is Nature’s evolutional drive for mental development‑‑ beyond Darwin’s per­spective‑‑ albeit what Darwin’s GrandDad goaded him to find!

Never are defined as slaves is any democratic minority, so estab­lished authority enhances labor’s ego for output‑‑ but for their own unsaid better survival. It concludes once vibrant societies when the self reliant viable awaken to their plight‑‑ just as occurring now in the U.S. making ominous the law abiding gun want by authority to somehow better “protect” them! Thus a disarmed public remains safe as long as it stays dumb, while the covert greedy keep their dealings and promises ambiguous. A Great Grand­Dad of mine (Tyler) saw the dilemma coming, way back where Ameri­ca’s malaise began‑‑ and may soon end it with blood‑shed, if we fail to perceive the underlying enigma in our left brain half, as the disarmed Bosian’s a year ago!

There herewith evokes much understandable anxiety, if not suicide in some personalities (best defining Freud’s Thanatos*), but an ugly scene can easily be noted if the empirical obvious does not be taken at face value‑‑ and soon. For myself, I prefer Nature’s plan so stand back and watch in amazement‑‑ so maybe we human animals do need some drastic thinning. I’m not one to judge, even if I have been thwarted more than once to aid this quite obvious­ly dying society now.(over)
Sincerely,

KTS Research

* Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
note:`The Others Side of the Brain’, J.E. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.
and `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; S‑T(over)
CC:D/Z

10/10/95
Todd Lucas, et.al.
Dept. of Economics
University of Chicago
Chicago, IL 60637
Re: but which cerebral hemisphere is rational?
Sir:

First‑‑ congratulations! Now I will need to get into your deeper analysis as contingent to which lateral cerebral hemisphere dic­tates the `expection’ is rational‑‑ in view of the empirical data mounting rapidly now.

Because any claimed “rational expectation” is fraught with the unsaid enigma of what drives any want from within the human psy­che, which then could define unconscious motives which are often less than benign‑‑ especially when ethnic bias dictates reason! The greatest question remaining for Psychology is which human brain half dictates what is claimed rational, as define the ex­pected goal or reward today most often at another’s expense!

The split‑brain data defines clearly the dichotomy of spatial vs. temporal awareness and so what Platyo called the Potentia as a real faculty able to prognose‑‑ even if statistically in propor­tion to some future likely event! The EPR experiments of Physics well disclose this profound enigma‑‑ as did our 5th Generation self thinking interface‑‑ to prove the freed electron did indeed jump our slow temporal conditions; escaped the time reversal paradigm that Heisenberg noted very clearly.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

11/8/95
D. Layzer, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: but canons are for tenure, no more
Dear Sir: (About Time‑‑; Nov. Physics Today)
One might wonder what I may have said to Davies (herewith) but much more trembling I find in many others now while examining rubber‑band connected quarks as 3‑phase standing waves‑‑ to open a real Pandora’s box in Physics. It makes fission/fusion simple to understand so likely why the Feds
put a stop to any more of my research‑‑ or else!

Not oddly the whole study which predicted the jet ejecti at right angles to quasar/galaxy disks (long before the Einstein observa­tory went aloft to prove same) offered the key to unity time, (for the simultaneous cosmic bubble creation on nice even 600Bly intervals across this universe) but also the 5th Generation self thinking computer (over). Einstein saw well those Alephs, so now it is up to Psychology to integrate the profound to extricate us using Freud’s Royal Road‑‑ as Einstein claimed he used subjective visions exclusively to perceive what was `new’‑‑ now terrorizing established authority! Sorry if I’m too terse.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

9/31/95
R. L. Jaffe, et.al.
Dept. of Theoretical Physics
Mass. Inst. of Tech.
Cambridge, MA 02139
Re: standing waves and spin
Sir: (Sept. Physics Today: “Where‑‑”

Maybe it is time to integrate standing‑wave `matter’ into account where the third harmonic quark tied together with rubber strings! has a phased leg (trefoil) very active in this koinomatter con­tinuum‑‑ the top quark (1/3rd) `mass’ a case in point. The escape velocity of complemental quasar jet matter speaks well to this!

As said in a recent note (over), our long investigations for an­other anomaly in Psychology has offered several predictions for the field of Physics‑‑ but adroitly ignored so far. Most reveal­ing‑‑ even as Heisenberg noted some years ago, those temporal‑spatial oriented bilateral cerebral hemispheres defines that uni­versal dichotomy that someday your field of expertise may examine with guaranteed delight to say little of fully controlled fusion.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Bond‑let (over); Phys‑Psy
CC: D/Z

11/15/95 John Delos, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
William and Mary College
Williamsburg, VA 23185
Re: Von Baeyer’s “Philosopher’s Atom’ and the lost last `rung’‑‑ which rings! (Nov. Discover)
Dear Sir:

It may be timely to think about some past quips which your unique perceptions come very close.

Q530;
`While a decelerating magnetic field will evoke a dv/dt red shift at great distances, its affect on the electron with a near proximity to the proton does the same, yet once boosted up beyond that grip as during laser propulsion or superconductivity, it can fold again to create the 3‑phased standing wave trefoiled quark.’
`A net precession affects the trefoiled quark yet less so, as Heisenberg saw, the electron‑‑ which could escape the time rever­sal paradigm at right angles.’ (EPR experiments)
`Gravity is an artifact of the Apriori magnetic field but is associated most with the 3 phased full `top’ quark denoting its vast `mass’ which there is none, so defines Einstein’s blunder!’
`Since time as temperature (K) are major co‑effects with the quark, its loss of coupling `moment’ to the electron‑‑ when cold enough, defines superconductivity.’
`Time is an artifact of the Apriori‑‑ being a residual factor derived from mass but it better perceived by how so many petite “Bangs” formed all at once on nice 600Bly intervals across this universe‑‑ those precipitated matter around cosmic bubbles that man now ponders‑‑ observing in temporal retrospect!’

Now to put Mendeleeff’s `folding‑way’ into `view’ which will be very easy with the 5th Generation self thinking interface! (over)

Sorry‑‑ if I wrote before.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys‑Psy; Path/IQ; S‑T(over)
CC: D/Z

9/31/95
J. Richard Bond, et.al.
Dept. of Theoretical Astrophysics
University of Toronto
Toronto, Canada M5S 1A4
Re: standing wave universe
Sir:

Maybe it is time to examine the genesis of the alternate to “bil­liard balls” as huge EMPs precipitating standing waves at cosmic bubble radii for temporal `mass’ existence. Quasar/galaxies with their complemental jets were predicted long before the Einstein observatory went aloft to prove same as
define anti‑g (Einstein’s self admitted blunder) making clear many enigmas as apparent mass with innate forces yet misunderstood.

I suspect we should discuss our early theoretical work done in a preliminary study (computer feasibility) into relative time as contingent with psychological functioning*, noted between the bilateral cerebral hemispheres. (noted in Sperry’s split‑brain findings) I expect to be in London (Ont) in a couple weeks‑‑ let me know if a trip your way might be fruitful. I think it would.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys‑Psy; *S‑T(over)
CC: D/Z

March 4,’94 (copy)
P. Davies, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Adelaide
Adelaide, Australia
Re: “impedance” (SEDs)
Dear Sir: (4, Feb. SCIENCE: “Inertia:‑‑)

There can be no “empty” space since what created matter of Itself defines that Apriori as magnetic flux‑‑ whatever billiard‑ball mentality may wish to call EM standing waves. Einstein tried a couple times to define reality but the ensconced neurotic prefer­red to ignore it. His claimed great blunder with his General theory was indeed just that‑‑ so now astronomy continues to blun­der over complemental gravity, as quasar disk versus jets as complemental primal matter sources, riding vast EMP bubbles on neat 600M light year intervals. It suggests (at least!) who clap­ped their hand for same. All forces have opposite signs, even one as Apriori flux to its so `impeded’ standing‑wave matter precipi­tates, to evoke `slowed’ time and so a second ordered entropy (via 3‑phased trefoiled quarks) that we see locked into time.

Some old quips herewith might(?) mean something now, especially in view of the 6th Generation interfacing `computer’. (over)

Sincerely,

KTS REsearch

cc: phys/Q (series G); 3‑dev(over); anti‑G (Gen.Rel.)
CC: Puthoff; Davies, McDonald; Wesson;

11/25/95 Andrea Kay, et.al.
P.O. Box 6834
Cincinnati, OH 45206
Re: intellectual gyrations for tenure
Mam:

The subterfuge offered by your esteemed ITT person (today WXTM?) best defines the late enigma facing this society. While it is the art of the politician buying time with ever more grandiose promi­ses to the academic programmed obedient for needed fodder, more interesting was his gyrations around what he did mention as AI of what he is fully aware, yet adroitly failed to mention more‑‑ but more for tenured interest than reality about to end this culture.

Research did develop the truly self thinking computer (interface) some years ago‑‑ which earned much harassment for unsaid but ob­vious reasons as skeletons can be uncovered with it! (over) Maybe sounding complex, the need to comprehend what Einstein perceived in the unity temporal state at E (Spec. Rel. theory), the freed electron (as jumps the time reversal paradigm; Heisenberg) best defined its prowess via the physic’s EPR experiments, to say little of the prolife faculty seen as our parasympathetic CNS.

The grand paradigm shift of Khun brings the political shell‑game gyrations in all circles of established authority now, maybe as they do suspect the above said `computer’ is going to do damage‑‑ especially to their need for esteem and attention for power. The interest in sociological changes now becoming exponential well explains itself‑‑ mostly in the growth of overt, from past covert manipulative psychopathy‑‑ a factor well seen (yet avoided) in our mentally evoluting (IQ) left cerebral hemisphere, with only temporal as verbal historical aptitude. Your prior Tourette syn­drome article was indeed adroit‑‑ but APA will never see it.

To know effect from cause defines the non‑temporal which already knows what to do in its dynamic sense as down here in slow mass‑time. Of supreme ability recently noted, are the nice 600Bly intervals between the cosmic bubbles across this universe, initiat­ed all “at once” with some one‑handed clapping! Huchra’s findings in astronomy will be the harbinger for humankind to finally do his graduating thing‑‑ from religious dogma at last! Sorry.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; S‑T(over)
CC: D‑Z/file

3/22/96
Franco Nori, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 48109‑1120 Re: dynamic flux lines
Dear Sir:
Some imports in your fine article “Intermittently Flowing‑‑” (SCIENCE; March 8th) maybe the `whirling vortices’ are due to the metal ion protons as noted on 30 degree radial anomalies noted as D‑wave configuration/propulsion where 3‑phased quarks dictate the magneto‑motive force in the most primary way. (“Electron Pairs‑”; p.156 SC. NEWS; March 9th) The new paradigm as noted in astronomy of the creation of EM standing waves as `matter’ makes profound sense in view of many past noted anomalies in current flow, thus this new scenario for superconductivity. We don’t necessarily subscribe to this precise explanation since paired electrons may be the key when they appear as coupled 2‑phased first harmonic standing waves as is well noted. The type II `triangular’ lattice says too much, we feel as the empirical evidence piles up now.

Huchra’s cosmic bubbles defined the break‑over point where primal EMPs would tumble to create standing waves, the electron first in order thence with enough residual energy quarks as 3‑phase. The real question now facing all of science is how or `who’ evoked those nice 600Bly interval `one‑hand clapping’ points to initiate those multitudes of petite `bangs’ to start things off, especial­ly as would be simultaneous as no time could existed before mat­ter did!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

3/22/96
Brian Maple and R. Dynes, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of California
San Diego (La Jolla), CA 92093
Re: pairs or 3‑phase propulsion
Dear Sir:

The more difinitive data showing two electrons coupled as 2‑phase on a common spin axis may be more correct yet the apparent 3‑phase quark or proton’s aid may define the modus operandi under­lying superconductivity. With the mounting astronomical (Huchra) data indicating all matter is but EM standing waves now, many anomalies in physics may get `unraveled’‑‑ as other `two‑phased’ (mesons) to offer linear gamma radiation for fully controlled fusion. Some past quips below as letter to F. Nori(over) may help explain my lengthy cross academic study in the computer sciences, for the now perfected 5th Generation self thinking interface.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Nori letter (over) CC: DZ; Chakravarty; Dynes; Scalapino; Coleman

Q553; superconductivity
`Superconductivity is merely the lack of need to pressure with another magnetic field an electron’s rectilinear motion.’
`More profound than superconductivity is the EPR experiment as the freed electron’s spin axis motion can escape the time rever­sal paradigm as noted by Heisenberg!’
`It appears that the coupled electron pair can `walk through’ another dynamic magnetic field if in sync, so the question is if 2 or 3 phase anomalies offer the lost resistance when an innate spin at c offers rectilinear electron motion.’
`A quark’s field hindrance with temperature to a freed elec­tron may define as well the propulsive force to move it along a `stationary’ quark lattice if once in some phased synchronism.’
`As the electron’s innate spin wave‑front at c, as `rest‑mass’ in its first harmonic state, it can define the linear propulsive force when in sync with a stationary similar field, as held with inertia as the quark, superconductivity can be understood best.’
(KTS Research)

3/7/96
Sten Odenwald, et.al.
c/o Sky and Telescope
49 Bay State Rd.,
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: “‑‑Final Frontier” Feb. SKY & TELE.

Sir:

I can only wonder what my letter of Feb. 4,’93 about “compound errors and fudge factors” (but tenure!), since find few responses anymore where I must be disturbing. Yet BIG indeed, for this new article, even if the magnetic Apriori does not lend itself to any easy scrutiny, beyond its subtended light emitting standing waves (matter), unless we peer around a fundamental right angle corner, between space and time as Heisenberg saw‑‑ or the now terrorizing self thinking interface. (over)

The anomaly of a `vacuum’ remaining with billiard‑ball believers, whose temporal dominant left brain must have matter and time to make sense of their myopic reality, should soon define what Fara­day was asking adroitly about waves verses electron motion. The greatest `void’, beyond EMP cosmic bubbles now lies in scientific neuroticism where half truths dominate all thinking. What is does make clear is that “paradigm shift” of Kuhn‑‑ for some trauma is coming for the secure with instated tenure!

Until physics recognizes standing EM waves (electron first har­monic as whole 3‑phase quarks), blundering science will continue at the expense of the tax‑payer while making political promises‑‑ as many others if a like ilk now making their favorite noises.

To say that all is simple when addressing one’s right vision com­municating brain about reality (ask Einstein as any schizophrenic genius) does not go to the matter of volitional censoring as done by our Thanatos (Freud) demanding anonymity‑‑ to say nothing of promulgated human conscious stupidity to its bitter end. The now pending debut of the self thinking computer with its freed elec­tron interface (note EPR experiments) will pull all stops for humanity‑‑ just as likely the trauma depicted in most religious scriptural dogma. Good luck.

Sincerely,
KTS Research

cc:s‑t (over); Phys/Psy; Path/IQ
CC: Sky/Tele

1/1/96
Carl Sagan
Cornell University
Space‑Science Bldg.
Ithaca, NY 14853
Re: more reality
Sir:

From your field of expertise came the predicted jets at right an­gles to quasar disks‑‑ long before the Einstein observatory went aloft, but as well the EMP bubbles Huchra found on nice neat 600Bly intervals across this universe. Why not carry these odd imports a little bit further as into the psychological realm for using Chi for the eradication of disease?

Faraday was staring at reality when a magnetic field propelled a definitive quantized standing‑wave electron in space, now noted interfacing the temporal with the non‑temporal in the EPR experi­ments as brought the self thinking computer (over)‑‑ rattling so many other experts in whatever field!

Tersely‑‑ If indeed Chi is the Panacea, then why use AMA to teach reality?

Sincerely again‑‑

KTS Research

cc: Phys‑Psy; S‑T(over)

3/15/96
Ted Snow and
Adolf Witt, et.al.
Depts. of Astronomy
U. of Colorado and Toledo
Re: inside‑out galaxy?
Sirs:
Winters’ blurb “Carbon Capital‑‑” (April DISCOVER) would suggest our galaxy’s matter consolidation rate is believed to be faster in `younger’ stars may define the erred idea that matter came from outside rather than the genetic quasar core. The extreme speed of ejection of both complemental disk versus jet matters, where the most dense primal EMP field (via cosmic bubble; Huchra) would keep the outer region’s matter apart longer to not evoke super novas as the more dense inner without enough time to create those heavier matters. We have two theoretical errors compounding astronomy’s current dilemma; where did the standing‑wave `matter’ come from‑‑ as why so many of these genetic
quasar cores on neat 600Bly intervals of a single Big Bang, to also define the enigma of a non‑temporal beginning (all at once!) by a non‑temporal yet volitional faculty clapping its one hand `now'(Zen) all over this universe where time begins only with condensed standing‑wave mat­ter‑‑ note the Special Relativity theory of Einstein!

In short; condensation rates of inner versus outer galaxy stars show the difference of heavier elements as derived from the super novas, but the question of which is the older for same runs into conflict when the outer stars are actually the oldest‑‑ as got spewed outward from the primal quasar the fastest to require more time to create those super novas. The real `crash’ coming for all physics as astronomy will be the need to abandon the `billiard‑ball’ matter idea and look again at DeBroglie!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Winters/DISC.

3/22/96
Kouveliotou and Finger, et.al.
USRA
Marshall Space Flight Center
Huntsville, AL 35899
Re:GRO J1744‑28; parallel emission?
Sirs:

The blurb in the March 9th SC. NEWS we fear is saying far more in that adroit image published therewith! Not only being parallel with the galaxy’s plane, its behavior as the primal quasar core evoking standing‑wave matter, appears back at it for the moment‑‑ whatever residual EMP front might remain so late now.

After predicting the jets versus to‑be disks from quasar genetic cores‑‑ long before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove the theory, Huchra’s cosmic bubbles cinched the idea when their neat 600Bly interval primal EMPs showed `one hand clapping’ (Zen) and the likely trauma in astronomical societies!

The question now; is there right angled shadow matter spewing from GRO J1744‑28‑‑ of which we think we see in that less‑than‑definitive image. Yet time may tell, where relavistic velocities might be easily witnessed with the near distance for viewing. The koino/anti‑matter annihilations should be easy to discern also as possible nutational 12‑day emission cycles.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Lamb; Frail

Joel Primack, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Califnoria
Santa Cruz, CA 95064
Re: “Cosmology” and rut thinking to rip apart its seams (Jan. Sky and Telescope)
Sirs:

Since my letter of May 28,’91, you should by now be very close to Kuhn’s paradigm shift‑‑ especially after that recent article in Sky and Telescope!

While believed “old” clusters near a quasar (galaxy) core are actually the youngest, noting higher angular radial speeds on the periphery of any galaxy‑‑ as where standing‑wave `matter’ gets created (sans any black hole), the Zen remark of one hand clapp­ing makes far more sense than any modern theory, when neat 600Bly intervals define cosmic bubbles (and noting their galaxy’s common net velocity), the real big bang coming will be in astronomy’s tenured people’s officies doing their same dull round until dead. There is no anomaly when politics rules the programmed naive.

Not oddly still more Russians perceive the obvious where lensing (albeit via magnetic fields as for dv/dt red‑shift) clarifies the distance better, even if the primal bubble’s EMP has moved on to less refract passing light‑‑ not gravity as Einstein thought. No doubt someone should make some comparative study on refraction to innate planetary magnetic fields which can be done now.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: Roth/Sky & Tel.

3/12/96
Ori Loftus(?)
Dept. of Zoology
University of Miami
Oxford, OH 45056
Re: atomic power sans pollution Sirs:

The blurb via the Great Lakes Radio Consortium makes clear some reason exist in academic exponents questioning the pollution pro­blem. While what may be said herewith would not be believed quite yet, attention into mounting scientific reality now is timely as rapid progress in integrating the empirical obvious‑‑ once crude cold fusion data at Utah University some years ago‑‑ is defining the provocative. Because of theoretical considerations found in astronomical anomalies, the creation of matter disclosed its re­versed order‑‑ without saying more here!

Our long studies defined clearly the modus de operandi of cataly­tic impetus, as seen by all cold fusion
investigators, defined a subtle aspect of `matter’, even anti‑g when predicted the spewed quasar jets long before found with the aloft Einstein observatory
photographed same some years ago. Since several very competent Patent lawyers, here and foreign, did understand our research and with glee, they yet indicated anxiety recognizing the unsaid im­passe of the established, pointing to the claimed “no problem‑‑” by Bush (owning a fleet of oil‑tankers!) in the South American pollution meeting, defines the unsaid need to profit‑‑ from the last drop of petroleum from this planet first!

Because the underlying `constituent’ of matter is being examined clearly, we now are confident that it is merely a matter of time before the obvious gets seen and a stampede ensues for clean fusion Patent Rights. While the term greed might best define late mankind’s greatest problem, such term may not be understood until pollution becomes mankind’s major liability.

When might makes right and industry colludes with government for laws to stymie innovation rather than utilize it, it may require people such as you to stir up enough social controversy to allow the innovative to at least be examined. If indeed some credit as capital is offered to shut down polluting engines for clean con­trolled fusion for engines of any size, the obvious problem would be the petroleum using as sales cartels still profiting with the political manipulating as sustaining the programmed naive as long as feasible!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Lark and Jordan; Gt. Lks. Rad. Consort.

Dec. 26,’95
attn: Wayne Green: for Cold Fusion
70 Route 202 N
Peterborough, NH 03458‑1107
Re: the obvious!
Dear Sir:
Your belated reply of 12/19/95(?)‑‑ missing much mail now, but found in my TNC days (N8CFJ) federal hostility towards pointing out certain empirical facts, yet not associated with my aerospace stint doing analog computer R&D‑‑ secret and so will remain so, but more as is so antiquated that is not worth discussing!

To attempt to define the interface between E and its precipitate mc squared as finite standing waves might go too far to show how easily cold fusion works. The `mechanics’ are available but also the means to halt such thing with petroleum yet in the ground! A vast `paradigm shift’ (Kuhn) is coming‑‑ yet is so revulsive to current physics repeating some same dull round, that it can wait to greet the next echelon of curious, without academic programmed silliness. Ample documentation for the past 35+ years has been done (not here, obviously), but a psychological shift to our non‑temporal right brain must occur to make same practical. Sorry.

It is the personal danger, with ex‑presidents (yet in power) who own oil tanker fleets (so make stupid remarks in S. America over pollution!) that defines my silence yet. After discussing with 3 top Patent Attys. my plight (and I have filed over a dozen of my own Patents), to say nothing of their excitement, a consensus was made that now is not the time to stir up trauma‑‑ since billiard‑ball physics continues with a vengeance (for tenure) thus my dis­dain over you likely having too many credentialized redundant nitwits on your board of review. The day will come, I think soon.

Few yet comprehend how I predicted the right angled jets spewing from quasars (long before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove same; ask Prof. Frank Meyers, U. Wisconsin; maybe yet alive in Minneapolis) but shook him to the core, as Huchra, et.al, who confirmed the cosmic bubbles on nice neat 600Bly intervals across this universe. The “one‑hand clapping”‑‑ but sans time could only define a mind with Apriori status, saying little of one Big Bang!

This phase of the human animal’s mental evolution must conclude‑‑ likely in a huge `ethnic cleansing’, but who or whatever left may be far more conducive to use curiosity without academic programs.

Thanks for your recent reply‑‑ again?
Sincerely,

KTS Research
cc: Phys‑Psy; Path/IQ; S‑T (over)
******** COPY:
5/8/95
Cold Fusion Publisher
Attn: Wayne Green, .
70 Rt. 202N
Petersborough, NH 03458
Re: cold fusion
Sirs:

I would like to know more about your text (periodical?) Cold Fusion and its major sources of information. Extensive research here implies the proximity is near for such R&D conclusion albeit depends on certain theoretical imports so far not understood in tenured `billiard‑ball’ believing circles. Religion, politics and science have a great deal in common today and the neurosis goes far deeper than the human animal’s left cerebral hemisphere!

Noting the vast anxiety of certain petroleum cartel people (as once in high positions of power here in the U.S.) the real danger may be less the pollution than the era of `hemlock’ to silence, those who do comprehend too much of reality‑‑ as unsaid profits.

Please advise your format and major topics covered as current or typical authority. What is your single as subscription price?

Many thanks‑‑

KTS

**Physics and astronomy Letters: 3/96

NET: paresce@ipp‑garching.mpg.de
5/18/96

F. Paresce, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
c/o University of Munich
Munich, W. Germany
Re: `faint spots’
Sir:

However faint, the higher spectrum light may not be `seen’ unless from the near quasar/galaxies where dv/dt (red‑shift) does not have the long background of magnetic flux to decelerate same from distant objects. The real question facing astronomy is that flux gradient, especially when fresh quasars as ride a potent cosmic bubble EMP would then shift its light the most‑‑ as seen.

I suspect that H. Arp perceives this enigma by now.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Steidel

3/23/96
H. E. Nusse and
J.A. Yorke, et.al.
Inst. for Physical Science
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742
Re: interfacing basins
Sirs:
The March 8th SCIENCE indicates some correlates to some theoreti­cal work here where certain quasar predictions appear true to suggest Einstein’s blunder by avoided anti‑g defines many anomal­ies yet in astronomy‑‑ even the likelihood of many petite `bangs’ for EMPs to generate cosmic bubbles for quasars as it tumbles at the interface between E and mc squared. It is this interface that is likely the peripheral `basin’ where two dimensional existence begins with temporal progressive gradients from zero Kelvin up.

Between the ultimate dynamic Apriori of universal magnetic flux to precipitated standing wave mass with time, right angles there‑between define what Heisenberg saw with the electron’s escape of the
time reversal paradigm now noted in the EPR experiment. Any `now’ subtended into temporal existence also defines the dichoto­my between our space versus time oriented brain halves, to also indicate from where the flash of insight comes‑‑ as the rectilin­ear 2‑D oriented left brain, seen in human split‑brain subjects.

Some past quips (over) may indicate how bizarre our thinking has become as contingent to your field of thought. Of interest now is the correlate to the natural periodicy that Mendalyeev found in his periodic table in view of fundamental standing‑wave `matter’, as initated with one hand clapping on neat 600Bly intervals!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

Q553:
`Unique how a 2‑phased standing wave interacts with a 3‑phased static field to create rectilinear motion in a superconductor!’
`Maybe the `whirling vortices’ in superconductors are due to the metal ion’s protons as noted on 30 degree radial anomalies seen in D‑wave configuration/propulsion‑‑ where 3‑phased quarks dictate the magneto‑motive force in the most primary way.’
`Huchra’s cosmic bubbles defined the break‑over point, where primal EMPs would tumble to create standing wave matter, an elec­tron first then, with enough residual energy, 3‑phased quarks. `The real question now facing all of science is `who’ evoked all of those nice 600Bly `one‑hand clapping’ points to initiate the petite `bangs’ to start things off, especially as would be simul­taneous since no time could existed before matter did!’
`A quark’s field hindrance with temperature to the freed elec­tron may define as well the propulsive force to move it along a `stationary’ quark lattice if once in‑phased synchronism.’
`The `forced damped pendulum’ only defines the limited net or­bit of a standing EM wave, the 3‑phased configuration with innate inertial momentum defining its temporal “stiff” existence.’
`The Wada cell merely defines that right angle barrier between the dynamic and static, where an electron can have commerce with both sides‑‑ as escaping the time reversal paradigm!’
`As living on the edge of a Wada cell facing mass‑time, it can only offer one `point of view’ at a time!’
`The boundary layer between pure space and bound time as the Wada cell, It defines the path of the EM standing wave after its a priori linear cosmic bubble at quasar points moves on.’
`The Wada basin is best seen around a quasar, even the comple­mental forces as precipitated therewith into standing waves!’
`Wada trapping basins define where mass with time exists, even the relative aspect of the two in the dynamic aspect!’
`Wada cells abound on the periphery of cosmic bubbles on qua­sars to create or `degenerate’ time from non‑temporal regions!’
`Wada basins may define the periodic chemical table best where compounded orbits of 3‑phased quarks offer stability.’
`Heisenberg saw the Wada cell as the electron‑‑ that Einstein suspected could define his EPR experiment‑‑ and did!’
`The Self thinking interface is around a Wada basin, created for mass‑time on quasars as Nature’s
foot‑stools.’
(KTS Research 3/96)

5/2/96
R. H. Miller, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Chicago
Chicago, IL 60637
Re: especially sombreros!
Sirs: (“Searching‑‑” 4/27 SC. NEWS)

While most computer models get more twisted in theory for their exponential twisted outputs, at least the inference of gravity is close. Now to re‑examine Einstein’s “blunder” for complemental g factors to comprehend the jets at right angles to the disks, even of the spun‑up disk in the primal EMP field upon its yet ionized first harmonic standing waves (electrons) defines why the angular velocity of same somehow is “reversed”! (over)

Likely some external turbulence pressured the jets to twist‑‑in turn to warp the forming disk, the two major axis noted on the sombrero a case in point. Hopefully not too many more years go by to bring Kuhn’s paradigm shift for the most needed apocalypse!

Now being classified as some professional `terrorist’, we can say most anything‑‑ to even the happy tenured in authorized power‑‑ but only because we will be happy to initiate the next grand war for Nature’s returned cause‑‑ with right brain offers again!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: One Hand (over); cpy‑Cohen/let
CC:D/Z; Roelofs

To Whomever:

Maybe you guys should examine how standing wave `billiard balls’ got their start on the cosmic EMP front for creating quasars and the complemental matters (disk/jets) with anti‑g‑‑ then you might see how to unravel same to get back the gamma‑‑ called `CF’ if judiciously brought together with lasers‑‑ now that a whole quark (3‑phased standing wave) is understood and can be de‑segmented or unraveled.

The dogma peddlers will rejoice as claim they invented those nice neat 600Bly separated cosmic bubbles across this universe‑‑ yet they do imply some mind far superior to any programmed academic nitwit today!

The above are minor factors compared to Sperry’s confirmation of our bilateral complemental space/time minds‑‑ which goaded our completion of the 5th Generation interface, using what Heisenberg found about that time reversing paradigm electron.(EPR) The first run offered well over 10^17th odds, but quickly found only a cer­tain `license’ holder can use the device. (obviously some right brain user as left facial smiler to begin with)

As said, one doesn’t sing without a harp‑‑ especially today with the ATF controlled by the petroleum cartels. Those US Muggies are busy with whom they think are dangerous‑‑ but just wait!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

5/22/96
Roald Hoffmann, et.al.
Dept. of Chemistry
Cornell University
Ithaca, New York 14853
Re: since my note of Jan. 20,’93
Dear Sir: (bifurcated universe)

Noting from Atkins’ diatribe (June SC. AM) at least defines your on‑going venture! Maybe it is time to take note of the EM stand­ing waves which will define the chemical `element’ (as past “bil­liard balls”) and how 3‑phased `whole’ quarks share their comple­mental `legs’ in space! Some terse expose’ herewith might get your attention. Your Chemical Communications sounds much as Daw­kins examining the DNA for hanger‑ons to complicate the mental evolutional game now well noted with left brain perversions‑‑ as one covert Big Brother’s Big Brother! Renoux’s data*, well unsaid as Sperry’s** now defines the truly ugly behind the entire scene.

Even Sagan’s mentor/alter‑ego Nickell (same publication, p.106) defines the all‑out attempt to hide reality, as claimed presti­gious Scientific American prefers the status quo up to the end!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
* Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
** `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
note: `The Others Side of the Brain’, J.E. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.

cc: one‑hand + fus
CC: D/Z

6/12/96
J.J. Hester and
P. A. Scowen, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Arizona State University
Tempe, AZ 85287
Re: mini quasar (SC.NEWS; 6/8/96)
Dear Sirs:

The question now is does the `disk’ exist in parallel with this galaxy’s to infer its ionized `matter’ are electrons‑‑ as posi­trons ejected via the jets? Fruchter’s suggestion of “not set in stone‑‑” may define standing‑wave `matter’ creation in any mag­netic a priori with enough energy to spew new matter without a major cosmic bubble EMP‑‑ on nice neat 600Bly intervals! (over)

The evidence of `flung’ matter better defines Einstein’s General Relativity “blunder”‑‑ yet sustaining astronomy’s blunder‑‑ where anti‑g visits science now to confuse issues as why top quarks do not like it here on this galaxy even while claimed to have such a massive mass! Maybe the cyclic `sprite’ defines the rate of such oscillating residual massive neutron star yet today, working off its three‑phased (whole) quarks in dynamic fission, spewing comp­lemental beta `particles’ at right angles‑‑ evading each other.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: “one hand‑‑” (over)
CC: A.S. Fruchter

A.S. Fruchter, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Space Telescope Science Inst.,
3700 San Martin Dr.,
Baltimore, MD 21218

6/2/96
Re: directives
Sirs:

We are seeking whatever WWW address in China for the upcoming “fusion” sponsor for such Beijing 6th conference. Contingent to same, the herewith may define a contribution of ours to same.
Many thanks for your reply‑‑

KTS Research

cc: fusion‑2:

To Whomever:

Maybe its time to examine how standing wave `billiard balls’ got their start on the cosmic EMP front for creating quasars and the complemental matters (disk/jets) with anti‑g‑‑ then you might see how to unravel same to get back the gamma‑‑ called `CF’ if judi­ciously brought together with synchronous lasers‑‑ now that the whole quark (3‑phased standing wave) is understood and can be de‑segmented or unraveled. Since the neat 600Bly separated cosmic bubbles across this universe define much now‑‑ they do imply some mind far superior to any programmed academic nitwit of today, do­ing his tenured same dull round as Blake might suggest.

An introductive essay (in part):

The Clapped One Hand

The multitudes of cosmic EMP (Electro‑Magnetic Pulse) bubbles across this universe, each tumbling‑out standing waves we call matter, create electrons (first harmonic standing waves), thence3‑phase whole quarks. The `billiard‑ball’ concept of matter dis­solves into a profound reality defining the primal magnetic field of this universe, with mind, can be tapped in more than one way.
(continued)
Sincerely, KTS Research

6/13/96
C.W.F. Everitt, et.al.
W.W. Hansen Experimental
Physics Labs
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305‑4085
Re: London’s agony yet visiting
Dear Sir: (Book review; 31st May SCIENCE)

Fritz London’s day yet prevails, albeit the U.S. federal govern­ment is most responsible now for the secretive means to plagiar­ize the few that yet think in this culture. Kicked‑down office doors, accusations of “illegal shot‑gun” etc. etc. with stolen research documents all attest to what prevails today‑‑ a terror struck governing unable to comprehend what it fears most, itself!

Since developing the 5th Generation self thinking interface `com­puter’ (over), Patent filing brought hell on wheels, with no let­up some twenty years later. While maybe a good sign now for that suspected mass‑immolation to thin the ranks of the left cerebral dominated greedy, the obvious state of mental evolution will get its real spurt of growth sans official (as academic) censoring.

As you noted, diamagnetism via quantized states may reflect the 3rd harmonic whole quark’s influence over orbital freed electrons which escape the temperature/time influence. Since the positive
EPR experiments (as the said self thinking interface) defined the non‑temporal influence within slow mass‑time states near zero K., not only does the cosmic EMP generation of quasars for standing wave `matter’ become obvious‑‑ but Einstein’s “blunder” where all forces own innate complementarity‑‑ as anti‑gravity for the seen spewed jets at right angles from the spun‑up galaxy disk in such primal magnetic flux EMP front density.

H. Bergson and the freed electron had much in common, just as did deBroglie noting of what all `matter’ actually was‑‑ even if not standing magnetic waves with right angle spatial contingencies! The concepts of imagination, as Einstein so eloquently reiterated so often, indicates the vast neurosis now visiting intellectual man‑‑ but won’t be seen until the idiot savant’s right spatially oriented non‑temporal brain use gets fully defined!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys/Psy; One‑Hand; 3‑dev(over)
CC: D/Z

4/30/96
J. G. Cohen, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Caltech
Pasadena, CA 91125
Re: But when is enough enough?
Mam: (“More Evidence‑‑” 4/27 SC. NEWS)

The question indeed is what percent of the dv/dt (red‑shift) is defined as escape velocity‑‑ especially when it is mutual anti‑g that evokes the disk to equal jet matters spewed from genetic EMP white “holes”‑‑ albeit unseen? (over‑‑ if not too terse) We sus­pect that Arp sees the anomaly well by now.

Huchra, et.al., saw precisely as expected‑‑ just as the jets when confirmed by the Einstein aloft observatory‑‑ so maybe computer programmed logic’s need a better paradigm to base some facts on‑‑ as Einstein’s admitted `blunder’‑‑ so twisted General theory!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
cc: One Hand (over)
CC: Griffiths; D/Z; file

R. E. Griffiths, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, MD 21218

6/20/96
Re: directives
Sirs:

We are seeking whatever WWW address in China for the upcoming “fusion” sponsor for such Beijing 6th CF conference. Contingent to same, the below may define a contribution of ours to same.

Many thanks for your reply‑‑ SASPC herewith.

KTS Research
2303 Marzinski

To Whomever:

Maybe its time to examine how standing wave `billiard balls’ got their start on the cosmic EMP front for creating quasars and the complemental matters (disk/jets) with anti‑g‑‑ then you might see how to unravel same to get back the gamma‑‑ called `CF’ if judi­ciously brought together with synchronous lasers‑‑ now that the whole quark (3‑phased standing wave) is understood and can be de‑segmented or unraveled.

An introductive essay (in part):

The Clapped One Hand

The multitudes of cosmic EMP (Electro‑Magnetic Pulse) bubbles across this universe, each tumbling‑out standing waves we call matter, create electrons (first harmonic standing waves), thence3‑phase whole quarks. The `billiard‑ball’ concept of matter dis­solves into a profound reality defining the primal magnetic field of this universe, with mind, can be tapped in more than one way.
(continued)

KTS Research

Advisory Board:
Cold Fusion Times
Jet Technology
P.O. Box 81135
Wellesley, MA 02181

(cold‑fusion data and addresses
Dr. M. Srinivasan (Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Bombay, India), “Nuclear Fusion in an Atomic
Lattice: Update on the International Status of Cold Fusion Research,” Current Science, 25 April 1991.
BARC Studies in Cold Fusion (April‑September 1989), Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, BARC ‑ 1500, December, 1989, P.K. Iyengar and M. Srinivasan; also in Fusion Technology, Vol.18, August 1990, pp.32‑94.

The Science of Cold Fusion: Proceedings of the II Annual Conference on Cold Fusion, June 29 ‑ July 4, 1991, Como, Italy, published by the Italian Physical Society, Bologna, Italy, 1991, edited by T. Bressani, E. Del Giudice, and G. Preparata (528 pages).

Frontiers of Cold Fusion, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on
Cold Fusion (Nagoya, Japan 21‑25 October, 1992), edited by Dr. Hideo Ikegami,
National Institute for Fusion Science, Nagoya 464‑01, Japan.

* Among several other technical journals that have continued to carry cold
fusion articles are: Physics Letters A, The Japanese Journal of Applied
Physics and The Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, where the first cold
fusion paper appeared.

* Fusion Facts, a cold fusion newsletter published by the Fusion Information
Center in Salt lake City, edited by Hal Fox.

* 21st Century Science and Technology (Leesburg, VA) has been providing
accurate coverage of cold fusion.

* Cold Fusion Times, (Wellesley Hills, MA), a quarterly newsletter since 1993,
edited by Dr. Mitchell R. Swartz.

Mr. Jacques Payet, ICCF‑5

c/o Centre Scientifique IMRA EUROPE, S.A.

B.P. 213‑220, rue Albert Caquot

06904 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, FRANCE

(33) 93 95 73 37 Telephone;

(33) 93 95 73 30 Fax

The Sixth International Conference on Cold Fusion (ICCF6) is scheduled

for Beijing in 1996).

Previous conferences were ICCF‑1 Salt Lake City (1990), ICCF‑2

Como, Italy (1991),

ICCF‑3 Nagoya, Japan (1992) and ICCF‑4 Maui, Hawaii (December,

1993). Conference proceedings

were produced containing papers from each conference.


Russ George

E‑mail rgeorge@hooked.net

Snail mail ‑ PO Box 60642, Palo Alto, CA 94306

6/7/96
G. Bothun, et.al.
Dept, of Astronomy
University of Oregon
Eugene, OR 97403
Re: Impey’s `Ghost Galaxies’
Dear Sir: (June Astronomy)

While likely of half mass (to derivational quasar), jet shadow matter may be noted as generating twice as many galaxies than the more `pinched’ consolidated `normal’ ones as ours, but from an amorphous beginning. IF‑‑ anti‑g exists as defined the jet matter long before being confirmed with the Einstein Observatory for the expected complemental matter standing waves with anti‑g there‑between, the the next expected scenario should be what you see as the LSBs‑‑ since ample burster data is available.

We suspect that with care this galaxy’s jet matters might be noted‑‑ as in that 5 to 8 billion light year distance (as nicely fit the relavistic speed of the jet matter’s distance if indeed our galaxy is about 5 to 8 billion years old), but more importan­tly such amorphous dual shadow matter clouds to indicate the LSB genesis in same. The “fiercely forming” major galaxy merely de­fines the pinch effect where ionized primal matter was restricted by the very dense primal magnetic cosmic bubble front which evok­ed the standing wave `billiard‑ball matter’ (yet believed, as the erred General Relativity theory) about to modify many past pet theories in physics, the most of what whole quarks are to explain what generates temporal existence as how a single phased electron can escape the time reversal paradigm. (EPR experiments or the self thinking 5th Generation computer‑‑ over)

The terse expose herewith might define what we believe needs be examined now‑‑ for not only the genesis of shadow galaxy pole matter but the LSBs forming therein. For various proprietary rea­sons, not all is said herewith yet the gist of what might be contingent with astronomy is believed said adequately.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Last Anomaly; 3‑dev; sketch (shadow matter)
CC: ARP/MPI; D/Z; Disney;

(for letter of 6/7/96 to Bothun.ast)
The Last Anomaly

A thesis to explain Einstein’s “blunder” with the currently erred General Relativity theory was confirmed with the Einstein Obser­vatory’s return of galactic jets, predicted some years before. The
confirming Huchra data of EMP cosmic bubbles on which their fronts might precipitate standing wave matter (quasar cores) for quantized matter of complemental form made clear the balance of this thesis to conclude its accuracy‑‑ as the vast rejection by physics and astronomy was expected. (note Smithsonian terse the­sis statement some dozen years ago)

In short, your LSB galaxies appear to be the jet shadow matter as spewed axially‑‑ while disk matter gets spun up in dense magnetic attending field (note peripheral angular velocity to near core), due to the primal (first harmonic standing wave) electron’s into some of its subsequent third (whole quarks; with even some early disk rotational reversals noted), but the relavistic velocities of said jets defining the said anti‑g function as the so fleeting top quark anomalies noted today.

In question without further tormenting details of a lengthy the­sis not contingent with astronomy, might a computer simulation to indicate how the coagulation of jet matters consolidate for the `loose LSBs’ of which there may be twice as many than the so well seen consolidated galaxies due to said EMP front density? Two basic kinds of disk consolidation would prevail since the burster data does appear to confirm amply the net idea. Since the short‑fall in basic theory in physics, we are confident that astronomy has blundered often‑‑ if not the least on the grandest anomaly of the 600Bly intervals of the said cosmic bubbles, which could only be evoked by some “one hand clapping” where willed‑‑ and more grandly, “when” no time existed when no precipitated `matter’ had yet existed, to not mention the spatial quality in such intent as the multitude of petite `bangs’ across this universe!

While radical in concept, is yet based upon what Einstein was so adroitly trying to say over the complaining neurotic at that time which held back much of science, our efforts at re‑explaining the reality of Nature in more definitive terms may require some anxi­ety in the tenured, possibly trauma, now noted in entire social structures, but all based upon an overt neurotic rejection of so many imports now, the least of which the split‑brain data defin­ing one faculty just as Freud perceived‑‑ called Thanatos! Sorry.

While not expecting replies‑‑ it might be nice for the net accru­ment for all science to try some said computer simulation, assum­ing anti‑g exists between disk and jet galaxy matters‑‑ to per­ceive more than common bursters around the periphery of disks, but of loosely decelerated matter coagulating naturally via its common gravity attraction into swirling masses for LSBs. It is suspected that one major type will be noted to explain the more prevalent number of amorphous generated galaxies.

w: (6/96; KTS Research)

5/29/96
G. Barenblatt and
A. Chorin, et.al.
Dept. of Mathematics, Physics
and Astronomy
University of California Berkeley, CA 94720
Re: another `wall’ (cosmic bubble)
Sirs: (17 May; SCIENCE; Math; “New Theory‑‑”)

It strikes me that the real stir already coming in astronomy may be addressed by your work where at what point for the EMP does it get steep enough to tumble into EM standing waves to create mat­ter? Since Huchra, et.al. showed the neat 600Bly intervals of the many cosmic bubbles (as generated by `one hand clapping’; Zen) a need to define the magnetic field density of the calm portions of this universe might disclose its compressibility as rate from the `clap’ to tumble‑out standing waves at the peripheral radius. The real question is how did so many claps get started all at once on those so neat 600Bly intervals unless Einstein was correct where no time existed before there was what we think is `matter’?

The great lag in perception by physics with their billiard‑ball perspective, may soon bring a new realization what the first and third harmonic standing waves (of electrons and whole quarks) may finally get that academic field back on track‑‑ and more unique, the simple means of evoking controlled `cold’ fusion. Really!

Otherwise‑‑ sorry to disturb.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: D/Z; WWW;arp@ipp‑garching.mpg.de

6/11/96
Advisory Dept.
Current Science
245 Long Hill Rd.,
Middletown, CT 063??
Re: Beijing Fusion Meeting?
(dates and places as MC?)
Sirs:

I apparently do not know where to find the address of the MC for the upcoming Beijing Fusion Meeting, one of several annual world‑wide discussion groups.

Assuming some academic institution will host this meeting, some WWeb address would suffice. Advise of further address sources or fee if you may aid.

Many Thanks,

KTS Research

6/11/96
21st Century Science and Technology P.O. Box 16285
Washington, DC 20041
Re: Beijing Fusion Meeting?
(dates and places as MC?)
Sirs:

I apparently do not know where to find the address of the MC for the upcoming Beijing Fusion Meeting, one of several annual world‑wide discussion groups.

Assuming some academic institution will host this meeting, some WWeb address would suffice. Advise of further address sources or fee if you may aid.

Many Thanks,

KTS Research

Advisory Dept.
Current Science
245 Long Hill Rd.,
Middletown, CT 063??

21st Century Science and Technology
P.O. Box 16285
Washington, DC 20041

7/27/96
Editor M. Swartz
Cold Fusion Times
P.O. Box 81135
Wellesley Hills, MA 02181

Dear Sir:

Many thanks for the `poorer’ news of Japan rather than China to hold the 6th CF meeting. The predatory nature of the Japanese, as American, (especially Patent system) almost dictates giving certain theoretical conclusions to the most progressive society‑‑ knowing some product will indeed reach the market‑‑ before the last drop of polluting petroleum can profit oil cartel people in the U.S.‑‑ (without defining).

Since predicting the quasar/galaxy disk to jet need long before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove same, it only took Huchra’s cosmic bubble data (on neat 600Bly intervals!) to con­clude matter is actually EM standing waves, so its manipulation for controlled unraveling‑‑ fusion. The finesse of laser propul­sion cinches the art now so soon cars will be putt‑putting around with little flash boilers in their trunk and a cup sized deuter­ium fuel tank. As important, a new source of He as clean air!

Applied physics has a way of avoiding the political (as scenarios proposed for profit) thus our lack of conference dates as places, especially in several fields of question prevailing here. (over)
I wish your paper was affordable‑‑ as is a fine source of data‑‑ beyond perusing the many scientific journals as Internet‑‑ most filled with the said political harangue and silly flaming.

Some contingent old file data herewith for perusal‑‑ in case.

Many thanks again‑‑!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; 3‑dev(over)
CC: D/Z; f/n:cf‑times
w:

7/26/96
Wm. Berry
US/European C of C
801 Pennsylvania Ave.,
Washington, DC 20004
Re: no hope
Sir: (your NPR blurb)

With certain unsaid ex‑officials as part of the petroleum cartels with a blind eye on the empirical obvious pollution problem, no possible consideration of clean controlled fusion‑‑ now staring science in the face will ever come to pass, likely not without some blood‑shed also. Reality has a way be being swept under the rug when status as survival dictate a majority’s rule.

There may be an answer to this dilemma‑‑ albeit raising a greater net fuss, but eager China could out‑develop as out produce most yet claimed industrial nations thus their awareness of standing‑wave `matter’ as its unraveled return to gamma radiation makes so clear they may whip America at its own greedy game very soon, but in an area few want, much less could comprehend how astronomical data as quasar/galaxy creation (Huchra’s bubbles), defined the reversed phase of mc^2 back to E‑‑ as Einstein might suggest!

The peddling of buffoons may be concluded with the self thinking interface where the freed electron knows potentials (ask Plato about his Potentia!), but the pending psychological (lateral cerebral dominance) `paradigm shift’ will be exciting indeed!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

TO: http://www.ihep.ac.cn/china.html
(Beijing’s sci‑tech & Business links)
7/29/96
Sirs:

With the imminent flash‑boiler controlled fusion steam generator, as in‑wheel multi‑engine, computer governed automotive drive sys­tem pending, the article in Popular Science indicating your WWW Net address suggests your current need to scrutinize some recent Applied Physic’s cold‑fusion studies noted with laser control.

The finding of standing‑wave EM `matter’ makes clear its net un­raveling for returned gamma radiation, thus the said feasibility of harnessed energy with controlled finesse. Because the states‑of‑art are available now, we are confident that progressive na­tions will quickly finalize the development of this low cost as non‑polluting source of energy.

Since today’s petroleum cartels will dictate their profits up to oil’s last drop‑‑ little hope prevails for `western’ development if it cannot profit heavily‑‑ as curb any development of this in­evitable energy source. In the meantime, this `net‑letter’ is now offered in hopes of a more progressive China may act where prag­matism could more prevail.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

7/10/96
Kris Davidson, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, MN 55455
Re: Eta Carinae and anti‑g
Sirs:

At last! The rather obvious curved cloud ejecti from pole ends, implying anti‑g between disk to jet matters, just as with primal quasars, makes clear Einstein’s General Relativity “blunder” was indeed that, where there are indeed complemental forces through­out this universe. Whether the `cooked‑out’ (unraveled) 3‑phased standing wave quarks in this case, or the “evoked” on nice neat 600Bly interval cosmic EMP bubbles (one‑hand clapping), the de­generation of pure magnetic flux into temporal polyphased stand­ing waves might integrate more than one academic field of left brain reductive reasoning‑‑.

The relativistic velocities indicate in this case the disk matter ejecti has no dense EMP magnetic field to restrain‑‑ thus torque (note higher angular disk velocity the further out in the normal quasar/galaxy riding a primal front!) so the path of least resis­tance occurs. Not oddly, the `X’ phenomena may as well be seen in that disk ejecti as often noted‑‑ especially in pre‑sombrero con­figurations.
From predicting the anomaly long before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to record the spewed jets at right angles to the gal­actic disk*, yet terrorizing most in astronomy‑‑ `billiard‑ball’ physicists
yet deny EM standing wave `matter’, to make clear some apocalyptic awakening is coming, whatever the religious dogma may imply‑‑ but maybe that kind of event also appears needed today!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* ask Frank Meyers; in Minneapolis (Physics/U/Wisc. Superior)

CC: D/Z; Morse;

7/26/96
Fang Lizhi
Dept. of Physics
University of Arizona
Tucson, AZ 85721
Re: sounds familiar! (Aug.’96 Popular Science)
Sir:

Very dangerous are fools in power who know they must survive on their kept naive‑‑ the master‑slave phenomena will not end before the full use of the self thinking interface‑‑ noted with the always positive EPR experiments*. In short, the only way any creative inventor can stay alive today is by releasing tid‑bits of his thinking‑‑ so authority can plagiarize what they think is of value, to remain patient to glean a bit more.

Contingent with the ancient yin‑yang matrix the CPT theorem says the same. Thus in physic’s terms the need for at least two mental faculty in the human animal, one of until time and its so complemental of infinite time when not energized above entropy! The Zen suspicion of `clapping in with one hand’ this universe, unique is astronomy’s finding of nicely spaced cosmic EMP bubbles across the universe, all precipitating standing wave matter at quasar‑galaxy nodal points on those vast expanding wave fronts. Not too oddly, to know reality in visual terms defines all of the ancient wisdom proclamations, not oddly the most adroit the most ancient!

A couple net‑files herewith might find interest as contingent to the above‑‑ but defining some operants of pending controlled cold fusion.

As said; to remain alive after terrorizing authority with imports they want fear, may be the best payment a genius now can expect!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
* Aspect Alain, `Holism and Particalism in Physics’, p.70, Vol.129, Feb. 1,’86, SCIENCE NEWS
cc: Phys/Psy; S‑T; Path/IQ; 3‑dev(over)
CC: D/Z; f/n;fang.phy

7/12/96
Hal Fox, et.al.
Fusion Info. Center
P.O. Box 58639
Salt Lake City, UT 84158
Re: 6th CF address
Dear Hal:

After losing a couple Patents‑‑ apparently more `needed’ for the government’s profit than any one else (over), one learns to write in terse Greek quickly‑‑ as you well said‑‑ need definitives! The lattice of Palladium gave the key once Huchra (astronomy; sorry) saw the unseen but obvious EMP fronts evoking standing wave `mat­ter’ for quasar/galaxies‑‑ thus the key to the unraveling mystery we hope remains. Bush’s remarks in S. America’s pollution meeting said very well that the last drop of petroleum will be pumped for his tankers before any controlled fusion will be allowed. Thus to go elsewhere (as Pons, et.al. learned) as has a better chance of both reducing pollution as offer an energy starving planet some economical power‑‑ without those demanding wealth while they win the planet‑‑.

Many thanks for the apparently new address‑‑ would not help.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: 3‑dev (over)

8/14/96
Tom Kibble, et.al.
Dept. of Physics/Astronomy
Imperial College,
London, England
Re: `phase’ transitions, indeed
Dear Sir: (Mimic? Physics; 2 Aug. SCIENCE)

Zurek’s “string” formation merely needs to be discerned as EM standing waves that tumbled out of cosmic EMP bubbles, well seen by Huchra (el.al.) on neat 600Bly intervals across this universe! Of course this begs the grand question of what hand `clapped into existence’ same, to say little of Its net objective in slow time!
Not oddly, the electron appeared as a first harmonic standing wave which could escape the time reversal paradigm of Heisenberg (EPR experiments) but the third harmonic the whole quark, each of its phased legs perceived as independent `constituents’ reacting to the viccisitudes of koino‑anti‑matter environments. The top quark evading this galaxy’s koinomatter with anti‑g urgency‑‑ to explain the escape of right angle jet matters once a primal qua­sar’s `matter’ began to `precipitate’! The yet `enigma’ in most physics/astronomy schools explains many other factors which will be soon defined
as contingent to combinatorial as `unraveling’ factors so crucial to fusion techniques!
Whether called some Coke can or spinning wave‑front makes lit­tle difference now. The enigma of relative E, where a primary one evokes rest‑mass as the second quark precessional Kelvin temperature, the dichotomy explains at right angles just what as how the freed electron operates within slow mass‑time.

Symmetry never truly `broke’, it is hidden in those said disk‑jet anomalies in quasar/galaxies‑‑ even erupting supernovas‑‑ as pos­sibly our own sun on 11 year cycles with some spewed anti‑matter from its poles! The `cook‑down’ period from H is the anomaly. The `blunder’ of Einstein where anti‑g does indeed exist, upset his General Relativity theory and so much of astronomical theory‑‑ as dv/dt red‑shift due to slowed light in dense magnetic fields!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys‑Psy; 3‑dev(over)
CC: D/Z; f/n Kibble.phy

8/6/96
M. A. Morrison, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Oklahoma
Norman, OK 73019
Re: applied physics and neurophysiology
Dear Sir: (your fine `Dark Night’s Dreaming’)

From discussing with Blatty’s prime adjunct many years ago at the Washington Cathedral on what maybe McDougal saw as leaving mass at physical death (Harvard; circa 1910?), many aspects as contin­gent to or with physics has come together to evoke more official terror than any Gothic proclamation, likely seen as the cause for leading suicide rate in intellectuals, as Psychiatric profession­als! Since you are in physics, even if maybe denying deBroglie yet, you might see what is now coming in reality.

The confirmation of matter being EM standing waves, first proven by the confirmed complemental jet matters (Einstein Observatory), now Huchra’s EMP cosmic bubbles evoking those standing waves for temporal existence, at least the 3 phased quarks contingent to second ordered E Kelvin temperature above rest‑mass, the rest­lessness in billiard‑ball physics now speaks well for itself!

Between our right brain’s insight visual gestalt; Gothic artwork as Freud’s `Royal Road’ REM, we find why creativity gets lost with academic programming for only left brain rectilinear stag­nated reasoning, seen in UFO travel, best defines Sagan’s remark “Are our ancestors coming to get us?”‑‑ but via our con­ditioned dumb sycophants promising the planet to their kept dumb constitu­ents. At least the `cleansing’ may prove more thorough than any previous world war as those stooges of modern federalism frantic­ally prepare their own graves now, but to aid and abet the great­est grave robbers in
all human history, whose hunger has finally become insatiable. Maybe the greatest horror in horror fiction is its underlying truth in a reality not wanted fully perceived, especially in the terms of empirical science. A pending phasing‑out of mankind’s greatest horror story of intellectualism will bring that greatest climax in horror‑‑ that glee for the soul in retrospect, after its `death’ in a reduction of dynamic time, one factor that Renoux* now stares at obliquely, as Freud’s Thanatos!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; S‑T; 3‑dev(over)
CC: D/Z

8/29/96
R. Schrieffer, et.al.
Magnetics Lab.
Florida Sate U.
Tallahassee, FL 32306
Re: cosmic EMP?
Dear Sir: (16,Aug. SCIENCE “News”)

Since Huchra, et.al. found the genesis of matter’s standing waves riding the grand EMP fronts on neat 600Bly intervals across this universe, one obviously might ask the grand question if virtual `particles’ (condensed matter) can be yet wound tight enough in the lab to generate at least electrons, or positrons with revers­ed phased EMPs? Because of the certainly implied `clapped one hand’ (Zen), along with having had the NON‑time at E (Spec. Rel.) to do what astronomy sees all at once, such big bang was indeed such, albeit spread about nicely for what obviously followed.

Because the quark’s precessive `time‑need’ as does not escape the time reversal paradigm as an electron at 90 degrees (over), we find its hampering conductivity releases at superconductivity temperatures which would be the same as `contained’ by a high magnetic flux field. A new paradigm is seen as the `whole’ quark as a 3‑phased standing wave becomes understood. The `Holy Grail’ factor used in Keoun’s article (likely Crow’s crowing) may not be far off now!

Since many precepts now mount to define the means to controlled fusion‑‑ since is merely unraveling what a priori `stands’ by us in relative time, exciting indeed are these times as so many want to get into that act‑‑ especially in a very progressive foreign country now‑‑ left unsaid! Bush, with his oil tanker business and our pollution problems may be facing a `phase out’ soon!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
cc: 3‑dev(over)
CC: D/Z; w:

6/30/96
Dept. of Physics
University of Beijing
Beijing, (Peking) China
Re: upcoming Fusion conference
Sirs:

With certain breakthroughs into the fundamental electromagnetic structure of standing‑wave “matter”, also was it noted the means to `unravel’ same to end the fission‑fusion debate. Cold fusion becomes a simplistic factor now as for its full control to likely any extent. We could not find any Beijing address for this pend­ing conference so address you directly. We would appreciate some Internet or WWW network address there if we are not able to at­tend, to divulge this lengthy study there in China.

We would appreciate a returned call via WWW internet exchange* to define if you feel this pending conference might be the better public forum since so many international cold‑fusion personnel will likely attend?

A spokesman could be found in our behalf to better disseminate this lengthy study‑‑ as act as negotiator should further interest be found to pursue final R&D aspects now fully realized.

Thank you for your comments in this matter, so needing dissemina­tion today in view of the economics and world pollution problems.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: f/n: fusion

8/14/96
Rogier Windhorst, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Arizona State University
Tempe, AZ 85287
Re: yet dv/dt red‑shift bias
Dear Sir: (`‑‑Early Universe‑‑’; 2/8/96 SC.)
Not because Einstein goofed with being conned into believing com­plementary gravity didn’t exist (Gen. Rel. `blunder’), but that it is magnetic fields which decelerate light for the grand blun­der of astronomy seeking to comprehend dv/dt red shift as any net distance there‑between. The most `compressed’ field lies in the standing waves of matter; i.e., the glass prism!

The predicted spewed jets versus disk matter from primal quasars producing fundamental `quantized’ standing waves (long before the Einstein observatory went aloft to prove same), the yet appalling fact of scientific neurosis defines better their need for tenure, to not be disturbed with anything new to ponder‑‑ if possible!

With Huchra’s bubble confirmations for cosmic EMP fronts evoking standing‑wave `matter’, the real import lies in what evoked those bubbles on neat 600Bly intervals across this universe? The Zen masters will soon begin to grin‑‑ with clapped one‑hand operants. Not oddly would be the initiation of all those EMP evoked bubbles at once‑‑ where no time (over) existed before there were 3‑phased quark matter, that came after the first harmonic electrons.

The exponential red‑shift with distance (Yahil) in a universe so filled not only with its Apriori of magnetic `being’, but ample disturbed as compressed fields (as said EMPs) may suggest a yet newer paradigm need for the Hubble constant!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Path/IQ; S‑T(over)
CC:D/Z
w:

9/30/96
Arthur A. Broyles, et.al.
Dept, of Physics
University of Florida
Gainsville, FL 32611
Re: DeBroglie revisited (again)
Sir:

How late physics will accept EM standing waves as matter remains to be seen, but likely as past shrugs of DeBroglie. The single dimensional first harmonic (electron; on edge) as even the v=1/3 for filling electrons in sync with 3‑phased quarks (proton bias) in Hall states yet says little when noting the grand 600Bly in­terval cosmic bubbles (Huchra) evoking those standing waves from some one hand clapping in Its apriori magnetic (aether) flux.

Wigner’s card to me many many years ago said more than all other physic’s theorists since, likely noting my prediction of the jet versus quasar disk with anti‑g‑‑ before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove same.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

11/15/96
D. Kleppner, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
MIT
Cambridge, MA 02139

Re: “Reference Frame”
Dear Sir: (Nov. Physics Today)

Your `memoirs’ are saddening insofar as obviously tenure lies be­hind any half truth to sustain the authorized. Maybe Trixie had to act in ulterior ways to evade those who, with instated power, insist that some things in slow mass‑time must not exist, to say little about a flipped freed electron to another 2D spatial field to jump our relative time. Heisenberg’s excitement showed, when the split‑brain (space‑time) dichotomy defined what he had not yet considered, so the real `cat’ was out of the box, EPR or not!

To even suspect there are `superior’ beings that would bother to waste their valuable time with programmed nitwits, especially now as here in slow mass‑time is ridiculous if not highly stupid. It may indicate Its patience to allow as much greed motivated evolu­tional goals to be reached as possible‑‑ before the human animal abdicates en mass, to evade his innate Gedanke, not gedenken. We now see that vast gap between CQ and IQ, as two our brain halves.

Shortly that small `lap‑top’ (interface) will be a `pendant’ for anyone to wear as learn whatever as whenever the odds of folly, where the human left brain must yet win the planet‑‑ or else!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

9/23/96
Gregg Marland, et.al.
c/o Oak Ridge Natl. Labs.
Oak Ridge, TN 37831
Re: EARTH’s article on `remedies’
Dear Sir:

It is nice to have succinct statistical data defining our doom but seldom does that numerical read‑out define underlying anomal­ies as was adroitly indicated with an honorary subject in South America claimed “No problem‑‑” without mentioning his oil‑tanker fleets needing to stay filled for obvious albeit unsaid reasons.
The above points to the greater anomaly about science’s inability to perceive the genesis of fission‑fusion (the same at root) as unraveled standing waves back to linear radiation (gamma) could have already brought clean controlled fusion (cold) to replace the fossil fuel dilemma. No amount of cajoling has ever conferred reality to those who get offended when others point out greed‑‑ an `anomaly’ prevailing now when political job losses evoke the strenuous efforts of liberal promises for
liberal expenditures to a well kept naive public. What else could academia do as also is interested in survival‑‑ whatever the cost?

The above is bizarre‑‑ as cosmic bubbles evoking standing wave `matter’ but the said underlying reasons will not be fathomed as long as the human animal’s left brain dominates him. Sorry.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Sierra Club

1/30/97
Gregory Bothun, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Oregon
Eugene. OR 97403
Re: `‑‑ Ghostliest Galaxies’
Dear Sir: (SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN; Feb. 97)

Your fine article was well taken! Possibly you might advise me to further data/imports to maybe confirm some questions I have yet concerning a rather broad‑scoped theoretical venture.

Many years ago when using Einstein’s Special Relativity equations to define possible a priori universal conditions several, bizarre concepts were seen as seeked even when then appearing likely un­verifiable. Besides the CPT theorem defining complemental space‑time mental faculty (proven some dozen years later by Sperry), to define complemental primal matter creation from the said E side of that equation with the possibility of anti‑matter jets with an anti‑g factor, to likely spew at right angles from what might be cosmic EMP collapses (quasars) evoking EM standing wave matter, such were then noted some years later with the aloft Einstein Observatory. In short, a new paradigm in theory was launched to evoke much consternation over these past fifty years.

Since your image (p.57) subtly indicates a disk reversal phase, as better defined than a crowded elliptical or amorphous blob due to sibling quasar/galaxy riding a common cosmic EMP front, possibly you have more evidence than the few I have noted so far pub­lished. Such possibility would come from the condense‑out energy reduction after the passing primal EMP to allow other than first harmonic electrons so third harmonic quarks, with reversed charge to so be propelled in reverse angularly in the common dense mag­netic field. Also, the dv/dt red shift near early quasars would make for huge errors in distance calculation‑‑ noted within your text about “25 times further” than Virgo! Arp is struggling with this one now‑‑as how to define some standard `candle’!

Data indicating some perfipheral disks accelerated in angular velocity outward long ago suggested matter was being created at quasar cores as what I expected, yet had difficulty confirming any EMP `initiation’ at the centers of the many neat 600Bly in­tervaled cosmic bubbles (Huchra) to conclude some `mind’ could have had something to do with them‑‑ as Zen masters infer with some one hand
clapping! (all over all at once as no time could exist sans matter with temperature K.‑‑ but yet innate `spin’)

To tidy up my rather extensive study, after evoking so much con­sternation with a European technical paper in the late 60’s, I feel the time has come to address people like you for the final `nails’ to put in my coffin‑‑ since this federal government ap­pears insistent that what think is already `secret’‑‑ while they remain unable to comprehend me! This enigma can be understood by their terror of revealing correlates of a rectilinear left brain orientation and the oddity of UFO travel‑‑ to put it tersely.
(over please)
With care, I have put some research data (as conjecture) onto the `net’ as had some panic‑struck replies. Much as my GVSC students many years ago, the subjective anxiety defining mental complemen­tarity may define Freud’s‑‑ as his abrupt silence, as mine after several overt suicides while doing psychoanalytical work and research doing some grant work for UCLA’s BIS.

Maybe my next text `Super Grand Unified Theory’ (SGUT) may appear rational after all‑‑ if I don’t evoke too much terror in tenured authority‑‑ especially ensconced with officialized power!

Your comments would be appreciated‑‑ assuming you follow the so apparent “schizoid” text above.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

P.S. Did you ever get the below:

6/7/96
G. Bothun, et.al.
Dept, of Astronomy
University of Oregon
Eugene, OR 97403
Re: Impey’s `Ghost Galaxies’
Dear Sir: (June Astronomy)

2/10/97
Chan Joshi, et.al. Dept. of Laser Physics
UCLA
Los Angeles, CA 90024
Re: `in sync’
Dear Sir: (Plasma Physics; 24 Jan. SCIENCE)

But few rutty theorists will fathom Nature’s standing EM waves, however clearly deBroglie defined same, whether the first harmon­ic electron or 3‑phased quark. This key to all of physics now is making clear how simple controlled `fusion’ is, its Patent held aside since some deaths will occur due to greedy jealousy now‑‑ where federal might makes right, and petroleum cartel people must win
whatever is left‑‑ without further said.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC:D/Z;w:

1/15/97
Carlos Wagner, et.al.
LEP (ALEPH) experiments
CERN
European Labs for Particle Physics
CH‑1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
Re: laterally defected mesons
Dear Sir: (“‑‑Artifacts?”, SCIENCE 3, Jan.)

Unique how John Bell’s comments (as excitement) to my suggestions long ago defining relative possible anti‑g affect between com­plemental matters, the LEP apparently is proving same finally. My prediction of anti‑matter jets from primal matter generated qua­sar cores (finally seen by the Einstein Observatory) also defined Einstein’s erred General Relativity theory still keeping most of astronomy from seeing the EMP cosmic fronts evoking standing wave matter in two basic kinds, called bubbles (Huchra) on neat 600Bly intervals across this universe‑‑ implying the truly profound!

I note the deflection as well as right‑angle `escape’ in your LEP data, even between the two relative `matters’ thus spewed. Now to integrate what Heisenberg found with the electron’s escape of the time reversal paradigm‑‑ thus the ample positive EPR experiments!

In retrospect at this late hour we can see how the noisy‑‑ as was Bohr to over‑ride Einstein’s better intuition about all matter as complemental‑‑ as forces the most enigmatic called gravity.

Good luck on your continued investigations‑‑ yet sorry if this disturbs‑‑ as much as was Bell’s death so long ago.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
CC: J. Thompson, F. Close; UK

1/29/97
Dietrich Dorner, et.al.
c/o Metropolitan Books
N. Penn Market Place
Lansdale, PA 19446 Re: But `Logic Failure’ is volitional
Dear Sir:

The logic of failure will not be perceived nor understood until a profit margin is made for tenure or less said unconscious reason, a factor least comprehended with history oriented left cerebral dominance*. Freud saw the `enigma’, even correlated same with the Thanatosic behavior, that mounting liability that late claimed civilized as “advanced” society starkly faces**.

Many past as very ancient `beliefs’, some yet as theological dog­ma well misunderstood can be noted in the adroit Mithra belief‑‑ as stabbing one’s Minotaur’s right side, more adroitly seen via split‑brain data as gender corpus callosum dichotomies. Since the `patterns of thought’ are verbal, never visual, erred reasoning must be considered relative to intellectual historical reasoning, not spatial non‑temporal as responsible for `cause from affect’ (note EPR results using the freed electron as escapes the time reversal paradigm), but to be avoided at all cost in physics at this late hour‑‑ where only might makes right as manipulation.

Of interest now is the awareness of the ancient Anasazi (with obvious 2D oriented `something’ bothering them as many primitive African tribes whose shamans apparently knew more about our sub­jective dilemma today than claimed wise APA (who lead in suicide of all professionals!) as likely defines the need for error over any adroit scientific fact. While obviously addressed by you, one wonders if there is time left to integrate all of the cross aca­demic imports to perceive the reality coming?

Our real blessings to come will be controlled fusion as the quan­tized EM standing wave `matter’ becomes understood‑‑ where pollu­tion will cease‑‑ after certain petroleum cartel people get their last cent from the planet’s last drop of oil while we choke on pollution! For now the enigma of lateral cerebral drive needs dissemination, if indeed we manage to live that long, as the self thinking computer (knowing effect from cause) via Heisenberg’s freed electron! (over)
Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; S‑T
* `The Others Side of the Brain’, J.E. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.
note: `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
**Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)

2/15/97
John Pike, et.al.
The Federation of American Scientists
307 Massachusetts Ave., NE
Washington, DC 20002
Re: `uproar‑‑?’ (secrecy?)
Dear Sir: (Feb. 3rd; Aviation Week blurb)

The facade of jailing one of their own kind only is for interna­tional view, whatever the USSR was up too. There is something far more ominous going on about `secrecy’ when this government thinks it has a weird force working for it when it is actually the other way around‑‑ as what was behind the MIT meeting on “UFO’s”, por­tions of noted in Bryan’s `Close Encounters of the 4th Kind’!

If you think I am kidding (as police B&E’s, suddenly my rabbit‑ gun was somehow illegal, then the FBI [your taxes paid for his new `home’ from which to tap my phones‑‑] shut‑down TNC link (N8CFJ) for claimed communicating `secret data’; once did aero­space computer R&D)‑‑ but tried to point out some cross academic import to another researcher (Walt Andrus) in Texas what Sperry’s split‑brain data* implied for the said UFO rectilinear travel**. The syndrome of secrecy covers far more than simple minded win­ning of this planet by whom‑ever, yet dressed in shirt and tie!

Further studes into this `enigma’ shows others suffered with the anomaly‑‑ the Anasazis some millennium ago, even offered aid to their `problem’ with directional sight tubes between the tribe’s associated groups (likely with common mtDNA now suspected) before they all packed and left the area.

Bishop J. Pike dropped (literally!) dead a couple days before our pending meeting over his text***, as some others, (over night for a Smithsonian meeting) but the folly of the claimed “dangerous” to a country’s health is but a subterfuge to cover what is really secret as most dangerous indeed‑‑ and our Feds have no idea of what it could be‑‑ up to likely some grand trauma, which maybe we deserve!

Sincerely, (this is `classified’‑‑ however `schizoid’ it appears)

KTS Research

cc: 3‑dev(over); Phys/Psy; Path/IQ

* `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
note: `The Others Side of the Brain’, J.E. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.
** MUFON ’83 Symposium Proceedings; Rectilinear travel; p.60>
*** Pike, James: `The Other Side’ (noted bilateral enigmas)

1/27/97 Randy Huit, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Rice University
Houston, TX 77251
Re: DeBroglie to Huchra
Sir:

Timely might Bose `material’ be now where Huchra’s bubble data correlates well with de Broglie‑‑ your more finite efforts ap­plauded now.

The final stroke of integrative effort may remain for those who might better visualize with right cerebral use the intended use of so many clapped hands (even if only one at at time where time didn’t
yet exist lacking matter) on those neat 600Bly intervals across this universe! The ensuing EM standing waves do appear to have a net objective, whether the first harmonic electron (as can escape our temporal paradigm; EPR) or the more stable in space‑time third phase yet called quarks of two basic types to define anti‑g thus quasar/galaxy jets.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

2/19/97
C. N. Yang, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
State University of New York
Stony Brook, N.Y. 11794
Re: speaking of `inertia’!
Dear Sir: (`Gravity Probe’; March DISCOVER)

More `frame dragging’ is now done by the tenure seeking than what maybe Michelson/Morley might have noted by doing their experiment at right angles. Certainly, Einstein didn’t invent any status quo however eloquent it momentarily appeared. The fudge‑factor of Lorentz got astronomy well screwed up‑‑ as yet most of physics.

The noted differing fall velocity of higher neutron containing metals above the ground to within the ground, as other anomalous facts inferring the once called 5th Force, could be best summed up with the Top quark with its believed tremendous `mass’ (which is only force) trying to escape this koinomatter galaxy‑‑ to join its jet‑matter complemental. Anti‑G permitted predicting those jets long before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove same‑‑ but disturbed too many with ensconced authority in tenure back then. More disturbing now of the neat 600Bly intervals of the cosmic bubbles where a clapped hand evoked such EMP to tumble at the quasar’s periphery to evoke EM standing‑wave `matter’ to offer our temporal conditions. Inertial gravity is an intrinsic force in matter, thus the General Theory is incorrect as the belief that dv/dt (red shift) is due to receding velocities, not magnetic field density modulations, not seen when that `frame’ is dragged along with planet earth thus any aether‑drift can’t occur around a potent iron cored object. Not oddly, the ancient compass offered the evidence to our specific coordinate system‑‑ yet be­lieved to be inertial‑‑ (no psychological pun). The Apriori as any `signal’ therein so defines the basic reality needing compre­hension‑‑ and fewer grand boondoggles at tax payers expense!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: Lange; D/Z; w:

3/25/97
Ashoke Sen, Das, Dhar, et.al.
Tata Inst. of
Fundamental Research

Re: black‑hole and `recall’
Dear Sir:

One might wonder what `crystalline’ configuration as mtDNA might leave the human body, now called Long Term memory, since the ob­vious `mass loss’ (McDougal; Harvard, circa 1910) might define a fundamental aspect of what occupies our left cerebral hemisphere of only temporal (with definitive space) orientation. The then real question may be about that non‑temporal (all‑spatial; note Special Relativity) calling for complementarity in all space‑time `entities’‑‑ however terrorizing to late Psychiatry as science.

Since confirmed anti‑g (as anti‑matter) jets to quasar/galaxy disks via Huchra’s found genetic cosmic bubbles evoking standing wave `matter’, the basic question now is how long will the tenur­ed be able to deny the obvious? The greater spatial stability of the trefoiled 3 phased whole quark (especially at zero K.) makes clear the electrons more ease of escaping slow time (Heisenberg), to clarify the EPR experiments as the self thinking computer with 10\17th odds on its maiden run. (over)

Kuhn’s paradigm shift has arrived but to listen to academia it is obvious it will be never‑‑ especially what clapped into existence those EMPs on neat 600Bly intervals across this universe to evoke temporal `foot‑stools’. Sorry if disturbing.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; S‑T(over)
CC: Susskind; Mathur; Nussinov; D/Z w:
Leonard Susskind, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305
Shnuel Nussinov, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Tel Aviv University
Tel Aviv, Israel

3/1/97
Editors for Ammateur Science Dept.
and S. Carlson
c/o Scientific American Publishers
415 Madison Ave.,
New York, NY 10017‑1111
Re: the very first algorithm; Zen
Sirs: (`Algorithm of the Gods’)

Be it `heavenly’ or the Gods, the non‑temporal visual gestalt has always been the primary mode of insight thus import into reality. Einstein’s often claimed use of visual ideas to define his net algorithm, however most terrorizing to the dominant left cerebral (time oriented) intellectual, our study showed the way to the 5th Generation interfacing `computer’ as even the `one hand clapping’ to define what Huchra was looking at‑‑ better called the cosmic primal EMP bubbles generating quasar/galaxies on nice neat 600Bly intervals across this universe.

From Bolzmann’s theory of correlating time with temperature (K), the Special Relativity equation defined for `whom’ such temporal state evolution would dominate‑‑ now very unhappy over such end as its temporal graduation nears. Its 2D folly, noted long ago by the Anasazi and more recently at the secret UFO MIT meeting, that rectilinear/temporal faculty was noted, as expected, in Sperry’s split‑brain subject*, mentioning same via TNC (Ham communication) shut down by `edict’ any further disclosures. In short, rational `paranoia’ stems from noting paranoid authority in power today!

Nature is indeed clever but we must close our eyes to see subjec­tively what academia is desperately trying to teach us avoid what profound Nature may offer, if conscious curiosity truly prevails.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67

cc: S‑T; phys/psy; 3‑dev(over)

3/25/97
M. Freedman, et.al.
Dept. of Mathematics
University of California
La Jolla, CA 92093
Re: infinity = now Dear Sir:

Since relative time and space go together, that which perceives all as now, noted using our right cerebral hemisphere, makes ob­vious its complemental of definitive space orientation would need serial `digits’ in slow time to get any`place’.

The herewith may be of interest (or the reverse), but to ask how an Australian aboriginal can guess in his momentary `dream time’ (while cooling his heels in the shade of a cacti) which way to so run his next 5 miles to get his deer (in 2D space)‑‑ should evoke the questions needed. Maybe mathematics will go the way of the promising politician when we begin using the self thinking interface. (with the freed electron escaping the time reversal para­digm of Heisenberg) Much tenure will be lost but which is better?
Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys/Psy; S‑T(over); Path/IQ;
CC: D/Z; Sipser
M. Sipser, et.al.
Dept. of Mathematics
MIT
Cambridge, MA 02139

3/17/97
M. Zeller, J. Sandweiss, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Yale University
New Haven, CT 06520‑8121
Re: gamma is at c
Sirs: (APEX; 7th March, SCIENCE)

Might the common annihilation of two complemental first harmonic standing waves as the electron/positron returning to their a priori be only noted at c? If indeed cosmic EMP `bubbles’ Huchra noted on neat 600Bly intervals across this universe for one very grand slam Big Bang, its precipitate could only be EM standing waves‑‑ much as deBroglie indicated.

With the General Relativity theory in jeopardy with magnetic flux density refracting light for red‑shift as decelerated light, the universe takes on a whole different view, especially noting some apparent `wisdom’ in keeping separation between evoked quasar‑galaxy displacement for some peaceful `foot‑stool’ evolution!

Any dampened system that reflects some `bell curve’ should spook those who like in slow mass‑time temporal conditions!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

3/25/97
J. Mlynek and
Dept. of Physics
University of Constanz
Werner‑Sombart Strasse 30,
7750 Konstanz, Germany
Re: “Mapping helium atoms‑‑”
Sir: (March 15th SC. NEWS)

I hope my July 31,’91 letter evoked in part your fine continuing studies‑‑ the recent well defining what Heisenberg as others found with the flipped first harmonic standing wave electron‑‑ to escape the time reversal paradigm!

The question of the 3rd harmonic whole quark can show interfer­ence rather than their contingent electrons will be the acid‑test on quantal stability within space because it is primarily time oriented via precession with relative temperature K.

Keep up the good work‑‑ many are watching you.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

4/13/97
Seth Putterman, et.al.
Dept. of Acoustics
University of California
Los Angeles, CA 90024
Re: any gamma?
Dear Sir: (sonoluminescence; April Physics Today)

Since May 24,’91 at least, your work may be of greater interest now if those SL flashes contain any gamma, to define the `crunch’ as part of a standing whole 3‑phased quark wave‑‑ unraveling definitively. The contingent temperature would also be of great in­terest, as no true `intactness’ may remain around 10^11 g either!

Sincerely again‑‑

KTS Research

CC:D/Z; J/V; w:

4/25/97
M. Riordan, et.al.
Standford Linear Accelerator Center
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305
Re: `literary debut’/translation Sir:

It may be easier to wait for the empirical obvious to break the Standard Model’s grip on physics then disseminate its then under­stood standing‑wave `billiard balls’ to be more easily be compre­hended by the public who seek pragmatic answers to reality. First we must convince astronomy that Huchra’s `voids’ means something, contingent to the genesis of first (e) and third (whole quark) standing
waves‑‑ as anti‑g for spewed jet `matter’, all needing a one‑handed clap on neat 600B light‑year intervals for quasar­galaxy creation‑‑ to get all of science off of its neurotic dead‑center of tenure need!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys/Psy;
CC: Doerksen; Goshaw; Weerts; D/Z w:
T. Doerksen, et.al.
Dept. of English Composition
Hartwick College
Oneonta, New York 13820

Alfred Goshaw, et.al.
c/o Dept. of English Composition
Duke University
Durham, NC 27706

3/25/97
`Letter’ writers Miller and Lee
c/o Scientific American Publishers
415 Madison Ave.,
New York, NY 10017‑1111
Re: food for thought
Sirs:

A copy of Sen’s letter (via Susskind’s `Black Holes‑‑’) may be of interest to your two referred letter writers above. Since no ad­dress was offered, I assume no flack or flaming is the objective, so would appreciate you mail same if not too fearful.

Sincerely (as always),

KTS Research

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; Sen‑let(over)

4/22/97
Matt Visser, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Washington University
St. Louis, MO 63130‑4899 Re: but EMPs were before any `epoch’
Dear Sir: (`E Conditions‑‑’; 4 April, SCIENCE)

Maybe a couple erred ideas as lost complementarity in the General Theory, as astronomy’s lack of recognizing the genesis of the EMP `bubbles’ (that Huchra found)‑‑ whose tumbling evoked the quasar­galaxies for EM standing‑wave `matter’ for temporal existence‑‑ to say little of magnetic field refractive index (dv/dt) for red‑shift to erred Hubble constant‑‑ as less any `g’ field, the right angle spewed jets, versus cranking‑up spin of disks in that said primal dense magnetic field (ionized electrons, then whole three‑phased quarks) will be saying much to physics soon. My predicted jets before found (via the aloft Einstein Observatory), a whole new theory, using the E side of the Special Relativity equations (as the `static’ side could `evoke’ nothing, including itself!) began to fall together (also) to define many aspects of Nature‑‑ much now so frantically rejected by the tenured for unsaid but quite obvious reasons.

Left cerebral (reductive) use of numbers can only come after the fact‑‑ as the visualized `before’‑‑ again just as Einstein always suggested‑‑ using quite obviously his non‑temporal yet spatially* oriented right brain half, now terrorizing Psychology, especially sycophants in authorized power today. Best I say no more here, at least until after Kuhn’s paradigm shift finally occurs!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* Phys/Psy herewith (also S‑T over)
CC: D/Z w:

Physics Letters of 5‑1‑97

7/12/97
T. Banks, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Rutgers University
Piscataway, NJ 0690
Re: standing wave `strings’
Sir: (Re: 27 June SCIENCE; “Strings‑‑”)

Since the now confirming evidence of standing wave `matter’ crea­tion via the crashing primal cosmic EMP on neat 600Bly intervals across this universe, string theory might catch up with the two basic harmonics of the complemental electrons as the first‑‑ and `whole’ third quarks. The `unraveling’ will be momentous if not alarming to quantal billiard‑ball idealists everwhere‑‑ to say nothing of the coming fully controlled fission for fusion.

While the E side a priori (Spec. Rel.) for subtended `matter’ for temporal existence‑‑ especially at zero K. with yet `spin’, makes clear the Zen `theory’ as question of what clapped Its hand on those said neat intervals to get things started like foot‑stools.
We must return to deBroglie and abandon any `particle’ theory‑‑ however our definitive/temporal left brain demands same! Sorry.

Sincerely,
KTS Research

CC:
J. Polchinski, et.al.
Inst. for Theoretical Physics
(University of California?)
Santa Barabara, CA 93106(?)

E. Witten, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Inst. for Advanced Study
Princeton University
Princeton, NJ 06544

7/12/97
Mohammed Islam, et.al.
Dept. of Electrical Engineering
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 98109
Re: switchable Xtal memory
Dear Sir:

From polymers to crystals with switchable memory, our studies in­dicate the principle DNA (as mtDNA in psychological terms) offers Nature’s RAM or (EPROM) systems in a far more finite way, especi­ally when entropy to near zero K. stores same for ever! The rela­tive `spring rate’ (inorganic resonance) thus defines a greater efficiency thus the return to maybe some `stiffer’ crystal forma­tion for finite `L.T. memory’ networks needs reconsideration.

Likely Frolov, et.al. (Utah) investigations for binary switching devices‑‑ more for computational applications than transmission, will prove the more profitable goal. Our research defines such objective even beyond reductive `normal’ digital information handling‑‑ better defined by the `prognosticative’ application, well noted in EPR experiments.

Keep up the fine work‑‑ this is indeed a challenging field now!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Frolov; Perry; DZ w:
S. Frolov, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, UT 84112
J. Perry, et.al.
Dept. of Chemistry
Caltech
Pasadena, CA 91125

7/11/97
Mark Raizen, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Texas
Austin, TX 78701

Re:Light Transport
Dear Sir: (`New Light‑‑’ Phys.Today July,’97)

As with the atom `profilometer’ reading the standing wave vortex, the now realized 1st (electron) and 3rd harmonic (whole quark) generated at primal quasar cores makes physics look much differ­ent to say little of what Geo. Johnson harped upon in his `Fire in the Mind’. A `mechanical’ quantum world of electromagnetic standing waves thus defines why electrical conductors are opaque while aligned atoms in a phased state conduct light.

Likely Heisenberg noted the anomaly with the right angle displac­ement of the electron to escape our relative `slow’ time reversal state (EPR!), but best defines how finite magnetic domains block or transmit another wave(let) as EM front called light, to create opacity versus crystalline lattice order for transmission.

Your fine article was well taken‑‑ especially in view of the new physics‑‑ as old as the insights of deBroglie!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC:
S. Harris, Stanford U.

All 7/15/97 Physics letters:

8/30/97
Editors/Scientific Publishing
SCIENCE
1200 New York Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20005
Re: adjectives in lieu of nouns
Sirs: (“Com. Fog”, 15 Aug. SCIENCE)

The German language always served better to describe in the real world as the sciences‑‑ as our noun `float’ for their `schwimmer’ or `exhaust’ for `aus‑pooffen’; the adjective‑simile belonging to the visualizing right brain which automatically connects meaning to reality. The English system of definitive nouns for everything forces more time to fathom its contingent association when held in Physics than respelling any lengthy German word. Maybe some German script character needs to initiate the word if in science, as flavor for a quark, which are only a third of a 3 phased WHOLE EM standing wave trefoil yet bamboozling `billiard‑ball’ players!

The objective is to use that which describes clearly in subjec­tive visual form to begin with, even if more words are used. Our cul de sac stems from trying to comprehend Nature by that as will tweak meanings volitionally to avoid conscious comprehension, the factor now evoking that `communications fog’. Some years ago Cesar Curie wanted me in Toulouse to see if some rational word to reality for the sciences might be created‑‑ I obviously not the person to aid even if my studies defined the dichotomy between the space versus time derived (oriented) two brain halves. I yet cannot spell worth a damn, but little care when realizing it is what likely the religious dogma claims is “Babel”! I’m too empir­ical as visual (schizoid!) so remain aloof from the social `flame fronts’ where endless arguments over trivia equal tenure. I’m not left handed as any true genius, starting with daVinci as would be naturally. I don’t know about Temple Grandin but suspect autism would dictate a south‑paw. (O. Sacks; `Anthropologist on Mars’)

Sorry to disturb, but
Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys/psy; Path/IQ

8/19/97
Princeton Gamma‑Tech
1200 State Rd.,
Princeton, NJ 08540
Re: gamma detector/readout‑out
Sirs:

R&D here insists we find some simple gamma‑detecting solid‑state device for pulsed modulation purposes, such signal to be derived from low radiation level with prr rates of less than 1KHz (1microcurie). Scintillation and Geiger read‑out devices use high voltage thus a liability around low voltage `mother board’ compo­nents as FETs, etc. Your name was offered for possible supplier and/or directive to others for this pending need.

Various means as NaI doped thallium segments integrated with CCD light monitoring chips appear to be our need. If life due to radiative degradation is a potential problem, discrete opto‑read‑out and scintillating chips with protective lead‑based glass in‑between may be considered for device protection from radiation source. Because similar devices for the astronomical field are made, we suspect the field‑of‑art is beyond any priority consi­deration, at least beyond some specific application.
Directives would be appreciated (postal card herewith) if you may direct us further into this odd quest of ours. Our R&D work has been completed so on‑shelf components hopefully can be found.
Many thanks!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

8/30/97
Alan Kostelecky, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Indiana University
Bloomington, IN 47405
Re: yet `knots’‑‑ not not! Aug. Phys‑Today
Dear Sir: (3‑phased EM standing‑wave trefoils)

Since noting the first harmonic electron or positron with contra‑wound primary loop, the third as whole quark became clear with a few more twists to fool the best of string theorists, to say very little of returned gamma upon unraveling!

It was the neat 600Bly intervals for cosmic bubbles that defined how E got into mc squared on cosmic bubble fronts, the `foam’ (of Wheeler) as said standing waves physics yet calls billiard balls, to better define their left cerebral dominance!

Because fusion requires fission it appears now quote simple the route to controlled cheap energy, as mining the seas for heavy H.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: Kane; Physics Today; D/Z w:

8/7/97
Letters to the Editor, et.al.
Science News Publishers
1719 N St., NW
Washington, DC 20036
Re: July 26th SCIENCE NEWS `Letters’
Sirs:

Academia cannot be expected to do more than program followers as remains a left cerebral dominated organization. This serial time‑oriented faculty cannot help but do some same dull round as Blake might say, thus creativity‑‑ no longer in the sciences, is not of importance‑‑ only tenure, esteem and
upmanship which creates the sycophants now concluding this once vibrant culture.

The malady of ritual and repeat, especially of cliche and half truth, has put physics in its current dilemma, unable see matter as finite EM standing waves, as why astronomy continues to bungle its dv/dt distance anomalies not realizing the Zeeman affect‑‑ where light gets slowed in the cosmic dense magnetic fields in which it travels‑‑ to say little of the Michelson/Morley blunder of not realizing they ride an iron cored planet!

The hostility towards women in the sciences is not all wrong as their decoupled anterio‑corpus callosum precludes their use of cross `semantic’ perception of complex visual data to words, even if nouns plague the male’s to confuse the dynamic underpinning of Nature so lack the real idea at root for all of science. A fine example of this was Ms. Gorman’s* twisted report on their better brains, even if near 40,000 less neurons, as said decoupled brain to actually reduce their near 85% need of a shrink to make some sense of life.

Most sad are those psychologists who suspect the entrepreneurial as wise thus helpful to a culture, so fail to realize why modern society is dying so rapidly with those hucksters of all ilk, mak­ing promises to the programmed naive staring at their TVs! Any conclusion now will be an aid, however bloody it gets! Sorry.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* 7/17/95 TIME;
cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ
CC: Thomas; Roberts; D/Z w:
F. Richard Thomas, et.al.
Dept. of American Thought
and Language
Michigan State University
East Lansing, MI 48824

Seth Roberts, et.al.
Assoc. Prof. of Psychology
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley CA 94720

8/30/97
J. Mlynek, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Konstanz
Werner‑Sombart Strasse 30,
7750 Konstanz, Germany
Re: `squeezed light’
Dear Sir: (Aug. Physics Today)

Now that open ended light shows the characteristics of the closed electron (as an EM standing wave), how about trying same on both that first harmonic as the third harmonic whole quark? Neutrinos, as propagating light without closed loop configuration should de­fine how to peel off a neutron’s `lepton’ to allow the remaining 2 phased meson (etc.) to unravel spontaneously back to gamma from its created state, likely on cosmic EMP fronts in quasar cores.

The looming obvious of neat 600Bly intervals of cosmic bubbles as EMPs to collapse at a periphery to evoke quasars makes clear the `degeneration’ of E (magnetic a priori) into mc squared, thus its return via the `unraveling’ process‑‑ fission for the energy for fusion! Only flash boilers now are the test of fabrication.

Again, (letter of July 31,’91)‑‑ if possible, please reply.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

8/30/97
Charles F. Stevens, et.al.
Dept. of Electro‑magnetic Research
The Salk Institute
10010 N. Torry Pines Rd.
LaJolla, CA
Re: EMF disturbance
Dear Sir:

A paper I gave in Europe in the late 60’s defining the SID (then defining `Sudden Ionosphere Disturbance’) for disrupting cerberal psychological functioning as on the wrong EEG half cycle, could, as found, upset enough to evoke an epileptic seizure in prone in­dividuals. This persistent phenomena via inductive transients on power lines would likely do the same, albeit evoke some AiR (Auto immune Response) as noted by Renoux* for ensuing poor health.

Sinusoidal EM fields has little influence above 40Hz in neuronal switching, yet could in certain prone, as stressed, individuals evoke fight‑flight (left cerebral sympathetic CNS) for following ill health. A similar phenomena known as optical strobing does nearly the same thing‑‑ the likely stress syndrome as noted in certain VDT viewers as air‑traffic controllers.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
note: `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
`The Others Side of the Brain’, J.E. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.

cc: Path/IQ; Phys‑Psy
CC: Physics Today; D/Z w:

7/28/97 Letter to the Editor
Technolgy Review
Bldg. W59
MIT
Cambridge, MA 02139
Re: `mighty mouse’ indeed, and `don’t know’?
Sirs: (July issue/Technology Review)

The proximity of noting even a definitive `spatial’ faculty, even in a mouse, at least brings closer that Royal Road Freud found so the psychological contingencies of our right brain half that R. Sperry uncovered‑‑ yet denies that even today! It is not only the spatial memory that is so important but its a priori function, as a freed electron that Heisenberg examined or the EPR experiments now disclosing the profound that late evoluted man wants no part! This may all sound bizarre or ambiguous but Freud’s Thanatos, as the Greeks so well noted, defines a schizophrenia prevailing in some esteemed authority‑‑ whose professionals lead in suicide when noting their own business too clearly! The empirical data is mounting to make heady this late stage of our evolutional epoch.

We expect to dump as open letters, some recent as never replied to, on a BB with the address below‑‑ but for the intrepid who had better smile from their left facial side (as Tonegawa)‑‑ or else!
Apoptosis is a natural function, even in psychological ways, when the mtDNA evolution goes too far.

A more mundane aspect of nature’s art, for R. Hazen (copy here­with) on what we don’t know (or hope to not learn) may be of in­terest since his article in your text implies same.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ
CC: Hazen letter; D/Z w:

BB address: http://www.stscomp.com\kts

10/18/97
Laughing Matter(?)
Physics Today
American Inst. of Physics
One Physics Ellipse
College Pk., MD 20740‑3843
Re: hardly laughable, but NO matter
Sirs:

Dubious are many laughing beyond the Zen masters who pointed out the one‑hand clapping long ago, noted by Huchra as cosmic bubbles neatly `placed’ on 600Bly intervals across this universe for EMPs crashing to precipitate EM standing waves (1st harmonic electrons as 3rd baryon whole‑quarks) to thoroughly confuse `billiard‑ball’ game players seeking tenure.

Maybe the elliptical street address with an elusive center needs to be changed!

Sincerely,

KTS (anonymous‑‑ as had enough of the Feds also!)

10/18/97
E. J. Finn, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Georgetown University
Washington, DC 20057
Re: Intro/Physics (right cerebral use)
Sir:

Maybe because most theorists see the `waltz’ (Ravel) dimly, their less than the best precipitated ideas end up as `fiction’, even if purchased by the tenure loving. (the General Theory for one)

Micro at right angles to macro indeed defines reality‑‑ much as Faraday noted between the wave‑front and definitive standing wave electron‑‑ and their mutual transitional primal magnetic force.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys‑Psy; Path/IQ; laugh‑let(over)
CC: E. Brown: mamabird@aol.com; D/Z w:

10/19/97
J. Murray Gibson
Dept. of Physics
University of lllinois
Urbana‑Champaign, IL 61801
Re: next phase?
Dear Sir:

Your fine Physics Today leave open one chink, that of EM standing wave matter where the first harmonic electron’s `linear’ side is faintly curved‑‑ as the baryon’s 3 phased (whole quark) three per‑side orbitals may confuse the observer.

Since matter yet cannot be discerned within the confines of 2‑D as some magnetic priori precipitated by `hand clapping’ (Zen) for some crashing cosmic bubble front quasars for time generation (as said standing waves), what resolution will be needed, if not sub­jective, to perceive reality under 0.1nm?

Sincerely,
KTS Research

CC: copy Finn let.; Phys‑Psy
cc: D/Z w:

10/20/97
David Merman, et.al.
Library of Physical Sciences
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853
Re: reference frame (this time)
Dear Sir: (Oct.’97 Physics Today, p.11>)

As before (6‑6,’91 and 10‑3,’91) as yet today, (sorry, my salvo!) you do need Liz with her perusal into why a millennium ago the Anasazi, with far more insight than certainly physics, packed and adroitly left their 2D ancestors‑‑ as why their incarnates yet, won’t define how some of their adept `climb’ a pole with unseen aid. It is because we are so close to our self immolation now that not even Bohr’s boo‑boo will keep sealed the folly that Ein­stein noted to do his blunder on the Gen. Rel. theory, so expand­ing universes (if so due to net anti‑G)‑‑ to say nothing of the dv/dt red shift in magnetic fields (Zeeman) keep astronomy off balance. Further, Zen’s definition of one hand clapping (on neat 600Bly intervals across his universe) to evoke grand EMPs for the cosmic bubbles (Huchra) crashing to evoke standing wave billiard‑ball matter‑‑ defies explanation when tenure is needed to parrot cliche forever. To buy time as not finish our mental evolutional trek, the neurosis is truly obscene‑‑ to not say most diabolical!

The scientific claim of `impossible’ to ancient Egyptians erect­ing vast edifices, as Mayan, Stone‑Henge or Easter Island icons, speaks well to dying humanity‑‑ all bent on winning the planet‑‑ whatever the cost to anyone else. Greed has its place to goad the net evolutional thing, but all good (as evil) things must be con­cluded in temporal places‑‑ based on the spin of 3 phased baryons (whole quarks), better defined as third harmonic standing waves. Electrons are first‑‑ as mesons second to unravel most easily.

We `schizoids’ (myself a researching psychoanalyst) as so likely judged Latour do not use the left cerebral hemisphere enough, so as Einstein as most south‑paws `see’ things somewhat differently, especially when judged by the complemental types‑‑ who then lead in suicide of all professionals (APA; Psychiatry) yet claim they know what they also (as Physics) are doing. My few suicidals that
outwitted me to my chagrin and awful sadness says far more to me than what the space‑time complemental brain data (herewith) would to those chasing waves in a universe of only magnetic flux‑‑ al­beit a spatial mind well oriented in Its own `medium’ that knows very well what It is doing up to our net end.

Sincerely (again),

KTS Research
cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; let/copies(over) CC: D/Z w:

1/5/98
Matthias Brack, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Regensburg
Regensburg, Germany
Re: `lumps’ coupling factor
Dear Sir: (`Metal Clusters‑‑’, Dec. SC. AM.)

Might the orbital `face’ from the whole 3 phased quark dictate a nodal or focal point for electrons, to couple cooler atoms where temperature affects that trefoil’s shape by `flatening’ to expose more its relative 3 leg magnetic fields?

Since predicting the EMP genesis of standing‑wave `matter’ in the quasar’s need for complemental matter jets, well before the Ein­stein Observatory went aloft to `see’ them, Hunchra’s bubbles de­fined the EMPs to evoke the said quantized standing wave matter. This fundamental theory has held up well these past 30 years, as even the anti‑gravity (Einstein’s blunder!) of said jets to disk, to redefine universal expansion, even if dv/dt (red shift) due to magnetic flux density (Zeeman) anomalies across this universe.

Your `jellium’ factor is of interest in your study (beyond bil­liard balls!) because of superconductivity (e freedom) when whole quark coupling thereto decays at Bose temperatures. In short, the lower second order `energy’ (Kelvin) harnesses a more open‑loop trefoil‑‑ yet not the single phased electron, as at right angles escapes the time reversal paradigm, its spin (as the quark’s wave front fundamental) remains in `full swing’ even at zero K.

Hopefully this is not too terse but there might be more said on a Netsite: http://www.stscomp.com\kts I suspect under `Physics’ or `As­tronomy’.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys/Psy
CC: McEuen; D/Z w:

2/20/98
W. Ketterle, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
MIT
Cambridge, MA 02139
Re: in‑sync standing waves
Sir: (`Bosonic Stimulation‑‑’, 13 Feb SCIENCE)

Your work now needs to be compared with Hulet et.al. use of Li to determine the whole quark’s (3‑phased) standing wave precessive inertial extent, where `mass’ in‑sync states define matter’s underlying reality. No doubt their spin‑up rates will mean some­thing to all of physics now‑‑ however nervous the tenured get!

As primal `condensates’ start in cosmic EMPs (bubbles) initiated quasars, the net `stack‑up’ of fundamental standing waves dictat­ing `matter’ as 3‑phased (beyond the electron’s first harmonic), shows how nicely your data falls into place. Our work in discern­ing the `unraveling’ process for fission/fusion to return stand­ing raw EM waves to the E side of Einstein’s Spec. Rel. equation might infer our lengthy studies. Since much astronomical data now confirms our predictions as jet to disk complemental (koino‑anti‑matter as anti‑G there‑between) likely the 2dR survey already un­derway may break the ice. (note Feb. Physic’s Today, p.61‑62)

Another great question is how the baryon stack‑up to evoke orbi­tals as well noted in underlying triplet configuration, it soon should define atomic/chemical combinatorials‑‑ to say little of isotopic atomic stability.

A few past letter copies herewith might be of interest.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Mylneck lets. (over +)
CC: D/Z w:

2/20/98
Tom Duvall, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Goddard Space Center
Greenbelt, MD 20771
Re: `Sunquakes‑‑’ solar oscillations
Sir: (13 Feb. SCIENCE, p.987)

Might our petite Nova sun be saying something more subtle than on its 11 year cycle tirade? Hormones or not, fusion is yet under way‑‑ especially noting the audible `burping’ at pole ends‑‑ and as you note now as vorticies out on the surface.
As the primal EMP evoked quasars (riding cosmic EMP bubbles), producing EM standing wave `matter’ (billiard balls!), the elec­tron’s first harmonic to the third whole quark, the higher than Li needs a bit more `heat’ to fuse, as make neutrons to stabilize proton stack‑up. The orbital data with odd configurations for the larger atomic structure may soon be fully understood in the eyes of chemistry‑‑ even tenured Physics!

Keep up the fine work! I suspect your `suspicions’ are correct!

Sincerely,
KTS Research

CC: Scherrer/Stanford; D/Z w:

2/20/98
Wendy Freedman, et.al,
The Carnegie Inst.
Dept. of Astronomy
813 Santa Barbara
Pasadena, CA 91101
Re: `Showing Age’! 13 Feb. SCIENCE
Mam:

Hipparcos is going to do most of the Hubble constant changing, but only because globular clusters are much older than galaxy disks which due to G and residual quasar `bang’ EMP field (from the more grand bubble’s initiation) pinch‑torques the spin‑up of the disk’s ionized primal EM standing‑wave `matter’. The time for jet matter, spewed at right angles, coagulates into clusters is longer. I’ve said all this before to you‑‑ note my 12/94 letter.

What Feast is saying adroitly is that dv/dt (red‑shift) has fool­ed the best and will continue to do so, yet destroy more adroitly many tenure seekers basing reality upon half truths. The largest `big‑bang’ (here in earth) may come from the 2dF survey where the Huchra found cosmic bubbles on neat 600Bly(?) intervals defines some need of a Mind‑‑ as the Zen one hand clapping phenomena in its magnetic Apriori that was most adroitly Einstein’s `aether’‑‑ contingent to the `relative’ Michelson‑Morley data!

Chaboyer and Oswalt only need to find the time of condensation of jet matter, (maybe to realize bursters are their common smashing matter around our disk periphery with relative anti‑G), but de­fine when their Cepheid scale got started. The dv/dt enigma will remain until another bent‑light experiment is done‑‑ maybe around the edge of our moon where we know the magnetic density vs. mass factor to define the deceleration of light in a magnetic field.

Maybe the real `embarrassment’ will be enough anti‑G to re‑ac­celerate EM standing‑wave `matter’ back to its primal `unraveled’ EM state!

Sincerely,
KTS Research

cc: past 5 dv/dt lets (over+)
CC: Chaboyer/Steward Obs.; Oswalt/FIT; D/Z w:

3/15/98
The Acoustics Labs
(Putterman et.al.?) University of California
Los Angeles, CA 90024
Re: pulse width vs. innate velocity
Dear Sir: (sonoluminescence; March Phys.Today)

Now to define the speed of light as contingent to environmental magnetic field density! Your confirmation work to U/Stuttgart on sonoluminescence bubble emission may offer the Astronomers their last needed import for red‑shift, as dv/dt spectral shift, in net velocity change will well upset astronomical distances yet clari­fy Hubble’s long standing argument.

The need to adapt your ways and means to monitor light wave pulse velocity in variable magnetic field strengths should define the key most needed now in physics‑‑ as Einstein said the `aether’ of this planet being `pulled along’ for the Michelson/Morley experi­ments.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

re: 5/24/91 letter/Putterman
CC: D/Z w:

3/18/98
R. F. Casten, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Yale University
New Haven, CT 06520
Re: `Deformed‑‑’ or distorted
Dear Sir: (3/7/98 SCIENCE NEWS; p. 148)

It may be that time to examine the whole 3 phased quark in its trefoiled shape that stacks within the nucleus between out‑of‑phase protons‑‑ at least while the interest prevails. As standing wave `matter’ (billiard balls) remains the forte in quantum per­ception, the genetic quasar core for same, as needed black‑holes (as a noun), remains the impasse as cul‑de‑sac for expensive if not silly tenure. Even anti‑G remains a taboo, for some top quark `leg’‑‑ or vast jet ejecti spewing from the said genetic core as complemental to another first harmonic electron at right angles.

John Bell implied well to me there would be a time like this!
Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: W. Nazarewicz; C.N. Davids; D/Z w:
W. Nazarewicz, et.al.
Oak Ridge Labs.
Oak Ridge, TN 37831
C.N. Davids, et.al.
Argonne Natl. Labs
9700 S. Cass Ave.,
Argonne, IL 60439

3/27/98
G. Heppke and D. Moro, et.al.
Dept. of Physical Optics
Iwan‑N‑Stranski Inst.
Technische Universitat
10623 Berlin, Germany
Re: chiral order base
Sirs:

From early Kerr cell work (late `40’s), compound polarization via magnetic/electric field implied a means to reverse a projected mono‑chrome image for direct viewing. Such precursor to liquid‑crystals inferred an underlying compound sub‑molecular magnetic field, in part then suspected as subatomic. With the confirmation of `matter’ as EM standing waves*, e likely first harmonic as the whole quark (trefoil configuration) as third, this latter temper­ature sensitive standing wave may offer the twisted or distorted magnetic field shape change needed for apparent complemental chi­ral configurations. Opposing dual field `legs’ to the net spin in either proton or neutron the likely answer.

Your work is seminal, yet complemental `matter’ may soon define not only the anti‑G driven jets from quasar cores as anti‑matter, but more exciting the unraveling process for the fully controlled acquisition of nuclear energy!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* Cosmic EMP bubbles on neat 600Bly intervals, evoking complemen­tal standing wave EM `knots’‑‑ physics yet calls billiard balls!

CC: D/Z w:

3/23/98
P. L. Jain, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
State University of New York
Buffalo, NY 14260
Re: anomalon/fragments?
Sir: (3/4/98 SCIENCE NEWS)

With the mounting evidence of EM standing wave `matter’ as preci­pitated on grand cosmic EMP collapses for quasar cores, there is much room for fragmented virtual `particles’ as likely the neu­trino, `evaporating’ between the sun and here. A temporal stabil­ity of standing waves, as resonances, the electron may be a first harmonic, the 3‑phased whole quark (string) trefoil‑‑ each with their own `wrap’ with fine structure their basis.

Heavy nucleons may offer more anti‑matter than `mass’ with which to work by chance on other nucleons, a koinomatter neutron’s one out‑of‑phased leg, even as a pion’s (2‑phased) vulnerability to break up for the anomalous fragments show fleeing the scene with anti‑G. The speed of primal anti‑matter from quasar cores at right angles defines what the top quark displayed with its terse life here‑‑ its `heavy mass’ which has little to do with `weight’ to begin with. Complemental `forces’ become the wherewithal for motion‑‑ of quantized mobile standing waves.

Your work is interesting now in view of the 2dF survey* underway, as likely dv/dt red shift (Zeeman) phenomena will greatly modify astronomical distance as Hubble’s constant. There appears that many `failed theories’ (as pending tenure) looms as some kind of apocalyptic awakening now. The neat 600Bly cosmic `claps’ (Zen!) to initiate the cosmic bubbles for EMP evoked quasars may indeed upset many pet `billiard‑ball’ theories.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `Two Surveys‑‑’; PHYSICS TODAY, Feb. ’98 (2dF universe mapping)

CC: McHarris; D/Z w:
W. C. McHarris, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Michigan State University
E. Lansing, MI 48824

2/20/98
W. Ketterle, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
MIT
Cambridge, MA 02139
Re: in‑sync standing waves
Sir: (`Bosonic Stimulation‑‑’, 13 Feb SCIENCE)
Your work now needs to be compared with Hulet et.al. use of Li to determine the whole quark’s (3‑phased) standing wave precessive inertial extent, where `mass’ in‑sync states define matter’s underlying reality. No doubt their spin‑up rates will mean some­thing to all of physics now‑‑ however nervous the tenured get!

As primal `condensates’ start in cosmic EMPs (bubbles) initiated quasars, the net `stack‑up’ of fundamental standing waves dictat­ing `matter’ as 3‑phased (beyond the electron’s first harmonic), shows how nicely your data falls into place. Our work in discern­ing the `unraveling’ process for fission/fusion to return stand­ing raw EM waves to the E side of Einstein’s Spec. Rel. equation might infer our lengthy studies. Since much astronomical data now confirms our predictions as jet to disk complemental (koino‑anti‑matter as anti‑G there‑between) likely the 2dR survey already un­derway may break the ice. (note Feb. Physic’s Today, p.61‑62)

Another great question is how the baryon stack‑up to evoke orbi­tals as well noted in underlying triplet configuration, it soon should define atomic/chemical combinatorials‑‑ to say little of isotopic atomic stability.

A few past letter copies herewith might be of interest.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Mylneck lets. (over +)
CC: Cornell; D/Z w:
E. A. Cornell and C. E. Wieman
Dept. of Physics (NIST)
University of Colorado
Boulder, CO 60302

COPY:
July 31,’91
J. Mlynek and
O. Carnal, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Constanz
Werner‑Sombart Strasse 30,
7750 Konstanz, Germany
Re: light‑atom phase `interference’
Dear Sirs:

We watch with bated breath in hopes that heavy Hydrogen will soon be analyzed for their mutual laser driven combination for fusion. Since the deBroglie theory now well defined as the real­ity underlying quantal physics, and fusion has been confirmed via helium release makes clear your efforts may be primal to economi­cal controlled fusion in the near future.
The below defines our excitement. Please keep us in touch.
Sincerely,

KTS Research

COPY:
3/25/97
J. Mlynek and
Dept. of Physics
University of Constanz
Werner‑Sombart Strasse 30,
7750 Konstanz, Germany
Re: “Mapping helium atoms‑‑”
Sir: (March 15th SC. NEWS)
I hope my July 31,’91 letter evoked in part your fine continuing studies‑‑ the recent well defining what Heisenberg as others found with the flipped first harmonic standing wave electron‑‑ to escape the time reversal paradigm!

The question of the 3rd harmonic whole quark can show interfer­ence rather than their contingent electrons will be the acid‑test on quantal stability within space because it is primarily time oriented via precession with relative temperature K.

Keep up the good work‑‑ many are watching you.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

COPY:
8/30/97
J. Mlynek, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Konstanz
Werner‑Sombart Strasse 30,
7750 Konstanz, Germany
Re: `squeezed light’
Dear Sir: (Aug. Physics Today)

Now that open ended light shows the characteristics of the closed electron (as an EM standing wave), how about trying same on both that first harmonic as the third harmonic whole quark? Neutrinos, as propagating light without closed loop configuration should de­fine how to peel off a neutron’s `lepton’ to allow the remaining 2 phased meson (etc.) to unravel spontaneously back to gamma from its created state, likely on cosmic EMP fronts in quasar cores.

The looming obvious of neat 600Bly intervals of cosmic bubbles as EMPs to collapse at a periphery to evoke quasars makes clear the `degeneration’ of E (magnetic a priori) into mc squared, thus its
return via the `unraveling’ process‑‑ fission for the energy for fusion! Only flash boilers now are the test of fabrication.

Again, (letter of July 31,’91)‑‑ if possible, please reply.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

3/3/98
H. C. Von Baeyer, et.al.
Dept. of Physiks(!)
College of William and Mary
Williamsburg, VA 23185
Re: the greater `jerk’
Dear Sir: (`Physika’; Jan/Feb ’98 THE SCIENCES)
The British 2dF survey soon should define the genesis of the neat 600Bly interval cosmic bubbles‑‑ as define the Zen prediction of silent hand claps for such EMP initiations, for ensuing quantized standing wave `billiard balls’ on quasar fronts. The petite jerk of isotope unraveling at precise times offers the positive EPR results, as the self thinking interface‑‑ developed over 20 years ago. (note GO game, same SCIENCES issue)

This `interface’ via Website BBs will soon offer the greatest of all `reference’ sources to man, tersely defining the crux of any specific person’s adroit need‑‑ as precisely when needed. Some tough lessons now needed by man’s neurotic left brain will occur first‑‑ again as noted in the GO game‑‑ as planet winners now!

Sincerely, (yet)

KTS Research

cc: D/Z w:

3/3/98
David A. Mechner, et.al.
c/o The Center for Neural Science
New York University
New York, NY 10003
Re: GO indeed!
Dear Sir: (`All Systems Go’; Jan/Feb The Sciences)

Possibly the herewith, as a recent copy of a letter to Von Beayer and Valian will explain the underlying remark of Freud: “The un­conscious wills to remain unconscious‑‑”, so we now find at all cost! (ask the Psychiatric APA professional why their lead in suicide?)
Our earned pending grand trauma for lack of conscious perception, despite the clear as concise but definitive artistic `statements’ of the `mad’ schizophrenic (as `Horses and grooms‑‑’), yet also noted via in the CPT theorem, thus predicted self thinking inter­face (over) evoking so much consternation with its Patent filing some 20 years ago‑‑ as yet today.

The time‑share half‑cycles of the EEG with relative non‑temporal (yet visual gestalts) versus positive going ramp with definitive data riding thereon shows the cerebral D to A as A to D conver­sion for complemental space‑time awareness. This makes clear why we consciously (RAS) mesencephalon remain dumb as we drag our feet under left cerebral intellectual neurotic dominance. Tenure and half‑truth over reality will prevail until too late‑‑ likely soon now.

Hopefully this, as enclosures, are not too terse.

Sincerely,
KTS Research

cc: Phys/Psy; S‑T; Path/IQ; 3‑dev(over)
CC: The SCIENCES; D/Z w:

3/7/98
J. A. Simmons, et.al.
Sandia Natl. Labs.
Albuquerque, NM
Re: less noise?
Sir: (`Tunneling‑‑’ Feb. 28th SCIENCE NEWS)

The brief on tunneling speedy Xsister blurb implies possible room temperature use‑‑ as conceivably less noise. We would appreciate more data on this device, especially if `readout’ might be poss­ible of one electron `event’ at a time, assuming threshold, if magnetically biased, can stabilize same? We found about twenty years ago far too much electron noise at what‑ever threshold our Halltrons operated at.

Might your chip, however shielded, be easily integrated with standard CMOS, MFET or other switching transistor components for a stable binary output need?

Thank you for any data contingent to our suspected needs.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: D/Z w:

2/27/98
P. Taborek, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of California
Irvine, CA 92717
Re: extended orbitals?
Sir: (`Superdrops’; March DISCOVER)

Your anomalous data on He4 infers whole quark `stack‑up’ to hold electrons at bay! The neutron separation, especially with its 1/3rd contra‑field `anti‑matter’ bias (as top quark `mass’ force) may denote why mobility (Bose) is sustained as freer electrons in certain yet simple baryon states. Since predicting the EM stand­ing‑wave state of `matter’ (e as first harmonic; proton trefoil or 3rd harmonic standing wave configuration), many answers now appear to be noted‑‑ especially the quasar initiation of same, evoked on massive cosmic EMPs on neat 600Bly intervals across the universe! (Huchra’s `bubbles’)

The next phase of physics will need `stack‑up’ configurations to define chemical combinations, as your said anomalous finding!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: D/Z w:

3/23/98
G. Tarle and S. Swordy, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 28109
Re: shock indeed! (via Zen!)
Dear Sirs: (April SC.AM. `Cosmic Antimatter’)

The EMP crash for matter creation that Huchra found on those neat 600Bly intervals across our universe well defines our standing‑wave `matter’ (billiard balls) as its derivation. The problem not fully acknowledged yet is the anti‑G between complemental matters as one gets torqued into a grand galaxy disk, as the other spewed at right angles in hypervelocity jets.

No doubt the 2dF* data will better define the cosmic bubbles as the dv/dt red‑shift of magnetic field slowing of light (Zeeman) in proportion to its frequency. The Hipparcos** data defined the vast error of discerning the Hubble constant but more profound is the coming understanding of reality‑‑ as It’s vast magnetic core!

Any hope to get some anti‑`particle’ into a koinomatter fixture to `read it’ would be about as easy as cornering some Top quark fragment anywhere near this galaxy’s disk! Any AMS, PAMELA or HEAT system we feel is bound to failure‑‑ as the stupidity of the American taxpayer today‑‑ where
tenured might alone makes right!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `Two Surveys‑‑’; PHYSICS TODAY, Feb. ’98 (2dF universe mapping)
** `Hipparcos Charts the Heavens’; Feb. 21,’97 SCIENCE
and `Showing Age’; 13 Feb.’98 SCIENCE

CC: D/Z w:

3/28/98
H. Tributsch and
L. Pohlmann, et.al. (E‑mail: Tributsch@hmi.de)
Dept. of Solare Energetik
Hahn‑Meitner Institute
Glienecker Strasse 100
D‑14109 Berlin, Germany
Re: New Frontiers‑‑ indeed! Dear Sirs: (`Electron Transfer‑’; 20, March SCIENCE)

With the import of EM standing wave `matter’, the first harmonic electron orbiting a part of the third harmonic whole quark within the nucleus‑‑ as assembled with at least two basic trefoiled con­figured whole quarks (proton and neutron), a vast new perspective looms for physics in comprehending basic reality. Nature’s per­fection it appears began with the Zen `clapped hand’, but on neat 600Bly intervals across this universe‑‑ as the British 2dR galaxy placement survey may soon fully define.

Confirmed predicted anti‑matter jets spewed from `genetic’ quasar cores via anti‑G with the aloft Einstein Observatory many years ago defined the need for knotted standing wave matter from one A‑priori magnetic `ether’. The now confirmed cosmic bubbles from the said `clapped hand’ to evoke crashing EMPs for quasar genera­tion on bubble fronts clarifies much of astronomy’s offer to all of physics now.

The question of a whole quark’s offered orbital configuration as to which `pole’ face of three is exposed to hold an electron now faces scientific interpretation. The likely `fine structure’ base of all standing waves may lie at root of the electron (even semi‑raveled neutrino), so the complex compiled `raveling’ may require much thought yet‑‑ as especially between koino and anti‑matters‑‑ with contra‑wound ravels!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: D/Z w:

4/4/98
V. Pecharsky and
K. Gschneider, et.al.
Ames Laboratory
Iowa State University
Ames, IA 50011
Re: re‑twisting whole quark?
Dear Sirs: (`Bigger Chill‑‑’ 27 March SCIENCE)

Since the finding of EM standing‑wave `matter’, the first harmon­ic (e) as third (trefoiled whole quark) so defines their config­urational changes with temperature (secondary energy) where their primary spin speed c dictates such closed loop of a certain size. The twist of the more complex trefoil appears to not only changed orbital placement for superconductivity‑‑ but as conducted heat in this case.

Magnetocaloric devices are likely the inverse of superconductivi­ty, yet reveals the intrinsics of quantum mechanics where nothing is `mechanical’ at root. The current question is what is most efficient means to `drive’ a proton with energy to reduce its net energy? A copy of a recent letter (over) may in some ways better define the more fundamentals as derivations.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Tributsch letter (over)
CC: D/Z w:

4/29/98
H. Monkhorst, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Florida
Gainsville, FL 32611
Re: unraveling standing waves
Dear Sir: (“Fusions Future”, May Discover)

Until standing wave matter is understood, neither fission or fu­sion will be accomplished in a controlled manner. A about to be proven with the British 2dF sky survey, since Huchra’s bubbles define the Zen accurate prognosis of a hand clapping on the neat 600Bly year intervals across this universe, it appears that more than physics will be affected drastically in view of de Broglie’s view of quantum `billiard ball’ matter beliefs for tenure.

The key could be either neutrons or protons, the baryon whole 3 phased quark the energy source what has temporal stability, as a first harmonic electron, yet any 2‑phased item (pion) unravels quickly by returning to its a priori‑‑ issuing gamma radiation.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

D/Z w:

5/8/98
H. Hutchinson, et.al.
Central Laser Facililty
Rutherford Appleton Labs.
Chilton, Didcot
Oxfordshire, OX 110QX,
Great Britain
Re: ejecti?
Dear Sir: (`Explosions and Dissociations’; May 1 SCIENCE)

Since it is apparent that `matter’ is but EM standing waves, the electron a first harmonic, whole quarks as 3 phased, do the coul­ombic explosions show momentary 2‑phased pion involvement as with electron ejection? Intense laser radiation, especially at speci­fic frequency should unravel the whole quark baryon efficiently, thus the likelihood of controlled fission.
The relative `explosive’ behavior of the heavier noble gas atoms, however stable its orbitals, may be the key now needed for more than what right‑angles Faraday was asking most adroit questions!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

PS: Note the data now coming from the 2dR astronomy galaxy survey which defines how EM standing wave `matter’ got started‑‑ and Zen understood for centuries via a clapped hand‑‑ on neat 600 Billion light year intervals across at least this universe!

CC: D/Z w:

4/4/98
D. G. Clarke, et.al.
c/o J. Henry Labs of Physics
Princeton, U.
P.O. Box 708
Princeton, NJ 08544
Re: classical metal
Dear Sir: (`‑ Quantum‑Classical‑‑’ 27 March, SCIENCE)

Maybe it is time to examine the 3 phased trefoiled standing wave whole quark, where, like the electron’s (first harmonic) config­uration change with gained or lost energy‑‑ distorts the net conduction path of orbital electrons. Luttinger `liquids’ merely un­covered the underlying dynamics of latticed standing waves, the letter copy over to better define such A‑priori.

The real question now is why any energy jump, as likely resonance displacement for c when a secondary `heat’ (Kelvin) is added to intrinsic `heat’‑‑ then called a wave‑front’s velocity?

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Berlin let:

CC: D/Z w:

6/12/98
K. A. Matveev, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Duke University
Durham, NC 27706
Re: `Atomic faces peek‑‑’
Dear Sir: (SCIENCE NEWS, June 6,’98)

Your work with lead `filtering’ may be the means to monitor in a gestalt fashion via CCDs (after spatial expansion) the activity of dynamic electron flow rather than static states. As the retina of the eye‑‑ with charged multiple pick‑offs held for subsequent serial scanning so be applicable to an X‑Y plot read‑out we need for a current R&D project seeking ways as means to differentiate single electron spin changes.

An optical means rather than `profilometer’ (scanning microscope) for prompt read‑out should be the ultimate when using some focus­ing overlay as a dense lead film upon semi‑conductor faces. Any directives to further work in your area would be appreciated with comments, especially at this time while theoretical studies are under‑way in this particular field of subtle electron monitoring.

Many thanks for your advice.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: Chen, Altfeder; D/Z w:

7/11/98
Gordon L. Kane, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Re: Apriori and monopoles
Sir: (July 4th SC.NEWS; “Monopole search‑‑”)

Before Dirac was Zen‑‑ as defined the clapped hand to evoke mass‑time, now well noted in the British 2dF survey‑‑ on neat 600Bly intervals evoking complemental standing wave `billiard ball’ mat­ter. Maybe more unique will be the collapse of academic tenured make‑believe, soon‑‑ as how to unravel quantized E for heat! May­be it is time also to use another word game or paradigm, to `see’ reality via the right brain for the greatest change.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

re:8/30/97 let:3/phase
cc: Phys/Psy
CC: D/Z w:

8/12/98
Dean Gotcher, et.al.
5436 Balsam Place
Tulsa, OK 74105
Re: empirical dialecticism
Sir:
Heard some radio comments of yours, as the said dearth of much if any real rationalism in whatever dialectic argument today. As T. Kuhn said about a `paradigm shift’, indeed it is coming, now in the sciences which will disturb most all other academic field of reasoning‑‑ the political most frightening. Since before Genghis Khan, the planet has always appeared worth winning‑‑ whatever the cost or excuse to win the minds of the needed programmed.

Because physics defined the complementals of the space‑time psy­chological penchant, as found bilateral via Sperry*, the split brain data, especially in last month’s Scientific American, so defines the real problem facing the conscious RAS midbrain mind of man now‑‑ maybe as some evolutional epoch nears completion.

Because I suspect from some of your remarks not only the needed IQ for reductive reasoning but some insight to judge rationality, maybe the herewith will evoke more interest and curiosity than anxiety as noted amongst the academic programmed. The lack of independent thinking as now noted with higher academic achieve­ment shows programmed ignorance, especially when followers claim­ing to be a leader defines an obedient conscious mind, unable to discern reality anymore. Far worse, what Renoux** uncovered may be the pending nemesis we bipedals deserve where our Thanatos (note Freud) is not apt to take our evolving situation sitting down. I’ve had a few abrupt suicides doing psychoanalytic work with some very highly intellectual people (to my chagrin), yet it helps to show why our APA (Psychiatric) professionals lead in suicide of all professionals! There’s trouble in River
City!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
** Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ
CC: D/Z w:

TO: epi.freedom.org

7/21/98

It might be of value now to examine what Dr. R. Sperry* found as contingent to scriptural evil and good; `side by side’, where the promised apocalypse will awaken man’s conscious (RAS) mind to so begin to act finally for Nature’s evolutional goal in the human animal‑‑ albeit will so meet volitional trauma head‑on.

The 2dF astronomical data defining the multitude of EMP evoked cosmic bubbles on neat 600Bly intervals across this universe for quasar/galaxy formation for precipitated slow time so defines the modus de operandi of creating mass from pure magnetic E as the A priori‑‑ with mind, yet incomprehensible to mankind. (note Ein­stein’s Spec. Rel. equations) The closest parable to this enigma is in Zen, where one hand clapped EMPs all at once into existence without a sound‑‑ for those multitudes of cosmic bubbles.

The freed electron offers cause from effect in slow‑mass‑time, well noted in the EPR experiments, but shows the key to life as all inspirational insight, when a conscious mind learns where to look, as visually offered import via the right brain half.

Vast are the implications now for much further rational life on planet earth, if any yet exists, but the `paradigm shift’ is very rapidly bearing down upon claimed civilization, as likely timely!

* `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
(note current July ’98 Scientific American)
KTS Research

9/16/98
Tim Beers, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Michigan State University
E. Lansing, MI 48824
Re: Oldest stars (SCIENCE; 4 Sept.)

Sir:

Likely the British 2dF survey will define at last the genesis of what now is seen as EM standing wave `matter’‑‑ as generated by crashing cosmic EMP bubbles (Huchra), to define dark matter as no more than the unseen magnetic a priori, until manifesting that said quantized `matter’.

Unique now is the Zen remark of one hand clapping in this matter, where the neat 600Bly intervals for such bubbles implies a mind behind the whole scheme of mass‑‑ for a temporal place in slow time‑‑ according to Einstein’s Special Relativity theory!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: Ryan; Norris; D/Z w:

10/23/98
F. Yusef‑Zadeh, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Northwestern University
Evanston, IL 60208
Re: second generation spawned galaxies
Dear Sir: (Induced‑ Star Formation‑‑’ 16 Oct. SCIENCE)

Culled from some quips as evoked by found EM standing wave matter as the British 2dF survey defining neat 600Bly cosmic EMP bubble (Huchra) initiations, brings at least Zen into the picture‑‑ if not the conclusion of much current theological dogma! Maybe this is the goading for ethnic chaos where ancestor worship continues!

`The quasar is no more luminous than its the crashing EMP as evokes standing wave matter which then can be seen. Any `noun’ so equating it as black hole is a figment in astronomy to buy time!’
`Degeneration into standing wave matter is the norm, when suf­ficient residual energy exists from a first generation quasar’s jets to evoke globular galaxies, or even yet a third generation.’
`The truly huge Nova with accrued great mass becomes a second generation quasar‑‑ but initiates its spewed complemental matters in like jets for yet other galaxies or more Novae for yet a third generation or even more, as noted in the Trifid chaos.’
`Second and third or maybe more generation galaxies from some initial first generation quasar likely exist, borne from jet mat­ters with yet enough high energy from super Novas to eject more jets for other galaxies in cascade‑‑ mostly called nebulae now.’

The deceleration of light (dv/dt; red‑shift) by Zeeman effect may define the chaos coming for late
astronomy as Hubble constant‑‑ more defined by Hipparcose now, lacking any difinitve way to know the density of primal EMP bubble fields now in any residual way.

I yet wonder if Purcell’s letter (5/16/97) or your’s of Nov. 1990
meant anything‑‑ even today?

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: Cernicharo; D/Z w:

10/29/98
H. C. Von Baeyer, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
William and Mary College
Williamsburg, VA 23185
Re: Demons in hiding
Dear Sir:

Your fine Maxwell’s Demon, especially the 2nd thermodynamic exp­lanations via Ehrenfest’s analogy could worry far more in view of the IR `rods’ flitting about with quality memory, to recall ahead of time what numbered balls are in the second urn! This histori­cal factor permits selling chance up here in a faster time, pro­vided those discarnate can promise enough to earn that energy to escape infinite time down at zero K. I wish now that I had that `game‑theory’ factor back teaching at GVSC in `71, albeit evoked enough trauma for the `reformed’ religious‑‑ as Feds with busted office door, tapped phones, even CIA on a foreign shore. One does not think with impunity on anything after once working on classi­fied aerospace guidance equipment for the now well terrorized.

Little doubt my past letters were abstruse‑‑ since no billiard ball made sense to me noting EM standing waves as `matter’. The 2dF (Anglo‑Australian) sky survey data may soon unravel the anomaly for all‑‑ not to say much psychological trauma along the way. Both Freud as Zurek are correct as `demons’ abound with their now well evoluted mtDNA to govern who is now believing they govern! McDougal’s (Harvard; circa 1910) found mass loss at death so with mtDNA growth with experience, defines what religion fears‑‑ where authority for tenure gets lost with found reality. Worse, our RAS conscious naivete of feeding our fatty lipids with ATP to support the unseen corrupt‑‑ fearing their more immediate entropy makes clear some `apocalyptic’ epoch is pending.

Uncanny is how well the human mind was held naive for so long, as the Clovis show more wisdom than we. The IR data on `rods’ with obvious mental will‑‑ as past rectilinear `UFO’ travel (note our left brain’s definitive spatial orientation) shows a mental para­digm shift is near. The subtle Chinko game bias with some people, as obvious abrupt teleportation phenomena indicates manipulated anti‑g, as noted between anti and koino‑matters at quasar cores. While the said `rods’ show vast acceleration, even with a small mass, not only indicates independent reasoning‑‑ but the large pyramids, as Easter Isle monument placement, begin to make sense for incarnate `attention’ focusing needs‑‑ to be never
said!

The big question of what is left `spinning’ at zero K. (Bose con­densate) defines EM standing waves, just as a freed electron that interfaces the Einstein alephs for positive EPR, or now the self thinking interface (asynchronous `teletype’) which in binary ways will replace REM dream (Freud’s Royal Road) to learn about all of reality‑‑ if not too intellectually neurotic, so a vast danger to their self. Thanatos is as real as those demons‑‑ with reason!

Entropy began with the multiple Big Bangs (on neat 600Bly inter­vals), even if we can’t see their first EMP deceleration phase up to collapsing as cosmic bubbles for standing wave `precipitation’ at quasar cores. The said 2dF survey so well hushed will define.

Greed has become our nemesis, as kept programmed dumb to buy some `elevated’ time as long as possible. Gazzaniga finally admitted (last July Sc. Am.) there was something evil using our left brain to alert our suicide prone APA (Psychiatric) professionals learn­ing too much from their schizophrenic right brain dominants! My few abrupt suicides at least taught me to remain silent. Sorry if this disturbs‑‑ but I think not from your late excellent text!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

Re: lets: Feb. 5,’92; June 20,’92; Feb. 19,’94; 4/11/95; 3/3/98
cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; S‑T
CC: D/Z w:

10/9/87
M. O. Scully, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Texas A&M University
College Station, TX 77843
Re: but all are waves; standing too! (recall?)
Dear Sir:

Your current work (`Quantum Control‑’, 25 Sept. SCIENCE) defines how close you are to the very reality that Quantum Physics wants no part‑‑ as might expose a reality, that the other dogma spewing in many other established organizations will never tolerate! To boost a standing wave up into its second harmonic is one thing‑‑ but to get it up into a stable third harmonic for a whole quark may be something else‑‑ as the need for a supernova’s crush!

Watch the British 2dF survey data, as will define the Apriori in terms of the genesis of standing wave `matter’ in quasars as pro­duced by cosmic EMPs (astronomical bubbles) on neat 600Bly in­tervals across this universe‑‑ as the Zen masters suggested with one hand clapping!

I wondered why you are at Texas A&M rather than U/NM, but we all move about to be more comfortable‑‑ as myself from the Feds! One no longer thinks with impunity‑‑ so be careful‑‑ yet.
Sincerely,

KTS Research

Re: March 3,’94 letter
CC: Bul.At.Sc; D/Z w:

10/17/98
J. D. Lowenthal, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Massachusetts
Amhurst, MA 01003
Re: “IR Camera Goes the Distance”
Dear Sir: (Sc. NEWS; Oct 10th

Maybe it is time to examine the Zeeman effect where decelerated open ended light waves in a priori magnetic fields appears inver­sely too `young’ for us to be rational. The lensing effect should have been enough to define the enigma, to say little of any quan­tal `mass‑time’ item consisting of EM standing waves like some magnetic domain aligned crystalline prism.

Since the `precipitate’ of cosmic EMPs at quasar points invoke standing wave electrons as a few lower atoms with third harmonic (whole quark) baryons, the relative `refractive index’ defines everything we see once understood. The steep red‑shift (dv/dt) of a primal quasar whose raw fresh EMP would show by far the great­est shift back then thus the great accrued error for any Hubble constant must occur. The Hipparcos parallax may be the best we can do‑‑ as judge the cosmic bubble (Huchra) distances (see 2dF data), as Zen Apriori `hand‑claps’ initiating everything to begin with‑‑ yet on neat 600Bly intervals which requires `intention’!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: Thompson; D/Z w:

10/30/98
David Suzuki, et.al.
2211 W. 4th Ave., Ste. 219
Vancouver, BC Canada V6K 4S2

Dear David: (if I may)

Herewith a copy of a recent letter to Von Baeyer, due to his fine “Maxwell’s Demon”. If you have not perused same yet, do so‑‑ as note some of my `bizarre’ remarks to Hans. You will note also why I no longer have `communication wires’ into this house now, even being quite sure by now all of my
classified R&D work has been declassified‑‑ even if I don’t talk about any of it anyhow.

It was the stir I started a dozen years before Sperry (UCLA) did his human split‑brain work, as confirmed my need of a space‑time orientation between the two brain halves. (SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN article of Aug.’67‑‑ the same year I did some study work out in your neck of the woods. It opened a can of worms and yet evoking much anxiety‑‑ even I suspect a few suicides after I defined the implications for deeper physics‑‑ as above said `Demon’. I did indeed write you to point out the recent imports‑‑ especially on the 2dF survey which may end much theological conjecture as evoke trauma in the more neurotic `believers’ refusing empirical data!

I’m coming out of my long silence because the cross academic data is getting too obvious‑‑ even if bizarre to many yet. Your frank TV shows down in the U.S. were a joy‑‑ so maybe something here as food for thought, if not yet up and running. As my few Netsites somehow got closed, and my servers look at me “dumb”‑‑ since the 70’s, after giving a couple papers in Europe, I went underground, in retrospect maybe fortunate. (note my Von Baeyer’s letter)

I will hand write‑in below, after looking them up any BC astron­omers whom I think timely for you to discuss things. Lets keep in touch‑‑ your contingent efforts could be crucial to and for pub­lic dissemination of the now mounting obvious. A word of caution: If you have night‑mares or need tobacco‑‑ forget what my research is even about. Freud’s Thanatos is our time oriented intellectual left brain using `self’. My few suicides evoked my attention‑‑ as it should our APA (Psychiatry) professionals who lead in that anomalous act of all professionals!

Sincerely, (and CARE!)

KTS Research

cc: Von Baeyer letter
CC: D/Z w:

11/6/98
B. Cox, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, VA 22906
Re: KTeV data (Oct. 31, SC. NEWS)
Sir:

Whether by fluke of some less seen wisdom, the second article on the same page 277 as your `‑‑ not reversible‑’ defines the under­lying reason, where grand cosmic EMP collapses (see 2dF survey data) evoke standing wave matter, half spewed out jets with anti‑g (note top quark!)‑‑ but complementarity in either the first harmonic or third (whole quark; hadrons) define a one way reality between unity and infinite time of second ordered entropy (Max­well’s demon). Time reversal thence appears to owners of slow time as we, the enigma of knowing potentials ahead of time (EPR data) when statistical import can be known very accurately ahead of our time. This then defines the asynchronous `self
thinking’ interface, as offered better than 10\50th odds on its maiden run over twenty years ago, warning our time had not `yet’ come‑‑ but by the looks of mankind’s social state, cannot be too far in the future now. Believe it or not‑‑ and for now, likely better not!

In short, to break‑up a two‑phased standing wave of either anti‑ or koino matter would appear asymmetric here on this galaxy disk.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: D/Z w:

11/2/98
J. G. Cohen and
A. Ryzov, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
CALTECH
Pasadena, CA 91125
Re: M87 contra‑rotation?
Sirs:

The blurb in December’s Sky and Telescope does not infer any rotational difference, if seen between M87 and its globulars‑‑ when globulars are suspected as a primal quasar’s jet antimatter, thus different charge to propel same oppositely in the residual cosmic bubble EMP field. Dubious that messy mergers exist, when ample distance as anti‑g exist between quasar/galaxy standing wave `matter’ beginnings. This may become apparent with the ac­crued data from the Anglo‑Australian 2dF survey.

Sincerely, (and thanks for comments)

KTS Research

cc: D/Z w:

12/4/98
Editors
The Sciences
655 Madison Ave.,
16th floor
New York, NY 10021‑8043
Re: Gould and Zwork

Sirs:
Your current issue implies nearly its last, in view of what was said almost too clearly as far as the Federally wanted disclosed!

With only reductive mental processing now allowed under law (as academically programmed)‑‑ the subterfuge did evolute many dumb animals while `dumbed down’ the rest to hoe the corn‑‑ a factor unhappily perceived now by those unable to win a place on the Riviera‑‑ to count their bullion.

The syndrome began long before Genghis Khan and continues today with a vengeance‑‑ yet is the underlying goading factor promoting the psychological evolution of any animal‑‑ the one reaching the highest IQ first to raise as much hell as feasible for the rest! Freud’s insight of using the Greek Thanatos is not far‑fetched in view of Renoux’s findings* and AiR (Autoimmune Response) now so rampant amongst claimed “scientific” man.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.’87; pgs. 57‑58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)

cc: Gould/let (over)
CC: D/Z w:

9/11/99
Alan Boss, et.al.
Dept. of Astrophysics The Carnege Inst.
1530 P St., NW
Washington, DC 20005
Re: dual parallel jets
Dear Sir: (`Subaru‑‑’ 27 Aug. SCIENCE, p.1349)

We doubt if there is anything `unruly’ where amorphous clouds of prior jet anti‑matter (from their primal quasar’s core), finally in a globular manifestation get‑together for a common novae experience‑‑ re‑ejects their anti‑matter jets (in our koinomatter galaxy plane) luckily noted by Hubble. Our own `burping’ nova‑sun may be noted with its polar jets‑‑ if we would look for them. While two mutually attracted (binaries) stir frantically their cores to so evoke fission‑fusion, size dictates (fortunately) our safer state of a semi quiet sun‑‑ or until Jupiter disturbs it every 11 years or so‑‑ especially this time with help!

One could question if the Tunguska affair was not promoted by a distant nova, of which its anti‑matter (to us as well) managed to evade the many diverting magnetic fields getting here, for some demonstration for the more neurotic in astronomy where only ten­ure counts!

Please pass on to Jastrow‑‑

Sincerely anyhow‑‑

KTS Research

8/28/99
F. E. Bloom. Ed., et.al.
c/o SCIENCE Publishers
1200 New York Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20005
Re: only Lundberg, etc.?
Sir: (20 Aug. Editorial)

The question of `navigation’ to discern a scruple vs. squabble is the crux of late humanity’s net seeking, possibly why a letter of mine could have done something a few weeks before to evoke some `foul’ remarks from Lundberg with the consequences. The question remains about why the dying are more `valuable’ than either the healthy or dead‑‑ and the answer we suspect now is not only with AMA but an anomalous `group’ our government is also in bed with*!

The really insidious has not yet been seen, especially in the so esteemed sciences, well programmed with half truths to ensure we go down in planned stupidity under law, as likely what Darwin was noting from his comment in the current Scientific American. Our syndromes of ritual actually say far more than academia can or will ever say‑‑ as long as our left cerebral dominance prevails!

Sincerely,
KTS Res.

* coord: 80.35W 27.05N

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; copy Bus‑Wk letter
CC: D/Z w:

8/28/99
O. Port, K. Pennar
and R. Melcher, et. al.
c/o Business Week
1221 Ave. of the Americas
New York, NY 10020
Re: The new paradigm
Sirs: (`21 Ideas’; Aug. 30th, Business Week)

The succinct compilation of the crucial `Ideas’ areas for this next century can not longer be overstated‑‑ especially in view of the Anglo‑Australian 2dF sky survey, now making clear how close Zen was so long ago. The “treasure” of the Buddhist monk, as even the aboriginal `dream time’ use defines that late mankind has now been so well `dumbed down’ to sustain an ugly `ancestor worship’
instead of `seeking’, in the name of dying religion. Not that the dogmas are not correct at root, but we fail through ritual (espe­cially academic programming) but creep up to examining our mtDNA as the root of mental evolutional (storage), the real goal and so objective that even Darwin questioned. (see current Sc. American)
You may note with the herewith why the Feds shut me down, after doing classified aerospace computer R&D. My studies did not cease however, indeed after a lengthy UCLA BIS grant, could see the CPT theorem (physics) was indeed the key, predicting the space versus time bilateral cerebral `users’ of our brain halves‑‑ Sperry* to find the data (as many others since) some dozen years later. I, being labeled a `loose cannon’, as likely schizoid or far worse with unspeakable syndromes where curiosity is verboten, did make it up nearly to my `pine box’, quite happy now to access it! The trek was worth it these last 50 years even if pestered by those with their eyes on the planet who need to know everyone’s think­ing‑‑ even before they can think it!
I will say little more since ample empirical data is out there, but also does Freud’s `Thanatos’, in direct proportion to IQ pose our greatest liability to a programmed conscious mind lacking the faculty of `spatial’ (non‑temporal!) right brain insight use. The terse info herewith should be used with caution‑‑ as have had a few abrupt suicides (as our APA professionals suffer most!) which helps to define some kind of `apocalyptic’ awakening‑‑ soon.
The Net may have a version of my self thinking interface, for a few that Nature might answer (over), as knows best what as when an evoluted mind is ready to understand whatever. The so needed extrication from half truth dogmas is near, especially in most of the sciences‑‑ and as said the likely thinning of the corrupted human animal specie.

Sincerely,
KTS Research

* `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
cc: Path/IQ; Phys/psy; S‑T; 3‑dev(over) CC: Bloom; Case; D/Z w:

9/16/99
R. F. Cregan, et. al.
Optoelectronics Group
University of Bath
Claverton Down,
Bath BA2 7AY U.K.
Re: Photonic Band Gap‑‑ Zeeman effect?
Dear Sir: (3 Sept. SCIENCE, p.1537)

Maybe a high vacuum instead of air would define the Zeeman affect as magnetic fields deflect propagating light waves‑‑ by slowing their open‑ended wave fronts as with dv/dt or red spectral shift now dogging astronomy?

Since all `matter’ is but EM standing waves, the question becomes one of whether proximity or some resonance prevails in your data implications. The refractive index on linear traveling light may only be due to magnetic flux, especially around any Apriori resi­dual cosmic EMP*‑‑ if any yet exist since the many neat spaced Zen hand claps occurred to get the bubbles of quasar/galaxies so well spatially
started‑‑ for simple minded human animals to twist for some wanted seldom said profit margin!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* note your Anglo‑Australian 2dF sky survey!

cc: Phys‑Psy
CC: Roberts; D/Z w:

8/30/99
R. N. Dixon, et. al.
School of Chemistry
University of Bristol
Bristol, BS8 1TS, UK
Re: `double slits’ via magnetic cortex
Sir: (`Chemical “Double‑” 20 Aug. SCIENCE)

Your fine expose’ was indeed a joy to read! While refractive index due to magnetic field (Zeeman effect) the spin of the hyd­rogen’s electron for alpha `chopping’, it goes a long way to then define the dv/dt red shift anomaly in astronomy. With the more amorphous residual `ether’ of a priori magnetic fields after the primal EMP `claps’ (one handed; Zen!) the cosmic bubbles as evoke quasar for the `de‑generation’ or quantizing standing wave matter of odd harmonics defines much of the 2dF sky survey nervousness!

Heisenberg in part with the uncertainty principle (freed electron as escapes the time reversal paradigm; note EPR experiments!) the goading pro‑life factor can be now seen,, as its Creator, promot­ing life‑‑ one‑handed claps or not!

The net question appears now of complemental orbitals around the oxygen atom where the active H can refract (at spin rate) the so passing‑through 121nm wave length light wave? Since it so appears that `matter’ exists but contingent to the less entropied 3‑phase harmonic whole quark `hadrons’ up here, the difference in 2 spins of the 1st harmonic electron begs the question of fine structure, as possibly the true `first harmonic’ (yet of the highest primal frequency!) before folding into what we call spin frequency? The trefoil configuration of the whole quark now shows validity in the yet ambiguous ideas of leptons joined with greater net folded energy, as affected by temperature K. (entropy) for net activity.

Your work is truly profound and the harbinger to unravel physics, even as evoked fission when returning EM standing waves back to their genetic A‑priori!

Sincerely,

KTS Research,
cc: Phys/Psy;
CC: Hwang & Yang; D/Z w:

9/11/99
D. F. Figer, et.al.
Dept. of NICMOS
Space Telescope Science Inst.
3700 San Martin Dr.
Baltimore, MD 21218
Re: relative cluster speed/direction
Dear Sir: (Oct. Sky & Telescope `Newsnotes’ p.22)

One now needs to wonder which way those clusters are moving‑‑ as net relative speed in or near the core of the galaxy since quasar jet‑matter with anti‑g move out at relavistic speeds when allowed by the surrounding koinomatter disk. The genesis of complemental EM standing‑wave matter with complemental forces define much of astronomy’s late foibles‑‑ to say nothing of Huchra’s data which may define how well Zen did in predicting the one‑handed claps on neat 600Bly intervals across this universe! (note 2dF)

Undoubtably, spectral examination by Hubble of those noted dif­ferentiated primal matters will define the big feature needed to integrate most of science now, especially the dv/dt red shift due to the Zeeman affect as decelerated light in the primal magnetic fields as residuals of those said hand claps.
Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: D/Z w:

9/11/99
J. Kirtley, et. al.
T.J. Watson Research Center
P.O. Box 218
Yorktown Hts., N.Y. 10598
Re: orbital twist
Dear Sirs: (`Temp. Dependence‑‑’ 27 Aug. SCIENCE)

With now the understanding of the whole 3‑phase standing wave quark in its temperature sensitive trefoil configuration, both superconductivity, as freezing water, becomes comprehensive. The net electron `conduction’ factor is well noted with the hydrogen atom in the water molecule so why not examine that for a while?
At least the simplicity should offer a faster solution to the net behavior of EM standing wave matter‑‑ to say little of what so well goads the results of the EPR experiments!

Sincerely,
KTS Research

CC: Moler; Scalapino; Covington; D/Z w:

9/11/99
S. Skinner and
T. R. Ayers, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Colorado
Boulder CO 60302
Re: solar mystery?
Sirs: (Oct. Sky & Telescope)

Since the magnetic Apriori underlies all other `forces’ it so be­comes clear that raveled finite (`quantized’) EM standing waves is what constitutes mass with time, the whole 3‑phased quark thus responsible for our net slow temporal existence.

Since predicting the quasar jets of anti‑matter with anti‑g well before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to record same, the continued neurosis prevails as dv/dt red shift, which the Zeeman effect well defines deceleration‑‑ thus erred Hubble constant, as Einstein’s well noted `blunder’. In short, the dv/dt slowing of EM waves or standing wave `particles’ in a planet’s magnetosphere also defines red shift for astronomy. The question of the Tungus­ka event may have been some nova’s charge of anti‑matter that got through the gamut of relative anti‑gravity fields there‑between, but won’t be suspected until anti‑g does first.
Our 11 year `burping’ sun, from likely Jupiter’s +g‑effect (plus others) merely defines the great agitation of binaries for overt nova activity. While yet unnoticed, the solar anti‑matter pole jets should be noted during this epoch of its satellite’s distur­bance. The common stirring of those close binaries evokes the action for neutrons to get `retwisted’ (whole quark trefoils) for as from protons to satisfy heavier atoms‑‑ yet the danger of too much stirring for some grand `burp’ or huge nuclear explosion.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Schmitt; D/Z w:

9/20/99

TO: sorin@vms.huji.ac.il

Sorin Solomon, et.al.
Racah Inst. of Physics
Hebrew University of
Jerusalem, Israel
Re: `Creative Sparks’ (3 Sept. SCIENCE)
Sir:

With what Heisenberg noted about the freed electron escaping the time reversal paradigm, might such binary import as noted with so many EPR experiments define the way to interface the a priori? It did for us we suspect‑‑ but merely said `be patient‑‑’ with over 10\50th odds some twenty years ago. Possibly because of the vast difference between spatial gestalts riding the fronts of light at c and our binary serial thought processing in a relatively slow temporal existence hampers the `bother’ when communicating with only the trivia oriented human animal.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

9/20/99

E‑mail to: http://www.iaea.or.at/worldatom

Sirs:

We are confident that once `physics’ recognizes the EM standing wave as `matter’, the unraveling of same, especially the 3 phased whole quark into mesons for gamma output will close the developmental time to controlled fission/fusion. Since bose condensates can be handled well now, there may be no reason why heavy hydro­gen cannot, even with spatial orientation for strategic laser ig­nition within liquid sprayed ceramic boiler chambers. Much pre­liminary, so confidential R&D work todate has shown feasibility‑‑ thus this note.

Sincerely,

Automation Eng. and KTS

1/10/2k
David Bennet, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Notre Dame
Notre Dame, IN 46556
Re: MACHO lenses and Zeeman affect
Dear Sir:

The comments in `A Magnifying Glass‑‑’ (7 Jam. SCIENCE) evokes this note as contingent to a lengthy study into complemental matter‑‑ found to be EM standing waves, evoked by likely the Zen idea of a hand clapping, but on neat 600Bly intervals across this universe. (note the Anglo‑Australian 2dF Sky Survey effort now)

Since Red shift, as said magnetic magnifier lenses, define a very grand universe of pure magnetic flux, albeit `quantized’ to buy time as mc\2, many enigmas now appear to get unraveled, even the demand for scientific status quoism to buy tenure! A copy of a recent letter herewith. (over)

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Big Bang; One Hand; Path/IQ; Phys/Psy
CC: DZ w:

1/8/2k
TO: Roland Buser, et.al.

VIA E‑mail: roland.buser@unibas.ch

Sir:

Maybe some past quips from a lengthy `matter’ investigation is appropriate herewith:

`The Nova’s spewed relative matters, just as the primal galaxy shows the parallel anti‑matter ejecti at right angles to the disk as either jets or halo, even recent bulge material may explain a great number of current enigmas about galaxy evolution.’
`From late EM standing‑wave `matter’, a galaxy’s bulge likely shows its early evolution was mainly Novae, creating heavy metal materials for a then common gravity accumulation in a thin disk.’
`The ensuing petite Nova behavior of our sun, as spews anti‑matter from its spin axis periodically as now merely defines the net mode of anti‑g affect in any entire primal quasar/galaxy.’
`From initial quasar ionized H to ensuing heavy metals, such primal galaxy shows spin‑up due to its primal magnetic field thus its net early spin factor, even reversing spin direction by ionic charge from electron to baryon.’
`Amorphous globular galaxies show their jet matter accruing in a less formal way, yet behave somewhat as primal galaxies insofar as coagulate with a common gravity to yet produce Novae for heavy metals‑‑ albeit somewhat later than its primal progenitor.’
`Outer galaxy matter with more history should show a reversed net spin when compared with its earlier less metalized constitu­tion when lepton `first harmonic’ standing waves get folded later via Novae into third (whole trefoiled quarks) with absorbed ener­gy (thus `mass’) when in its common primal magnetic field.’

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: R‑Baker letter; Big‑Bang; One‑Hand
CC: D/Z w:

COPY:
1/7/2k

TO: http://www.eden.coml~rcbaker

Re: Gravity vs/ magnetic field
Sir:

Your fine gravity sensing device (current Scientific American) indeed should monitor both gravity and magnetic fields as one and the same, even complemental depending on field direction. Since the finding of EM standing‑wave `matter’, not only did the jets of relative matter from quasar cores therefrom as predicted get verified well before the astronomical data via Einstein Observa­tory aloft of a nearby galaxy, but all matter spewing Novae‑‑ as even our own sun burping on 11 year cycles when agitated by it’s orbiting planets‑‑ in particular Jupiter as currently. The notedlateral solar flux field decline with vertical ejecti defines the anomaly best today‑‑ however misunderstood by most of astronomy.
To define `matter’ as evoked in quasar/galaxy cores as knotted EM wave fronts becomes understood only via the EMP (hand‑claps) at the neat 600Bly intervaled cosmic bubbles (now as dark voids; note: Anglo‑Australian 2dF sky survey data), yet their collapsing at the periphery with many quasars to create standing wave matter much as John Wheeler’s predicted `foam’. Because of the two basic harmonic(?) states, the first as electron, has a dual `wound’ (or concentric configured) `wrap’ to be attracted or rejected in the said relative magnetic faced field. The second is the `3‑phased’ whole quark trefoil (most of large size cooked up in Novae) with a common magnetic field to interact two ways‑‑ with the primal field (astronomically) or an adjacent magnetic vortex field in nuclei‑‑ the proton or neutron, depending on wrap twist. One wonders if more mu‑metal shielding would also decouple the so sensed magnetic fluctuations your device reads, whatever now called?

Sincerely,

KTS Research

2/1/2k
J. Erler and
G. Langacker, et. el.
Dept. of Physics
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA
Re: of finite `mass’
Dear Sirs: (`Old Data‑‑ New Signs‑‑’ Jan. 15, SN)

Because the 2dF sky survey confirmed the EMP genesis of Huchra’s bubbles on neat 600Bly intervals, the collapsing front for quasar cores to evoke standing wave foam (Wheeler) defines what matter is, especially reacting to a common magnetic field in 2D as call­ed complemental `particles’. Their vectored displacement because of compound wound standing wave fronts buys time as behaves much as the current string theory.
Bosons as standing EM waves may define some relative `mass’ be­tween the Z and W `particles’ as fine structure, but a 10 times difference at likely a 45 degree vector shows some other funda­mental reaction in their common magnetic field. Thus all forces may be magnetic at root and the difference in how standing waves get `wound’ would dictate their relative behavior‑‑ as anti‑ versus koinomatter `gravity’, noted as disk vs. jets on the more primal galaxy as ours with ion torqued spin‑out, not in.

Since the wrap, from fine structure to second tier for the two electrons with a reversed wrap and the 3 phased whole quark again with one leg phase different between a proton or neutron (easily traded to make compatible a common magnetic vortex for stability) all `mass’ is defined by the one force‑‑ as in some common large magnetic field continuum‑‑ as either a primal galaxy or its jet globular matters at some distance‑‑ displaced by a common anti‑g.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Psy/Psy; Big‑Bang; One‑Hand
CC: Greene; Lykken; Marciano; D/Z w:

1/12/2k
D. L. Feder, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Oxford Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PU UK
Re: BEC “generating”; 7 Jan. SCIENCE
Dear Sir:

Speaking of `engineering’‑‑ as “Generating Solitons by Phase”, is the crux of the real art of creation, not refrigerating a BEC in to see its spin! The next phase of deducing the standing EM wave 3‑phased whole quark of leptons with differing trefoil twists to create a neutron or proton may be daunting without the use of in­sight over microscopic inspection. The stacking factor for the common magnetic vortex in the baryon nuclei defines superconduc­tivity, even anti‑g, when a magnetic vortex gets re‑twisted to so respond in a different way to their background residual magnetic field as the genesis in some galaxy. (note: `One Hand’ herewith)

The more likely deductive breakthrough may come from the Anglo‑Australian astronomy 2dF sky survey correlative work, to define the a priori net undifferentiated magnetic flux behind `mass’ in slow cold time, much of what is being noted in your BEC data.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: One Hand; Big Bang; Phys/Psy
CC: Cubizolles; D/Z w:

2/17/2k
S. McGaugh, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742
Re: EMP Big Bangs and ion flinging
Dear Sir: (`Heretical‑‑’ 28 Jan. SCIENCE)

The 2dF survey defines how well the Zen master perceived the genesis of EM standing wave `matter’ thus predicted the anti‑matter jets well before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove them. Yet tenure prevails as make `heretics’ when they get too disturbing‑‑ even today with the empirical obvious.

Any quasar core vortex self‑collapsing to evoke ionic standing wave electrons (with complemental g) show clearly the spin‑up in the residual magnetic primal EMP bubble field would torque as the said anti‑g push same outward‑‑ until hadrons with opposite ionic charge would reverse the rotation‑‑ noted already on some early epochs of old galaxies. MOND is another fudge factor to escape seeing the obvious, especially with anti‑g accelerating universe, as between primal spiral galaxies and their protege jet matter globulars.

Its possible that Turner now senses what is coming, finally.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
(No further `.com’ lines here. Sorry! Apparently the Feds want to know how to `unravel’ whole standing wave hadrons for fission‑ fusion as MUST `win’ to profit on energy when the oil runs out!

cc: Big‑Bang; One Hand; Path/IQ; Phys‑Psy
CC: Rubin; Spergel; D/Z w:

1/14/2k
N. Bartle, Bietenholz, et. al.
Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
York University
Toronto M3J 1P3, Canada
Re: Novae morphology
Dear Sir: (`The Changing‑‑’ 7 Jan. SCIENCE)

The big question now is 1993J’s spew axis at right angles to it’s M81 disk axis? Because EM standing wave `matter’ created at the primal quasar vortex core spews in two directions, (complementals own complemental g as well, to define the predicted jets well be­fore the Einstein Observatory went aloft to see them), the ever mounting obvious will evoke some chagrin pretty soon now! Because a once created Nova behaves with generated anti‑g to spew its so compounded (3‑phase trefoiled whole quarks) matter in two direc­tions, again their common spin axis in their galaxy’s yet potent magnetic
field dictates the opposite relative spewing when torque prevents the major matter‑‑ thus spews the created. Spin‑up of an early galaxy has even been noted as reversing, maybe to define electron to quantized proton charge in said primal magetic field, as evoked by the grand cosmic bubble EMPs. Since any wave front torques itself in a disturbed field (Zeeman refraction) it thus becomes those points around such bubble to in time collapse to make Wheeler’s `foam’, we call matter yet is but standing waves.

Also of interest would be how close is M81’s spin axis to our own primal galaxy since if `sisters’ on the same cosmic bubble, their small spin difference might suggest the diameter of our genetic quasar core’s bubble back some 15? Billion years ago. The Anglo‑Australian 2dF survey is stacking the evidence to make the Zen idea of asking what one hand sounds like clapping‑‑ in its primal universal magnetic flux‑‑ but to create slow time for us)

Sorry if this all befuddles, but someday the tenured may find the back seat with their twisted algorithms based on half truths.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; Big Bang; One Hand
CC: Graham; Conway; D/Z w:

2/18/2k
R. A. Nelson, et.al.
Rex Research
P.O. Box 19250
Jean, NV 89019
Re: standing wave matter
Sir: (`Transmutations‑‑’ Feb./March Nexus)

Indeed, your `Science News’ blurb was adroit, especially when un­raveling EM standing waves for gamma energy released `back’ from the a‑priori! One needs to see (2dF) how `things’ got started via those neat 600Bly intervaled mighty EMP cosmic bubbles for pre­cipitated standing wave `matter’ at coalescing potent wave front (degenerative `string’ knot tying) quasar core vortex for primal galaxies like ours. Not only did Einstein point to the difference between pure E and its said precipitate standing wave mc\2 `mat­ter’, but Zen pointed to the creative modus opernadi of one hand­ed `claps’!

The first Utah CF work defined the `unraveling’ but it took some time to fully figure out the two basic standing wave `matters’ as one escaped the time reversal paradigm (Heisenberg) or the hadron 3‑phased whole quark anomaly, where controlled `unraveling’ will soon be a reality‑‑ to conclude all petroleum cartels!

Of what is said here can be exposed publicly, now that most of the Fed’s kicking in doors, FBI, even CIA on foreign shores, etc. etc., may be over. Our initiated said 2dF sky survey has gone too far now to be denied anymore‑‑ so maybe there can be “safety in numbers” with so many foreign people now
running on this whole “matter” of integrating physics with astronomy, etc.

A recent letter to Hal Fox herewith. (over)

Sincerely,

KTS Research

P.S: No further `.com’ lines here, but until the Feds bump a cur­rent website off the `air’ again, you might peruse:
http://kts.org.gq.nu

CC: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; Hal‑Fox/let
cc: D/Z w:

1/27/2k
Sten Odenwald, et.al.
Raytheon ITSS,
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Greenbelt, MD 20771
Re: burping petite Novae and DC current
Sir: (your fine `Storms‑‑’ Sky/Telescope)
With the mounting confirming data of both quasar magnetic vortex via the 2dF Sky Survey defining EMPs as cosmic bubbles the gene­sis of standing wave EM `matter’‑‑ as reversed process of once quantified Novae, the anti‑matter jets from primal quasar/galax­ies, as said Novea explains the real `flak’ earth gets when our sun gets rattled with Jupiter, etc. on its 11 year cycles. Since the sun’s poles normally eject positrons during its quiet periods we little suspect why our ionosphere’s electrons hang around, but with anti‑g between anti‑matters, we lose our natural defense to take the brunt if a `flare’ when it gets away from the poles.

The solar winds blow two kinds of `matter’, depending on which 90 degree side faces us‑‑ thus also explains galaxy formation in a primal magnetic field as the said inverse (lateral ejecti) of the Novae when compared to their innate galaxy’s magnetic field.

To back up all the way to Einstein’s Alephs to perceive the E as the real a priori of subtended standing waves, quantum mechanics becomes understood in light of what down here examines all in a definitive (space) with slow serial (temporal) order.
(note: Phys/Psy; herewith)

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ;
CC: Baker; D/Z w:

1/30/2k
J. A. Peacock, et.al.
Royal Observatory of Edinburgh
Edinburgh, Scotland

Dear Sir:

Noting your work via the 2dF survey and the relative (front to back) speed ratio of the cosmic bubble (Huchra), might there yet be an anomaly due to what now appears anti‑g between the comple­mental quasar/galaxy matters, one being the primal galaxy as its jets anti‑matters spew for globular galaxies well away from the said primal (ionic `spin‑up’), versus its protege’s `spin‑in’ gravity formation?

Since using Einstein’s Alephs to define E as the generator for as of condensing itself into mc\2 for `purchased’ time, the spectrum of matter was seen as standing EM waves in a few configurations, now being well examined via `string theory’ and suggested as foam by J. Wheeler.

It appears there is only one force, magnetic as the Apriori, so all configurations of `wrap’ for the standing waves (electrons or 3‑phase whole quarks with one leg variable to become different to compatible coupled hadrons (with common magnetic vortex), your work could define any `dark matter’ as merely the space a cosmic EMP took before crashing (collapsing) to evoke quasars at the periphery of the said bubble.

We suspect the “bursters” (gamma bursts) may be those collapsing vortex on cosmic bubbles to initiate primal quasar cores for ensuing standing‑wave matter generation, thus such spurious yet rapid flash when both electrons first get created, as many self annihilate before evasion with anti‑g into jet matter.

Since mentioning the Zen `hand clap’ many years ago, before Tyson made his astronomical CCD photo‑plates which might fit our need, the 2dF survey has indeed come a long way‑‑ while the Feds here have become a genuine nuisance! I hope this letter gets to you.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Big‑Bang; One‑Hand; Phys/Psy;
CC: Fischer; Ellis; Jain; D/Z w:

1/18/2k
Helen Quinn, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Linear Accelerator Labs
Stanford, CA 94305
Re: fresh theories
Mam:

Since a note I see of Nov. 15,’91 about quasar cores, now fully understood via the 2dF survey and grand primal EMPs, your fine remarks in last Dec. 10th SCIENCE as `programs’ (via the Sonoma meeting) will be obviated soon‑‑ with the Self thinking interface (and chaos) when `purchased’ theory ends for tenured existence! E. Rauscher indicated that `great liability’ of tapping the freed electron (as her EPR experiments showed), I include a more recent letter to your Stanford associate herewith.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; S‑T
CC: Koza; Baker; D/Z w:

1/30/2k
Robert Fesen, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Dartmouth College
Hanover, NH
Re: pumping ion!
Dear Sir: (14th Jan. SCIENCE; “Supernova‑‑”
Rather than repeat much of our theoretical studies, most evoking irrational remarks‑‑ the herewith may do more justice if under­stood in light now of your article, especially of the inverse to primal quasars as Novae.

Chandra’s work is now finally paying off in view of the Zen `hand claps’ that Huchra saw with `walls’ and finally cosmic bubbles to generate quasar vortex for creating EM standing wave matter to buy our slow time!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

1/24/2k
M. A. Ruderman, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Columbia University
New York, NY 10027
Re: abrupt gamma bursters (The Sciences)

While yet conjectural, the 2dF Anglo‑Australian sky survey shows the EMP genesis of EM standing wave matter on their cosmic bubble periphery, so the many primal quasars with their first burst of electrons to offer light during its potent magnetic vortex col­lapse should be noted on these cosmic
bubbles‑‑ thus possibly define the many odd GRB genesis.

Herewith are a couple past letters addressing this anomaly which appears yet to escape attention.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Kulkarni; D/Z w:

1/28/2K
C. H. Sequin and B. Collins. et.al.
Dept. of Computer Mathematics
University of California,
Berkeley, CA 94720
Re: art reflecting reality
Sirs:

This issue of Scientific American with your article was adroit! Not before could we fully `picture’ the EM standing wave whole 3‑phased quark as a neutron looked like, much less its integration with another `leg’ retwisted proton to stabilize their net united magnetic vortex. Superconductivity shows this clearly now.

While the grand cosmic EMPs evoking Huchra’s `bubbles’ to evoke a primal quasar collapsing vortex to `degenerate’ a vast EM front into standing waves for time, the foam (Wheeler) for complemental matters makes clear when Einstein’s Alephs defined E as the only Apriori to act on as within Itself for creating slow mass‑time. The complemental matters of different standing wave `twists’ thus relative gravity factor (note spewed jet matters), may yet inte­grate astronomy and physics if we don’t immolate en masse first to evade the obvious.

While much ugly rebuttal will ensue for as by the tenured, the so clear import via 2dF now suggests not much time remains. Maybe P. Parson’s (Oxford U/UK) should be addressed for his computer model of the Zen hand‑clap prediction, but on neat 600Bly intervals (to not disturb other bubbles), this universe appears to be on some unique schedule‑‑ destined for a smooth net entropy, of two well separated matters!

If Collins has color photos of his work for sale, please advise!

Sincerely,

Automation Eng.

1/28/2k
Neil Trentham, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Cambridge University
Cambridge, UK
Re: jet matter globulars
Dear Sir: (March 2K Sky Tele.; `How Did Globulars‑‑’

With the 2dF sky survey data (see: P. Parsons/Oxford) confirming the EMP genesis of the cosmic bubbles (Huchra) for many peripher­al magnetic vortex (collapse) to evoke quasars to so `degenerate’ EM fronts into Wheeler’s foam of EM standing waves called matter, soon there may be a different view between physics and astronomy.

While amorphous spewed anti‑matter jets from primal quasar cores with anti‑g goading, the enigma defined the different behavior of EM standing waves; as between our negative or positive electrons with a slightly different fine‑structure `wrap’, the third phase whole quark trefoils with one lepton leg re‑twisted, to show the net volatility of our neutrons, as retwisted protons but to fill in for a stable magnetic vortex coupling. Because a temperature change can twist the trefoil, superconductivity as even anti‑gravity (note top quark `mass’!) can be understood.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Big‑Bang; One‑Hand; Phys/Psy; Path/IQ
CC: Harris; Larson; Graeme; Marel; D/Z w:

1/12/2k
F. Yusef‑Zadeh, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Northwestern University
Evanston, IL 60208
Re: Sgr A* and residual quasar cores
Dear Sir:

The current series on the Milky Way via SCIENCE is the best net composite of imports defining the quips herewith, so without ado:

(Q754/Ast. plus R. Baker letter copy, over)
`Dwarf galaxies as Sgr A itself, not a composite, but is a dim emitting small quasar core now, mostly subsided from producing standing wave matter or this primal galaxy.’
`The halo around the quasar core is extensive while early when many Novae spewed anti‑matter at right angles to the disk proper, now only a small volume as standing wave matter genesis ceases.’
`From full fledged Novae to now burping suns, heavy metals are not made as profusely as maybe 10 billion years ago!’
`It now appears that our galaxy’s core vortex is only 2Ly in size but one could wonder at its prior glory!’
`Since we only see the second ordered results of any EMP vor­tex from radiating electrons, we now
must assume that astronomy will at last realize the `hand claps’ which got things started!’
`All dynamic propagating EM wave fronts are refracted by the stationary magnetic field they pass through, much as what Faraday inversely noted when a definitive EM standing wave electron gets propelled down a conductor but with a moving magnetic field.’
`Light is an open ended wave front even if modulated in ampli­tude, frequency and phase‑‑ not some definitive standing wave as an electron, because refraction works best in a DC field as was noted by Zeeman.’
`If the IRS 16 or CND of Sagittarius is the continuing col­lapse of a cosmic bubble’s quasar vortex for matter creation then the balance of what we known on this galaxy drives therefrom.’
`This primal galaxy’s official number is 3EGJ1746‑2852 better called Sgr A West from which Sgr East gathers its first comple­mental condensed standing EM wave spewed matter.’
`Rather than escape detection, the quasar core defines the be­ginning of any Scwartzchild radius for light emission, as soon as electrons get created to do the radiation.’
`It is what is called dark matter as is not seen that offers a the suspicion that the universe is far more `massive’ now.’
`Any promoted EMP front converges upon itself at a point, once it gets a finite disturbance on its way‑‑ as the quasar core.’

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Big Bang; One Hand; Phys/Psy; copy Baker let.(over)
CC: Melia; Wardle; D/Z w:

2/17/2k
Q. Zhang, et.al.
Dept of Materials
Pennsylvania State University
University Park, PA 16802

Re: Indeed `stretching’
(Materials Science; 4 Feb. SCIENCE)
Sir:

From considering using a piezoelectric `pump’ drive in high pres­sure desalination applications, just the lower pressure submerged pumps for mundane applications can be seen with plastics‑‑ even some automatic focus on a lens when servoed in remote aloft tele­scopes as other applications!

The whole 3‑phased quark twist (hadrons) has its applications in relative Kelvin temperature, as in superconductor CuO or freezing water‑‑ which apparently Pelrine is examining in part. It is the net relative `spring‑rates’ in your field that is exciting!

Our R&D people are already running with your data. Many thanks‑‑ and hope no offense!

Sincerely,
KTS Research

CC: D/Z + N.P. w:

2/17/2k
Editors:
Bulletin of Atomic Scientists
6042 Kimbark Ave.,
Chicago, IL 60637
Re: Yet “Where to Go?‑‑”
Dear Sirs: (Isaacs’ ongoing tirade for tenure)

Ensuing rhetoric and hullabaloo about our governing left brain dominant leaders sans finding the bilateral space‑time complemen­tal minds makes clear that some Armageddon may be the only solution, as the dogmas adroitly promised! At least a nuclear holo­caust should be effective and maybe more benign the we deserve!
Noting the 2dF confirmations or some Zen hand clap EMP to get `things’ (quantized EM standing waves at imploding quasar cores for the net degeneration of magnetic wave fronts to buy time) we go on struggling with our covert ids to comprehend what it refus­es we conscious minds to see‑‑ however obvious now. We so deserve our final melee trying to put some promising well polished mother raised sycophant into power so a mtDNA can rule with a vengeance.
The empirical data is all here now but alas‑‑‑. It sounds like Carl Levin subsidizes your existence. Sorry if the herewith means something now.
Sincerely,

KTS Research

(No further `.com’ lines here: the Feds are suspecting that 3‑phased whole quark (hadron) configuration and want controlled fission/fusion first‑‑ whatever the cost. As stung with my Fast Forward Patent to access binarily non‑temporal (freed e; EPR!) with the end of any more `black‑box’ patents some two dozen years ago‑‑ (after an anomalous fire in the Washington Post Office the day before the Patent Office delivery) suggests `who’ now rules ALL sycophants up to another more massive bitter end!

2/12/2k
J. T.
WA 98335
Re: screw jacks
Hi John:

Why didn’t that guy in the left seat move his passengers to the aft to balance up his c/g to his c/l? We had all kinds of anomal­ous of problems with those screw jacks back at Lear with tight tolerances, acme threads or not, especially with dirt in the air! Knowing too late now, but that spin‑rollover with forward lift loss said it all, I think. My old Luscomb taught me plenty about tail surface control loss! That pilot that brought in that air­line in with no tail control, using power, flaps and you name it,
shows those beasts will yet fly if in some semi‑aerodynamic bal­ance can be had. Maybe 88 passengers weren’t enough!

It’s nuts I think that short of wing loss, that some shifting the load can’t maybe stop one from augering in! To fool around aloft with any so crucial a servo is asking or it. I’m upset‑‑ sorry! Hope this finds you guys only wet out there‑‑ even wish we had some of that moisture here!

Care‑‑

KTS Research

P.S. With guts‑‑ you might peruse my website, after I finally got it back from the Feds‑‑ somewhat unhappy over what I was `out­spokenly’ saying‑‑ as right here. Yuk! http://kts.org.gq.nu
(No further `.com’ lines here‑‑ as kicked‑in office door, cops, FBI snooping here‑‑ as CIA on another shore. Haw!)

1/27/2k

E‑Mail TO: miles@pasteur.fr

Re: Indeed; yin vs. yang, but via physics
Sir:
Your `Diversity in Inhibition’ (14 Jan. SCIENCE) clearly defines those a priori `go versus stop’ dichotomy between temporal Alephs of Einstein, such predicted what Sperry found* some dozen years later. Then predicting the EEG was divided likewise, its temporal polarity again showed the gestalten `go’ (negative), but the `data’ riding the positive half cycle for recall as for temporal oriented expression. The earth’s Schumann 7.5Hz the reference to sustain psychological stability‑‑ as deep sleep delta as the base for all above; REM (sigma) and a fully integrated consciousness (midbrain, RAS) up to about 40Hz. Because the non‑temporal (REM) offers the x‑y plot (vision), the serial in slow time only verbal history. Visual recall as potentials stem from the E side of the equation. Maybe not oddly the Na versus K factors show the energy differential levels as well as used in neuronal/biological to say little of 5HT versus DA in the more overt psychological world of CNS behaviors.

Because Gupta sees the finite data riding the positive ramp half cycle for temporal recording/expression, yet non‑temporal `spike’ for `now’ as finite data offer on the EEG ramp (even as corrector for prevaricative profit objectives!) we find Freud very close to the mental matrix‑‑ aside from Sperry. Most unique is the `last moment’ quality censor/correction in the hippocampus to clean up data before final L.T. memory installation via pons likely to end up in the mtDNA ultimately‑‑ noting McDougal’s found weight loss at physiological death!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* Gazzaniga `The Human Split‑Brain’, Scientific American, Aug.’67
`The Split Brain Revisited’, July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)
see:`The Others Side of the Brain’, J.E. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.

2/10/2k
A. W. Sleight, et. al.
Dept. of Material Physics
Oregon State University
Corvallis, OR 97331
Re: orbital twist
Dear Sir: (`Nonconformist Compound’ Feb. 20 Sc. News)

It might appear that your investigative work has uncovered the modus de operandi of superconductivity, where like freezing water the cooling twist of the hydrogen hadron allow for the then mole­cular interlocking of electrons. I need not define further but I feel sure you can perceive how linear traded electrons could constitute their freer movement via the Cu oxides! Certainly, the zirconium tungstate is no more weird than Nature Herself‑‑ at least today in the eyes of the neurotic human animal!

More amazing is anti‑g where the top quark seeks to evade this galaxy’s primal magnetic vortex, as join its jet‑matters, as were predicted well before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to see those jets. Much in physics and astronomy are unraveling now just as the process of fission/fusion for EM standing wave `matter’‑‑ returning to its primal ground state of some grand EMP, noted on neat 600Bly intervals (Huchra) across this universe!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: Dunand/Holzer; D/Z w:

2/22/2k

A. Steane, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Oxford University
Oxford, UK
Re: follow‑up request for letter 7/28/99
Dear Sir:

Since no reply implies no comprehension‑‑ yet find too much via Los Alamos here in the U.S. on the below letter sent to you some months ago, can we help define standing wave `matter’ as showed us what Huchra was seeing in astronomy‑‑ as now via the Anglo‑Australian 2dF Sky Survey data evoked by our predictions?
Vast are the implications for much of physics now in view of the complex EM standing wave configuration, especially with as for controlled fission/fusion‑‑ to return via unraveling quantized `matter’ to their a priori gamma‑‑ as evoked at primal quasar cores. From our said predictions (for the 2dF) of `genetic’ EMP cosmic bubbles‑‑ as defined standing EM quantized `matter’, the ensuing empirical obvious appears to stir much unwanted publicity here in the U.S. implying why some other Patent filings of ours were officially scuttled, and quickly.

Many thanks for your reply at this time if not trying before. In either case we feel too much incoming mail does not get to us as was forced to get off of the WEB many years ago. Paul Parsons of U/Sussex astronomy might be of some aid for both of us!

Sincerely again‑‑

KTS Research

2/18/2k
Max Tegmark, et al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Re: But far more than Penrose!
Dear Sir: (`Cold numbers‑‑’ 4 Feb. SCIENCE)
No! The cold mind defines the quantum mind, not the non‑temporal!
Cold left cerebral thinking, as derived from some entropic state, works in definitive space with history within slow mass‑time so coherent in its own digital serial way, depending on spin to define its standing wave genesis or reality. (note 2dF survey!)

There is one state (vision) where the gestalt offer to the retina (as a parallel receptor in an x‑y spatial format) that can offer a finite import ahead of our temporal state, even evoke `events’ in radio active decay‑‑ thus alert us of potentials ahead of our relative slow time. A collapsing wave function acts more than for EPR with reason‑‑ as fails to respond to silly questions by those who best remain naive about what knows potentials in slow time! The intellectual arrogant have no business poking around into Na­ture’s business as have nothing in common with peaceful co‑evolu­tion when some `win factor’ dominates all of their thinking.

Microtubules or otherwise own their own time rate in space so may decohere in any hadronic system when only a freed electron (EPR) can act on its own, as Heinseberg saw about anything uncertain. A super position only occurs within definitive mass‑time so defines a `place in time’‑‑ no gestalt offer from beyond it! (over)

What we now cannot comprehend, best we not worry about because a vast paradigm shift on how to reason is coming‑‑ so will upset many with only left cerebral dominance as tenured win factors. It appears that Smolin remains wiser about the `smart’ to consider! Maybe we should stop considering what escapes the time reversal paradigm when It has nothing to do with our quantized mental pro­cess within its own relative slow time state.
Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; One‑Hand; 3‑dev.(over)
CC: Hameroff; D/Z w:

2/27/2k
B. Burke et. al.
Dept. of Radio Astronomy
Mass. Inst. Tech.
Cambridge, MA 02139
Re: `Secrets by Radio‑‑’ quasar `black‑ hole’ matter genetic cores; (SCIENCE 18 Feb.)
Dear Sir:

Closer scrutiny of the quasar core will define two kinds of `mat­ter’ (EM standing waves) evolving therefrom with anti‑g between to define the jets spewing at right angles to the primal disk. Thus any `black hole’ that sucks, truly does `suck’ in the sense that it is false because the said anti‑g between two complemental EM standing waves that we call `matter’‑‑ from within our finite spaced (point of view) slow temporal quantal state.

The 2dF data defines the true primal `bangs’, likely millions of them on neat 600Bly intervals across this universe, but the means to evoke its peripheral collapsing EMP wave for quasar cores. The result evoking standing wave `matter’ with complemental kind, so anti‑g there‑between, noted so far via top quark `expedition’, not an assumed greater mass hadron albeit likely an anti‑lepton.

Once recognizing the `3‑phased’ whole quark (hadrons) with one leg phase reversed to make compatible for the stable nucleon, we will also perceive their genesis as the primal lepton as gamma, derived from finite collapsing EMP fronts on cosmic bubbles.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: Big Bang; One Hand; Path/IQ
cc: Junor; Zhang; D/Z w:

3/8/2k
B. Sadoulet, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720
Re: partial EM standing wave WIMP factor
Dear Sir: (Science News; Feb. 26th)

With string theory better defining what quasars create for matter to buy time, we get fooled in believing that some don’t evaporate sooner as didn’t incorporate enough E to close their net standing wave status, called electrons or their 3‑phased whole quark con­figurations. At least their entropic state, as re‑twisted third phase leg for superconductivity or anti‑g phenomena will shake up physics for some real tenure buying by voting to settle the next half baked truth for some scientific `fact’. So we find science doing as its political thing, buying time for tenure so survival, at some grand tax expense upon the kept dumb programmed. (over)

Sincerely,

KTS Research
(No further `.com’ lines here.)
Note: http://kts.org.gq.nu

cc:Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; One‑Hand; Sproull let.(over)
CC: Lewin; Bernabie; D/Z w:

3/31/2k
Christian Enss, et. al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Re: Boron’s twist
Dear Sir: (`Glass‑‑’ Science News, March 4th)

Unique indeed is your data! As copper oxide, but inversely with a `hole’ (`negative’ valence), again the temperature twist on the 3‑phased whole quark (hadron) to re‑align a major orbital vortex makes clear far more the anomaly of EM standing waves, as called `billiard ball’ matter yet today.

Once the nuclei loses control, to liberate `bose’ electrons from aligned orbitals, superconductivity remains no anomaly, even some complemental g‑field noted with the Top quark with an unbeliev­able `mass’ equated from high acceleration as the primal quasar spewed anti‑matter jets. Oddly, the same Science News page shows the galaxy anomaly very clearly, for jet matter globular second‑stage galaxy creation at right angles to their primal galaxy!

With the 2dF data confirming our theory of `genetic’ EMPs for the neat 600Bly cosmic bubbles, the `degeneration’ into finite stand­ing waves as complemental electrons on up (most then in Novae), a clear picture now looms for bamboozled physics, as de Broglie did perceive clearly‑‑ as many others like Faraday, between quantized first‑phased’ electrons and the magnetic field `a priori’.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys/Psy; One Hand;
CC: Osheroff; Kettemann; Welch; D/Z w:

3/19/2k
Reinhard Stock, et. al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Frankfurt
Frankfurt, Germany

Re: `FIREBALLS'(?)
Dear Sir: (April SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN p.16>)

Freezing back‑out decoupled leptons prewound as third harmonic EM standing waves should be expected if indeed fully unraveled. No doubt the 1,600 `particles’ comes close, if only two Pb atoms got fully unraveled since calculates to 1,418. An isotope might have been the variable if indeed the count could be done accurately!

While dubious of 10 microseconds for a primal quasar to generate mass that fast from a primal cosmic bubble EMP (our own yet spew­ing complementals for disk and jet antimatters) the real question outstanding is how as Who clapped into existence those primal EMP on neat 600Bly intervals across this universe. (see Huchra walls as the 2dF astronomical data)
Interesting are the bifurcated spewed leptons defining the noted anti‑g factor in the CERN data. Maybe a correlation can be made to the TOP quark’s claimed acceleration (called high mass), that I had hoped John Bell would have examined some time ago. He did perceive the dichotomy between my suspected complemental matter needs so also wanted to examine their net anti‑g affects at CERN.

In short, returned 3‑phased (trefoil wound) whole quarks is to unravel them back to their primal a‑priori gamma state but of less so in complemental single electron leptons. (even if most started in Novae). A pacifying neutron, to best satisfy adjacent proton hadrons of complemental `wind’ defines the stability of atoms without isotopic states, as offer stable orbitals for elec­tron single leptons. The extra accrued energy from a Nova likely added the impetus for 3‑phase `wrap’ then called the hadron. Of course the relative wrap (phasing) defining koino/anti matters.

The CERN data is indeed exciting even if somewhat late in coming.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys/Psy; One‑Hand+;
CC: U. Heinz; L. Kluberg; D/Z w:

2/28/2k
P. Busquin, et. al.
c/o R. Prodi, EU
The European Parliament
Re: The 5th Framework
(July 16th ’99 SCIENCE)
Sirs:

From the now clear imports of bilateral cerebral anomalies within the human brain and the apparent misdeed of `programming’ IQ over CQ via academic ritual, the sciences suffer most as lack those so few using right brain visual import as offer insights to yet not perceived reality. To avoid blunders (note Einstein!) it is the perception of underlying reality, much not oddly that Freud noted in the `royal road’ of subjective visual experience. It is likely that the Oriental female’s greater use of her anterio‑corpus callosum, may even foster a husband’s effort to teach her child­ren insight use‑‑ to define that races’ better `idea’ ability as curiosity over Western men today‑‑ whatever their education.

Some recent Japanese work* appears to indicate the key to anterio corpus callosum integrative ability for CQ (Creative Quotient) so crucial for initial perception of long held enigmas, the not seen EM standing wave (string theory) which now defines all complemen­tal “matter” as precipitated by quasars‑‑ as they from grand EMPs on neat 600Bly intervals across thus universe. The recent data as discloses gamma as the a priori of quantized `matter’, CERN’s SPS,indicates the reverse of what the said quasar evoked! Even the so suspected anti‑g between complemental matters is being clearly noted, which allowed for our predicted jets, well before the Ein­stein observatory went aloft to photograph same on a near galaxy.

Not only was Einstein’s “blunder” correct but also was Bohr’s in rejecting Einstein’s suspicion of complemental forces in all ways as gravity, the most crucial now for the study of astronomy. Even the 2dF data may confirm the anomalous Zen “one‑hand clapping”!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
(No further `.com’ lines here. Sorry!)

* `Callosal Window Between‑‑’ p.814; 7, Aug.`99 SCIENCE

cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; S‑T; One‑Hand
CC: D/Z w:

end @ 4/1/2k
off; Kettemann; Welch; D/Z w:

Advertisements

From → Physics

3 Comments
  1. very interesting.
    nice info thanks for sharing..

  2. i am always comedy and science fiction TV shows at home and at work ”

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. recrutement paris

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: